ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT02960997

Using Topical Sirolimus 2% for Patients With Epidermolysis Bullous Simplex (EBS) Study

NCT02960997, Phase 2, Completed, Stanford University; results first posted 2020-01-30

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Using Topical Sirolimus 2% for Patients With Epidermolysis Bullous Simplex (EBS) Study. Trials, record NCT02960997. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02960997

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Using Topical Sirolimus 2% for Patients With Epidermolysis Bullous Simplex (EBS) Study
NCT number
NCT02960997
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
8 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Stanford University
Conditions
Epidermolysis Bullosa Simplex, Epidermolysis Bullosa Simplex Kobner, Weber-Cockayne Syndrome
Interventions
Sirolimus, 2%, Vehicle
First posted
2016-11-10
Last updated
2022-03-09
Results first posted
2020-01-30

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes10

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryFoot Health Status Questionnaire, Foot Function Domain ScoreWeek 0 and week 12 of the respective treatment period
Foot function was assessed utilizing the validated Foot Health Status Questionnaire (FHSQ). Low Score (0) means severely limited in performing a broad range of physical activities. High Score (100) means can perform all desired physical activities. Data are reported per intervention.
PrimaryFoot Health Status Questionnaire, Physical Activity Domain ScoreWeek 0 and week 12 of the respective treatment period
Physical Activity was assessed utilizing the validated Foot Health Status Questionnaire (FHSQ). Low Score (0) means severely limited in performing a broad range of physical activities. High Score (100) means can perform all desired physical activities. Data are reported per intervention.
PrimaryTrough Concentration of SirolimusWeek 12Trough measurements were taken prior to topical sirolimus administration at the week 12 study visit.
SecondaryAverage Steps Per Day Assessed by FitBit® / Pedometer12 weeksAverage number of steps walked per day from baseline to the end of each treatment.
SecondaryChild Dermatological Quality of Life Questionnaire ScoreWeek 0 and week 12 of the respective treatment period
Quality of Life-Epidermolysis Bullosa (QOLEB) Questionnaire specifically designed for people with EB. The QOLEB can be used to identify everyday life occurrences negatively affected by EB. It assesses change in quality of life over time, an important measure when assessing the success of new treatments for EB. Scores from 0 to 51, with higher scores indicate greater impact of EB on quality of life. Data are reported per intervention.
SecondaryEpidermolysis Bullosa Disease Activity and Scarring Index (EBDASI) Disease Severity Scale ScoreWeek 0 and week 12 of the respective treatment period
The EBDASI is a validated scoring system that objectively quantifies the severity of EB affecting the entire body. It has been designed to evaluate the response to new therapies for the treatment of EB. Scores range from 0 (absent of EB) to 10 (entire area involved). Data are reported per intervention.
Secondary5-D Pruritus Scale ScoreWeek 0 and week 12 of the respective treatment period
The 5-D Pruritus Scale is a 1-page, 5-question tool used in clinical trials to assess 5 dimensions of background itch: degree, duration, direction, disability, and distribution. Each question corresponds to 1 of the 5 dimensions of itch; participants were to rate their symptoms over the preceding 2-week period on a 1 to 5 scale, with 5 being the most affected. After the summation of individual score, the total score ranges from 5 (least affected) to 25 (most affected). Data are reported per intervention.
SecondaryPlantar Defect Size Using 3D PhotographyBaseline, week 12Plantar defect size measurements using 3D photography (% change in total defect area).
SecondaryFoot Plantar Pressure MeasurementsBaseline, week 12Foot plantar pressure measurements before and after treatment using the Podotech Elftman Foot Scanner.
SecondaryChange in mTOR Pathway InhibitionBaseline, week 12Molecular biology study of skin biopsies assayed for mTOR pathway inhibition (e.g. determination of phosphoprotein inhibition included ribosomal protein S6, S6 kinase and/or eIF-4E binding protein).

Outcomes10

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYFoot Health Status Questionnaire, Foot Function Domain ScoreWeek 0 and week 12 of the respective treatment periodscore on a scaleMEAN
PRIMARYFoot Health Status Questionnaire, Physical Activity Domain ScoreWeek 0 and week 12 of the respective treatment periodscore on a scaleMEAN
PRIMARYTrough Concentration of SirolimusWeek 12Trough concentration of sirolimus was collected during Sirolimus treatment only, so the Placebo group is not presented in this outcome measure.ng/mLMEAN
SECONDARYAverage Steps Per Day Assessed by FitBit® / Pedometer12 weeks
One participant had no Fitbit data during placebo treatment and is excluded from the analysis. Three participants lost their Fitbit devices for week 12 reporting during sirolimus treatment; their data through week 8 are included in the analysis.
stepsMEAN
SECONDARYChild Dermatological Quality of Life Questionnaire ScoreWeek 0 and week 12 of the respective treatment periodscore on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYEpidermolysis Bullosa Disease Activity and Scarring Index (EBDASI) Disease Severity Scale ScoreWeek 0 and week 12 of the respective treatment periodscore on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARY5-D Pruritus Scale ScoreWeek 0 and week 12 of the respective treatment periodscore on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYPlantar Defect Size Using 3D PhotographyBaseline, week 12Data were not collected for this outcome measure.
SECONDARYFoot Plantar Pressure MeasurementsBaseline, week 12Data were not collected for this outcome measure.
SECONDARYChange in mTOR Pathway InhibitionBaseline, week 12Data were not collected for this outcome measure

Results by group23

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Foot Health Status Questionnaire, Foot Function Domain ScoreSirolimusWeek 061.7Standard Deviation 26.48score on a scale
Foot Health Status Questionnaire, Foot Function Domain ScorePlaceboWeek 049.3Standard Deviation 20.83score on a scale
Foot Health Status Questionnaire, Foot Function Domain ScoreSirolimusWeek 1260.2Standard Deviation 23.37score on a scale
Foot Health Status Questionnaire, Foot Function Domain ScorePlaceboWeek 1256.3Standard Deviation 24.09score on a scale
Foot Health Status Questionnaire, Physical Activity Domain ScoreSirolimusWeek 069.4Standard Deviation 24.37score on a scale
Foot Health Status Questionnaire, Physical Activity Domain ScorePlaceboWeek 054.2Standard Deviation 21.65score on a scale
Foot Health Status Questionnaire, Physical Activity Domain ScoreSirolimusWeek 1270.8Standard Deviation 20.37score on a scale
Foot Health Status Questionnaire, Physical Activity Domain ScorePlaceboWeek 1261.8Standard Deviation 24.91score on a scale
Trough Concentration of SirolimusSirolimusNAStandard Deviation NAng/mL
Average Steps Per Day Assessed by FitBit® / PedometerSirolimus6624Standard Deviation 1847steps

Participant flow24

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
First Intervention, 12 WeeksSTARTEDSirolimus, Then Placebo4
First Intervention, 12 WeeksSTARTEDPlacebo, Then Sirolimus4
First Intervention, 12 WeeksCOMPLETEDSirolimus, Then Placebo4
First Intervention, 12 WeeksCOMPLETEDPlacebo, Then Sirolimus4
First Intervention, 12 WeeksNOT COMPLETEDSirolimus, Then Placebo0
First Intervention, 12 WeeksNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo, Then Sirolimus0
Washout Period, 4 WeeksSTARTEDSirolimus, Then Placebo4
Washout Period, 4 WeeksSTARTEDPlacebo, Then Sirolimus4
Washout Period, 4 WeeksCOMPLETEDSirolimus, Then Placebo4
Washout Period, 4 WeeksCOMPLETEDPlacebo, Then Sirolimus4

Adverse events38

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAllergic Reaction to antiobiotic (sulfamethoxole)Immune system disordersSirolimus08
otherAllergic Reaction to antiobiotic (sulfamethoxole)Immune system disordersPlacebo18
otherBurning sensation on feetSkin and subcutaneous tissue disordersSirolimus18
otherBurning sensation on feetSkin and subcutaneous tissue disordersPlacebo08
otherCommon coldInfections and infestationsSirolimus08
otherCommon coldInfections and infestationsPlacebo38
otherCoughGeneral disordersSirolimus08
otherCoughGeneral disordersPlacebo28
otherEar infectionInfections and infestationsSirolimus28
otherEar infectionInfections and infestationsPlacebo08

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalitySirolimus08
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo08
Total, other adverse eventsSirolimus88
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo88
Total, serious adverse eventsSirolimus08
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo08

Papers14

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
11416184BACKGROUNDPubMed
11821896BACKGROUNDPubMed
11840159BACKGROUNDPubMed
14987264BACKGROUNDPubMed
15495218BACKGROUNDPubMed
19681875BACKGROUNDPubMed
19699613BACKGROUNDPubMed
19995367BACKGROUNDPubMed
22588747BACKGROUNDPubMed
24075228BACKGROUNDPubMed

1 to 10 of 14

See all 14 papers

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Sirolimus vs Placebo: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Sirolimus vs Placebo: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02960997

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02960997/results?page=2