ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT02944448

A Study Evaluating Pain Relief and Safety of Orally Administered CR845 in Patients With Osteoarthritis of Hip or Knee

NCT02944448, Phase 2, Completed, Cara Therapeutics, Inc.; results first posted 2020-10-20

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Study Evaluating Pain Relief and Safety of Orally Administered CR845 in Patients With Osteoarthritis of Hip or Knee. Trials, record NCT02944448. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02944448

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Study Evaluating Pain Relief and Safety of Orally Administered CR845 in Patients With Osteoarthritis of Hip or Knee
NCT number
NCT02944448
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
761 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Cara Therapeutics, Inc.
Conditions
Osteoarthritis, Hip, Osteoarthritis, Knee, Arthritis, Joint Diseases, Musculoskeletal Diseases, Rheumatic Diseases
Interventions
CR845 tablet 1 mg, CR845 tablet 2.5 mg, CR845 tablet 5 mg, Placebo tablet
First posted
2016-10-25
Last updated
2020-10-20
Results first posted
2020-10-20

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes10

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange From Baseline at Week 8 With Respect to the Weekly Mean of the Daily 24-hour Pain Intensity for the Index Joint as Measured by the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS).Baseline, Week 811-point NRS scale where 0 = no pain, and 10= pain as bad as you can imagine
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the Western Ontario & McMaster Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) Index Total Score at Week 8Baseline, Week 8
The WOMAC Index is a self-administered assessment used to measure pain, stiffness, and physical function in patients with osteoarthritis. The WOMAC Index contains 24 questions across 3 different sub-scales (pain, stiffness, and function) all with scoring 0-10 (0 = No Pain/Stiffness/Difficulty, 10 = Extreme Pain/Stiffness/Difficulty). Each WOMAC Index Subscale score (Pain/Stiffness/Function) is calculated as the sum of all scores within that subscale. The pain subscale consists of five scores from 0-10, 0 is no pain 10 is extreme pain possible for a range of 0 - 50 points. The stiffness subscale consists of two scores from 0-10, 0 is no stiffness 10 is extreme stiffness possible for a range of 0 - 20 points. The function subscale consists of 17 scores from 0-10, 0 is no difficulty and 10 is extreme difficulty, for a range of 0 - 170 points. The WOMAC Index Total Score is calculated as the sum of all 24 scores (range of 0-240).
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the WOMAC Pain Intensity Sub-scale Score at Week 8Baseline, Week 8The pain subscale consists of five scores from 0-10, 0 is no pain 10 is extreme pain possible for a range of 0 - 50 points.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the WOMAC Stiffness Sub-scale Score at Week 8Baseline, Week 8The stiffness subscale consists of two scores from 0-10, 0 is no stiffness 10 is extreme stiffness possible for a range of 0 - 20 points.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the WOMAC Function Sub-scale Score at Week 8Baseline, Week 8The function subscale consists of 17 scores from 0-10, 0 is no difficulty and 10 is extreme difficulty, for a range of 0 - 170 points.
SecondaryProportion of Patients With at Least 30% Improvement From Baseline in the Weekly Mean Pain Intensity at Week 8Week 8
A patient's pain response to treatment is defined as the percent improvement from baseline with respect to the weekly mean of "average pain in the last 24 hours" pain score during the last week of the Maintenance Treatment Period (Week 8) . If a patient's mean weekly pain score during the last week of the Maintenance Treatment Period is greater than the baseline score (i.e., the patient has an increase in pain compared to baseline), his/her response to treatment will be assigned a value of 0 (i.e. the patient will be considered a non-responder). Patients who discontinue study drug early will be considered non-responders to treatment and will be assigned a pain response of 0. The percentage of subjects achieving levels of treatment response 10% to 100% by 10% increments as defined above will be calculated with 30% of key interest as it has been shown to represent a clinically important improvement in pain.
SecondaryProportion of Patients With at Least 50% Improvement From Baseline in the Weekly Mean Pain Intensity at Week 8Week 8
A patient's pain response to treatment is defined as the percent improvement from baseline with respect to the weekly mean of "average pain in the last 24 hours" pain score during the last week of the Maintenance Treatment Period (Week 8) . If a patient's mean weekly pain score during the last week of the Maintenance Treatment Period is greater than the baseline score (i.e., the patient has an increase in pain compared to baseline), his/her response to treatment will be assigned a value of 0 (i.e. the patient will be considered a non-responder). Patients who discontinue study drug early will be considered non-responders to treatment and will be assigned a pain response of 0. The percentage of subjects achieving levels of treatment response 10% to 100% by 10% increments as defined above will be calculated with 30% of key interest as it has been shown to represent a clinically important improvement in pain.
SecondaryProportion of Patients Whose OA Pain Was "Very Much Improved" or "Much Improved" as Indicated by Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Score at Week 8Week 8The PGIC is a self-administered instrument that measures the patient's overall impression of his/her OA on a 7-point scale where 1 = "Very much improved" and 7 = "Very much worse".
SecondaryAverage Daily Number of Acetaminophen Tablets Used During Entire StudyWeek 8
The average daily number of acetaminophen tablets used during the study will be calculated using data recorded in the patient diary as the sum of the total number of tablets used divided by the length of exposure (in days). The supplemental pain medication for OA will be grouped categorically into the following classes: (1) no supplemental acetaminophen tablets, (2) 0 to ≤ 0.5 tablets, (3) \> 0.5 to ≤ 1.0 tablets, (4) \> 1.0 to ≤ 2.0 tablets, and (5) \> 2.0 tablets.
SecondaryProportion of Patients Withdrawing From Treatment Due to Lack of Analgesic EfficacyWeek 8

Outcomes10

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange From Baseline at Week 8 With Respect to the Weekly Mean of the Daily 24-hour Pain Intensity for the Index Joint as Measured by the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS).Baseline, Week 8score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in the Western Ontario & McMaster Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) Index Total Score at Week 8Baseline, Week 8score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in the WOMAC Pain Intensity Sub-scale Score at Week 8Baseline, Week 8score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in the WOMAC Stiffness Sub-scale Score at Week 8Baseline, Week 8score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in the WOMAC Function Sub-scale Score at Week 8Baseline, Week 8score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYProportion of Patients With at Least 30% Improvement From Baseline in the Weekly Mean Pain Intensity at Week 8Week 8percentage of patientsNUMBER
SECONDARYProportion of Patients With at Least 50% Improvement From Baseline in the Weekly Mean Pain Intensity at Week 8Week 8percentage of patientsNUMBER
SECONDARYProportion of Patients Whose OA Pain Was Very Much Improved or Much Improved as Indicated by Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Score at Week 8Week 8percentage of patientsNUMBER
SECONDARYAverage Daily Number of Acetaminophen Tablets Used During Entire StudyWeek 8TabletsMEDIAN
SECONDARYProportion of Patients Withdrawing From Treatment Due to Lack of Analgesic EfficacyWeek 8percentage of patientsNUMBER

Results by group20

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change From Baseline at Week 8 With Respect to the Weekly Mean of the Daily 24-hour Pain Intensity for the Index Joint as Measured by the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS).CR845 Tablet-2.3Standard Error 0.14score on a scale
Change From Baseline at Week 8 With Respect to the Weekly Mean of the Daily 24-hour Pain Intensity for the Index Joint as Measured by the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS).Placebo Tablet-2.4Standard Error 0.19score on a scale
Change From Baseline in the Western Ontario & McMaster Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) Index Total Score at Week 8CR845 Tablet-62.4Standard Error 3.28score on a scale
Change From Baseline in the Western Ontario & McMaster Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) Index Total Score at Week 8Placebo Tablet-59.7Standard Error 4.34score on a scale
Change From Baseline in the WOMAC Pain Intensity Sub-scale Score at Week 8CR845 Tablet-13.5Standard Error 0.70score on a scale
Change From Baseline in the WOMAC Pain Intensity Sub-scale Score at Week 8Placebo Tablet-12.7Standard Error 0.92score on a scale
Change From Baseline in the WOMAC Stiffness Sub-scale Score at Week 8CR845 Tablet-5.7Standard Error 0.29score on a scale
Change From Baseline in the WOMAC Stiffness Sub-scale Score at Week 8Placebo Tablet-5.6Standard Error 0.38score on a scale
Change From Baseline in the WOMAC Function Sub-scale Score at Week 8CR845 Tablet-43.1Standard Error 2.34score on a scale
Change From Baseline in the WOMAC Function Sub-scale Score at Week 8Placebo Tablet-41.5Standard Error 3.10score on a scale

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDCR845 Tablet316
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo Tablet160
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDCR845 Tablet227
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo Tablet136
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDCR845 Tablet89
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo Tablet24

Adverse events40

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherConstipationGastrointestinal disordersCR845 Tablet42316
otherConstipationGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo Tablet3160
otherDizzinessNervous system disordersCR845 Tablet26316
otherDizzinessNervous system disordersPlacebo Tablet3160
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersCR845 Tablet18316
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersPlacebo Tablet9160
otherDry mouthGastrointestinal disordersCR845 Tablet18316
otherDry mouthGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo Tablet3160
seriousGastrooesophageal reflux diseaseGastrointestinal disordersCR845 Tablet1316
seriousGastrooesophageal reflux diseaseGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo Tablet0160

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityCR845 Tablet0316
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo Tablet0160
Total, other adverse eventsCR845 Tablet82316
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo Tablet17160
Total, serious adverse eventsCR845 Tablet9316
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo Tablet1160

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
CR845 Tablet vs Placebo Tablet: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
CR845 Tablet vs Placebo Tablet: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02944448

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02944448/events?page=2