ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT03022045

A Study to Assess Efficacy and Safety of Two Different Dose Regimens of Risankizumab Administered Subcutaneously in Japanese Subjects With Generalized Pustular Psoriasis or Erythrodermic Psoriasis

NCT03022045, Phase 3, Completed, AbbVie; results first posted 2019-02-06

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Study to Assess Efficacy and Safety of Two Different Dose Regimens of Risankizumab Administered Subcutaneously in Japanese Subjects With Generalized Pustular Psoriasis or Erythrodermic Psoriasis. Trials, record NCT03022045. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT03022045

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Study to Assess Efficacy and Safety of Two Different Dose Regimens of Risankizumab Administered Subcutaneously in Japanese Subjects With Generalized Pustular Psoriasis or Erythrodermic Psoriasis
NCT number
NCT03022045
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
18 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
AbbVie
Conditions
Psoriasis
Interventions
risankizumab
First posted
2017-01-16
Last updated
2021-11-18
Results first posted
2019-02-06

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes8

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercentage of Participants With Generalized Pustular Psoriasis (GPP) Achieving GPP Clinical Response at Week 16Week 16
GPP Clinical Response defined as at least "Slightly Improved" in the overall improvement rating from baseline according to Japanese Dermatological Association (JDA) total score for GPP. The JDA consists of an assessment of skin symptoms (area of skin with erythema, pustules, and edema) on a scale of 0 (none) to 9 (severe) and a systemic symptoms/assessment of test findings (fever, white blood count \[WBC\], serum C-reactive protein \[CRP\], and serum albumin) on a scale of 0 (none) to 8 (severe). The JDA total score is the sum of the 2 assessments ranging from 0 (mild) to 17 (severe). The overall improvement rating ranges from Markedly improved (decreased by ≥ 3 points) to Worsened (increased by ≥ 1 point); Slightly improved represents no change in points and ≥ 20% and \< 30% reduction of erythema area with pustules compared to baseline, or clinically meaningful improvement in ≥1 other parameters of the severity assessment criteria. Nonresponder imputation (NRI) was used for missing data.
PrimaryPercentage of Participants With Erythrodermic Psoriasis (EP) Achieving EP Clinical Response at Week 16Week 16
EP Clinical Response, defined as at least "Minimally Improved" in Clinical Global Impression-Global Improvement (CGI-GI) for EP. The CGI-GI is a global assessment by the Investigator of the change in clinical status since the start of treatment. The CGI-GI ratings are as follows: 0 (not assessed), 1 (very much improved), 2 (much improved), 3 (minimally improved), 4 (no change), 5 (minimally worse), 6 (much worse), 7 (very much worse). NRI was used for missing data.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With GPP Achieving GPP Clinical Response at Week 52Week 52
GPP Clinical Response defined as at least "Slightly Improved" in the overall improvement rating from baseline according to JDA total score for GPP. The JDA consists of an assessment of skin symptoms (area of skin with erythema, pustules, and edema) on a scale of 0 (none) to 9 (severe) and a systemic symptoms/assessment of test findings (fever, WBC, serum CRP, and serum albumin) on a scale of 0 (none) to 8 (severe). The JDA total score is the sum of the 2 assessments ranging from 0 (mild) to 17 (severe). The overall improvement rating ranges from Markedly improved (decreased by ≥ 3 points) to Worsened (increased by ≥ 1 point); Slightly improved represents no change in points and ≥ 20% and \< 30% reduction of erythema area with pustules compared to baseline, or clinically meaningful improvement in ≥1 other parameters of the severity assessment criteria.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With EP Achieving EP Clinical Response at Week 52Week 52
EP Clinical Response, defined as at least "Minimally Improved" in CGI-GI for EP. The CGI-GI is a global assessment by the Investigator of the change in clinical status since the start of treatment. The CGI-GI ratings are as follows: 0 (not assessed), 1 (very much improved), 2 (much improved), 3 (minimally improved), 4 (no change), 5 (minimally worse), 6 (much worse), 7 (very much worse).
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With GPP Achieving 90% Improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score (PASI90) at Week 16Week 16
PASI is a composite score based on the degree of effect on body surface area of psoriasis and the extension of erythema (reddening), induration (thickness), desquamation (scaling) of the lesions and area affected as observed on the day of examination. The severity of each sign was assessed using a 5-point scale, where 0=no symptoms, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked. The PASI score ranges from 0 to 72, where 0 indicates no psoriasis and 72 indicates very severe psoriasis. PASI90 is defined as at least a 90% reduction in PASI score compared with the Baseline PASI score. The percent reduction in score is calculated as (PASI score at Baseline - score at follow-up visit) / PASI score at Baseline \* 100.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With EP Achieving PASI90 at Week 16Week 16
PASI is a composite score based on the degree of effect on body surface area of psoriasis and the extension of erythema (reddening), induration (thickness), desquamation (scaling) of the lesions and area affected as observed on the day of examination. The severity of each sign was assessed using a 5-point scale, where 0=no symptoms, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked. The PASI score ranges from 0 to 72, where 0 indicates no psoriasis and 72 indicates very severe psoriasis. PASI90 is defined as at least a 90% reduction in PASI score compared with the Baseline PASI score. The percent reduction in score is calculated as (PASI score at Baseline - score at follow-up visit) / PASI score at Baseline \* 100. NRI was used for missing data.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With GPP Achieving PASI90 at Week 52Week 52
PASI is a composite score based on the degree of effect on body surface area of psoriasis and the extension of erythema (reddening), induration (thickness), desquamation (scaling) of the lesions and area affected as observed on the day of examination. The severity of each sign was assessed using a 5-point scale, where 0=no symptoms, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked. The PASI score ranges from 0 to 72, where 0 indicates no psoriasis and 72 indicates very severe psoriasis. PASI90 is defined as at least a 90% reduction in PASI score compared with the Baseline PASI score. The percent reduction in score is calculated as (PASI score at Baseline - score at follow-up visit) / PASI score at Baseline \* 100.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With EP Achieving PASI90 at Week 52Week 52
PASI is a composite score based on the degree of effect on body surface area of psoriasis and the extension of erythema (reddening), induration (thickness), desquamation (scaling) of the lesions and area affected as observed on the day of examination. The severity of each sign was assessed using a 5-point scale, where 0=no symptoms, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked. The PASI score ranges from 0 to 72, where 0 indicates no psoriasis and 72 indicates very severe psoriasis. PASI90 is defined as at least a 90% reduction in PASI score compared with the Baseline PASI score. The percent reduction in score is calculated as (PASI score at Baseline - score at follow-up visit) / PASI score at Baseline \* 100.

Outcomes8

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercentage of Participants With Generalized Pustular Psoriasis (GPP) Achieving GPP Clinical Response at Week 16Week 16percentage of participantsNUMBER
PRIMARYPercentage of Participants With Erythrodermic Psoriasis (EP) Achieving EP Clinical Response at Week 16Week 16percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With GPP Achieving GPP Clinical Response at Week 52Week 52
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With EP Achieving EP Clinical Response at Week 52Week 52
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With GPP Achieving 90% Improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score (PASI90) at Week 16Week 16percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With EP Achieving PASI90 at Week 16Week 16percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With GPP Achieving PASI90 at Week 52Week 52
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With EP Achieving PASI90 at Week 52Week 52

Results by group8

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percentage of Participants With Generalized Pustular Psoriasis (GPP) Achieving GPP Clinical Response at Week 16GPP Risankizumab 75 mg100percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Generalized Pustular Psoriasis (GPP) Achieving GPP Clinical Response at Week 16GPP Risankizumab 150 mg100percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Erythrodermic Psoriasis (EP) Achieving EP Clinical Response at Week 16EP Risankizumab 75 mg100percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Erythrodermic Psoriasis (EP) Achieving EP Clinical Response at Week 16EP Risankizumab 150 mg100percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With GPP Achieving 90% Improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score (PASI90) at Week 16GPP Risankizumab 75 mg100percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With GPP Achieving 90% Improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score (PASI90) at Week 16GPP Risankizumab 150 mg75percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With EP Achieving PASI90 at Week 16EP Risankizumab 75 mg60percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With EP Achieving PASI90 at Week 16EP Risankizumab 150 mg100percentage of participants

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDRisankizumab 75 mg9
Overall StudySTARTEDRisankizumab 150 mg8
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDRisankizumab 75 mg8
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDRisankizumab 150 mg6
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDRisankizumab 75 mg1
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDRisankizumab 150 mg2

Adverse events160

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAbdominal pain upperGastrointestinal disordersGPP Risankizumab 75 mg040
otherAbdominal pain upperGastrointestinal disordersGPP Risankizumab 150 mg141
otherAbdominal pain upperGastrointestinal disordersEP Risankizumab 75 mg050
otherAbdominal pain upperGastrointestinal disordersEP Risankizumab 150 mg040
otherConstipationGastrointestinal disordersGPP Risankizumab 75 mg040
otherConstipationGastrointestinal disordersGPP Risankizumab 150 mg141
otherConstipationGastrointestinal disordersEP Risankizumab 75 mg151
otherConstipationGastrointestinal disordersEP Risankizumab 150 mg040
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersGPP Risankizumab 75 mg040
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersGPP Risankizumab 150 mg040

Adverse event totals12

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityGPP Risankizumab 75 mg04
Total, all-cause mortalityGPP Risankizumab 150 mg04
Total, all-cause mortalityEP Risankizumab 75 mg05
Total, all-cause mortalityEP Risankizumab 150 mg04
Total, other adverse eventsGPP Risankizumab 75 mg44
Total, other adverse eventsGPP Risankizumab 150 mg44
Total, other adverse eventsEP Risankizumab 75 mg35
Total, other adverse eventsEP Risankizumab 150 mg44
Total, serious adverse eventsGPP Risankizumab 75 mg04
Total, serious adverse eventsGPP Risankizumab 150 mg24

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
31667790DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03022045

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03022045/events?page=2