ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT03055806

IX-01 Effect on Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT), Patient Reported Outcomes and Safety in Men With Premature Ejaculation (PE)

NCT03055806, Phase 2, Completed, Ixchelsis Limited; results first posted 2019-10-07

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. IX-01 Effect on Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT), Patient Reported Outcomes and Safety in Men With Premature Ejaculation (PE). Trials, record NCT03055806. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT03055806

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
IX-01 Effect on Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT), Patient Reported Outcomes and Safety in Men With Premature Ejaculation (PE)
NCT number
NCT03055806
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
239 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Ixchelsis Limited
Conditions
Premature Ejaculation
Interventions
IX-01 400 mg, Placebo, IX-01 800 mg, IX-01 1200 mg
First posted
2017-02-16
Last updated
2019-10-07
Results first posted
2019-10-07

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes9

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange From Baseline in Geometric Mean (GM) Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT) Over the Treatment Assessment PeriodLast 4 weeks of treatment compared to baseline
Intravaginal ejaculatory latency time (IELT) was defined as the time from the initiation of sexual intercourse (penetration) until ejaculation occurred and was recorded by the patient or partner using the stopwatch provided.
SecondaryFold Change From Baseline in Geometric Mean (GM) IELT Over the Treatment Assessment Period Compared With BaselineLast 4 weeks of treatment compared to baselineIntravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT) was defined as the time from the initiation of sexual intercourse (penetration) until ejaculation occurred and was recorded using the stopwatch provided.
SecondaryProportion of Patients With ≥2.5-fold Increase in Geometric Mean (GM) Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT) Over the Treatment Assessment Period Compared With BaselineLast 4 weeks of treatment compared to baselineIntravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT) was defined as the time from the initiation of sexual intercourse (penetration) until ejaculation occurred and was measured using the stopwatch provided.
SecondaryProportion of Patients Rating Their Premature Ejaculation (PE) as Improved Per the Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) QuestionnaireBaseline to the end of treatment (approximately 8 weeks)
7 point scale ranging from much worse (-3) to much better (3). The proportion refers to the proportion of patients who had the best 2 possible responses \[better (2) or much better (3)\] on this scale.
SecondaryProportion of Patients Achieving Mean Change in Category of ≥1 or ≥2 on Control of Timing of Ejaculation on the Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP) Questionnaire.Baseline to the end of treatment (approximately 8 weeks)
Reported in electronic diary and based on the Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP). PEP is scored on a 5 point scale with the scores ranging from 0 (worst answer) to 4 (best answer). A mean change in category of ≥1 or ≥2 corresponds to improving control from 'very poor' to 'fair', 'good', or 'very good'; or from 'poor' to 'fair', 'good', or 'very good'.
SecondaryProportion of Patients Achieving Mean Change in Category of ≥1 or ≥2 in Ejaculation-related Personal Distress on the Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP) QuestionnaireBaseline to the end of treatment (approximately 8 weeks)
Reported in e-diary. Based on Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP). Scale ranges from 'extremely' (0) to 'not at all' (4). An increase in score from baseline indicates improvement. A change in category of ≥1 or ≥2 corresponds to improving distress from 'extremely' to 'moderately', 'a little bit' or 'not at all'; or from 'quite a bit' to 'moderately', 'a little bit' or 'not at all'; or from 'moderately' to 'a little bit' or 'not at all'.
SecondaryProportion of Patients Achieving Change in Category of ≥2 on Control of Timing of Ejaculation and Achieving Change in Category of ≥1 in Ejaculation-related Personal Distress at End of TreatmentBaseline to the end of treatment (approximately 8 weeks)Reported in electronic diary and based on the Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP). PEP is scored on a 5 point scale with the scores ranging from 0 (worst answer) to 4 (best answer).
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in Score on Control of EjaculationLast 4 weeks of treatment compared to baseline
Reported in electronic diary and based on the Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP). PEP question on control of timing is scored on a 5 point scale with the scores ranging from very poor (this is the worst answer scored as 0) to very good (this is the best answer scored as 4).
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in Score on Ejaculation-related Personal DistressLast 4 weeks of treatment compared to baselineBased on Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP). Scale ranges from 'extremely' (0) to 'not at all' (4). An increase in score from baseline indicates improvement.

Outcomes9

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in Geometric Mean (GM) Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT) Over the Treatment Assessment PeriodLast 4 weeks of treatment compared to baselineResults presented for modified Intent to treat (mITT) population (all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 2 postbaseline nonmissing IELT assessments).SecondsLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYFold Change From Baseline in Geometric Mean (GM) IELT Over the Treatment Assessment Period Compared With BaselineLast 4 weeks of treatment compared to baselineResults presented for modified Intent to treat (mITT) population (all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 2 postbaseline nonmissing IELT assessments).Fold changeLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYProportion of Patients With ≥2.5-fold Increase in Geometric Mean (GM) Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT) Over the Treatment Assessment Period Compared With BaselineLast 4 weeks of treatment compared to baselineResults presented for modified Intent to treat (mITT) population (all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 2 postbaseline nonmissing IELT assessments).Proportion of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYProportion of Patients Rating Their Premature Ejaculation (PE) as Improved Per the Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) QuestionnaireBaseline to the end of treatment (approximately 8 weeks)Results presented for modified Intent To Treat (mITT) population (all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 2 postbaseline nonmissing IELT assessments).Proportion of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYProportion of Patients Achieving Mean Change in Category of ≥1 or ≥2 on Control of Timing of Ejaculation on the Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP) Questionnaire.Baseline to the end of treatment (approximately 8 weeks)Results presented for modified Intent To Treat (mITT) population (all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 2 postbaseline nonmissing IELT assessments).Proportion of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYProportion of Patients Achieving Mean Change in Category of ≥1 or ≥2 in Ejaculation-related Personal Distress on the Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP) QuestionnaireBaseline to the end of treatment (approximately 8 weeks)Results presented for modified Intent To Treat (mITT) population (all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 2 postbaseline nonmissing IELT assessments).Proportion of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYProportion of Patients Achieving Change in Category of ≥2 on Control of Timing of Ejaculation and Achieving Change in Category of ≥1 in Ejaculation-related Personal Distress at End of TreatmentBaseline to the end of treatment (approximately 8 weeks)Results presented for modified Intent To Treat (mITT) population (all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 2 postbaseline nonmissing IELT assessments).Proportion of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYMean Change From Baseline in Score on Control of EjaculationLast 4 weeks of treatment compared to baselineResults presented for modified Intent To Treat (mITT) population (all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 2 postbaseline nonmissing IELT assessments).score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYMean Change From Baseline in Score on Ejaculation-related Personal DistressLast 4 weeks of treatment compared to baselineResults presented for modified Intent To Treat (mITT) population (all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 2 postbaseline nonmissing IELT assessments).score on a scaleMEAN

Results by group40

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change From Baseline in Geometric Mean (GM) Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT) Over the Treatment Assessment PeriodPlacebo42.6Standard Error 10.9Seconds
Change From Baseline in Geometric Mean (GM) Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT) Over the Treatment Assessment PeriodIX-01 400 mg39.7Standard Error 10.6Seconds
Change From Baseline in Geometric Mean (GM) Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT) Over the Treatment Assessment PeriodIX-01 800 mg44.5Standard Error 9.0Seconds
Change From Baseline in Geometric Mean (GM) Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT) Over the Treatment Assessment PeriodIX-01 1200 mg29.2Standard Error 9.1Seconds
Fold Change From Baseline in Geometric Mean (GM) IELT Over the Treatment Assessment Period Compared With BaselinePlacebo1.77Standard Error 0.11Fold change
Fold Change From Baseline in Geometric Mean (GM) IELT Over the Treatment Assessment Period Compared With BaselineIX-01 400 mg1.56Standard Error 0.11Fold change
Fold Change From Baseline in Geometric Mean (GM) IELT Over the Treatment Assessment Period Compared With BaselineIX-01 800 mg1.79Standard Error 0.09Fold change
Fold Change From Baseline in Geometric Mean (GM) IELT Over the Treatment Assessment Period Compared With BaselineIX-01 1200 mg1.54Standard Error 0.09Fold change
Proportion of Patients With ≥2.5-fold Increase in Geometric Mean (GM) Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT) Over the Treatment Assessment Period Compared With BaselinePlacebo0.30Proportion of participants
Proportion of Patients With ≥2.5-fold Increase in Geometric Mean (GM) Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT) Over the Treatment Assessment Period Compared With BaselineIX-01 400 mg0.20Proportion of participants

Participant flow12

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo48
Overall StudySTARTEDIX-01 400 mg48
Overall StudySTARTEDIX-01 800 mg71
Overall StudySTARTEDIX-01 1200 mg72
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo42
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDIX-01 400 mg41
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDIX-01 800 mg58
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDIX-01 1200 mg57
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo6
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDIX-01 400 mg7

Adverse events212

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherDizzinessNervous system disordersPlacebo046
otherDizzinessNervous system disordersIX-01 400 mg048
otherDizzinessNervous system disordersIX-01 800 mg068
otherDizzinessNervous system disordersIX-01 1200 mg169
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersPlacebo346
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersIX-01 400 mg248
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersIX-01 800 mg268
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersIX-01 1200 mg269
otherHypersomniaNervous system disordersPlacebo046
otherHypersomniaNervous system disordersIX-01 400 mg048

Adverse event totals12

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo046
Total, all-cause mortalityIX-01 400 mg048
Total, all-cause mortalityIX-01 800 mg068
Total, all-cause mortalityIX-01 1200 mg069
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo1246
Total, other adverse eventsIX-01 400 mg848
Total, other adverse eventsIX-01 800 mg1268
Total, other adverse eventsIX-01 1200 mg1869
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo046
Total, serious adverse eventsIX-01 400 mg048

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
31351660DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03055806

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03055806/results?page=2