ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT02959983

Efficacy of Eluxadoline in the Treatment of Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Diarrhea in Patients With Inadequate Control of Symptoms With Prior Loperamide Use

NCT02959983, Phase 4, Completed, Allergan; results first posted 2019-02-15

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Efficacy of Eluxadoline in the Treatment of Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Diarrhea in Patients With Inadequate Control of Symptoms With Prior Loperamide Use. Trials, record NCT02959983. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02959983

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Efficacy of Eluxadoline in the Treatment of Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Diarrhea in Patients With Inadequate Control of Symptoms With Prior Loperamide Use
NCT number
NCT02959983
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Enrollment
346 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Allergan
Conditions
Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Diarrhea
Interventions
Eluxadoline, Placebo
First posted
2016-11-09
Last updated
2019-02-15
Results first posted
2019-02-15

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes4

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercentage of Participants Who Were Composite Responders Based on Improvements From Baseline in Daily Worst Abdominal Pain And Daily Stool Consistency ScoresBaseline, Weeks 1 to 12
Percentage of primary composite responders is defined as the percentage of participants who meet both of the following daily composite criteria for at least 50% of the days with diary entry: 1)Worst Abdominal Pain (WAP) score improved by ≥40% compared to Baseline. The participant records their WAP score in the past 24 hours each day in a daily patient diary where: 0=no pain to 10=worst imaginable pain. 2) Bristol Stool Score (BSS) \<5; or the absence of a bowel movement if accompanied by ≥40% improvement in WAP compared to Baseline. The participant records their stool consistency each day in a daily patient diary using the BSS on a scale from 1 (hard stool) to 7 (watery stool).
SecondaryPercentage of Stool Consistency RespondersWeeks 1 to 12 and 4-week intervals (Weeks 1 to 4, Weeks 5 to 8 and Weeks 9 to 12)
Percentage of stool consistency responders is defined as the percentage of participants who meet the daily stool consistency response criteria: BSS \<5; or the absence of a bowel movement if accompanied by ≥40% improvement in WAP compared to Baseline for ≥50% of days with daily patient diary entries over a certain time period. The participant records their stool consistency each day in a daily patient diary using the BSS on a scale from 1 (hard stool) to 7 (watery stool). A participant must have had a minimum of 20 days of diary entries over any 4-week interval.
SecondaryPercentage of Pain RespondersBaseline, Weeks 1 to 12 and 4-week intervals (Weeks 1 to 4, Weeks 5 to 8 and Weeks 9 to 12)
Percentage of pain responders is defined as the percentage of participants who meet the daily pain response criteria: WAP score improved by ≥40% compared to Baseline for ≥50% of days with diary entries over a certain time period. The participant records their WAP score in the past 24 hours each day in a daily diary where: 0=no pain to 10=worst imaginable pain. A participant must have had a minimum of 20 days of diary entries over any 4-week interval.
SecondaryPercentage of Monthly Composite RespondersWeeks 1 to 4, 5 to 8, and 9 to 12
Percentage of monthly composite responders is defined as the percentage of participants who meet the daily composite response criteria for at least 50% of days with diary entry for a minimum of 20 days during each 4-week interval (weeks 1 to 4, 5 to 8, and 9 to 12). Composite response includes both of the following criteria: 1) WAP score improved by ≥40% compared to Baseline. The participant records their WAP score in the past 24 hours each day in a daily patient diary where: 0=no pain to 10=worst imaginable pain. 2) BSS \<5; or the absence of a bowel movement if accompanied by ≥40% improvement in WAP compared to Baseline. The participant records their stool consistency each day in a daily patient diary using the BSS on a scale from 1 (hard stool) to 7 (watery stool).

Outcomes4

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercentage of Participants Who Were Composite Responders Based on Improvements From Baseline in Daily Worst Abdominal Pain And Daily Stool Consistency ScoresBaseline, Weeks 1 to 12The Intent-to-Treat population includes all randomized patients.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Stool Consistency RespondersWeeks 1 to 12 and 4-week intervals (Weeks 1 to 4, Weeks 5 to 8 and Weeks 9 to 12)The Intent-to-Treat population includes all randomized patients.Percentage of ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Pain RespondersBaseline, Weeks 1 to 12 and 4-week intervals (Weeks 1 to 4, Weeks 5 to 8 and Weeks 9 to 12)The Intent-to-Treat population includes all randomized patients.Percentage of ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Monthly Composite RespondersWeeks 1 to 4, 5 to 8, and 9 to 12The Intent-to-Treat population includes all randomized patients.Percentage of ParticipantsNUMBER

Results by group24

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percentage of Participants Who Were Composite Responders Based on Improvements From Baseline in Daily Worst Abdominal Pain And Daily Stool Consistency ScoresEluxadoline22.7percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Were Composite Responders Based on Improvements From Baseline in Daily Worst Abdominal Pain And Daily Stool Consistency ScoresPlacebo10.3percentage of participants
Percentage of Stool Consistency RespondersEluxadolineOverall Weeks 1 to 1227.9Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Stool Consistency RespondersPlaceboOverall Weeks 1 to 1216.7Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Stool Consistency RespondersEluxadolineWeeks 1 to 424.4Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Stool Consistency RespondersPlaceboWeeks 1 to 412.6Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Stool Consistency RespondersEluxadolineWeeks 5 to 830.8Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Stool Consistency RespondersPlaceboWeeks 5 to 820.1Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Stool Consistency RespondersEluxadolineWeeks 9 to 1229.7Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Stool Consistency RespondersPlaceboWeeks 9 to 1225.3Percentage of Participants

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDEluxadoline172
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo174
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDEluxadoline146
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo149
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDEluxadoline26
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo25

Adverse events20

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersEluxadoline10171
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo5173
seriousPancreatic massGastrointestinal disordersEluxadoline1171
seriousPancreatic massGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo0173
seriousCellulitisInfections and infestationsEluxadoline0171
seriousCellulitisInfections and infestationsPlacebo1173
seriousPneumoniaInfections and infestationsEluxadoline0171
seriousPneumoniaInfections and infestationsPlacebo1173
seriousCardiac failure congestiveCardiac disordersEluxadoline0171
seriousCardiac failure congestiveCardiac disordersPlacebo1173

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityEluxadoline0171
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo0173
Total, other adverse eventsEluxadoline10171
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo5173
Total, serious adverse eventsEluxadoline1171
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo3173

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Eluxadoline vs Placebo: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Eluxadoline vs Placebo: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02959983

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02959983/results?page=2