ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT02991807

RAD001 and Neurocognition in PTEN Hamartoma Tumor Syndrome

NCT02991807, Phase 1, Phase 2, Completed, Boston Children's Hospital; results first posted 2025-02-17

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. RAD001 and Neurocognition in PTEN Hamartoma Tumor Syndrome. Trials, record NCT02991807. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02991807

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
RAD001 and Neurocognition in PTEN Hamartoma Tumor Syndrome
NCT number
NCT02991807
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1, Phase 2
Enrollment
46 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Boston Children's Hospital
Conditions
PTEN Gene Mutation, PTEN Hamartoma Tumor Syndrome
Interventions
RAD001, Placebo
First posted
2016-12-14
Last updated
2025-02-17
Results first posted
2025-02-17
Limitations and caveats
1\) Small sample size, as recruitment is difficult for rare neurogenetic disorders. 2) A subset of participants was unable to complete all assessments, largely due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Amidst COVID-19 pandemic, participants completed instruments remotely when possible. CPT-3 hit reaction time had a sample size n\<10 at the month 6 timepoint, while the other measures had reasonable sample sizes. 3) Enrollment numbers were insufficient to power subgroup analysis, such as participants with ASD.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes8

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryIncidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability], DropoutThrough study completion, an average of 6 months
The primary endpoint will be safety as measured by study drop-out rate due to side effects, comparing everolimus vs. placebo. We will also determine the frequency of adverse events by type and severity. This section displays participant dropout rate and for what reason.
PrimaryIncidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability], Adverse Events (AEs) Overview (% of Participants)Through study completion, an average of 6 months
The primary endpoint will be safety as measured by study drop-out rate due to side effects, comparing everolimus vs. placebo. We will also determine the frequency of adverse events by type and severity. this section displays the number of participants who experienced an AE and the description of such AEs, pertaining to: 1. Seriousness 2. Grade, 3. Relation to treatment 4. Recovery from AE 5. Category
SecondaryChange at 6 Months in Composite Score6 months
Composite score was based on the following: Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales, 5th Ed (SB-5) non-verbal and verbal working memory standard score; for the SB-5, the minimum score is 40 and the maximum score is 160, where the higher score represents a better outcome. Conners' Continuous Performance Test, 3rd Ed (CPT-3) hit reaction time standard score (reverse coded; standard score generated from T-score); for the CPT-3, the min score is 0 and the max score is 90, where the lower the T-score, the better the outcome. Purdue Pegboard Test (PPT) both hands standard score (generated from T-score); for the PPT, the min score is 20 and the max score is 190, where the higher the T-score, the better the outcome. For the composite score, the higher the score, the better the outcome. The composite score is on the SS metric (M=100, SD=15, min=20, max=180).
SecondaryChange in Processing Speed at 6 Months, Conner's Continuous Performance Test (CPT)-36 monthsProcessing speed will be evaluated using mean reaction time on the Conner's Continuous Performance Test (CPT)-3. This outcome evaluates the change from baseline to 6 months.
SecondaryChange in Fine Motor Skills at 6 Months, Purdue Pegboard6 monthsFine motor skills will be evaluated using the Purdue Pegboard sub-tests average of both hands. This outcome evaluates the change from baseline to 6 months.
SecondaryChange in Global Cognitive Ability at 6 Months, Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales, Fifth Edition (SB-5) or Mullen Scales of Early Learning6 monthsChange in global cognitive ability will be measured by Stanford-Binet 5 or Mullen; Full scale, verbal and nonverbal ability (IQ). This outcome evaluates the change from baseline to 6 months.
SecondaryChange in Motor Functioning at 6 Months, Purdue Pegboard and Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire (DCDQ)6 months
Motor functioning will be measured by the Purdue Pegboard (Pegs): Dominant and non-dominant hand combined standard scores and Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire (DCDQ): Total score. This outcome evaluates the change from baseline to 6 months.
SecondaryChange in Memory, Executive Functioning, Autism Symptoms, Adaptive Behaviors, and Other Behaviors at 6 Months6 months
1. Change in memory measured by Wide Range Assessment of Memory and Learning (WRAML-2) verbal learning core subtest, delayed recall, and recognition scaled scores over 6 months. 2. Change in executive functioning measured by Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF-2) global executive composite standard score over 6 months. 3. Change in autism symptoms measured by Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS-2) total standard score and Repetitive Behaviors Scale (RBS-R) total subscale score over 6 months. 4. Change in adaptive behaviors measured by Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales (VABS-III) adaptive behavior composite standard score over 6 months. 5. Change in other behaviors measured by Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) total problems standard score and Short Sensory Profile (SSP) total score over 6 months.

Outcomes8

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYIncidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability], DropoutThrough study completion, an average of 6 monthsParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
PRIMARYIncidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability], Adverse Events (AEs) Overview (% of Participants)Through study completion, an average of 6 monthspercentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange at 6 Months in Composite Score6 monthsscore on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange in Processing Speed at 6 Months, Conner's Continuous Performance Test (CPT)-36 months
Change in processing speed scores were obtained from Conner's Continuous Performance Test (CPT)-3. Change in processing speed subscale scores were converted to standard scores, where a higher score indicates a better result (range 0-100).
score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange in Fine Motor Skills at 6 Months, Purdue Pegboard6 monthsChange in fine motor skill scores were obtained from Purdue Pegboard. Fine motor skill scores were generated using standard scores, where a higher score indicates a better result (range 0-100).score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange in Global Cognitive Ability at 6 Months, Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales, Fifth Edition (SB-5) or Mullen Scales of Early Learning6 months
Global Cognitive Ability scores were obtained from Stanford Binet 5 or Mullen Scales of Early Learning depending on participant age and testing capability. Global Cognitive Ability subscale scores were converted to standard scores, where a higher score indicates a better result (range 0-100).
score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange in Motor Functioning at 6 Months, Purdue Pegboard and Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire (DCDQ)6 months
Change in motor functioning scores were obtained from Purdue Pegboard Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire (DCDQ). Pegboard motor functioning scores were generated using standard scores, where a higher score indicates a better result (range 0-100). DCDQ motor functioning scores utilize the scale's total score, where higher scores indicate a better result (range 15-75).
score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange in Memory, Executive Functioning, Autism Symptoms, Adaptive Behaviors, and Other Behaviors at 6 Months6 months
WRAML-2 scaled scores (range 1-19, higher = better) BRIEF-2 global executive composite standard score (range 0-100, higher = better) SRS-2 total standard score (range 0-100, higher = better) RBS-R total subscale score (range 0-56, LOWER = better) VABS-III adaptive behavior composite standard score (range 0-100, higher = better) CBCL total problems standard score (range 0-100, higher = better) SSP total score (range 38-190, higher = better)
score on a scaleMEAN

Results by group140

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability], DropoutRAD001Dropout (Total)3Participants
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability], DropoutPlaceboDropout (Total)2Participants
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability], DropoutTotalDropout (Total)5Participants
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability], DropoutRAD001Dropout due to participant/parent request2Participants
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability], DropoutPlaceboDropout due to participant/parent request1Participants
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability], DropoutTotalDropout due to participant/parent request3Participants
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability], DropoutRAD001Dropout due to investigator request0Participants
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability], DropoutPlaceboDropout due to investigator request1Participants
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability], DropoutTotalDropout due to investigator request1Participants
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability], DropoutRAD001Dropout due to other requests1Participants

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDRAD00124
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo22
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDRAD00121
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo20
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDRAD0013
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo2

Adverse events118

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherStomatitisGeneral disordersRAD001324
otherStomatitisGeneral disordersPlacebo022
otherGastrointestinal disordersRAD001124
otherGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo022
otherFatigueGeneral disordersRAD001024
otherFatigueGeneral disordersPlacebo122
otherLow Tolerance for FrustrationPsychiatric disordersRAD001024
otherLow Tolerance for FrustrationPsychiatric disordersPlacebo122
otherAnxietyPsychiatric disordersRAD001124
otherAnxietyPsychiatric disordersPlacebo022

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityRAD001024
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo022
Total, other adverse eventsRAD0012124
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo1322
Total, serious adverse eventsRAD001324
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo022

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
35594551DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants1

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

ProjectTitlePrincipal investigatorsOrganizationFunderFiscal years
U54NS092090Developmental Synaptopathies Associated with TSC, PTEN, SHANK3 and SynGAP1 Pathogenic VariantsSAHIN, MUSTAFABOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITALNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE2014 to 2025

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
RAD001 vs Placebo: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
RAD001 vs Placebo: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests1

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

TestNamed as
Continuous Performance TestSecondary outcome

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02991807

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02991807/results?page=2