ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT02932904

Effect of Vortioxetine, Paroxetine, and Placebo on Sexual Functioning in Healthy Volunteers

NCT02932904, Phase 4, Completed, Takeda; results first posted 2018-09-14

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Effect of Vortioxetine, Paroxetine, and Placebo on Sexual Functioning in Healthy Volunteers. Trials, record NCT02932904. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02932904

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Effect of Vortioxetine, Paroxetine, and Placebo on Sexual Functioning in Healthy Volunteers
NCT number
NCT02932904
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Enrollment
361 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Takeda
Conditions
Healthy Volunteers
Interventions
Vortioxetine, Paroxetine, Placebo
First posted
2016-10-13
Last updated
2018-09-14
Results first posted
2018-09-14

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes9

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange From Baseline in the Changes in Sexual Functioning Questionnaire (CSFQ-14) Total Score Difference for Vortioxetine Versus Paroxetine at Week 5 in Full Analysis Set (FAS)Baseline and Week 5
The CSFQ-14 is a structured, self-reported questionnaire designed to measure illness- and medication-related changes in sexual functioning consisting of 14 items that measure sexual functioning as a total score (14 items) and on the subscales of pleasure (1 item), desire/frequency (2 items), desire/interest (3 items), arousal (3 items), orgasm (3 items) and 2 additional items are included in the total score, but do not map to a specific phase of the sexual response cycle, rated on a 5-point scale from 1 to 5 with a total score range from 14 to 70. Higher scores reflect higher sexual functioning. A negative change from baseline indicates that symptoms have worsened.
PrimaryChange From Baseline in the CSFQ-14 Total Score Difference for Vortioxetine Versus Paroxetine at Week 5 in Modified Full Analysis Set 1 (mFAS1)Baseline and Week 5
The CSFQ-14 is a structured, self-reported questionnaire designed to measure illness- and medication-related changes in sexual functioning consisting of 14 items that measure sexual functioning as a total score (14 items) and on the subscales of pleasure (1 item), desire/frequency (2 items), desire/interest (3 items), arousal (3 items), orgasm (3 items) and 2 additional items are included in the total score, but do not map to a specific phase of the sexual response cycle, rated on a 5-point scale from 1 to 5 with a total score range from 14 to 70. Higher scores reflect higher sexual functioning. A negative change from baseline indicates that symptoms have worsened.
PrimaryChange From Baseline in the CSFQ-14 Total Score Difference for Vortioxetine Versus Paroxetine at Week 5 in Modified Full Analysis Set 2 (mFAS2)Baseline and Week 5
The CSFQ-14 is a structured, self-reported questionnaire designed to measure illness- and medication-related changes in sexual functioning consisting of 14 items that measure sexual functioning as a total score (14 items) and on the subscales of pleasure (1 item), desire/frequency (2 items), desire/interest (3 items), arousal (3 items), orgasm (3 items) and 2 additional items are included in the total score, but do not map to a specific phase of the sexual response cycle, rated on a 5-point scale from 1 to 5 with a total score range from 14 to 70. Higher scores reflect higher sexual functioning. A negative change from baseline indicates that symptoms have worsened.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the CSFQ-14 Total Score Difference for Vortioxetine Versus Paroxetine at Weeks 1, 2, 3 and 4Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3 and 4
The CSFQ-14 is a structured, self-reported questionnaire designed to measure illness- and medication-related changes in sexual functioning consisting of 14 items that measure sexual functioning as a total score (14 items) and on the subscales of pleasure (1 item), desire/frequency (2 items), desire/interest (3 items), arousal (3 items), orgasm (3 items) and 2 additional items are included in the total score, but do not map to a specific phase of the sexual response cycle, rated on a 5-point scale from 1 to 5 with a total score range from 14 to 70. Higher scores reflect higher sexual functioning. A negative change from baseline indicates that symptoms have worsened.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in CSFQ-14 Total Score Difference for Paroxetine Versus Placebo at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5
The CSFQ-14 is a structured, self-reported questionnaire designed to measure illness- and medication-related changes in sexual functioning consisting of 14 items that measure sexual functioning as a total score (14 items) and on the subscales of pleasure (1 item), desire/frequency (2 items), desire/interest (3 items), arousal (3 items), orgasm (3 items) and 2 additional items are included in the total score, but do not map to a specific phase of the sexual response cycle, rated on a 5-point scale from 1 to 5 with a total score range from 14 to 70. Higher scores reflect higher sexual functioning. A negative change from baseline indicates that symptoms have worsened.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in CSFQ-14 Total Score Difference for Vortioxetine Versus Placebo at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5
The CSFQ-14 is a structured, self-reported questionnaire designed to measure illness- and medication-related changes in sexual functioning consisting of 14 items that measure sexual functioning as a total score (14 items) and on the subscales of pleasure (1 item), desire/frequency (2 items), desire/interest (3 items), arousal (3 items), orgasm (3 items) and 2 additional items are included in the total score, but do not map to a specific phase of the sexual response cycle, rated on a 5-point scale from 1 to 5 with a total score range from 14 to 70. Higher scores reflect higher sexual functioning. A negative change from baseline indicates that symptoms have worsened.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Meeting Criteria for Sexual Dysfunction at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5Sexual dysfunction is defined as CSFQ-14 score ≤47 for men and ≤41 for women.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in CSFQ-14 Subscales 5 Dimensions at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5
The CSFQ-14 is a structured, self-reported questionnaire designed to measure illness- and medication-related changes in sexual functioning consisting of 14 items that measure sexual functioning on the subscales of pleasure (1 item, score range 1-5), desire/frequency (2 items, score range 2-10), desire/interest (3 items, score range 3-15), arousal (3 items, score range 3-15), and orgasm (3 items, score range 3-15), rated on a 5-point scale from 1 to 5. Higher scores reflect higher sexual functioning. A negative change from baseline indicates that symptoms have worsened.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in CSFQ-14 3 Phases of the Sexual Response Cycle (Desire, Arousal, and Orgasm/Completion) at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5
The CSFQ-14 is a structured, self-reported questionnaire designed to measure illness- and medication-related changes in sexual functioning consisting of 14 items that measure sexual functioning on the 3 phases of the sexual response cycle , desire (5 items, score range 5-25), arousal (3 items, score range 3-15), and orgasm (3 items, score range 3-15), rated on a 5-point scale from 1 to 5. Higher scores reflect higher sexual functioning. A negative change from baseline indicates that symptoms have worsened.

Outcomes9

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in the Changes in Sexual Functioning Questionnaire (CSFQ-14) Total Score Difference for Vortioxetine Versus Paroxetine at Week 5 in Full Analysis Set (FAS)Baseline and Week 5FAS included all participants who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug, and had at least 1 valid postbaseline value for assessment of primary endpoint.score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in the CSFQ-14 Total Score Difference for Vortioxetine Versus Paroxetine at Weeks 1, 2, 3 and 4Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3 and 4
FAS included all participants who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug, and had at least 1 valid postbaseline value for assessment of primary endpoint. Here, number analyzed are the participants who were evaluated for this outcome measure in the FAS.
score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in CSFQ-14 Total Score Difference for Paroxetine Versus Placebo at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5
FAS included all participants who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug, and had at least 1 valid postbaseline value for assessment of primary endpoint. Here, number analyzed are the participants who were evaluated for this outcome measure in the FAS.
score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in CSFQ-14 Total Score Difference for Vortioxetine Versus Placebo at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5
FAS included all participants who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug, and had at least 1 valid postbaseline value for assessment of primary endpoint. Here, number analyzed are the participants who were evaluated for this outcome measure in the FAS.
score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Meeting Criteria for Sexual Dysfunction at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5
FAS included all participants who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug, and had at least 1 valid postbaseline value for assessment of primary endpoint. Missing values were imputed by using LOCF. Here, number analyzed are the participants who were evaluated for this outcome measure.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in CSFQ-14 Subscales 5 Dimensions at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5
FAS included all participants who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug, and had at least 1 valid postbaseline value for assessment of primary endpoint. Missing values were imputed by using LOCF. Here, number analyzed are the participants who were evaluated for this outcome measure.
score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in CSFQ-14 3 Phases of the Sexual Response Cycle (Desire, Arousal, and Orgasm/Completion) at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5
FAS included all participants who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug, and had at least 1 valid postbaseline value for assessment of primary endpoint. Missing values were imputed by using LOCF. Here, number analyzed are the participants who were evaluated for this outcome measure.
score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in the CSFQ-14 Total Score Difference for Vortioxetine Versus Paroxetine at Week 5 in Modified Full Analysis Set 1 (mFAS1)Baseline and Week 5
mFAS1 included all participants in the FAS except those who had active drug concentrations below the limit of quantification (BLOQ) at all study visits where pharmacokinetic (PK) samples were collected.
score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in the CSFQ-14 Total Score Difference for Vortioxetine Versus Paroxetine at Week 5 in Modified Full Analysis Set 2 (mFAS2)Baseline and Week 5mFAS2 included all participants in the FAS except those who had drug concentrations BLOQ at any study visit where PK samples were collected.score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN

Results by group235

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change From Baseline in the Changes in Sexual Functioning Questionnaire (CSFQ-14) Total Score Difference for Vortioxetine Versus Paroxetine at Week 5 in Full Analysis Set (FAS)Paroxetine 20 mgBaseline59.27Standard Error 0.584score on a scale
Change From Baseline in the Changes in Sexual Functioning Questionnaire (CSFQ-14) Total Score Difference for Vortioxetine Versus Paroxetine at Week 5 in Full Analysis Set (FAS)Vortioxetine 10 mgBaseline58.56Standard Error 0.578score on a scale
Change From Baseline in the Changes in Sexual Functioning Questionnaire (CSFQ-14) Total Score Difference for Vortioxetine Versus Paroxetine at Week 5 in Full Analysis Set (FAS)Vortioxetine 20 mgBaseline59.43Standard Error 0.560score on a scale
Change From Baseline in the Changes in Sexual Functioning Questionnaire (CSFQ-14) Total Score Difference for Vortioxetine Versus Paroxetine at Week 5 in Full Analysis Set (FAS)Paroxetine 20 mgChange from Baseline at Week 5-3.56Standard Error 0.758score on a scale
Change From Baseline in the Changes in Sexual Functioning Questionnaire (CSFQ-14) Total Score Difference for Vortioxetine Versus Paroxetine at Week 5 in Full Analysis Set (FAS)Vortioxetine 10 mgChange from Baseline at Week 5-0.82Standard Error 0.752score on a scale
Change From Baseline in the Changes in Sexual Functioning Questionnaire (CSFQ-14) Total Score Difference for Vortioxetine Versus Paroxetine at Week 5 in Full Analysis Set (FAS)Vortioxetine 20 mgChange from Baseline at Week 5-2.51Standard Error 0.727score on a scale
Change From Baseline in the CSFQ-14 Total Score Difference for Vortioxetine Versus Paroxetine at Weeks 1, 2, 3 and 4Paroxetine 20 mgWeek 1-1.67Standard Error 0.457score on a scale
Change From Baseline in the CSFQ-14 Total Score Difference for Vortioxetine Versus Paroxetine at Weeks 1, 2, 3 and 4Vortioxetine 10 mgWeek 1-0.54Standard Error 0.453score on a scale
Change From Baseline in the CSFQ-14 Total Score Difference for Vortioxetine Versus Paroxetine at Weeks 1, 2, 3 and 4Vortioxetine 20 mgWeek 1-0.38Standard Error 0.436score on a scale
Change From Baseline in the CSFQ-14 Total Score Difference for Vortioxetine Versus Paroxetine at Weeks 1, 2, 3 and 4Paroxetine 20 mgWeek 2-2.40Standard Error 0.617score on a scale

Participant flow16

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo92
Overall StudySTARTEDParoxetine 20 mg85
Overall StudySTARTEDVortioxetine 10 mg91
Overall StudySTARTEDVortioxetine 20 mg93
Overall StudyTreatedPlacebo91
Overall StudyTreatedParoxetine 20 mg84
Overall StudyTreatedVortioxetine 10 mg91
Overall StudyTreatedVortioxetine 20 mg91
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo76
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDParoxetine 20 mg67

Adverse events56

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo491
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersParoxetine 20 mg2284
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersVortioxetine 10 mg2691
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersVortioxetine 20 mg1891
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo391
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersParoxetine 20 mg584
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersVortioxetine 10 mg191
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersVortioxetine 20 mg391
otherFatigueGeneral disordersPlacebo291
otherFatigueGeneral disordersParoxetine 20 mg584

Adverse event totals12

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo091
Total, all-cause mortalityParoxetine 20 mg084
Total, all-cause mortalityVortioxetine 10 mg091
Total, all-cause mortalityVortioxetine 20 mg091
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo3691
Total, other adverse eventsParoxetine 20 mg5984
Total, other adverse eventsVortioxetine 10 mg5291
Total, other adverse eventsVortioxetine 20 mg4091
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo091
Total, serious adverse eventsParoxetine 20 mg084

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02932904

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02932904/results?page=2