ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT03008889

A Feasibility Study of N-acetylcysteine for Self-injurious Behavior in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder

NCT03008889, Phase 2, Completed, Emory University; results first posted 2020-12-16

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Feasibility Study of N-acetylcysteine for Self-injurious Behavior in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder. Trials, record NCT03008889. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT03008889

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Feasibility Study of N-acetylcysteine for Self-injurious Behavior in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder
NCT number
NCT03008889
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
8 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Emory University
Conditions
Autism Spectrum Disorder
Interventions
N-acetylcysteine, Placebo
First posted
2017-01-04
Last updated
2021-01-26
Results first posted
2020-12-16

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes10

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercentage of Participants Randomized12 months (throughout the duration of the study)Goal: randomize 1.75 participants per month
PrimaryAttrition Rate12 months (throughout the duration of the study)Attrition rate is defined as the percent of subjects who did not complete the study. Goal:less than 15% (to indicate that study was acceptable to participants and parents).
PrimaryStudy Medication Compliance12 months (throughout the duration of the study)Goal: at least 70% treatment compliance (tablet counts and drug dairies).
PrimarySuccessful Collection of Outcome Measures12 months (throughout the duration of the study)Goal: at least 80% collection of essential outcome data to demonstrate the feasibility of data collection procedures.
PrimaryParent Satisfaction RatingWeek 9 (at the end of the study intervention)Goal: at least 80% of parents will agree or strongly agree when asked in an anonymous survey that they would recommend the study and the study treatment to other parents of children with ASD and SIB.
SecondaryPositive Predictive Value of Screening Method of Classifying Self-injurious Behavior (SIB) by Type.12 months (duration of the study)
Goal: at least 75% positive predictive value of our screening method to classify children with automatically maintained self-injurious behavior using a semi-structured interview at screening compared to the findings of five- to six-hour functional analysis at baseline. Only children who appear to have automatically maintained SIB will be referred for the baseline evaluation. Demonstrating a high positive predictive value for the screening method is a necessary prerequisite for launching a larger study. Using the formula: Positive Predictive Value (PPV) = screen positive and true cases ÷ all positive screens, a value of 75% or greater would indicate success of the screening method used.
SecondaryAberrant Behavior Checklist Irritability Subscale Score at Baseline and 9 Weeks Post-interventionBaseline, Week 9
The Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC) is a commonly used 58-item parent-rated measure of overall behavioral problems. The Irritability subscale is comprised of 15 items reflecting tantrums, aggression and self injury. Range is 0 to 45, higher scores indicate higher severity. As a preliminary efficacy outcome, it was calculated the average score at baseline and Week 9 post-intervention.
SecondaryNumber of Self-Injurious Behavior EventsBaseline, Week 9
Direct observation of the frequency of SIB was collected at baseline in a separate observational session after completing the functional analysis and again at Week 9. Investigators set a benchmark of an average decline in the frequency of SIB of 50% within the NAC group.
SecondaryChange in Clinical Global Impression (CGI-I) Scale at 9 Weeks Post-interventionWeek 9
The Clinical Global Impression (CGI-I) scale is a 7-item scale from 1 (Very Much Improved) through 4 (No Change) to 7 (Very Much Worse). By convention, scores of 2 (Much Improved) or 1 (Very Much Improved) are used to define positive response.
SecondaryChange in Biomarkers and Possible Mechanisms of Action of NAC in Children With ASD.Baseline, Week 9
Changes amino acid levels before and after NAC treatment: cysteine/cystine and glutathione/glutathione disulfide (GSH/GSSG) ratios (antioxidant effects), glutamate and glutamate/glutamine ratio (glutamate signaling) and GABA levels.

Outcomes10

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercentage of Participants Randomized12 months (throughout the duration of the study)percentage of participants randomizedNUMBER
PRIMARYAttrition Rate12 months (throughout the duration of the study)percentage of participantsNUMBER
PRIMARYStudy Medication Compliance12 months (throughout the duration of the study)ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
PRIMARYSuccessful Collection of Outcome Measures12 months (throughout the duration of the study)ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
PRIMARYParent Satisfaction RatingWeek 9 (at the end of the study intervention)ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYPositive Predictive Value of Screening Method of Classifying Self-injurious Behavior (SIB) by Type.12 months (duration of the study)
Screening method for classifying self-injurious behavior (SIB) happened before randomization. Of the 8 participants that consented, one was excluded due to asthma. Results show participants that were classified with repetitive SIB.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYAberrant Behavior Checklist Irritability Subscale Score at Baseline and 9 Weeks Post-interventionBaseline, Week 9score on a scaleNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Self-Injurious Behavior EventsBaseline, Week 9Self injurious eventsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange in Clinical Global Impression (CGI-I) Scale at 9 Weeks Post-interventionWeek 9score on a scaleNUMBER
SECONDARYChange in Biomarkers and Possible Mechanisms of Action of NAC in Children With ASD.Baseline, Week 9
Blood samples were collected and processed in accordance with the protocol. In consultation with our biochemist collaborator, we did not proceed with the multiple laboratory procedures to analyze the sample. Our collaborator indicated that the findings would not be interpretable because we only had two subjects.

Results by group21

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percentage of Participants RandomizedParticipants Taking NAC100percentage of participants randomized
Percentage of Participants RandomizedParticipants Taking Placebo100percentage of participants randomized
Attrition RateParticipants Taking NAC0percentage of participants
Attrition RateParticipants Taking Placebo0percentage of participants
Study Medication ComplianceParticipants Taking NAC1Participants
Study Medication ComplianceParticipants Taking Placebo1Participants
Successful Collection of Outcome MeasuresParticipants Taking NAC1Participants
Successful Collection of Outcome MeasuresParticipants Taking Placebo1Participants
Parent Satisfaction RatingParticipants Taking NAC1Participants
Parent Satisfaction RatingParticipants Taking Placebo1Participants

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDParticipants Taking NAC1
Overall StudySTARTEDParticipants Taking Placebo1
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDParticipants Taking NAC1
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDParticipants Taking Placebo1
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDParticipants Taking NAC0
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDParticipants Taking Placebo0

Adverse events26

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherEarly morning awakeningGeneral disordersParticipants Taking NAC111
otherEarly morning awakeningGeneral disordersParticipants Taking Placebo010
otherDrowsinessGeneral disordersParticipants Taking NAC111
otherDrowsinessGeneral disordersParticipants Taking Placebo010
otherFeverGeneral disordersParticipants Taking NAC111
otherFeverGeneral disordersParticipants Taking Placebo010
otherRhinitisInfections and infestationsParticipants Taking NAC111
otherRhinitisInfections and infestationsParticipants Taking Placebo010
otherVomitingGastrointestinal disordersParticipants Taking NAC010
otherVomitingGastrointestinal disordersParticipants Taking Placebo111

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityParticipants Taking NAC01
Total, all-cause mortalityParticipants Taking Placebo01
Total, other adverse eventsParticipants Taking NAC11
Total, other adverse eventsParticipants Taking Placebo11
Total, serious adverse eventsParticipants Taking NAC01
Total, serious adverse eventsParticipants Taking Placebo01

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons5

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Participants Taking NAC vs Participants Taking Placebo: Successful Collection of Outcome MeasuresTrial comparisons
Participants Taking NAC vs Participants Taking Placebo: Parent Satisfaction RatingTrial comparisons
Participants Taking NAC vs Participants Taking Placebo: Study Medication ComplianceTrial comparisons
Participants Taking NAC vs Participants Taking Placebo: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Participants Taking NAC vs Participants Taking Placebo: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03008889

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03008889/results?page=2