ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT03003000

Ibuprofen/Caffeine Lower Back or Neck Pain Study

NCT03003000, Phase 3, Completed, Boehringer Ingelheim; results first posted 2019-06-07

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Ibuprofen/Caffeine Lower Back or Neck Pain Study. Trials, record NCT03003000. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT03003000

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Ibuprofen/Caffeine Lower Back or Neck Pain Study
NCT number
NCT03003000
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
635 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Boehringer Ingelheim
Conditions
Back Pain, Neck Pain
Interventions
ibuprofen, caffeine, placebo
First posted
2016-12-26
Last updated
2019-06-07
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2016-000902-12
Results first posted
2019-06-07

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes7

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange in Pain on Movement (POM) With Regard to the Worst Procedure (WP) Between Baseline and Day 2 (Morning, 2 Hours After Drug Intake)Baseline and Day 2
The change in pain on movement (POM) with regard to the worst procedure (WP), i.e. the procedure with the highest pain score at baseline (POMwp), between baseline (morning of Day 1, pre-dosing) and Day 2 (morning, 2 hour (h) after drug intake). POM was assessed by the patient at the performance of one standardized, muscle group specific movement and was measured by a numerical rating scale ranging from 0 = 'no pain'to 10 = 'worst pain possible for this condition'. The procedure resulting in highest POM at baseline (worst procedure, POMWP) was repeated for an individual patient. If 2 or more procedures gave the same highest POM, the patient was asked which of the procedures giving the highest POM scores he/she considered the most unpleasant. Change in POMwp was calculated as baseline POMwp - POMwp at Day 2 - indicating a reduction in POMwp, where the result is positive.
SecondaryThe Area Under the Curve (AUC) for Pain on Movement (POM) With Regard to the Worst Procedure (POMwp) Between Baseline and Day 4 (Morning) (POMwpAUC72hour (h))Baseline, Day 1, Day 2 and Day 4 (morning)
This is a key secondary endpoint. The area under the curve (AUC) for pain on movement (POM) with regard to the worst procedure (POMwp) between baseline and Day 4 (morning), (POMwpAUC72h ). POM was assessed by the patient at the performance of one standardized, muscle group specific movement and was measured by a numerical rating scale ranging from 0 = 'no pain'to 10 = 'worst pain possible for this condition'. A higher AUC value indicates higher POMwp
SecondaryThe Area Under the Curve (AUC) for the Procedure With the Highest Pain Score at Baseline (POMWP) Between Baseline and Day 6 (Morning) (POM(WP)AUC(120h))Baseline, Day 1, Day 2, Day 4 and Day 6 (morning)
This is a key secondary endpoint. The area under the curve for pain on movement with regard to the worst procedure between baseline and Day 6 (morning) (POM(WP)AUC(120h). POM was assessed by the patient at the performance of one standardized, muscle group specific movement and was measured by a numerical rating scale ranging from 0 = 'no pain'to 10 = 'worst pain possible for this condition'. A higher AUC value indicates higher POMwp.
SecondaryChange in Pressure Algometry Between Baseline and Day 2 (Morning, 2 Hour After Drug Intake)Baseline and Day 2 (morning, 2 h after drug intake)
Change in pressure algometry between baseline and Day 2 (morning, 2 h after drug intake). Pressure algometry was determined by the investigator as the pressure value (N/cm2) at a defined trigger point which is located in the area of POMWP. The measurement was performed by using a Somedic Algometer (Somedic AB, Sweden) or an equivalent calibrated and certified device. The pain reaction was determined by placing the algometer on the trigger point, i.e. an area of 1 cm² for which the patient indicated most painful tenderness. The pressure was constantly increased until the patient asked not to increase the pressure anymore. Upon this pain reaction, the corresponding pressure value was documented in the Electronic case report form (eCRF). The trigger point was to be marked with a ball pen to be able to repeat the subsequent assessment at the same position. Change in pressure was calculated as baseline pressure - pressure at Day 2, with a negative result indicating an improvement.
SecondaryGlobal Assessment of Efficacy by the Patient at the End of Treatment (Morning of Day 6)At the end of treatment (morning of Day 6)
Global assessment of efficacy by the patient at the end of treatment (morning of Day 6) is presented. The patient/investigator assessed the overall efficacy of the trial treatment on a 4-point verbal rating scale by answering the question: "How would you rate the overall effect of the trial medication for relieving back or neck pain?" (0 = poor; 1 = fair; 2 = good; 3 = very good).
SecondaryNumber of Patients With a Decrease in POMwp of at Least 30% or 50% Between Baseline and Day 2 (Morning, 2 h After Drug Intake)Baseline and Day 2 (morning, 2 h after drug intake)Number of patients with a decrease in POMwp of at least 30% or 50% between baseline and Day 2 (morning, 2 h after drug intake.
SecondaryTime to First Meaningful POMwp Relief Within 2 h After the First Dose of Trial MedicationWithin 2 h after the first dose of trial medication
Time to event analysis of patients with first meaningful POMwp relief within 2 h after the first dose of trial medication. The percentage of observed patients with a meaningful POMwp relief within 2 h after the first dose of trial medication was reported. The procedure which resulted in the highest POM at baseline (POMwp) was repeated by the investigator 10, 20, 30, 60 and 120 min after the first dose of trial medication. The POMwp relief score (POMwpRS) was assessed by the patient at each of these time points by using a 5-point verbal rating scale (0 = no POMwp relief; 1 = little or perceptible POMwp relief; 2 = meaningful POMwp relief; 3 = a lot of POMwp relief; 4 = complete POMwp relief). The time to first meaningful POMWP relief was the earliest assessment time point after the first application of the trial medication at which the patient reported a score of ≥2.

Outcomes7

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange in Pain on Movement (POM) With Regard to the Worst Procedure (WP) Between Baseline and Day 2 (Morning, 2 Hours After Drug Intake)Baseline and Day 2
Full analysis set (FAS): FAS comprised all patients in the TS who provided a baseline value for POMWP at Visit 1 (before drug intake) and at least 1 POMWP post-treatment value at Visit 1 (Day 1 morning, 2 h after drug intake) and at Visit 2 (Day 2, morning, 2 h after drug intake).
Unit on scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYThe Area Under the Curve (AUC) for Pain on Movement (POM) With Regard to the Worst Procedure (POMwp) Between Baseline and Day 4 (Morning) (POMwpAUC72hour (h))Baseline, Day 1, Day 2 and Day 4 (morning)Treated Set (TS): The TS comprised all randomised patients who took at least 1 dose of trial medication.Unit on scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYThe Area Under the Curve (AUC) for the Procedure With the Highest Pain Score at Baseline (POMWP) Between Baseline and Day 6 (Morning) (POM(WP)AUC(120h))Baseline, Day 1, Day 2, Day 4 and Day 6 (morning)TSUnit on scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange in Pressure Algometry Between Baseline and Day 2 (Morning, 2 Hour After Drug Intake)Baseline and Day 2 (morning, 2 h after drug intake)TSnewton/centimeter² (N/cm^2)LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYGlobal Assessment of Efficacy by the Patient at the End of Treatment (Morning of Day 6)At the end of treatment (morning of Day 6)TS including participants with available data for global assessment of efficacyParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Patients With a Decrease in POMwp of at Least 30% or 50% Between Baseline and Day 2 (Morning, 2 h After Drug Intake)Baseline and Day 2 (morning, 2 h after drug intake)TSParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYTime to First Meaningful POMwp Relief Within 2 h After the First Dose of Trial MedicationWithin 2 h after the first dose of trial medicationTSPercentage of participantsNUMBER

Results by group48

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change in Pain on Movement (POM) With Regard to the Worst Procedure (WP) Between Baseline and Day 2 (Morning, 2 Hours After Drug Intake)Placebo1.712Standard Error 0.1422Unit on scale
Change in Pain on Movement (POM) With Regard to the Worst Procedure (WP) Between Baseline and Day 2 (Morning, 2 Hours After Drug Intake)Ibuprofen1.998Standard Error 0.1042Unit on scale
Change in Pain on Movement (POM) With Regard to the Worst Procedure (WP) Between Baseline and Day 2 (Morning, 2 Hours After Drug Intake)Ibuprofen and Caffeine1.869Standard Error 0.1030Unit on scale
The Area Under the Curve (AUC) for Pain on Movement (POM) With Regard to the Worst Procedure (POMwp) Between Baseline and Day 4 (Morning) (POMwpAUC72hour (h))Placebo4.800Standard Error 0.1266Unit on scale
The Area Under the Curve (AUC) for Pain on Movement (POM) With Regard to the Worst Procedure (POMwp) Between Baseline and Day 4 (Morning) (POMwpAUC72hour (h))Ibuprofen4.461Standard Error 0.0942Unit on scale
The Area Under the Curve (AUC) for Pain on Movement (POM) With Regard to the Worst Procedure (POMwp) Between Baseline and Day 4 (Morning) (POMwpAUC72hour (h))Ibuprofen and Caffeine4.512Standard Error 0.0931Unit on scale
The Area Under the Curve (AUC) for the Procedure With the Highest Pain Score at Baseline (POMWP) Between Baseline and Day 6 (Morning) (POM(WP)AUC(120h))Placebo4.175Standard Error 0.1334Unit on scale
The Area Under the Curve (AUC) for the Procedure With the Highest Pain Score at Baseline (POMWP) Between Baseline and Day 6 (Morning) (POM(WP)AUC(120h))Ibuprofen3.718Standard Error 0.0992Unit on scale
The Area Under the Curve (AUC) for the Procedure With the Highest Pain Score at Baseline (POMWP) Between Baseline and Day 6 (Morning) (POM(WP)AUC(120h))Ibuprofen and Caffeine3.776Standard Error 0.0981Unit on scale
Change in Pressure Algometry Between Baseline and Day 2 (Morning, 2 Hour After Drug Intake)Placebo-3.734Standard Error 0.6107newton/centimeter² (N/cm^2)

Participant flow9

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo126
Overall StudySTARTEDIbuprofen253
Overall StudySTARTEDIbuprofen and Caffeine256
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo121
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDIbuprofen249
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDIbuprofen and Caffeine251
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo5
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDIbuprofen4
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDIbuprofen and Caffeine5

Adverse events0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

None in this release.

Adverse event totals9

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo0126
Total, all-cause mortalityIbuprofen0253
Total, all-cause mortalityIbuprofen and Caffeine0256
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo0126
Total, other adverse eventsIbuprofen0253
Total, other adverse eventsIbuprofen and Caffeine0256
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo0126
Total, serious adverse eventsIbuprofen0253
Total, serious adverse eventsIbuprofen and Caffeine0256

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03003000

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03003000/results?page=2