ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT02993822

A Dose-ranging Study of Orvepitant in Patients With Chronic Refractory Cough

NCT02993822, Phase 2, Completed, Nerre Therapeutics Ltd.; results first posted 2022-04-26

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Dose-ranging Study of Orvepitant in Patients With Chronic Refractory Cough. Trials, record NCT02993822. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02993822

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Dose-ranging Study of Orvepitant in Patients With Chronic Refractory Cough
NCT number
NCT02993822
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
315 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Nerre Therapeutics Ltd.
Conditions
Chronic Refractory Cough
Interventions
Orvepitant Maleate, Placebo
First posted
2016-12-15
Last updated
2022-04-26
Results first posted
2022-04-26

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes27

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Awake Objective Cough FrequencyBaseline to Week 12Objective cough frequency measured by ambulatory cough monitoring device
SecondaryChange in Awake Objective Cough Frequency at Week 2 Compared to BaselineBaseline to Week 2Objective cough frequency measured by ambulatory cough monitoring device
SecondaryChange in Awake Objective Cough Frequency at Week 4 Compared to BaselineWeek 4Objective cough frequency measured by ambulatory cough monitoring device
SecondaryChange in the Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) at Week 2 Compared to BaselineBaseline to Week 2
The Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) is a 19 item questionnaire that assessed cough related quality of life. It has three domains (physical, psychological and social) and subjects were asked to complete it based on their experience in a recall period of 2 weeks. The total score range is 3 to 21 and domain scores each range from 1 to 7; a higher score indicated a better quality of life. Subjects completed the LCQ whilst in the clinic at baseline/Day 1 (pre dose) and at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12.
SecondaryChange in the Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) at Week 4 Compared to BaselineBaseline to Week 4
The Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) is a 19 item questionnaire that assessed cough related quality of life. It has three domains (physical, psychological and social) and subjects were asked to complete it based on their experience in a recall period of 4 weeks. The total score range is 3 to 21 and domain scores each range from 1 to 7; a higher score indicated a better quality of life. Subjects completed the LCQ whilst in the clinic at baseline/Day 1 (pre dose) and at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12.
SecondaryChange in the Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) at Week 8 Compared to BaselineBaseline to Week 8
The Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) is a 19 item questionnaire that assessed cough related quality of life. It has three domains (physical, psychological and social) and subjects were asked to complete it based on their experience in a recall period of 8 weeks. The total score range is 3 to 21 and domain scores each range from 1 to 7; a higher score indicated a better quality of life. Subjects completed the LCQ whilst in the clinic at baseline/Day 1 (pre dose) and at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12.
SecondaryChange in the Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) at Week 12 Compared to BaselineBaseline to Week 12
The Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) is a 19 item questionnaire that assessed cough related quality of life. It has three domains (physical, psychological and social) and subjects were asked to complete it based on their experience in a recall period of 12 weeks. The total score range is 3 to 21 and domain scores each range from 1 to 7; a higher score indicated a better quality of life. Subjects completed the LCQ whilst in the clinic at baseline/Day 1 (pre dose) and at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12.
SecondaryChange in the Cough Severity Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Week 2 Compared to Baseline - Day-timeBaseline to Week 2
The cough VAS is a 100 mm scale on which subjects indicated their severity of cough over the previous 24 hours, both during the day-time and during night time separately. The VAS ranged from "no cough" (0 mm) on the left to "worst cough" (100 mm) on the right. Subjects completed the cough severity VAS at baseline/Day 1 (pre dose) and at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12.
SecondaryChange in the Cough Severity Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Week 4 Compared to Baseline - Day-timeBaseline to Week 4
The cough VAS is a 100 mm scale on which subjects indicated their severity of cough over the previous 24 hours, both during the day-time and during night time separately. The VAS ranged from "no cough" (0 mm) on the left to "worst cough" (100 mm) on the right. Subjects completed the cough severity VAS at baseline/Day 1 (pre dose) and at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12.
SecondaryChange in the Cough Severity Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Week 8 Compared to Baseline - Day-timeBaseline to Week 8
The cough VAS is a 100 mm scale on which subjects indicated their severity of cough over the previous 24 hours, both during the day-time and during night time separately. The VAS ranged from "no cough" (0 mm) on the left to "worst cough" (100 mm) on the right. Subjects completed the cough severity VAS at baseline/Day 1 (pre dose) and at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12.

Outcomes27

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Awake Objective Cough FrequencyBaseline to Week 12The number of participants analyzed differs from the overall subject disposition as it includes only participants with data available for the comparison (i.e. some participants have missing data).coughs per hour (log transformed)MEAN
SECONDARYChange in Awake Objective Cough Frequency at Week 2 Compared to BaselineBaseline to Week 2The number of participants analyzed differs from the overall subject disposition as it includes only participants with data available for the comparison (i.e. some participants have missing data).coughs per hour (log transformed)MEAN
SECONDARYChange in Awake Objective Cough Frequency at Week 4 Compared to BaselineWeek 4The number of participants analyzed differs from the overall subject disposition as it includes only participants with data available for the comparison (i.e. some participants have missing data).coughs per hour (log transformed)MEAN
SECONDARYChange in the Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) at Week 2 Compared to BaselineBaseline to Week 2The number of participants analyzed differs from the overall subject disposition as it includes only participants with data available for the comparison (i.e. some participants have missing data).Total scoreMEAN
SECONDARYChange in the Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) at Week 4 Compared to BaselineBaseline to Week 4The number of participants analyzed differs from the overall subject disposition as it includes only participants with data available for the comparison (i.e. some participants have missing data).Total scoreMEAN
SECONDARYChange in the Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) at Week 8 Compared to BaselineBaseline to Week 8The number of participants analyzed differs from the overall subject disposition as it includes only participants with data available for the comparison (i.e. some participants have missing data).Total scoreMEAN
SECONDARYChange in the Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) at Week 12 Compared to BaselineBaseline to Week 12The number of participants analyzed differs from the overall subject disposition as it includes only participants with data available for the comparison (i.e. some participants have missing data).Total scoreMEAN
SECONDARYChange in the Cough Severity Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Week 2 Compared to Baseline - Day-timeBaseline to Week 2The number of participants analyzed differs from the overall subject disposition as it includes only participants with data available for the comparison (i.e. some participants have missing data).ScoreMEAN
SECONDARYChange in the Cough Severity Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Week 4 Compared to Baseline - Day-timeBaseline to Week 4The number of participants analyzed differs from the overall subject disposition as it includes only participants with data available for the comparison (i.e. some participants have missing data).ScoreMEAN
SECONDARYChange in the Cough Severity Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Week 8 Compared to Baseline - Day-timeBaseline to Week 8The number of participants analyzed differs from the overall subject disposition as it includes only participants with data available for the comparison (i.e. some participants have missing data).ScoreMEAN

Results by group172

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Awake Objective Cough FrequencyOrvepitant 10mg-0.185Standard Deviation 0.3258coughs per hour (log transformed)
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Awake Objective Cough FrequencyOrvepitant 20mg-0.192Standard Deviation 0.3405coughs per hour (log transformed)
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Awake Objective Cough FrequencyOrvepitant 30mg-0.271Standard Deviation 0.4055coughs per hour (log transformed)
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Awake Objective Cough FrequencyPlacebo-0.243Standard Deviation 0.3225coughs per hour (log transformed)
Change in Awake Objective Cough Frequency at Week 2 Compared to BaselineOrvepitant 10mg-0.180Standard Deviation 0.2791coughs per hour (log transformed)
Change in Awake Objective Cough Frequency at Week 2 Compared to BaselineOrvepitant 20mg-0.181Standard Deviation 0.3142coughs per hour (log transformed)
Change in Awake Objective Cough Frequency at Week 2 Compared to BaselineOrvepitant 30mg-0.215Standard Deviation 0.2515coughs per hour (log transformed)
Change in Awake Objective Cough Frequency at Week 2 Compared to BaselinePlacebo-0.139Standard Deviation 0.2892coughs per hour (log transformed)
Change in Awake Objective Cough Frequency at Week 4 Compared to BaselineOrvepitant 10mg-0.188Standard Deviation 0.3292coughs per hour (log transformed)
Change in Awake Objective Cough Frequency at Week 4 Compared to BaselineOrvepitant 20mg-0.231Standard Deviation 0.3665coughs per hour (log transformed)

Participant flow12

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDOrvepitant 10mg79
Overall StudySTARTEDOrvepitant 20mg78
Overall StudySTARTEDOrvepitant 30mg79
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo79
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDOrvepitant 10mg69
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDOrvepitant 20mg74
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDOrvepitant 30mg69
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo75
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDOrvepitant 10mg10
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDOrvepitant 20mg4

Adverse events76

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherOropharyngeal painRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disordersOrvepitant 10mg5796
otherOropharyngeal painRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disordersOrvepitant 20mg1782
otherOropharyngeal painRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disordersOrvepitant 30mg4795
otherOropharyngeal painRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disordersPlacebo3793
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersOrvepitant 10mg7797
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersOrvepitant 20mg107819
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersOrvepitant 30mg7799
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersPlacebo4796
otherDizzinessNervous system disordersOrvepitant 10mg5795
otherDizzinessNervous system disordersOrvepitant 20mg4784

Adverse event totals12

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityOrvepitant 10mg079
Total, all-cause mortalityOrvepitant 20mg078
Total, all-cause mortalityOrvepitant 30mg079
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo079
Total, other adverse eventsOrvepitant 10mg6379
Total, other adverse eventsOrvepitant 20mg4878
Total, other adverse eventsOrvepitant 30mg5379
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo4079
Total, serious adverse eventsOrvepitant 10mg179
Total, serious adverse eventsOrvepitant 20mg178

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02993822

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02993822/registered?page=2