ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT02993224

Open-label, Multicenter Study Assessing Preference for Deferasirox Film-coated Tablet Compared to Dispersible Tablet

NCT02993224, Phase 2, Completed, Novartis Pharmaceuticals; results first posted 2021-10-04

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Open-label, Multicenter Study Assessing Preference for Deferasirox Film-coated Tablet Compared to Dispersible Tablet. Trials, record NCT02993224. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02993224

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Open-label, Multicenter Study Assessing Preference for Deferasirox Film-coated Tablet Compared to Dispersible Tablet
NCT number
NCT02993224
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
148 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Conditions
Transfusion-dependent Thalassemia, Non-transfusion-dependent Thalassemia
Interventions
Deferasirox dispersable tablet (DT), Deferasirox film coated tablet (FCT)
First posted
2016-12-15
Last updated
2021-10-04
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2016-002282-61
Results first posted
2021-10-04

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes12

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryNumber of Participants Preferring Deferasirox FCT or DT at Week 48 Based on Preference Questionnaire (Item 2)Week 48
Number of participants preferring deferasirox FCT or DT as measured by preference questionnaire (item 2) at Week 48. The preference questionnaire was a 3-item questionnaire. At Week 48, the second item of the preference questionnaire asked the patients (or parents of young patients from 2 to 9 years old) which medicine did the patient "like best": "Tablet to dissolve in liquid" (=deferasirox DT), "Film coated tablet" (=deferasirox FCT), "Sprinkle powder on food" (=deferasirox FCT) and "I don't know" (=none of the above). The number of participants who selected each response option for item 2 was assessed. The analysis was performed for participants who answered the item 2 of the preference questionnaire.
SecondaryNumber of Participants Preferring Deferasirox FCT, Deferasirox DT or Previous Iron Chelation Therapy at Week 28 Based on Preference Questionnaire (Item 2)Week 28
Number of participants preferring deferasirox FCT, deferasirox DT or previous iron chelation therapy as measured by preference questionnaire (item 2) at Week 28. The preference questionnaire was a 3-item questionnaire. At Week 28, the second item of this questionnaire asked the patients (or parents of young patients from 2 to 9 years old) which medicine did the patient "like best": "Tablet to dissolve in liquid" (=deferasirox DT), "Film coated tablet (taken once a day)" (=deferasirox FCT), "Sprinkle powder on food" (=deferasirox FCT), "Tablet (taken 3 times a day)" (=previous iron chelation therapy), "Injection" (=previous iron chelation therapy) and "I don't know" (=none of the above). The number of participants who selected each response option for item 2 was assessed. This analysis was performed only for patients who had received iron chelation therapy prior to enrolling in the study and who answered the item 2 of the preference questionnaire.
SecondaryNumber of Participants Preferring Deferasirox DT or Previous Iron Chelation Therapy at Week 4 and Week 24 Based on Preference Questionnaire (Item 2)Week 4 and Week 24
Number of participants preferring deferasirox DT or previous iron chelation therapy as measured by preference questionnaire (item 2) at Week 4 and 24. The preference questionnaire was a 3-item questionnaire. At Week 4 and 24, the second item of the preference questionnaire asked the patients (or parents of young patients from 2 to 9 years old) which medicine did the patient "like best": "Tablet to dissolve in liquid" (=deferasirox DT), "Tablet (taken 3 times a day)" (=previous iron chelation therapy), "Injection" (=previous iron chelation therapy) and "I don't know" (=none of the above). The number of participants who selected each response option for item 2 was assessed. This analysis was performed only for patients who had received iron chelation therapy prior to enrolling in the study and who answered item 2 of the preference questionnaire.
SecondaryNumber of Participants Selecting Each Reason for Treatment Preference as Assessed by the Preference Questionnaire at Week 28 and Week 48Week 28 and Week 48
The preference questionnaire was a 3 item questionnaire. The first item asked the patients (or parents of young patients from 2 to 9 years old) which medicine they were taking. The second item asked which of the medicines did the patient "Like best". Finally, the third item asked the patient why he/she preferred the medicine they chose in the second item. The number of participants who selected each response option for item 3 was assessed. Participants could select multiple reasons for treatment preference at each timepoint.
SecondaryPercentage of Consumed Tablet Counts During Deferasirox DT and Deferasirox FCT Treatment PeriodsDeferasirox DT: From Baseline up to Week 24. Deferasirox FCT: From Week 25 up to Week 48
The percentage of consumed tablet counts (compliance) was calculated for each treatment period in the core phase: deferasirox DT (period 1) and deferasirox FCT (period 2). Compliance was defined as the total tablet count consumed divided by total tablet count prescribed and multiplied by 100. Total tablet count consumed was calculated as total number of tablets dispensed minus total number of tablets lost/wasted or returned. Total tablet count prescribed was calculated as the number of tablets that the patient should have taken during this period. If a patient did not return the study drug, the compliance was not calculated.
SecondaryChange Over Time in Aftertaste Score of Palatability QuestionnaireWeek 4, 24, 28 and 48
The palatability questionnaire consisted of 4 items, three items measuring taste and one item measuring aftertaste. The aftertaste item scored on a 5-point response scale with the response option: Very good = 1, Good = 2, Neither good nor bad = 3, Bad = 4, Very bad = 5. This item offered an additional response option of "no aftertaste". The aftertaste score was calculated among participants who had an aftertaste. Higher aftertaste scores indicated a worse aftertaste. For participants less than (\<) 10 years old, an observer palatability questionnaire was administered. Items and scoring algorithm remained the same as for participants greater than or equal to (≥) 10 years old. Change in aftertaste score over time was assessed
SecondaryChange Over Time in Palatability Score of Palatability QuestionnaireWeek 4, 24, 28 and 48
The palatability questionnaire consisted of 4 items, three items measuring taste and one item measuring aftertaste. Among the taste items, first one measured taste on a 5-point response scale. The other two items measured what happened after taking the medicine and how the perceived amount of liquid taken with the medicine was. Responses to these 3 items were combined and converted into a single palatability score using a scoring matrix: each combination of responses on each of 3 items corresponded to a predefined palatability score. E.g. if a participant responded "bad" to item 1, "vomited \<30min" to item 2 and "not enough" to item 3, then the palatability score assigned was 0. This score ranged from 0 to 11; higher scores indicated better palatability. For participants \<10 years old, an observer palatability questionnaire was administered. Items and scoring algorithm were the same as for participants ≥10 years old. Change in palatability score over time was assessed
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Adherence Domain Score of Modified Satisfaction With Iron Chelation (mSICT) QuestionnaireBaseline (week 2 or, if missing, week 3), week 24, 28 and 48
The mSICT patient reported outcome (PRO) consisted of 15 items that represented 3 domains: Adherence, Preference, and Concerns. The adherence domain score consisted of 6 adherence items, measured using a 5-point response scale. The adherence score was calculated by summing these 6 items, with scores ranging from 6 to 30. Higher scores indicated worse adherence. For participants \<10 years old, an observer version (ObsRO) was administered. The adherence score remained the same as for participants ≥10 years old.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Preference Domain Score of Modified Satisfaction With Iron Chelation (mSICT) QuestionnaireBaseline (week 2 or, if missing, week 3), week 24, 28 and 48
The mSICT patient reported outcome (PRO) consisted of 15 items that represented 3 domains: Adherence, Preference, and Concerns. The preference/satisfaction domain score consisted of 2 preference/satisfaction items, measured using a 5-point response scale. The preference score was calculated by summing these 2 items, with scores ranging from 2 to 10. Higher scores indicated worse satisfaction. For participants \< 10 years old, an observer version (ObsRO) was administered. Preference score remained the same as for participants ≥ 10 years old.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Concerns Domain Score of Modified Satisfaction With Iron Chelation (mSICT) QuestionnaireBaseline (week 2 or, if missing, week 3), week 24, 28 and 48
The mSICT patient reported outcome (PRO) consisted of 15 items that represented 3 domains: Adherence, Preference, and Concerns. The concerns domain score consisted of 3 items to address any concerns or worries with the medication. All 3 items were measured on a 5-point response scale. The concerns score was calculated by summing the 3 items, with scores ranging from 3 to 15. Higher scores indicated fewer concerns. For participants \< 10 years old, an observer version (ObsRO) was administered. Concerns score remained the same as for participants ≥ 10 years old.

Outcomes12

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYNumber of Participants Preferring Deferasirox FCT or DT at Week 48 Based on Preference Questionnaire (Item 2)Week 48
Full Analysis Set (FAS): Participants to whom study treatment was assigned and who received at least one dose of each study treatment (DT and FCT). Only participants with available data for this outcome measure were included in this analysis.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants Preferring Deferasirox FCT, Deferasirox DT or Previous Iron Chelation Therapy at Week 28 Based on Preference Questionnaire (Item 2)Week 28
Participants in the FAS \[to whom study treatment was assigned and who received at least one dose of each study treatment (DT and FCT)\] and who received iron chelation therapy prior to enrolling in the study. Only participants with available data for this outcome measure were included in this analysis.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants Preferring Deferasirox DT or Previous Iron Chelation Therapy at Week 4 and Week 24 Based on Preference Questionnaire (Item 2)Week 4 and Week 24
Participants in the FAS \[to whom study treatment was assigned and who received at least one dose of each study treatment (DT and FCT)\] and who received iron chelation therapy prior to enrolling in the study. Number analyzed signified number of participants with available data for this outcome measure at specified timepoints.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants Selecting Each Reason for Treatment Preference as Assessed by the Preference Questionnaire at Week 28 and Week 48Week 28 and Week 48FAS: Participants to whom study treatment was assigned and who received at least one dose of each study treatment (DT and FCT).ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYPercentage of Consumed Tablet Counts During Deferasirox DT and Deferasirox FCT Treatment PeriodsDeferasirox DT: From Baseline up to Week 24. Deferasirox FCT: From Week 25 up to Week 48
FAS: Participants to whom study treatment was assigned and who received at least one dose of each study treatment (DT and FCT). Number analyzed signified number of participants with available data for this outcome measure for each treatment period
Percentage of tablet countsMEAN
SECONDARYChange Over Time in Aftertaste Score of Palatability QuestionnaireWeek 4, 24, 28 and 48
FAS: Participants to whom study treatment was assigned and who received at least one dose of each study treatment (DT and FCT). Number analyzed signified number of participants with available data for this outcome measure at specified timepoints.
Score on a ScaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange Over Time in Palatability Score of Palatability QuestionnaireWeek 4, 24, 28 and 48
FAS: Participants to whom study treatment was assigned and who received at least one dose of each study treatment (DT and FCT). Number analyzed signified number of participants with available data for this outcome measure at specified timepoints.
Score on a ScaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Adherence Domain Score of Modified Satisfaction With Iron Chelation (mSICT) QuestionnaireBaseline (week 2 or, if missing, week 3), week 24, 28 and 48
FAS: Participants to whom study treatment was assigned and who received at least one dose of each study treatment (DT and FCT). Number analyzed signified number of participants with available data for this outcome measure at specified timepoints
Score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Preference Domain Score of Modified Satisfaction With Iron Chelation (mSICT) QuestionnaireBaseline (week 2 or, if missing, week 3), week 24, 28 and 48
FAS: Participants to whom study treatment was assigned and who received at least one dose of each study treatment (DT and FCT). Number analyzed signified number of participants with available data for this outcome measure at specified timepoints
Score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Concerns Domain Score of Modified Satisfaction With Iron Chelation (mSICT) QuestionnaireBaseline (week 2 or, if missing, week 3), week 24, 28 and 48
FAS: Participants to whom study treatment was assigned and who received at least one dose of each study treatment (DT and FCT). Number analyzed signified number of participants with available data for this outcome measure at specified timepoints
Score on a scaleMEAN

Results by group102

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Number of Participants Preferring Deferasirox FCT or DT at Week 48 Based on Preference Questionnaire (Item 2)Deferasirox DT Followed by Deferasirox FCTPreference for deferasirox DT10Participants
Number of Participants Preferring Deferasirox FCT or DT at Week 48 Based on Preference Questionnaire (Item 2)Deferasirox DT Followed by Deferasirox FCTPreference for deferasirox FCT121Participants
Number of Participants Preferring Deferasirox FCT or DT at Week 48 Based on Preference Questionnaire (Item 2)Deferasirox DT Followed by Deferasirox FCTPreference for none of the above3Participants
Number of Participants Preferring Deferasirox FCT, Deferasirox DT or Previous Iron Chelation Therapy at Week 28 Based on Preference Questionnaire (Item 2)Deferasirox DT Followed by Deferasirox FCTPreference for deferasirox DT6Participants
Number of Participants Preferring Deferasirox FCT, Deferasirox DT or Previous Iron Chelation Therapy at Week 28 Based on Preference Questionnaire (Item 2)Deferasirox DT Followed by Deferasirox FCTPreference for deferasirox FCT60Participants
Number of Participants Preferring Deferasirox FCT, Deferasirox DT or Previous Iron Chelation Therapy at Week 28 Based on Preference Questionnaire (Item 2)Deferasirox DT Followed by Deferasirox FCTPreference for previous iron chelation therapy3Participants
Number of Participants Preferring Deferasirox FCT, Deferasirox DT or Previous Iron Chelation Therapy at Week 28 Based on Preference Questionnaire (Item 2)Deferasirox DT Followed by Deferasirox FCTPreference for none of the above0Participants
Number of Participants Preferring Deferasirox DT or Previous Iron Chelation Therapy at Week 4 and Week 24 Based on Preference Questionnaire (Item 2)Deferasirox DT Followed by Deferasirox FCTWeek 4 / Preference for deferasirox DT57Participants
Number of Participants Preferring Deferasirox DT or Previous Iron Chelation Therapy at Week 4 and Week 24 Based on Preference Questionnaire (Item 2)Deferasirox DT Followed by Deferasirox FCTWeek 4 / Preference for previous iron chelation therapy11Participants
Number of Participants Preferring Deferasirox DT or Previous Iron Chelation Therapy at Week 4 and Week 24 Based on Preference Questionnaire (Item 2)Deferasirox DT Followed by Deferasirox FCTWeek 4 / Preference for none of the above2Participants

Participant flow9

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Core Phase - Period 1STARTEDDeferasirox DT Followed by Deferasirox FCT148
Core Phase - Period 1COMPLETEDDeferasirox DT Followed by Deferasirox FCT140
Core Phase - Period 1NOT COMPLETEDDeferasirox DT Followed by Deferasirox FCT8
Core Phase- Period 2STARTEDDeferasirox DT Followed by Deferasirox FCT140
Core Phase- Period 2COMPLETEDDeferasirox DT Followed by Deferasirox FCT136
Core Phase- Period 2NOT COMPLETEDDeferasirox DT Followed by Deferasirox FCT4
Extension PhaseSTARTEDDeferasirox DT Followed by Deferasirox FCT116
Extension PhaseCOMPLETEDDeferasirox DT Followed by Deferasirox FCT80
Extension PhaseNOT COMPLETEDDeferasirox DT Followed by Deferasirox FCT36

Adverse events147

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersDeferasirox DT (Core Phase)16148
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersDeferasirox FCT (Core Phase)5140
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersDeferasirox FCT (Extension Phase)2116
otherPyrexiaGeneral disordersDeferasirox DT (Core Phase)7148
otherPyrexiaGeneral disordersDeferasirox FCT (Core Phase)8140
otherPyrexiaGeneral disordersDeferasirox FCT (Extension Phase)5116
otherHepatomegalyHepatobiliary disordersDeferasirox DT (Core Phase)8148
otherHepatomegalyHepatobiliary disordersDeferasirox FCT (Core Phase)0140
otherHepatomegalyHepatobiliary disordersDeferasirox FCT (Extension Phase)0116
otherNasopharyngitisInfections and infestationsDeferasirox DT (Core Phase)6148

Adverse event totals9

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityDeferasirox DT (Core Phase)0148
Total, all-cause mortalityDeferasirox FCT (Core Phase)0140
Total, all-cause mortalityDeferasirox FCT (Extension Phase)0116
Total, other adverse eventsDeferasirox DT (Core Phase)82148
Total, other adverse eventsDeferasirox FCT (Core Phase)59140
Total, other adverse eventsDeferasirox FCT (Extension Phase)49116
Total, serious adverse eventsDeferasirox DT (Core Phase)13148
Total, serious adverse eventsDeferasirox FCT (Core Phase)6140
Total, serious adverse eventsDeferasirox FCT (Extension Phase)16116

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02993224

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02993224/results?page=2