Trial · NCT03055806
IX-01 Effect on Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT), Patient Reported Outcomes and Safety in Men With Premature Ejaculation (PE)
NCT03055806, Phase 2, Completed, Ixchelsis Limited; results first posted 2019-10-07
3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0
Cite this record
ConductScience Library. IX-01 Effect on Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT), Patient Reported Outcomes and Safety in Men With Premature Ejaculation (PE). Trials, record NCT03055806. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT03055806
On this page
Trial
As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.
- Title
- IX-01 Effect on Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT), Patient Reported Outcomes and Safety in Men With Premature Ejaculation (PE)
- NCT number
- NCT03055806
- Status
- Completed
- Phases
- Phase 2
- Enrollment
- 239 participants, actual
- Lead sponsor
- Ixchelsis Limited
- Conditions
- Premature Ejaculation
- Interventions
- IX-01 400 mg, Placebo, IX-01 800 mg, IX-01 1200 mg
- First posted
- 2017-02-16
- Last updated
- 2019-10-07
- Results first posted
- 2019-10-07
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Registered outcomes9
Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
| List | Outcome | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Change From Baseline in Geometric Mean (GM) Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT) Over the Treatment Assessment Period | Last 4 weeks of treatment compared to baseline | Intravaginal ejaculatory latency time (IELT) was defined as the time from the initiation of sexual intercourse (penetration) until ejaculation occurred and was recorded by the patient or partner using the stopwatch provided. |
| Secondary | Fold Change From Baseline in Geometric Mean (GM) IELT Over the Treatment Assessment Period Compared With Baseline | Last 4 weeks of treatment compared to baseline | Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT) was defined as the time from the initiation of sexual intercourse (penetration) until ejaculation occurred and was recorded using the stopwatch provided. |
| Secondary | Proportion of Patients With ≥2.5-fold Increase in Geometric Mean (GM) Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT) Over the Treatment Assessment Period Compared With Baseline | Last 4 weeks of treatment compared to baseline | Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT) was defined as the time from the initiation of sexual intercourse (penetration) until ejaculation occurred and was measured using the stopwatch provided. |
| Secondary | Proportion of Patients Rating Their Premature Ejaculation (PE) as Improved Per the Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) Questionnaire | Baseline to the end of treatment (approximately 8 weeks) | 7 point scale ranging from much worse (-3) to much better (3). The proportion refers to the proportion of patients who had the best 2 possible responses \[better (2) or much better (3)\] on this scale. |
| Secondary | Proportion of Patients Achieving Mean Change in Category of ≥1 or ≥2 on Control of Timing of Ejaculation on the Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP) Questionnaire. | Baseline to the end of treatment (approximately 8 weeks) | Reported in electronic diary and based on the Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP). PEP is scored on a 5 point scale with the scores ranging from 0 (worst answer) to 4 (best answer). A mean change in category of ≥1 or ≥2 corresponds to improving control from 'very poor' to 'fair', 'good', or 'very good'; or from 'poor' to 'fair', 'good', or 'very good'. |
| Secondary | Proportion of Patients Achieving Mean Change in Category of ≥1 or ≥2 in Ejaculation-related Personal Distress on the Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP) Questionnaire | Baseline to the end of treatment (approximately 8 weeks) | Reported in e-diary. Based on Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP). Scale ranges from 'extremely' (0) to 'not at all' (4). An increase in score from baseline indicates improvement. A change in category of ≥1 or ≥2 corresponds to improving distress from 'extremely' to 'moderately', 'a little bit' or 'not at all'; or from 'quite a bit' to 'moderately', 'a little bit' or 'not at all'; or from 'moderately' to 'a little bit' or 'not at all'. |
| Secondary | Proportion of Patients Achieving Change in Category of ≥2 on Control of Timing of Ejaculation and Achieving Change in Category of ≥1 in Ejaculation-related Personal Distress at End of Treatment | Baseline to the end of treatment (approximately 8 weeks) | Reported in electronic diary and based on the Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP). PEP is scored on a 5 point scale with the scores ranging from 0 (worst answer) to 4 (best answer). |
| Secondary | Mean Change From Baseline in Score on Control of Ejaculation | Last 4 weeks of treatment compared to baseline | Reported in electronic diary and based on the Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP). PEP question on control of timing is scored on a 5 point scale with the scores ranging from very poor (this is the worst answer scored as 0) to very good (this is the best answer scored as 4). |
| Secondary | Mean Change From Baseline in Score on Ejaculation-related Personal Distress | Last 4 weeks of treatment compared to baseline | Based on Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP). Scale ranges from 'extremely' (0) to 'not at all' (4). An increase in score from baseline indicates improvement. |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Outcomes9
Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
| Type | Outcome | Time frame | Population | Units | Measured as |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY | Change From Baseline in Geometric Mean (GM) Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT) Over the Treatment Assessment Period | Last 4 weeks of treatment compared to baseline | Results presented for modified Intent to treat (mITT) population (all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 2 postbaseline nonmissing IELT assessments). | Seconds | LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN |
| SECONDARY | Fold Change From Baseline in Geometric Mean (GM) IELT Over the Treatment Assessment Period Compared With Baseline | Last 4 weeks of treatment compared to baseline | Results presented for modified Intent to treat (mITT) population (all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 2 postbaseline nonmissing IELT assessments). | Fold change | LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN |
| SECONDARY | Proportion of Patients With ≥2.5-fold Increase in Geometric Mean (GM) Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT) Over the Treatment Assessment Period Compared With Baseline | Last 4 weeks of treatment compared to baseline | Results presented for modified Intent to treat (mITT) population (all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 2 postbaseline nonmissing IELT assessments). | Proportion of participants | NUMBER |
| SECONDARY | Proportion of Patients Rating Their Premature Ejaculation (PE) as Improved Per the Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) Questionnaire | Baseline to the end of treatment (approximately 8 weeks) | Results presented for modified Intent To Treat (mITT) population (all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 2 postbaseline nonmissing IELT assessments). | Proportion of participants | NUMBER |
| SECONDARY | Proportion of Patients Achieving Mean Change in Category of ≥1 or ≥2 on Control of Timing of Ejaculation on the Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP) Questionnaire. | Baseline to the end of treatment (approximately 8 weeks) | Results presented for modified Intent To Treat (mITT) population (all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 2 postbaseline nonmissing IELT assessments). | Proportion of participants | NUMBER |
| SECONDARY | Proportion of Patients Achieving Mean Change in Category of ≥1 or ≥2 in Ejaculation-related Personal Distress on the Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP) Questionnaire | Baseline to the end of treatment (approximately 8 weeks) | Results presented for modified Intent To Treat (mITT) population (all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 2 postbaseline nonmissing IELT assessments). | Proportion of participants | NUMBER |
| SECONDARY | Proportion of Patients Achieving Change in Category of ≥2 on Control of Timing of Ejaculation and Achieving Change in Category of ≥1 in Ejaculation-related Personal Distress at End of Treatment | Baseline to the end of treatment (approximately 8 weeks) | Results presented for modified Intent To Treat (mITT) population (all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 2 postbaseline nonmissing IELT assessments). | Proportion of participants | NUMBER |
| SECONDARY | Mean Change From Baseline in Score on Control of Ejaculation | Last 4 weeks of treatment compared to baseline | Results presented for modified Intent To Treat (mITT) population (all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 2 postbaseline nonmissing IELT assessments). | score on a scale | MEAN |
| SECONDARY | Mean Change From Baseline in Score on Ejaculation-related Personal Distress | Last 4 weeks of treatment compared to baseline | Results presented for modified Intent To Treat (mITT) population (all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 2 postbaseline nonmissing IELT assessments). | score on a scale | MEAN |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Results by group40
Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.
| Outcome | Group | Category | Value | Spread | Units |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in Geometric Mean (GM) Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT) Over the Treatment Assessment Period | Placebo | 42.6 | Standard Error 10.9 | Seconds | |
| Change From Baseline in Geometric Mean (GM) Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT) Over the Treatment Assessment Period | IX-01 400 mg | 39.7 | Standard Error 10.6 | Seconds | |
| Change From Baseline in Geometric Mean (GM) Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT) Over the Treatment Assessment Period | IX-01 800 mg | 44.5 | Standard Error 9.0 | Seconds | |
| Change From Baseline in Geometric Mean (GM) Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT) Over the Treatment Assessment Period | IX-01 1200 mg | 29.2 | Standard Error 9.1 | Seconds | |
| Fold Change From Baseline in Geometric Mean (GM) IELT Over the Treatment Assessment Period Compared With Baseline | Placebo | 1.77 | Standard Error 0.11 | Fold change | |
| Fold Change From Baseline in Geometric Mean (GM) IELT Over the Treatment Assessment Period Compared With Baseline | IX-01 400 mg | 1.56 | Standard Error 0.11 | Fold change | |
| Fold Change From Baseline in Geometric Mean (GM) IELT Over the Treatment Assessment Period Compared With Baseline | IX-01 800 mg | 1.79 | Standard Error 0.09 | Fold change | |
| Fold Change From Baseline in Geometric Mean (GM) IELT Over the Treatment Assessment Period Compared With Baseline | IX-01 1200 mg | 1.54 | Standard Error 0.09 | Fold change | |
| Proportion of Patients With ≥2.5-fold Increase in Geometric Mean (GM) Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT) Over the Treatment Assessment Period Compared With Baseline | Placebo | 0.30 | Proportion of participants | ||
| Proportion of Patients With ≥2.5-fold Increase in Geometric Mean (GM) Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT) Over the Treatment Assessment Period Compared With Baseline | IX-01 400 mg | 0.20 | Proportion of participants |
1 to 10 of 40Source ClinicalTrials.gov
See all 40 results by groupParticipant flow12
How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.
| Period | Milestone | Group | Participants | Units counted |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | STARTED | Placebo | 48 | |
| Overall Study | STARTED | IX-01 400 mg | 48 | |
| Overall Study | STARTED | IX-01 800 mg | 71 | |
| Overall Study | STARTED | IX-01 1200 mg | 72 | |
| Overall Study | COMPLETED | Placebo | 42 | |
| Overall Study | COMPLETED | IX-01 400 mg | 41 | |
| Overall Study | COMPLETED | IX-01 800 mg | 58 | |
| Overall Study | COMPLETED | IX-01 1200 mg | 57 | |
| Overall Study | NOT COMPLETED | Placebo | 6 | |
| Overall Study | NOT COMPLETED | IX-01 400 mg | 7 |
1 to 10 of 12Source ClinicalTrials.gov
See all 12 participant flowAdverse events212
Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.
| Type | Event | Organ system | Group | Affected | At risk | Events |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| other | Dizziness | Nervous system disorders | Placebo | 0 | 46 | |
| other | Dizziness | Nervous system disorders | IX-01 400 mg | 0 | 48 | |
| other | Dizziness | Nervous system disorders | IX-01 800 mg | 0 | 68 | |
| other | Dizziness | Nervous system disorders | IX-01 1200 mg | 1 | 69 | |
| other | Headache | Nervous system disorders | Placebo | 3 | 46 | |
| other | Headache | Nervous system disorders | IX-01 400 mg | 2 | 48 | |
| other | Headache | Nervous system disorders | IX-01 800 mg | 2 | 68 | |
| other | Headache | Nervous system disorders | IX-01 1200 mg | 2 | 69 | |
| other | Hypersomnia | Nervous system disorders | Placebo | 0 | 46 | |
| other | Hypersomnia | Nervous system disorders | IX-01 400 mg | 0 | 48 |
1 to 10 of 212Source ClinicalTrials.gov
See all 212 adverse eventsAdverse event totals12
The totals the trial posted for each group.
| Total | Group | Affected | At risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total, all-cause mortality | Placebo | 0 | 46 |
| Total, all-cause mortality | IX-01 400 mg | 0 | 48 |
| Total, all-cause mortality | IX-01 800 mg | 0 | 68 |
| Total, all-cause mortality | IX-01 1200 mg | 0 | 69 |
| Total, other adverse events | Placebo | 12 | 46 |
| Total, other adverse events | IX-01 400 mg | 8 | 48 |
| Total, other adverse events | IX-01 800 mg | 12 | 68 |
| Total, other adverse events | IX-01 1200 mg | 18 | 69 |
| Total, serious adverse events | Placebo | 0 | 46 |
| Total, serious adverse events | IX-01 400 mg | 0 | 48 |
1 to 10 of 12Source ClinicalTrials.gov
See all 12 adverse event totalsPapers1
The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.
| PMID | Listed as |
|---|---|
| 31351660 | DERIVED |
Source PubMed
Grants0
The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.
None in this release.
Trial comparisons0
Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.
None in this release.
Tests0
The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.
None in this release.
Data dates
The day each source was copied for this release.
Sources 3
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
- ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
- ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)
ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.
For software
Read this trial from software.
The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03055806
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03055806/results?page=2