ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT02961374

Erlotinib Hydrochloride in Reducing Duodenal Polyp Burden in Patients With Familial Adenomatous Polyposis at Risk of Developing Colon Cancer

NCT02961374, Phase 2, Completed, National Cancer Institute (NCI); results first posted 2021-09-22

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Erlotinib Hydrochloride in Reducing Duodenal Polyp Burden in Patients With Familial Adenomatous Polyposis at Risk of Developing Colon Cancer. Trials, record NCT02961374. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02961374

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Erlotinib Hydrochloride in Reducing Duodenal Polyp Burden in Patients With Familial Adenomatous Polyposis at Risk of Developing Colon Cancer
NCT number
NCT02961374
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
46 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Conditions
Attenuated Familial Adenomatous Polyposis, Familial Adenomatous Polyposis
Interventions
Erlotinib, Erlotinib Hydrochloride
First posted
2016-11-11
Last updated
2022-07-26
Results first posted
2021-09-22

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes12

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryMean Percent Change in Duodenal Polyp BurdenBaseline to 6 months post-intervention
Assessed by esophagogastroduodenoscopy, the mean percent change was calculated by subtracting the sum of diameters from all polyps at baseline from the sum of diameters of all polyps at 6 months, then dividing by the sum of diameters from all polyps at baseline and multiplying by 100.
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Grade 2/3 Adverse Event (AE)Up to 7 months from registrationAssessed according to National Cancer Institute's (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0. The number of patients reporting a grade 2 or higher event are reported.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Any Adverse EventsUp to 7 months from registration
Assessed according to NCI CTCAE version 4.0. All registered and treated participants will be evaluable for AEs from the time of their first dose of weekly erlotinib treatment. To evaluate the AE profile for this treatment, the maximum grade for each type of adverse event will be recorded for each participant and frequency tables will be reviewed to determine the overall patterns. The number of patients reporting a grade 1 or higher adverse event at least possibly related to treatment are reported.
SecondaryChange in Duodenal Polyp NumberBaseline to 6 months
The number of duodenal polyps at baseline and the number of polyps remaining after 6 months of treatment will collected. The change in duodenal polyp number will be calculated for each patient by subtracting the baseline number of polyps from the 6 month number. Therefore a negative value indicates a decrease in the number of polyps present after 6 months. The median difference and standard deviation is reported.
SecondaryAbsolute Change in Lower Gastrointestinal Polyp BurdenBaseline to 6 months
Lower GI polyp burden was defined using the Pouch Exam form as either 1) the average diameter reported for pouch for participants with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA), or 2) the average diameter reported for rectum for participants with ileorectal anastomosis (IRA) + rectal stump. Absolute change from baseline to month 6 are reported here.
SecondaryPercent Change in Lower Gastrointestinal Polyp BurdenBaseline to 6 months
Lower GI polyp burden was defined using the Pouch Exam form as either 1) the average diameter reported for pouch for participants with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA), or 2) the average diameter reported for rectum for participants with ileorectal anastomosis (IRA) + rectal stump. The percent change from baseline to month 6 are reported here.
SecondaryAbsolute Change in Lower Gastrointestinal Polyp NumberBaseline to 6 months
Lower GI polyp number was defined using the Pouch Exam form as either 1) the number of polyps reported for pouch for participants with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA), or 2) the number of polyps reported for rectum for participants with ileorectal anastomosis (IRA) + rectal stump. Absolute change from baseline to month 6 are reported here.
SecondaryPercent Change in Lower Gastrointestinal Polyp NumberBaseline to 6 months
Lower GI polyp number was defined using the Pouch Exam form as either 1) the number of polyps reported for pouch for participants with IPAA, or 2) the number of polyps reported for rectum for participants with IRA + rectal stump.
SecondaryAbsolute and Percent Change in Desmoid Tumor SizeBaseline to 6 months
Laboratory measures will be correlated with participant outcomes (i.e., polyp burden, adverse events) and with each other as well. Cut-points will be determined based on previously defined and accepted standards. Descriptive statistics and simple scatter plots will be generated to review the tissue-based biomarker data. For continuous variables, the actual and % change in the level of each of the biomarkers from pre- to post-intervention will be explored using Wilcoxon signed rank tests, and paired sample t-tests. All categorical variables will be analyzed using chi-square tests or Fisher's exact test. For all translational endpoints, any notable statistical result will be viewed as an impetus for further study rather than as a definitive finding in and of itself.
OtherImmune Response Signaling in Duodenal Adenomas and Uninvolved TissueUp to 2.5 years
Laboratory measures will be correlated with participant outcomes (i.e., polyp burden, adverse events) and with each other as well. Cut-points will be determined based on previously defined and accepted standards. Descriptive statistics and simple scatter plots will be generated to review the tissue-based biomarker data. For continuous variables, the actual and % change in the level of each of the biomarkers from pre- to post-intervention will be explored using Wilcoxon signed rank tests, and paired sample t-tests. All categorical variables will be analyzed using chi-square tests or Fisher's exact test. For all translational endpoints, any notable statistical result will be viewed as an impetus for further study rather than as a definitive finding in and of itself.

Outcomes12

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYMean Percent Change in Duodenal Polyp BurdenBaseline to 6 months post-interventionOf the 46 patients registered, 42 patients began protocol treatment and were assessed at both baseline and at the 6 month timepoint.percent change in Duodenal Polyp BurdenMEAN
PRIMARYNumber of Participants With Grade 2/3 Adverse Event (AE)Up to 7 months from registrationAll patients that registered and completed one course of treatment are included in this analysis.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Any Adverse EventsUp to 7 months from registrationAll registered patients that began protocol treatment and were assessed for adverse events are included in this analysis.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYChange in Duodenal Polyp NumberBaseline to 6 monthsAll patients that began protocol therapy and were assessed for duodenal polyp number at baseline and after 6 months are included in this analysis.polypsMEDIAN
SECONDARYAbsolute Change in Lower Gastrointestinal Polyp BurdenBaseline to 6 monthsAll registered participants who reported an average lower GI polyp diameter at both baseline and assessed at month 6 and were evaluable for change in lower GI polyp number.polypsMEDIAN
SECONDARYPercent Change in Lower Gastrointestinal Polyp BurdenBaseline to 6 monthsAll registered participants who reported an average lower GI polyp diameter at both baseline and assessed at month 6 and were evaluable for change in lower GI polyp number.Percent change in polyp burdenMEDIAN
SECONDARYAbsolute Change in Lower Gastrointestinal Polyp NumberBaseline to 6 monthsAll registered participants who reported total number of lower GI polyps at baseline and assessed at month 6 and were evaluable for change in lower GI polyp number.Change in the polyp numberMEDIAN
SECONDARYPercent Change in Lower Gastrointestinal Polyp NumberBaseline to 6 monthsAll registered participants who reported total number of lower GI polyps at baseline and assessed at month 6 and were evaluable for change in lower GI polyp number.percent change in polyp numberMEDIAN
SECONDARYAbsolute and Percent Change in Desmoid Tumor SizeBaseline to 6 monthsData on desmoid tumor size was not collected.
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIEDImmune Response Signaling in Duodenal Adenomas and Uninvolved TissueUp to 2.5 years

Results by group8

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Mean Percent Change in Duodenal Polyp BurdenTreatment (Erlotinib Hydrochloride)-29.695% Confidence Interval -39.6 to -19.7percent change in Duodenal Polyp Burden
Number of Participants With Grade 2/3 Adverse Event (AE)Treatment (Erlotinib Hydrochloride)33Participants
Number of Participants With Any Adverse EventsTreatment (Erlotinib Hydrochloride)41Participants
Change in Duodenal Polyp NumberTreatment (Erlotinib Hydrochloride)-12.8Standard Deviation 22.96polyps
Absolute Change in Lower Gastrointestinal Polyp BurdenTreatment (Erlotinib Hydrochloride)0Inter-Quartile Range 0 to 1polyps
Percent Change in Lower Gastrointestinal Polyp BurdenTreatment (Erlotinib Hydrochloride)0Inter-Quartile Range 0 to 25.0Percent change in polyp burden
Absolute Change in Lower Gastrointestinal Polyp NumberTreatment (Erlotinib Hydrochloride)-6Inter-Quartile Range -26.0 to 0.0Change in the polyp number
Percent Change in Lower Gastrointestinal Polyp NumberTreatment (Erlotinib Hydrochloride)-30.8Inter-Quartile Range -47.4 to 0.0percent change in polyp number

Participant flow3

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDTreatment (Erlotinib Hydrochloride)46
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDTreatment (Erlotinib Hydrochloride)42
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDTreatment (Erlotinib Hydrochloride)4

Adverse events104

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAnemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersTreatment (Erlotinib Hydrochloride)2462
otherPalpitationsCardiac disordersTreatment (Erlotinib Hydrochloride)2463
otherEar painEar and labyrinth disordersTreatment (Erlotinib Hydrochloride)1461
otherMiddle ear inflammationEar and labyrinth disordersTreatment (Erlotinib Hydrochloride)1461
otherTinnitusEar and labyrinth disordersTreatment (Erlotinib Hydrochloride)1461
otherCataractEye disordersTreatment (Erlotinib Hydrochloride)1461
otherDry eyeEye disordersTreatment (Erlotinib Hydrochloride)2463
otherEye disorders - Other, specifyEye disordersTreatment (Erlotinib Hydrochloride)1461
otherKeratitisEye disordersTreatment (Erlotinib Hydrochloride)1461
otherPhotophobiaEye disordersTreatment (Erlotinib Hydrochloride)1461

Adverse event totals3

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityTreatment (Erlotinib Hydrochloride)046
Total, other adverse eventsTreatment (Erlotinib Hydrochloride)4646
Total, serious adverse eventsTreatment (Erlotinib Hydrochloride)346

Papers2

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
35636921DERIVEDPubMed
37119510DERIVEDPubMed

Grants1

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

ProjectTitlePrincipal investigatorsOrganizationFunderFiscal years
P30CA015083Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center Support GrantWILLMAN, CHERYL LYNNMAYO CLINIC ROCHESTERNATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE1985 to 2025

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02961374

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02961374/events?page=2