ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT03038672

Nivolumab With or Without Varlilumab in Treating Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Aggressive B-cell Lymphomas

NCT03038672, Phase 2, Active not recruiting, National Cancer Institute (NCI); results first posted 2024-10-16

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Nivolumab With or Without Varlilumab in Treating Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Aggressive B-cell Lymphomas. Trials, record NCT03038672. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT03038672

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Nivolumab With or Without Varlilumab in Treating Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Aggressive B-cell Lymphomas
NCT number
NCT03038672
Status
Active not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
54 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Conditions
ALK-Positive Large B-Cell Lymphoma, Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Activated B-Cell Type, Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Associated With Chronic Inflammation, Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Germinal Center B-Cell Type, Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma, Not Otherwise Specified, EBV-Positive Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma, Not Otherwise Specified, EBV-Positive Mucocutaneous Ulcer, HHV8-Positive Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma, Not Otherwise Specified, High Grade B-Cell Lymphoma With MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 Rearrangements, High Grade B-Cell Lymphoma, Not Otherwise Specified, Intravascular Large B-Cell Lymphoma, Large B-Cell Lymphoma With 11q Aberration, Large B-Cell Lymphoma With IRF4 Rearrangement, Plasmablastic Lymphoma, Primary Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma of the Central Nervous System, Primary Effusion Lymphoma, Recurrent B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, Recurrent Burkitt Lymphoma, Recurrent Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma, Recurrent Gray-Zone Lymphoma, Recurrent High Grade B-Cell Lymphoma With MYC and BCL2 or BCL6 Rearrangements, Recurrent High Grade B-Cell Lymphoma With MYC, BCL2, and BCL6 Rearrangements, Recurrent Lymphomatoid Granulomatosis, Recurrent Primary Cutaneous Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma, Leg Type, Recurrent Primary Mediastinal Large B-Cell Lymphoma, Recurrent T-Cell/Histiocyte-Rich Large B-Cell Lymphoma, Refractory B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, Refractory Burkitt Lymphoma, Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma, Refractory Gray-Zone Lymphoma, Refractory High Grade B-Cell Lymphoma With MYC and BCL2 or BCL6 Rearrangements, Refractory High Grade B-Cell Lymphoma With MYC, BCL2, and BCL6 Rearrangements, Refractory Primary Cutaneous Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma, Leg Type, Refractory Primary Mediastinal Large B-Cell Lymphoma, Refractory T-Cell/Histiocyte-Rich Large B-Cell Lymphoma
Interventions
Nivolumab, Varlilumab
First posted
2017-02-01
Last updated
2026-10-26
Results first posted
2024-10-16

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes11

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryOverall Response Rate2 years
Will be assessed by computed tomography (CT)-based criteria or positron emission tomography (PET)-CT based criteria. A response will be defined as an objective status of partial remission (PR) or complete remission (CR) for patients evaluated by CT-based criteria and complete metabolic response (CMR) or partial metabolic response (PMR) for patients evaluated by PET-CT based criteria. Exact binomial ninety-five percent confidence intervals for the true success proportion will be calculated in each arm. Comparison of overall response rates between the two treatment groups will be performed using a one-sided Fisher's exact test at significance level 0.15.
SecondaryDuration of Response2 years
Defined as the date at which the patient's objective status is first noted to be a PR or CR for patients evaluated by CT-based criteria or CMR or PMR for patients evaluated by PET-CT based criteria to the earliest date progression (documentation of disease progression \[PMD\] or progressive disease \[PD\]) is documented. The distribution of duration of response will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier. The comparison of duration of response between two treatment arms will be based on the log-rank test.
SecondaryOverall Survival37 monthsThe distribution of survival time will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier. The comparison of overall survival between two treatment arms will be based on the log-rank test.
SecondaryProgression Free Survival (PFS)37 monthsThe distribution of PFS will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier. The comparison of progression-free survival between two treatment arms will be based on the log-rank test.
SecondaryProportion of Patients With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events25 months
Will be graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. The overall adverse event rates for grade 3 or higher hematologic and non-hematologic adverse events at least possibly related to treatment will be compared between the two treatment groups using the Chi-square test (or Fisher's exact test if the data in the contingency table is sparse).
OtherChange in CD27 Expression in TissueBaseline up to 100 days after last dose of study drug
Will be assessed by immunohistochemistry. Will be both graphically and quantitatively summarized and explored. Standard paired comparisons methodologies (Wilcoxon signed rank and McNemar's tests) will be used to assess changes in these variables before and after therapy. In addition, baseline values and changes over time in each measure will be explored in relation to clinical outcome. Differences between responders and non-responders will be assessed using Wilcoxon's rank sum (continuous data) or Fisher's exact (categorical data) test. The relationship between each measure and time to event measures (PFS, overall survival \[OS\]) will be evaluated using Cox's proportional hazards models and log-rank tests. Logistic regression will be used to model the response rate as a function of treatment and CD27 (as a continuous variable). The distribution of CD27 will be estimated empirically in the entire trial population and used to calculate CD27 values corresponding to each fixed percentile.
OtherChange in Peripheral Blood Immune CellsBaseline up to 12 weeks
Will be assessed by cytometry by time of flight (CyTOF). The relationship between presence/absence of a particular subtype of cell and association with outcomes will be evaluated. Evaluation of particular combinations of immune cells (immune signature) and whether they are predictive of outcome will also be evaluated. Will be both graphically and quantitatively summarized and explored. Standard paired comparisons methodologies (Wilcoxon signed rank and McNemar's tests) will be used to assess changes in these variables before and after therapy. In addition, baseline values and changes over time in each measure will be explored in relation to clinical outcome. Differences between responders and non-responders will be assessed using Wilcoxon's rank sum (continuous data) or Fisher's exact (categorical data) test. The relationship between each measure and time to event measures (PFS, OS) will be evaluated using Cox's proportional hazards models and log-rank tests.
OtherChange in the Identification/Characterization of Intratumoral Immune Cells in TissueBaseline up to time of disease progression
Will be assessed by immunohistochemistry and CyTOF. Will be both graphically and quantitatively summarized and explored. Standard paired comparisons methodologies (Wilcoxon signed rank and McNemar's tests) will be used to assess changes in these variables before and after therapy. In addition, baseline values and changes over time in each measure will be explored in relation to clinical outcome. Differences between responders and non-responders will be assessed using Wilcoxon's rank sum (continuous data) or Fisher's exact (categorical data) test. The relationship between each measure and time to event measures (PFS, OS) will be evaluated using Cox's proportional hazards models and log-rank tests.
OtherChange in Genetic Alterations of Chromosome 9p24.1 in TissueBaseline up to time of disease progression
Will be assessed by fluorescence in situ hybridization. The proportion of patients in each of these groups who achieve a response will be evaluated. Will be both graphically and quantitatively summarized and explored. Standard paired comparisons methodologies (Wilcoxon signed rank and McNemar's tests) will be used to assess changes in these variables before and after therapy. In addition, baseline values and changes over time in each measure will be explored in relation to clinical outcome. Differences between responders and non-responders will be assessed using Wilcoxon's rank sum (continuous data) or Fisher's exact (categorical data) test. The relationship between each measure and time to event measures (PFS, OS) will be evaluated using Cox's proportional hazards models and log-rank tests.
OtherChange in Serum Cytokine ProfileBaseline up to 12 weeks
Will be assessed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Will be both graphically and quantitatively summarized and explored. Standard paired comparisons methodologies (Wilcoxon signed rank and McNemar's tests) will be used to assess changes in these variables before and after therapy. In addition, baseline values and changes over time in each measure will be explored in relation to clinical outcome. Differences between responders and non-responders will be assessed using Wilcoxon's rank sum (continuous data) or Fisher's exact (categorical data) test. The relationship between each measure and time to event measures (PFS, OS) will be evaluated using Cox's proportional hazards models and log-rank tests.

Outcomes11

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYOverall Response Rate2 yearsAll eligible patients that had a disease evaluation after being treated.proportion of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYDuration of Response2 yearsAll eligible and treated patients that achieve a response.yearsMEDIAN
SECONDARYOverall Survival37 monthsAll eligible and treated patients.MonthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYProgression Free Survival (PFS)37 monthsAll eligible and treated patients that had a disease evaluation.MonthsMEAN
SECONDARYProportion of Patients With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events25 monthsAll eligible and treated patients.proportion of patientsNUMBER
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIEDChange in CD27 Expression in TissueBaseline up to 100 days after last dose of study drug
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIEDChange in Peripheral Blood Immune CellsBaseline up to 12 weeks
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIEDChange in the Identification/Characterization of Intratumoral Immune Cells in TissueBaseline up to time of disease progression
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIEDChange in Genetic Alterations of Chromosome 9p24.1 in TissueBaseline up to time of disease progression
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIEDChange in Serum Cytokine ProfileBaseline up to 12 weeks

Results by group10

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Overall Response RateGroup I (Nivolumab)0.1695% Confidence Interval 0.045 to 0.361proportion of participants
Overall Response RateGroup II (Varlilumab, Nivolumab)0.0895% Confidence Interval 0.010 to 0.251proportion of participants
Duration of ResponseGroup I (Nivolumab)NA95% Confidence Interval NA to NAyears
Duration of ResponseGroup II (Varlilumab, Nivolumab)0.295% Confidence Interval 0.2 to NAyears
Overall SurvivalGroup I (Nivolumab)8.695% Confidence Interval 4.7 to NAMonths
Overall SurvivalGroup II (Varlilumab, Nivolumab)10.295% Confidence Interval 3.1 to NAMonths
Progression Free Survival (PFS)Group I (Nivolumab)2.695% Confidence Interval 1.5 to 3.2Months
Progression Free Survival (PFS)Group II (Varlilumab, Nivolumab)1.595% Confidence Interval 1.1 to 3.2Months
Proportion of Patients With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse EventsGroup I (Nivolumab)0.76proportion of patients
Proportion of Patients With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse EventsGroup II (Varlilumab, Nivolumab)0.84proportion of patients

Participant flow12

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Initial TreatmentSTARTEDGroup I (Nivolumab)27
Initial TreatmentSTARTEDGroup II (Varlilumab, Nivolumab)27
Initial TreatmentCOMPLETEDGroup I (Nivolumab)25
Initial TreatmentCOMPLETEDGroup II (Varlilumab, Nivolumab)26
Initial TreatmentNOT COMPLETEDGroup I (Nivolumab)2
Initial TreatmentNOT COMPLETEDGroup II (Varlilumab, Nivolumab)1
Cross Over From Group I to Group IISTARTEDGroup I (Nivolumab)7
Cross Over From Group I to Group IISTARTEDGroup II (Varlilumab, Nivolumab)26
Cross Over From Group I to Group IICOMPLETEDGroup I (Nivolumab)7
Cross Over From Group I to Group IICOMPLETEDGroup II (Varlilumab, Nivolumab)26

Adverse events555

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAnemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersGroup I (Nivolumab)8278
otherAnemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersGroup II (Varlilumab, Nivolumab)132718
otherAnemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersCross Over to Group II Treatment (Varlilumab, Nivolumab)171
otherBlood and lymph sys disorders - Oth SpecBlood and lymphatic system disordersGroup I (Nivolumab)3273
otherBlood and lymph sys disorders - Oth SpecBlood and lymphatic system disordersGroup II (Varlilumab, Nivolumab)5275
otherBlood and lymph sys disorders - Oth SpecBlood and lymphatic system disordersCross Over to Group II Treatment (Varlilumab, Nivolumab)171
otherLeukocytosisBlood and lymphatic system disordersGroup I (Nivolumab)0270
otherLeukocytosisBlood and lymphatic system disordersGroup II (Varlilumab, Nivolumab)2272
otherLeukocytosisBlood and lymphatic system disordersCross Over to Group II Treatment (Varlilumab, Nivolumab)070
otherAtrioventricular block completeCardiac disordersGroup I (Nivolumab)1271

Adverse event totals9

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityGroup I (Nivolumab)327
Total, all-cause mortalityGroup II (Varlilumab, Nivolumab)527
Total, all-cause mortalityCross Over to Group II Treatment (Varlilumab, Nivolumab)07
Total, other adverse eventsGroup I (Nivolumab)2427
Total, other adverse eventsGroup II (Varlilumab, Nivolumab)2427
Total, other adverse eventsCross Over to Group II Treatment (Varlilumab, Nivolumab)77
Total, serious adverse eventsGroup I (Nivolumab)1027
Total, serious adverse eventsGroup II (Varlilumab, Nivolumab)1227
Total, serious adverse eventsCross Over to Group II Treatment (Varlilumab, Nivolumab)37

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants2

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

ProjectTitlePrincipal investigatorsOrganizationFunderFiscal yearsSource
UM1CA186709Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center Experimental Therapeutics Clinical Trials Network Site (DF/HCC ETCTN Site)SHAPIRO, GEOFFREY I.; FLAHERTY, KEITH T; KUFE, DONALD W.DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTNATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE2014 to 2025NIH RePORTER
UM1CA186686NCI Experimental Therapeutics-Clinical Trials Network with Phase 1 EmphasisADJEI, ALEX A.MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTERNATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE2014 to 2019NIH RePORTER

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03038672

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03038672/events?page=2