ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT02920892

AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children With FXS

NCT02920892, Phase 2, Completed, Elizabeth Berry-Kravis; results first posted 2023-10-10

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children With FXS. Trials, record NCT02920892. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02920892

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children With FXS
NCT number
NCT02920892
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
110 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Elizabeth Berry-Kravis
Conditions
Fragile X Syndrome
Interventions
AFQ056, Placebo, Language Intervention
First posted
2016-09-30
Last updated
2023-10-10
Results first posted
2023-10-10

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes8

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange in Weighted Child Intentional Communication ScoreBaseline through Month 8
The Weighted Child Intentional Communication Score is derived from a 22 minute semi-structured examiner/child play session. Structured and unstructured component scores are found by multiplying each intentional communication act by the following weights: nonverbal = 1; single symbol = 2; and multiple symbols = 3. The two scores are summed together to obtain the total. Higher scores indicate more child-initiated communication. There is no maximum score. The scale was administered at Baseline, Month 2, Month 4, Month 6, and Month 8. A composite score representing the average of the estimated change scores calculated at months 2, 4, 6, and 8 was recorded. A higher least squares mean value indicates a greater increase in WCS score from baseline.
SecondaryChange in Mullen Scales of Early Learning (MSEL) Developmental Quotient (DQ)Baseline through Month 8
Mullen Scales of Early Learning (MSEL) Developmental Quotient (DQ) is calculated by averaging the developmental age equivalents from 4 domains of the Mullen (visual reception, fine motor, receptive language, and expressive language) to find developmental age in months, dividing by chronological age in months, then multiplying by 100. DQ can range from 1 to 70. A higher DQ indicates better performance on the MSEL. The MSEL was administered at Baseline, Month 2, and Month 8. A composite score representing the average of the estimated change scores calculated at month 2 and month 8 was recorded. A negative least squares mean indicates a net decrease in DQs over time. A more negative least squares mean indicates a larger negative change in DQs over time.
SecondaryChange in Mullen Scales of Early Learning (MSEL) Expressive Language SubscoreBaseline through Month 8
The MSEL measures performance over 5 subscales including expressive language. The range of possible subscores for the expressive language domain is 1-50. A higher score indicates better performance / greater use of expressive language The MSEL was administered at Baseline, Month 2, and Month 8. A composite score representing the average of the estimated change scores calculated at month 2 and month 8 was recorded. A positive least squares mean indicates a net positive change in expressive language scores over time. A higher least squares mean indicates a larger change in expressive language scores over time.
SecondaryChange in Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale (Vineland-3) Composite ScoreBaseline through Month 8
The Vineland-3 composite score is yielded from the subject's level of adaptive functioning in the domains of communication, daily living skills, socialization, and motor skills. The range of possible composite scores is 20-140 with a higher score indicating higher levels of adaptive functioning. The Vineland-3 was administered at Baseline, Month 2, Month 4, Month 6, and Month 8. A composite score representing the average of the estimated change scores calculated at months 2, 4, 6, and 8 was recorded. A positive least squares mean indicates a net increase in composite score over time. A higher least squares mean indicates a greater change in composite score over time.
SecondaryChange in Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale (Vineland-3) Communication SubscoreBaseline and Month 8
The communication domain of the Vineland-3 examines adaptive functioning in receptive, expressive, and written language. The range of possible subscores for the communication domain is 20-140 with a higher score indicating more advanced use of language. The Vineland-3 was administered at Baseline, Month 2, Month 4, Month 6, and Month 8. A composite score representing the average of the estimated change scores calculated at months 2, 4, 6, and 8 was recorded. A positive least squares mean indicates a net increase in communication score over time. A higher least squares mean indicates a greater change in communication score over time.
SecondaryChange in Preschool Language Scale (PLS-5) Expressive Communication ScoreBaseline and Month 8
The PLS-5 is a comprehensive developmental language assessment that requires the child to point to or verbally respond to items. Raw scores for expressive language were collected from this test. It is difficult to specify an upper bound on the score, because there is no clear expectation of a limit on the number of times a child can communicate unless one sets it artificially (e.g., once per second in an 11-minute free play). The lower bound is zero for a child who produces no communication acts. The PLS-5 was administered at Baseline, Month 2, and Month 8. A composite score representing the average of the estimated change scores calculated at month 2 and month 8 was recorded. A higher least squares mean indicates a larger change in PLS-5 communication score over 8 months.
SecondaryMacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventory (CDI) Number of Spoken WordsMonth 8
The MacArthur-Bates CDI is a parent interview that allows tracking of a child's progress in developing words, sentences, and more complex language. The assessment consists of two parts including "Words Children Use," a 680-word vocabulary checklist in which the parent indicates those vocabulary words the child regularly produces in spoken language, and "Sentences and Grammar" an assessment of several aspects of grammar and word endings. The MacArthur-Bates CDI number of spoken words will be recorded with higher scores indicating more words used / greater language development at Month 8.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With a Positive Response as Defined by Improvement in Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) Overall Function ScoresMonth 8
Completion of the CGI-I requires the clinician to rate how much the study participant's illness has improved or worsened relative to a baseline state. For this study, two sets of CGI-I are administered at each applicable visit - one associated with Language/Communication and the other to Overall Function. The Overall Function CGI-I considers all areas of function including cognition, adaptive behavior, and maladaptive behavior. The CGI-I is a 7-point scale that includes the following ratings: 1 = very much improved, 2 = much improved, 3 = minimally improved, 4 = no change, 5 = minimally worse, 6 = much worse, 7 = very much worse. The CGI-I was rated at all study visits after screening. This measure shows the number of participants with positive CGI-I scores indicating perceived improvement at Month 8.

Outcomes8

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange in Weighted Child Intentional Communication ScoreBaseline through Month 8Comparison of WCS from baseline and from month 8 visit (end of double-blind period) in both AFQ056 \& Language Intervention and Placebo \& Language Intervention groups.log10(scores on a scale)LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange in Mullen Scales of Early Learning (MSEL) Developmental Quotient (DQ)Baseline through Month 8Comparison of DQ from baseline and from month 8 visit (end of double-blind period) in both AFQ056 \& Language Intervention and Placebo \& Language Intervention groups.scores on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange in Mullen Scales of Early Learning (MSEL) Expressive Language SubscoreBaseline through Month 8Comparison of MSEL expressive language subscore from baseline and from month 8 visit (end of double-blind period) in both AFQ056 \& Language Intervention and Placebo \& Language Intervention groups.scores on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange in Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale (Vineland-3) Composite ScoreBaseline through Month 8Comparison of Vineland-3 Composite Score from baseline and from month 8 visit (end of double-blind period) in both AFQ056 \& Language Intervention and Placebo \& Language Intervention groups.scores on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange in Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale (Vineland-3) Communication SubscoreBaseline and Month 8Comparison of Vineland-3 Communication Subscore from baseline and from month 8 visit (end of double-blind period) in both AFQ056 \& Language Intervention and Placebo \& Language Intervention groups.scores on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange in Preschool Language Scale (PLS-5) Expressive Communication ScoreBaseline and Month 8
Comparison of PLS-5 expressive communication scores from baseline and from month 8 visit (end of double-blind period) in both AFQ056 \& Language Intervention and Placebo \& Language Intervention groups.
scores on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYMacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventory (CDI) Number of Spoken WordsMonth 8Number of words spoken at month 8 visit (end of double-blind period) in both AFQ056 \& Language Intervention and Placebo \& Language Intervention groups.Spoken WordsMEDIAN
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With a Positive Response as Defined by Improvement in Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) Overall Function ScoresMonth 8Patients with positive change in CGI-I scores from baseline to month 8 visit (end of double-blind period) in both AFQ056 \& Language Intervention and Placebo \& Language Intervention groups.participantsNUMBER

Results by group16

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change in Weighted Child Intentional Communication ScorePlacebo Comparator: Double-Blind Placebo With Language Intervention0.1490% Confidence Interval 0.05 to 0.22log10(scores on a scale)
Change in Weighted Child Intentional Communication ScoreExperimental: Double-Blind AFQ056 With Language Intervention0.0490% Confidence Interval -0.05 to 0.12log10(scores on a scale)
Change in Mullen Scales of Early Learning (MSEL) Developmental Quotient (DQ)Placebo Comparator: Double-Blind Placebo With Language Intervention-0.790% Confidence Interval -1.90 to 0.50scores on a scale
Change in Mullen Scales of Early Learning (MSEL) Developmental Quotient (DQ)Experimental: Double-Blind AFQ056 With Language Intervention-2.3590% Confidence Interval -3.55 to -1.16scores on a scale
Change in Mullen Scales of Early Learning (MSEL) Expressive Language SubscorePlacebo Comparator: Double-Blind Placebo With Language Intervention1.9990% Confidence Interval 1.19 to 2.79scores on a scale
Change in Mullen Scales of Early Learning (MSEL) Expressive Language SubscoreExperimental: Double-Blind AFQ056 With Language Intervention1.3290% Confidence Interval 0.52 to 2.11scores on a scale
Change in Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale (Vineland-3) Composite ScorePlacebo Comparator: Double-Blind Placebo With Language Intervention0.6890% Confidence Interval -0.51 to 1.88scores on a scale
Change in Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale (Vineland-3) Composite ScoreExperimental: Double-Blind AFQ056 With Language Intervention0.3990% Confidence Interval -0.81 to 1.60scores on a scale
Change in Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale (Vineland-3) Communication SubscorePlacebo Comparator: Double-Blind Placebo With Language Intervention0.5490% Confidence Interval -0.97 to 2.05scores on a scale
Change in Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale (Vineland-3) Communication SubscoreExperimental: Double-Blind AFQ056 With Language Intervention0.6390% Confidence Interval -0.90 to 2.16scores on a scale

Participant flow27

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Placebo Lead-In PeriodSTARTEDPlacebo Lead-In110
Placebo Lead-In PeriodSTARTEDDouble-Blind Placebo, Then Open-Label AFQ0560
Placebo Lead-In PeriodSTARTEDDouble-Blind AFQ056, Then Open-Label AFQ0560
Placebo Lead-In PeriodCOMPLETEDPlacebo Lead-In99
Placebo Lead-In PeriodCOMPLETEDDouble-Blind Placebo, Then Open-Label AFQ0560
Placebo Lead-In PeriodCOMPLETEDDouble-Blind AFQ056, Then Open-Label AFQ0560
Placebo Lead-In PeriodNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo Lead-In11
Placebo Lead-In PeriodNOT COMPLETEDDouble-Blind Placebo, Then Open-Label AFQ0560
Placebo Lead-In PeriodNOT COMPLETEDDouble-Blind AFQ056, Then Open-Label AFQ0560
Placebo-Controlled PeriodSTARTEDPlacebo Lead-In0

Adverse events84

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherDiarrheaGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo Lead-In Period71108
otherDiarrheaGastrointestinal disordersDouble-Blind Period: Placebo With Language Intervention3493
otherDiarrheaGastrointestinal disordersDouble-Blind Period: AFQ056 With Language Intervention7508
otherDiarrheaGastrointestinal disordersOpen-Label Period: AFQ056 With Language Intervention108913
otherVomitingGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo Lead-In Period911016
otherVomitingGastrointestinal disordersDouble-Blind Period: Placebo With Language Intervention9499
otherVomitingGastrointestinal disordersDouble-Blind Period: AFQ056 With Language Intervention4507
otherVomitingGastrointestinal disordersOpen-Label Period: AFQ056 With Language Intervention118917
otherPyrexiaGeneral disordersPlacebo Lead-In Period41104
otherPyrexiaGeneral disordersDouble-Blind Period: Placebo With Language Intervention1491

Adverse event totals12

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo Lead-In Period0110
Total, all-cause mortalityDouble-Blind Period: Placebo With Language Intervention049
Total, all-cause mortalityDouble-Blind Period: AFQ056 With Language Intervention050
Total, all-cause mortalityOpen-Label Period: AFQ056 With Language Intervention089
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo Lead-In Period65110
Total, other adverse eventsDouble-Blind Period: Placebo With Language Intervention4449
Total, other adverse eventsDouble-Blind Period: AFQ056 With Language Intervention4550
Total, other adverse eventsOpen-Label Period: AFQ056 With Language Intervention7689
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo Lead-In Period1110
Total, serious adverse eventsDouble-Blind Period: Placebo With Language Intervention149

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
39483619DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants1

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

ProjectTitlePrincipal investigatorsOrganizationFunderFiscal years
U01NS096767Effects of AFQ056 on Language Learning in Young Children with Fragile X Syndrome (FXS)BERRY-KRAVIS, ELIZABETH MARA; ABBEDUTO, LEONARD J.; HAGERMAN, RANDI J.RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE2016 to 2019

Trial comparisons1

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

Comparison
Placebo Comparator: Double-Blind Placebo With Language Intervention vs Experimental: Double-Blind AFQ056 With Language Intervention: Number of Participants With a Positive Response as Defined by Improvement in Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) Overall Function Scores

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02920892

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02920892/flow?page=2