ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT03028740

AURORA: A Study for the Efficacy and Safety of Cenicriviroc (CVC) for the Treatment of Liver Fibrosis in Adults With Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH)

NCT03028740, Phase 3, Terminated, Tobira Therapeutics, Inc.; results first posted 2022-03-10

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. AURORA: A Study for the Efficacy and Safety of Cenicriviroc (CVC) for the Treatment of Liver Fibrosis in Adults With Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH). Trials, record NCT03028740. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT03028740

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
AURORA: A Study for the Efficacy and Safety of Cenicriviroc (CVC) for the Treatment of Liver Fibrosis in Adults With Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH)
NCT number
NCT03028740
Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
1,778 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Tobira Therapeutics, Inc.
Conditions
Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis
Interventions
Placebo, Cenicriviroc
First posted
2017-01-23
Last updated
2022-03-10
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2016-004566-26
Results first posted
2022-03-10

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes13

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPart 1: Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Fibrosis by at Least 1 Stage and No Worsening of Steatohepatitis on Liver Histology at Month 12Month 12
Fibrosis stage was evaluated using the Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Clinical Research Network (NASH CRN) Fibrosis Staging System with stages: 0=none; 1=perisinusoidal or periportal; 1A=mild, zone 3, perisinusoidal; 1B=moderate, zone 3, perisinusoidal; 1C=portal/periportal; 2=perisinusoidal and portal/periportal; 3=bridging fibrosis; 4=cirrhosis. No worsening of steatohepatitis was defined as no worsening of lobular inflammation or hepatocellular ballooning grade as per scoring in relevant nonalcoholic fatty liver disease activity score (NAS) categories. NAS is a semiquantitative scoring system based on the unweighted sum of: steatosis (0=\<5% to 3=\>66%), lobular inflammation (0=no foci to 3=\>4 foci/200x), and hepatocellular ballooning (0=none to 2=many cells/prominent ballooning) scores. Improvement in fibrosis is a decrease in the NASH CRN fibrosis stage.
PrimaryTime to First Occurrence of Adjudicated Events in the Full Study CohortFrom first dose of study drug to onset of first occurrence of the event (Up to approximately 42 months)
Time to first occurrence from Baseline was defined as the number of days from the first dose of randomized investigational product to the onset of the first occurrence of any of the following adjudicated events: death (all cause), histopathologic progression to cirrhosis, liver transplant, model for end stage liver disease (MELD) score ≥15, ascites, hospitalization for onset of: variceal bleed, hepatic encephalopathy, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. MELD is a scoring system for assessing the severity of chronic liver disease and uses the participant's values for total bilirubin, serum creatinine, and the international normalized ratio for prothrombin time to predict survival. MELD score ranges from 6 (less ill) to 40 (gravely ill) with scores and mortality probability being: Score 40=71.3% mortality; Scores 30-39=52.6% mortality; Scores 20-29=19.6% mortality; Scores10-19=6.0% mortality; Score 9 or less=1.9% mortality.
SecondaryPart 1: Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Fibrosis by at Least 2 Stages and No Worsening of Steatohepatitis on Liver Histology at Month 12Month 12
Fibrosis stage was evaluated using the NASH CRN Fibrosis Staging System with stages: 0=none; 1=perisinusoidal or periportal; 1A=mild, zone 3, perisinusoidal; 1B=moderate, zone 3, perisinusoidal; 1C=portal/periportal; 2=perisinusoidal and portal/periportal; 3=bridging fibrosis; 4=cirrhosis. No worsening of steatohepatitis was defined as no worsening of lobular inflammation or hepatocellular ballooning grade as per scoring in relevant NAS categories. NAS is a semiquantitative scoring system based on the unweighted sum of: steatosis (0=\<5% to 3=\>66%), lobular inflammation (0=no foci to 3=\>4 foci/200x), and hepatocellular ballooning (0=none to 2=many cells/prominent ballooning) scores. Improvement in fibrosis is a decrease in the NASH CRN fibrosis stage.
SecondaryPart 1: Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Fibrosis by at Least 1 Stage Regardless of Effect on Steatohepatitis at Month 12Month 12
Fibrosis stage was evaluated using the NASH CRN Fibrosis Staging System with stages 0=none, 1=perisinusoidal or periportal, 1A=mild, zone 3, perisinusoidal, 1B=moderate, zone 3, perisinusoidal, 1C=portal/periportal, 2=perisinusoidal and portal/periportal, 3=bridging fibrosis, 4=cirrhosis.
SecondaryPart 1: Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Fibrosis by at Least 2 Stages Regardless of Effect on Steatohepatitis at Month 12Month 12
Fibrosis stage was evaluated using the NASH CRN Fibrosis Staging System with stages 0=none, 1=perisinusoidal or periportal, 1A=mild, zone 3, perisinusoidal, 1B=moderate, zone 3, perisinusoidal, 1C=portal/periportal, 2=perisinusoidal and portal/periportal, 3=bridging fibrosis, 4=cirrhosis.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Improvement in Fibrosis by at Least 1 Stage and No Worsening of Steatohepatitis on Liver Biopsy at Month 12 in the Full Study CohortMonth 12
Fibrosis stage was evaluated using the NASH CRN Fibrosis Staging System with stages: 0=none; 1=perisinusoidal or periportal; 1A=mild, zone 3, perisinusoidal; 1B=moderate, zone 3, perisinusoidal; 1C=portal/periportal; 2=perisinusoidal and portal/periportal; 3=bridging fibrosis; 4=cirrhosis. No worsening of steatohepatitis was defined as no worsening of lobular inflammation or hepatocellular ballooning grade as per scoring in relevant NAS categories. NAS is a semiquantitative scoring system based on the unweighted sum of: steatosis (0=\<5% to 3=\>66%), lobular inflammation (0=no foci to 3=\>4 foci/200x), and hepatocellular ballooning (0=none to 2=many cells/prominent ballooning) scores. Improvement in fibrosis is a decrease in the NASH CRN fibrosis stage.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Improvement in Fibrosis by at Least 1 Stage Regardless of Effect on Steatohepatitis on Liver Biopsy at Month 12 in the Full Study CohortMonth 12
Fibrosis stage was evaluated using the NASH CRN Fibrosis Staging System with stages 0=none, 1=perisinusoidal or periportal, 1A=mild, zone 3, perisinusoidal, 1B=moderate, zone 3, perisinusoidal, 1C=portal/periportal, 2=perisinusoidal and portal/periportal, 3=bridging fibrosis, 4=cirrhosis.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Improvement in Fibrosis by at Least 2 Stages and No Worsening of Steatohepatitis on Liver Biopsy at Month 12 in the Full Study CohortMonth 12
Fibrosis stage was evaluated using the NASH CRN Fibrosis Staging System with stages: 0=none; 1=perisinusoidal or periportal; 1A=mild, zone 3, perisinusoidal; 1B=moderate, zone 3, perisinusoidal; 1C=portal/periportal; 2=perisinusoidal and portal/periportal; 3=bridging fibrosis; 4=cirrhosis. No worsening of steatohepatitis was defined as no worsening of lobular inflammation or hepatocellular ballooning grade as per scoring in relevant NAS categories. NAS is a semiquantitative scoring system based on the unweighted sum of: steatosis (0=\<5% to 3=\>66%), lobular inflammation (0=no foci to 3=\>4 foci/200x), and hepatocellular ballooning (0=none to 2=many cells/prominent ballooning) scores. Improvement in fibrosis is a decrease in the NASH CRN fibrosis stage.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Improvement in Fibrosis by at Least 2 Stages Regardless of Effect on Steatohepatitis on Liver Biopsy at Month 12 in the Full Study CohortMonth 12
Fibrosis stage was evaluated using the NASH CRN Fibrosis Staging System with stages 0=none, 1=perisinusoidal or periportal, 1A=mild, zone 3, perisinusoidal, 1B=moderate, zone 3, perisinusoidal, 1C=portal/periportal, 2=perisinusoidal and portal/periportal, 3=bridging fibrosis, 4=cirrhosis.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Improvement in Fibrosis by at Least 1 Stage and No Worsening of Steatohepatitis on Liver Biopsy at Month 60 in the Full Study CohortMonth 60
Fibrosis stage was evaluated using the NASH CRN Fibrosis Staging System with stages: 0=none; 1=perisinusoidal or periportal; 1A=mild, zone 3, perisinusoidal; 1B=moderate, zone 3, perisinusoidal; 1C=portal/periportal; 2=perisinusoidal and portal/periportal; 3=bridging fibrosis; 4=cirrhosis. No worsening of steatohepatitis was defined as no worsening of lobular inflammation or hepatocellular ballooning grade as per scoring in relevant NAS categories. NAS is a semiquantitative scoring system based on the unweighted sum of: steatosis (0=\<5% to 3=\>66%), lobular inflammation (0=no foci to 3=\>4 foci/200x), and hepatocellular ballooning (0=none to 2=many cells/prominent ballooning) scores. Improvement in fibrosis is a decrease in the NASH CRN fibrosis stage.

Outcomes13

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPart 1: Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Fibrosis by at Least 1 Stage and No Worsening of Steatohepatitis on Liver Histology at Month 12Month 12mITT Population for Part 1 included participants randomly assigned to a treatment group who received at least one dose of study drug in Part 1.percentage of participantsNUMBER
PRIMARYTime to First Occurrence of Adjudicated Events in the Full Study CohortFrom first dose of study drug to onset of first occurrence of the event (Up to approximately 42 months)mITT Population for the full study cohort included participants randomly assigned to a treatment group who received at least one dose of study drug in Parts 1 and 2 of the study combined.daysMEDIAN
SECONDARYPart 1: Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Fibrosis by at Least 2 Stages and No Worsening of Steatohepatitis on Liver Histology at Month 12Month 12mITT Population for Part 1 included participants randomly assigned to a treatment group who received at least one dose of study drug in Part 1.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPart 1: Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Fibrosis by at Least 1 Stage Regardless of Effect on Steatohepatitis at Month 12Month 12
mITT Population for Part 1 included participants randomly assigned to a treatment group who received at least one dose of study drug in Part 1. Overall number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPart 1: Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Fibrosis by at Least 2 Stages Regardless of Effect on Steatohepatitis at Month 12Month 12
mITT Population for Part 1 included participants randomly assigned to a treatment group who received at least one dose of study drug in Part 1. Overall number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Improvement in Fibrosis by at Least 1 Stage and No Worsening of Steatohepatitis on Liver Biopsy at Month 12 in the Full Study CohortMonth 12mITT Population for the full study cohort included participants randomly assigned to a treatment group who received at least one dose of study drug in Parts 1 and 2 of the study combined.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Improvement in Fibrosis by at Least 1 Stage Regardless of Effect on Steatohepatitis on Liver Biopsy at Month 12 in the Full Study CohortMonth 12
mITT Population for the full study cohort included participants randomly assigned to a treatment group who received at least one dose of study drug in Parts 1 and 2 of the study combined. Overall number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Improvement in Fibrosis by at Least 2 Stages and No Worsening of Steatohepatitis on Liver Biopsy at Month 12 in the Full Study CohortMonth 12mITT Population for the full study cohort included participants randomly assigned to a treatment group who received at least one dose of study drug for Parts 1 and 2 of the study combined.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Improvement in Fibrosis by at Least 2 Stages Regardless of Effect on Steatohepatitis on Liver Biopsy at Month 12 in the Full Study CohortMonth 12
mITT Population for the full study cohort included participants randomly assigned to a treatment group who received at least one dose of study drug in Parts 1 and 2 of the study combined. Overall number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Improvement in Fibrosis by at Least 1 Stage and No Worsening of Steatohepatitis on Liver Biopsy at Month 60 in the Full Study CohortMonth 60No data was collected as the study was terminated and no participants reached the Month 60 timepoint.

Results by group18

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Part 1: Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Fibrosis by at Least 1 Stage and No Worsening of Steatohepatitis on Liver Histology at Month 12Placebo25.595% Confidence Interval 21.5 to 29.9percentage of participants
Part 1: Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Fibrosis by at Least 1 Stage and No Worsening of Steatohepatitis on Liver Histology at Month 12Cenicriviroc 150 mg22.395% Confidence Interval 19.6 to 25.2percentage of participants
Time to First Occurrence of Adjudicated Events in the Full Study CohortPlaceboNA95% Confidence Interval NA to NAdays
Time to First Occurrence of Adjudicated Events in the Full Study CohortCenicriviroc 150 mgNA95% Confidence Interval NA to NAdays
Part 1: Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Fibrosis by at Least 2 Stages and No Worsening of Steatohepatitis on Liver Histology at Month 12Placebo8.395% Confidence Interval 6.0 to 11.3percentage of participants
Part 1: Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Fibrosis by at Least 2 Stages and No Worsening of Steatohepatitis on Liver Histology at Month 12Cenicriviroc 150 mg6.695% Confidence Interval 5.1 to 8.5percentage of participants
Part 1: Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Fibrosis by at Least 1 Stage Regardless of Effect on Steatohepatitis at Month 12Placebo33.395% Confidence Interval 28.6 to 38.4percentage of participants
Part 1: Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Fibrosis by at Least 1 Stage Regardless of Effect on Steatohepatitis at Month 12Cenicriviroc 150 mg30.695% Confidence Interval 27.3 to 34.2percentage of participants
Part 1: Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Fibrosis by at Least 2 Stages Regardless of Effect on Steatohepatitis at Month 12Placebo10.3percentage of participants
Part 1: Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Fibrosis by at Least 2 Stages Regardless of Effect on Steatohepatitis at Month 12Cenicriviroc 150 mg8.8percentage of participants

Participant flow12

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo593
Overall StudySTARTEDCenicriviroc 150 mg1,185
Overall StudyFull Study Cohort: Received Study DrugPlacebo589
Overall StudyFull Study Cohort: Received Study DrugCenicriviroc 150 mg1,180
Overall StudyParticipated in Part 1Placebo432
Overall StudyParticipated in Part 1Cenicriviroc 150 mg861
Overall StudyPart 1: Received Study DrugPlacebo429
Overall StudyPart 1: Received Study DrugCenicriviroc 150 mg859
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo0
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDCenicriviroc 150 mg0

Adverse events484

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo39589
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersCenicriviroc 150 mg1041,180
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo56589
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersCenicriviroc 150 mg921,180
otherAbdominal pain upperGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo26589
otherAbdominal pain upperGastrointestinal disordersCenicriviroc 150 mg641,180
otherAbdominal painGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo30589
otherAbdominal painGastrointestinal disordersCenicriviroc 150 mg561,180
otherFatigueGeneral disordersPlacebo33589
otherFatigueGeneral disordersCenicriviroc 150 mg741,180

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo2593
Total, all-cause mortalityCenicriviroc 150 mg61,185
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo218589
Total, other adverse eventsCenicriviroc 150 mg4251,180
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo70589
Total, serious adverse eventsCenicriviroc 150 mg1591,180

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
37061109DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Cenicriviroc 150 mg vs Placebo: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Cenicriviroc 150 mg vs Placebo: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03028740

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03028740/events?page=2