ConductScience.org, home

Library / Trials

Use of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Augment Hypnotic Analgesia

NCT02969707, Not applicable, Completed, Stanford University; results first posted 2021-08-30

Trial 12

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

FieldValueSource
TitleUse of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Augment Hypnotic AnalgesiaClinicalTrials.gov
NCT numberNCT02969707ClinicalTrials.gov
StatusCompletedClinicalTrials.gov
PhasesNot applicableClinicalTrials.gov
Enrollment101 participants, actualClinicalTrials.gov
Lead sponsorStanford UniversityClinicalTrials.gov
ConditionsFibromyalgiaClinicalTrials.gov
InterventionsMagPro TMS system (MagVenture, Denmark), HypnosisClinicalTrials.gov
First posted2016-11-21ClinicalTrials.gov
Last updated2024-12-20ClinicalTrials.gov
Results first posted2021-08-30ClinicalTrials.gov
Limitations and caveats
fMRI BOLD data were preprocessed using fMRIPrep 1.5.10 (Esteban, Markiewicz, et al. (2018); Esteban, Blair, et al. (2018); RRID:SCR\_016216), which is based on Nipype 1.4.2 (Gorgolewski et al. (2011); Gorgolewski et al. (2018); RRID:SCR\_002502) with MNI152NLin2009cAsym and anatomical output spaces. BOLD time series were bandpass filtered to include data in the window of 0.0025-0.025 Hz, which is on the low end of the spectrum. A more typical bandpass window is 0.01 - 0.1 Hz.
ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes 20

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescriptionSource
PrimaryThe Change in Functional Connectivity (FC) Between the Left Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex (L-DLPFC) and the Dorsal Anterior Cingulate Cortex (dACC)Baseline and at 15-20 min post-TMS (up to 30 min)
Functional MRI (fMRI) measures changes in oxygenated blood in the brain; at rest these levels fluctuate over time. These fluctuations can be similar between different brain regions. FC is the similarity in fluctuations of these fMRI signals and suggests how strongly two regions communicate with each other. We measured how inhibitory continuous theta-burst stimulation (cTBS) over L-DLPFC changes FC between L-DLPFC and dACC. This was done by estimating z-transformed correlation coefficients (CC) for each voxel (-1 to 1) between the L-DLPFC and dACC pre and post cTBS intervention. Negative FC was assigned to voxels with a weight \< 0, positive FC to voxels with weight\> 0. Total FC includes positive and negative voxels. The change in FC is regarded as the change in the sum of these weighted voxels from pre to post cTBS for total, positive and negative FC, respectively. Greater sums of voxels correspond to more significant levels of coordinated activity (positive, negative, or total).
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryThe Change in the Neural Network Underlying Hypnotic IntensityBaseline and 2 hours
Blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) signal and interleaved TMS-BOLD analyses will be used to determine the effect of active, inhibitory rTMS (cTBS) over L-DLPFC on modulating the neural network that underlies hypnotic intensity.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChange in Hypnotic Induction Profile ScoreBaseline and Immediately post rTMS (up to 30 min)
The investigators used the Hypnotic Induction Profile (HIP) to determine the effect of active, inhibitory rTMS (cTBS) over L-DLPFC on enhancing hypnotizability. HIP scores range from 0 to 10 (low to high hypnotizability).
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChange in The Hypnosis Intensity ScaleBaseline and immediately post rTMS (up to 2 hrs)
The investigators used the Hypnotic Intensity Scale (HIS) to determine the effect of active, inhibitory rTMS (cTBS) over L-DLPFC on enhancing hypnotic intensity. HIS scores range from 0 to 10 (low to high hypnotic intensity).
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryThe Change in Functional Connectivity (FC) Within The Neural Network Underlying Conflict Regulation.Baseline and at 15-20 min post-TMS (up to 30 min)
We examined the effect of active, inhibitory cTBS over L-DLPFC on functional connectivity (FC) in key nodes in the neural network underlying the conflict regulation system. FC between each voxel in the L-DLPFC and the entire dACC was established by estimating z-transformed correlation coefficients (CC) for each voxel (-1 to 1) pre and post cTBS intervention. This paradigm was also used for voxels in the Default Mode Network (DMN) (Schaefer, 2018; Yeo, 2011) to the entire right inferior frontal gyrus (rIFG). Negative FC was assigned to voxels with a weight \< 0, positive FC to voxels with weight \> 0. Total FC includes positive and negative voxels. The change in FC is regarded as the change in the sum of these weighted voxels from pre to post cTBS for total, positive and negative FC, respectively. Greater sums of voxels correspond to more significant levels of coordinated activity (positive, negative, or total).
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryThe Change in Stroop PerformanceBaseline and at 15-20 min post-TMS (up to 30 min)Stroop effect is measured by the response time of a participant during the stroop task. Increases in response time indicate increased stroop effect (SE) and vice versa.ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryStroop TaskBaseline and at 15-20 min post-TMS (up to 30 min)
Active, inhibitory cTBS effect over L-DLPFC on the neural network that underlies the hypnotic Stroop modulation effect was determined by first estimating the average of connectivity weights for all parcel pairs linking Ventral Attentional Network (VAN) to the DMN. Parcels are determined by extracting mean resting state BOLD time-series for each region of the Schaefer 100 parcellation. A correlation matrix between all parcels is created and FC weights for each pair are established by estimating z-transformed correlation coefficients (CC) (-1 to 1). Each parcel pair is then assigned to one of the 7 resting state networks defined by Yeo et al., (2011). Negative FC is defined for parcel pairs with a weight \< 0, positive FC pairs with weight \> 0 and total FC includes all pairs. FC is thus the average value between parcel pairs in the DMN and VAN pre/post TMS. Greater sums of weighted pairs correspond to more significant levels of coordinated activity (positive, negative, or total).
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryLinear Relationship Between the Change in FC of the VAN to the DMN and the Change in Stroop Performance (Correlation Coefficient) With no Hypnosis Intervention.Baseline and at 15-20 min post-TMS (up to 1 hr)
Spearman's correlation was used to determine the linear relationship between the response time taken to answer incongruent Stroop task blocks (a measure of Stroop performance) and the change the resting-state network FC between the VAN and the DMN when no hypnosis intervention was implemented.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryLinear Relationship Between the Change in FC of the VAN to the DMN and the Change in Stroop Performance (Correlation Coefficient) With Hypnosis Intervention.Baseline and at 15-20 min post-TMS (up to 1 hr)
Spearman's correlation was used to determine the linear relationship between the response time taken to answer incongruent Stroop task blocks (a measure of Stroop performance) and the change the resting-state network FC between the VAN and the DMN when the hypnosis intervention was implemented.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryLinear Relationship Between the Change in FC of the VAN to the DMN and the Change in Stroop Interference (Correlation Coefficient) With no Hypnosis Intervention.Baseline and at 15-20 min post-TMS (up to 1 hr)
Spearman's correlation was used to determine the linear relationship between the Stroop interference and the change the resting-state network FC between the VAN and the DMN when no hypnosis intervention was implemented. In psychology, the Stroop effect is the delay in reaction time between congruent and incongruent stimuli.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryLinear Relationship Between the Change in FC of the VAN to the DMN and the Change in Stroop Interference (Correlation Coefficient) With Hypnosis Intervention.Baseline and at 15-20 min post-TMS (up to 1 hr)
Spearman's correlation was used to determine the linear relationship between the Stroop interference and the change the resting-state network FC between the VAN and the DMN when the hypnosis intervention was implemented. In psychology, the Stroop effect is the delay in reaction time between congruent and incongruent stimuli.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChange in the Numeric Pain Rating ScaleBaseline and immediately post-rTMS (up to 30 minutes)
To determine the effect of active, inhibitory rTMS (cTBS) over L-DLPFC on modulating the neural network that underlies hypnotic analgesia (HA). Numeric Pain Rating Scale scores range from 0 to 10 (low to high pain intensity).
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChange in Sense of Agency Rating Scale (SOARS)Baseline and immediately post-rTMS (up to 30 min)
The investigators used the Sense of Agency Rating Scale (SOARS) to determine the effect of active, inhibitory rTMS (cTBS) over L-DLPFC on altering the subjective sense of agency during hypnotizability. SOARS scores are calculated for Involuntariness and Effortlessness, each range from 0 to 35 (low to high).
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryMetabolic Alterations in Fibromyalgia (FMS) Defined by Excitatory / Inhibitory RatioBaseline Scan (up to 15 min)
E/I ratio is defined as the logarithm of the concentration of Glx (excitatory neurotransmitter metabolite complex) /GABA+ (inhibitory neurotransmitter metabolite complex) relative to either water or creatine peak signal and it is a unitless measure ranging from -1 to 1. Logarithmic transformations are used to account for non-normal distributions of metabolite concentrations across participants and ratios \> 0 are thought to be excitatory neurotransmitter dominant while ratios \<0 are thought to be inhibition dominant.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryAlterations in Pain Perception in FibromyalgiaBaseline visit (up to 30 min)
To characterize clinical pain measures, which are defined as thermal pain threshold and thermal pain tolerance. Thermal pain threshold is determined as the temperature of a thermode determined as painful (degrees Celsius) by a participant. Thermal pain tolerance extends this to the point at which discontinuation is necessary (degrees Celsius).
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryLinear Regression of Thermal Pain Threshold to Logarithm of E/I Ratio as it Relates to Water in Fibromyalgia (Coefficient of Determination)Baseline visit (up to 45 min)
Linear regression was used to evaluate the scalar relationship between E/I ratio as it relates to water and Thermal Pain Threshold with E/I as the independent variable and Thermal Pain Threshold as the dependent variable.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryLinear Regression of Thermal Pain Tolerance to Logarithm of E/I Ratio as it Relates to Water in Fibromyalgia (Coefficient of Determination)Baseline visit (up to 45 min)
Linear regression was used to evaluate the scalar relationship between E/I ratio as it relates to water and Thermal Pain Tolerance with E/I as the independent variable and Thermal Pain Tolerance as the dependent variable.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryLinear Regression of Thermal Pain Threshold to Logarithm of E/I Ratio as it Relates to Creatine in Fibromyalgia (Coefficient of Determination)Baseline visit (up to 45 min)
Linear regression was used to evaluate the scalar relationship between E/I ratio as it relates to creatine and Thermal Pain Threshold with E/I as the independent variable and Thermal Pain Threshold as the dependent variable.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryLinear Regression of Thermal Pain Tolerance to Logarithm of E/I Ratio as it Relates to Creatine in Fibromyalgia (Coefficient of Determination)Baseline visit (up to 45 min)
Linear regression was used to evaluate the scalar relationship between E/I ratio as it relates to creatine and Thermal Pain Tolerance with E/I as the independent variable and Thermal Pain Tolerance as the dependent variable.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryMetabolic Changes in L-DLPFC Pre- and Post-rTMSBaseline Scan and at 15-20 min post-TMS (up to 30 min)
To determine the relationship between the metabolic alterations pre and post-rTMS. Metabolic changes as measured by MEGA-PRESS spectroscopy were assessed by quantification of excitatory (Glx) and inhibitory (GABA+) neurotransmitter complexes. The E/I ratio is defined as the logarithm of the concentration of Glx/GABA+relative to either the reference water or creatine signal and it is a unitless measure ranging from -1 to 1. Logarithmic transformations are used to account for non-normal distributions of metabolite concentrations across participants and ratios \> 0 are thought to be excitatory neurotransmitter dominant while ratios \<0 are thought to be inhibition dominant.
ClinicalTrials.gov

Outcomes 20

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured asSource
PRIMARYThe Change in Functional Connectivity (FC) Between the Left Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex (L-DLPFC) and the Dorsal Anterior Cingulate Cortex (dACC)Baseline and at 15-20 min post-TMS (up to 30 min)Participants with resting-state scans for both pre and post-TMS conditions that passed QC and motion-based scan inclusion criteria; outlier data were excluded.Z-transformed CCMEANClinicalTrials.gov
SECONDARYThe Change in the Neural Network Underlying Hypnotic IntensityBaseline and 2 hoursDuring the study, data were not collected using interleaved TMS-BOLD, as originally planned.ClinicalTrials.gov
SECONDARYChange in Hypnotic Induction Profile ScoreBaseline and Immediately post rTMS (up to 30 min)Participants with available data are included in the analysisscore on a scaleMEANClinicalTrials.gov
SECONDARYChange in The Hypnosis Intensity ScaleBaseline and immediately post rTMS (up to 2 hrs)Participants who completed the protocol and completed HIS ratings are included in the analysis.score on a scaleMEANClinicalTrials.gov
SECONDARYThe Change in Functional Connectivity (FC) Within The Neural Network Underlying Conflict Regulation.Baseline and at 15-20 min post-TMS (up to 30 min)
Population consisted of patients with fibromyalgia who underwent either active or sham cTBS either in combination with hypnosis or without it. Participants were excluded from the original sample for 1) fMRI imaging problems, 2) missing data. For the analyses below additional outliers were excluded on a test by test basis.
Z-transformed CCMEANClinicalTrials.gov
SECONDARYThe Change in Stroop PerformanceBaseline and at 15-20 min post-TMS (up to 30 min)
Population consisted of patients with fibromyalgia who underwent either active or sham cTBS either in combination with hypnosis or without it. Participants were excluded from the original sample for 1) poor Stroop task performance, 2) fMRI imaging problems, 3) missing data. For the analyses below additional outliers were excluded on a test by test basis.
SecondsMEANClinicalTrials.gov
SECONDARYStroop TaskBaseline and at 15-20 min post-TMS (up to 30 min)Subjects who had pre and post TMS resting-state fMRI scans that passed QC and motion-based inclusion criteriaZ-transformed CCMEANClinicalTrials.gov
SECONDARYLinear Relationship Between the Change in FC of the VAN to the DMN and the Change in Stroop Performance (Correlation Coefficient) With no Hypnosis Intervention.Baseline and at 15-20 min post-TMS (up to 1 hr)
Population consisted of patients with fibromyalgia who underwent either active or sham cTBS either in combination with hypnosis or without it. Participants were excluded from the original sample for 1) poor Stroop task performance, 2) fMRI imaging problems, 3) missing data. Subjects who had pre and post TMS resting-state fMRI scans that passed QC and motion-based inclusion criteria were included.
Correlation CoefficientNUMBERClinicalTrials.gov
SECONDARYLinear Relationship Between the Change in FC of the VAN to the DMN and the Change in Stroop Performance (Correlation Coefficient) With Hypnosis Intervention.Baseline and at 15-20 min post-TMS (up to 1 hr)
Population consisted of patients with fibromyalgia who underwent either active or sham cTBS either in combination with hypnosis or without it. Participants were excluded from the original sample for 1) poor Stroop task performance, 2) fMRI imaging problems, 3) missing data. Subjects who had pre and post TMS resting-state fMRI scans that passed QC and motion-based inclusion criteria were included.
Correlation CoefficientNUMBERClinicalTrials.gov
SECONDARYLinear Relationship Between the Change in FC of the VAN to the DMN and the Change in Stroop Interference (Correlation Coefficient) With no Hypnosis Intervention.Baseline and at 15-20 min post-TMS (up to 1 hr)
Population consisted of patients with fibromyalgia who underwent either active or sham cTBS either in combination with hypnosis or without it. Participants were excluded from the original sample for 1) poor Stroop task performance, 2) fMRI imaging problems, 3) missing data. Subjects who had pre and post TMS resting-state fMRI scans that passed QC and motion-based inclusion criteria were included.
Correlation CoefficientNUMBERClinicalTrials.gov
SECONDARYLinear Relationship Between the Change in FC of the VAN to the DMN and the Change in Stroop Interference (Correlation Coefficient) With Hypnosis Intervention.Baseline and at 15-20 min post-TMS (up to 1 hr)
Population consisted of patients with fibromyalgia who underwent either active or sham cTBS either in combination with hypnosis or without it. Participants were excluded from the original sample for 1) poor Stroop task performance, 2) fMRI imaging problems, 3) missing data. Subjects who had pre and post TMS resting-state fMRI scans that passed QC and motion-based inclusion criteria were included.
Correlation CoefficientNUMBERClinicalTrials.gov
SECONDARYChange in the Numeric Pain Rating ScaleBaseline and immediately post-rTMS (up to 30 minutes)Participants with available data are included in the analysismean change of scores on a scaleMEANClinicalTrials.gov
SECONDARYChange in Sense of Agency Rating Scale (SOARS)Baseline and immediately post-rTMS (up to 30 min)Participants who completed the protocol and completed all items of the SOARS are included in the analysis.score on a scaleMEANClinicalTrials.gov
SECONDARYMetabolic Alterations in Fibromyalgia (FMS) Defined by Excitatory / Inhibitory RatioBaseline Scan (up to 15 min)Participants with baseline MegaPress scan dataRatioMEANClinicalTrials.gov
SECONDARYAlterations in Pain Perception in FibromyalgiaBaseline visit (up to 30 min)Participants with baseline MegaPress scan dataDegrees CelsiusMEANClinicalTrials.gov
SECONDARYLinear Regression of Thermal Pain Threshold to Logarithm of E/I Ratio as it Relates to Water in Fibromyalgia (Coefficient of Determination)Baseline visit (up to 45 min)Participants with baseline MegaPress scan dataCoefficient of determinationNUMBERClinicalTrials.gov
SECONDARYLinear Regression of Thermal Pain Tolerance to Logarithm of E/I Ratio as it Relates to Water in Fibromyalgia (Coefficient of Determination)Baseline visit (up to 45 min)Participants with baseline MegaPress scan dataCoefficient of determinationNUMBERClinicalTrials.gov
SECONDARYLinear Regression of Thermal Pain Threshold to Logarithm of E/I Ratio as it Relates to Creatine in Fibromyalgia (Coefficient of Determination)Baseline visit (up to 45 min)Participants with baseline MegaPress scan dataCoefficient of determinationNUMBERClinicalTrials.gov
SECONDARYLinear Regression of Thermal Pain Tolerance to Logarithm of E/I Ratio as it Relates to Creatine in Fibromyalgia (Coefficient of Determination)Baseline visit (up to 45 min)Participants with baseline MegaPress scan dataCoefficient of determinationNUMBERClinicalTrials.gov
SECONDARYMetabolic Changes in L-DLPFC Pre- and Post-rTMSBaseline Scan and at 15-20 min post-TMS (up to 30 min)Participants with available dataRatioMEANClinicalTrials.gov

Results by group 64

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnitsSource
The Change in Functional Connectivity (FC) Between the Left Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex (L-DLPFC) and the Dorsal Anterior Cingulate Cortex (dACC)Active rTMSChange in sum of positive z-transformed CC.61.98Standard Error 21.63Z-transformed CCClinicalTrials.gov
The Change in Functional Connectivity (FC) Between the Left Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex (L-DLPFC) and the Dorsal Anterior Cingulate Cortex (dACC)Sham rTMSChange in sum of positive z-transformed CC.4.16Standard Error 16.43Z-transformed CCClinicalTrials.gov
The Change in Functional Connectivity (FC) Between the Left Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex (L-DLPFC) and the Dorsal Anterior Cingulate Cortex (dACC)Active rTMSChange in sum of negative z-transformed CC.-21.41Standard Error 16.8Z-transformed CCClinicalTrials.gov
The Change in Functional Connectivity (FC) Between the Left Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex (L-DLPFC) and the Dorsal Anterior Cingulate Cortex (dACC)Sham rTMSChange in sum of negative z-transformed CC.-13.22Standard Error 16.8Z-transformed CCClinicalTrials.gov
The Change in Functional Connectivity (FC) Between the Left Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex (L-DLPFC) and the Dorsal Anterior Cingulate Cortex (dACC)Active rTMSChange in sum of all z-transformed CC.40.56Standard Error 32.34Z-transformed CCClinicalTrials.gov
The Change in Functional Connectivity (FC) Between the Left Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex (L-DLPFC) and the Dorsal Anterior Cingulate Cortex (dACC)Sham rTMSChange in sum of all z-transformed CC.-9.06Standard Error 28.25Z-transformed CCClinicalTrials.gov
Change in Hypnotic Induction Profile ScoreActive rTMS.63Standard Deviation 1.18score on a scaleClinicalTrials.gov
Change in Hypnotic Induction Profile ScoreSham rTMS.31Standard Deviation 1.67score on a scaleClinicalTrials.gov
Change in The Hypnosis Intensity ScaleActive rTMS.475Standard Deviation 2.242score on a scaleClinicalTrials.gov
Change in The Hypnosis Intensity ScaleSham rTMS-.128Standard Deviation 1.490score on a scaleClinicalTrials.gov
The Change in Functional Connectivity (FC) Within The Neural Network Underlying Conflict Regulation.Active rTMSChange in sum of all z-transformed CC in L-DLPFC.0.01Standard Deviation 0.14Z-transformed CCClinicalTrials.gov
The Change in Functional Connectivity (FC) Within The Neural Network Underlying Conflict Regulation.Sham rTMSChange in sum of all z-transformed CC in L-DLPFC.-0.003Standard Deviation 0.13Z-transformed CCClinicalTrials.gov
The Change in Functional Connectivity (FC) Within The Neural Network Underlying Conflict Regulation.Active rTMSChange in sum of positive z-transformed CC in L-DLPFC.33.76Standard Deviation 136.5Z-transformed CCClinicalTrials.gov
The Change in Functional Connectivity (FC) Within The Neural Network Underlying Conflict Regulation.Sham rTMSChange in sum of positive z-transformed CC in L-DLPFC.6.39Standard Deviation 99.82Z-transformed CCClinicalTrials.gov
The Change in Functional Connectivity (FC) Within The Neural Network Underlying Conflict Regulation.Active rTMSChange in sum of negative z-transformed CC in L-DLPFC.-20.36Standard Deviation 88.88Z-transformed CCClinicalTrials.gov
The Change in Functional Connectivity (FC) Within The Neural Network Underlying Conflict Regulation.Sham rTMSChange in sum of negative z-transformed CC in L-DLPFC.-10.11Standard Deviation 96.55Z-transformed CCClinicalTrials.gov
The Change in Functional Connectivity (FC) Within The Neural Network Underlying Conflict Regulation.Active rTMSChange in sum of all z-transformed CC in DMN.0.004Standard Deviation 0.05Z-transformed CCClinicalTrials.gov
The Change in Functional Connectivity (FC) Within The Neural Network Underlying Conflict Regulation.Sham rTMSChange in sum of all z-transformed CC in DMN.-0.01Standard Deviation 0.05Z-transformed CCClinicalTrials.gov
The Change in Functional Connectivity (FC) Within The Neural Network Underlying Conflict Regulation.Active rTMSChange in sum of positive z-transformed CC in DMN.-31.20Standard Deviation 137.73Z-transformed CCClinicalTrials.gov
The Change in Functional Connectivity (FC) Within The Neural Network Underlying Conflict Regulation.Sham rTMSChange in sum of positive z-transformed CC in DMN.21.12Standard Deviation 153.54Z-transformed CCClinicalTrials.gov

Participant flow 12

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits countedSource
Overall StudySTARTEDActive rTMS49ClinicalTrials.gov
Overall StudySTARTEDSham rTMS52ClinicalTrials.gov
Overall StudyReceived InterventionActive rTMS40ClinicalTrials.gov
Overall StudyReceived InterventionSham rTMS40ClinicalTrials.gov
Overall StudyCompleted Pain Evaluation Study DayActive rTMS41ClinicalTrials.gov
Overall StudyCompleted Pain Evaluation Study DaySham rTMS44ClinicalTrials.gov
Overall StudyCompleted Mechanistic Evaluation Study DayActive rTMS40ClinicalTrials.gov
Overall StudyCompleted Mechanistic Evaluation Study DaySham rTMS40ClinicalTrials.gov
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDActive rTMS40ClinicalTrials.gov
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDSham rTMS40ClinicalTrials.gov
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDActive rTMS9ClinicalTrials.gov
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDSham rTMS12ClinicalTrials.gov

Adverse events 6

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEventsSource
otherMedication Withdrawal During WashoutMetabolism and nutrition disordersActive rTMS0490ClinicalTrials.gov
otherMedication Withdrawal During WashoutMetabolism and nutrition disordersSham rTMS1521ClinicalTrials.gov
otherHeadache / Scalp IrritationSkin and subcutaneous tissue disordersActive rTMS1491ClinicalTrials.gov
otherHeadache / Scalp IrritationSkin and subcutaneous tissue disordersSham rTMS0520ClinicalTrials.gov
otherDizzinessEar and labyrinth disordersActive rTMS0490ClinicalTrials.gov
otherDizzinessEar and labyrinth disordersSham rTMS1521ClinicalTrials.gov

Adverse event totals 6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt riskSource
Total, all-cause mortalityActive rTMS049ClinicalTrials.gov
Total, all-cause mortalitySham rTMS052ClinicalTrials.gov
Total, other adverse eventsActive rTMS149ClinicalTrials.gov
Total, other adverse eventsSham rTMS252ClinicalTrials.gov
Total, serious adverse eventsActive rTMS049ClinicalTrials.gov
Total, serious adverse eventsSham rTMS052ClinicalTrials.gov

Papers 16

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
9252330BACKGROUNDPubMed
10467921BACKGROUNDPubMed
10700332BACKGROUNDPubMed
12470132BACKGROUNDPubMed
15994228BACKGROUNDPubMed
18185107BACKGROUNDPubMed
18653363BACKGROUNDPubMed
19937376BACKGROUNDPubMed
21764215BACKGROUNDPubMed
22613775BACKGROUNDPubMed
22835528BACKGROUNDPubMed
23026956BACKGROUNDPubMed
24828639BACKGROUNDPubMed
25505220BACKGROUNDPubMed
26049149BACKGROUNDPubMed
27469596BACKGROUNDPubMed

Grants 1

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

ProjectTitlePrincipal investigatorsOrganizationFunderFiscal yearsSource
R33AT009305Use of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Augment Hypnotic AnalgesiaWILLIAMS, NOLAN R.; SPIEGEL, DAVIDSTANFORD UNIVERSITYNATIONAL CENTER FOR COMPLEMENTARY & INTEGRATIVE HEALTH2016 to 2018NIH RePORTER

Trial comparisons 2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Active rTMS vs Sham rTMS: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Active rTMS vs Sham rTMS: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests 1

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

TestNamed asSource
Stroop Color-Word TestSecondary outcomeConductCognition

Source 5

FieldValueSource
Releasetrials-2026-11-12-0.4.0ClinicalTrials.gov
Release manifest SHA-2560f4a8d8c48aee2a7573ae0fa94ecbeab70c1adbe449bbc95c424bc7d3e97b9d4ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry capture2026-11-12ClinicalTrials.gov
Results copy, AACT2026-03-23ClinicalTrials.gov
NIH clinical studies file2026-11-13ClinicalTrials.gov

The same record as JSON

Release trials-2026-11-12-0.4.0

ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACT: ClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299 ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

ClinicalTrials.gov: none stated ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project files: Public domain (NIH RePORTER)