ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT03093870

Varlitinib in Combination With Capecitabine for Advanced or Metastatic Biliary Tract Cancer

NCT03093870, Phase 2, Phase 3, Completed, ASLAN Pharmaceuticals; results first posted 2021-08-03

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Varlitinib in Combination With Capecitabine for Advanced or Metastatic Biliary Tract Cancer. Trials, record NCT03093870. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT03093870

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Varlitinib in Combination With Capecitabine for Advanced or Metastatic Biliary Tract Cancer
NCT number
NCT03093870
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2, Phase 3
Enrollment
151 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
ASLAN Pharmaceuticals
Conditions
Biliary Tract Cancer
Interventions
Varlitinib, Capecitabine, Placebo (for Varlitinib)
First posted
2017-03-28
Last updated
2021-08-03
Results first posted
2021-08-03

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes15

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryObjective Response Rate (ORR) - Part 1
Data obtained up until progression, or until last evaluable assessment in the absence of progression, regardless of whether subjects discontinued treatment or received a subsequent therapy prior to progression, up to 2 years.
Part 1: The ORR was defined as the number (%) of subjects with ≥ 1 visit response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). Data obtained up until progression, or until last evaluable assessment in the absence of progression, was included in the assessment of ORR, regardless of whether subjects discontinued treatment or received a subsequent therapy prior to progression. Best overall RECIST Response (BOR) was calculated based on the overall visit responses from each RECIST assessment, i.e. the best response a subject had following randomization and prior to RECIST progression or the last evaluable assessment in the absence of RECIST progression. Categorization of BOR was based on the RECIST criteria using the following response categories: CR, PR, stable disease (SD), progressive disease (PD) and not evaluable (NE).
PrimaryProgression-free Survival (PFS) - Part 1
Time from randomization until date of objective disease progression or death (by any cause in absence of disease progression) regardless of whether subject withdrew from randomized therapy or received another antitumor therapy prior to PD, up to 2 years.
Part 1: Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time from randomization (or starting treatment for the Safety Lead-in) until the date of objective disease progression or death (by any cause in the absence of disease progression) regardless of whether the subject withdrew from randomized therapy or received another antitumor therapy prior to disease progression. Subjects who did not experience disease progression or died at the time of analysis were censored at the time of the latest date of assessment from their last evaluable RECIST assessment. However, if the patient progressed or died after ≥ 2 missed visits (12 weeks ± 5 days maximum), the subject was censored at the time of the latest evaluable RECIST assessment. The PFS time was based on the scan/assessment dates rather than visit dates.
SecondaryObject Response Rates (ORR) - Safety Lead-In
Data obtained up until progression, or until last evaluable assessment in absence of progression, regardless of whether subjects discontinued treatment or received a subsequent therapy prior to progression, up to 2 years.
The ORR rate was defined as the number (%) of subjects with ≥ 1 visit response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). Data obtained up until progression, or until last evaluable assessment in the absence of progression, was included in the assessment of ORR, regardless of whether subjects discontinued treatment or received a subsequent therapy prior to progression. In all study parts, the primary assessment of ORR was based on the Full Analysis Set (FAS).
SecondaryOverall Survival (OS) - Part 1Time from the date of randomization until death due to any cause, up to 2 years
Part 1: Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from the date of randomization until death due to any cause. Any subject not known to have died at the time of the data cut-off was censored based on the last recorded date on which the subject was known to be alive.
SecondaryOverall Survival (OS) - Safety Lead-InTime from the date of randomization until death due to any cause, up to 2 years
Part 1: Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from the date of randomization until death due to any cause. Any subject not known to have died at the time of the data cut-off was censored based on the last recorded date on which the subject was known to be alive.
SecondaryDuration of Response (DoR) - Part 1Time from the date of first documented response until the date of documented PD or death in the absence of disease progression, up to 2 years
Part 1: Duration of response (DoR) was defined as the time from the date of first documented response until the date of documented PD or death in the absence of disease progression. The end of the response should have coincided with the date of disease progression or death from any cause used for the PFS endpoint. For Part 1, DoR was calculated based on data from the ICR of radiological data.
SecondaryDisease Control Rate DCR - Part 1Number (%) of subjects with ≥ 1 visit response of CR or PR, or with SD for a minimum of 12 weeks (± 5 days) from randomization.
Part 1: DCR rate was defined as the number (%) of subjects with ≥ 1 visit response of CR or PR, or with SD for a minimum of 12 weeks (± 5 days) from randomization. Data obtained up until progression, or until last evaluable assessment in the absence of progression, were included in the assessment of DCR, regardless of whether subjects discontinued treatment or received a subsequent therapy prior to progression. For all study parts, the primary assessment of DCR was based on the FAS. For Part 1, DCR was calculated based on data from the ICR
SecondaryTumor Size - Part 1Week 12
Part 1: The percentage change from baseline in tumor size at Week 12 (%ΔTSWk12) was a secondary endpoint for Part 1 and was used to present waterfall plots of the target lesion data in the Evaluable for Response (EFR) Population
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Tests- Safety Lead-inSubject screening visit to 28 days post last study drug administrationClinical laboratory tests (hematology, clinical chemistry, urinalysis) - Number of Participants with Clinically Significant Laboratory Tests.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Tests - Part 1Subject screening visit to 28 days post last study drug administrationClinical laboratory tests (hematology, clinical chemistry, urinalysis) - Number of Participants with Clinically Significant Laboratory Tests.

Outcomes15

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYObjective Response Rate (ORR) - Part 1
Data obtained up until progression, or until last evaluable assessment in the absence of progression, regardless of whether subjects discontinued treatment or received a subsequent therapy prior to progression, up to 2 years.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
PRIMARYProgression-free Survival (PFS) - Part 1
Time from randomization until date of objective disease progression or death (by any cause in absence of disease progression) regardless of whether subject withdrew from randomized therapy or received another antitumor therapy prior to PD, up to 2 years.
MonthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYObject Response Rates (ORR) - Safety Lead-In
Data obtained up until progression, or until last evaluable assessment in absence of progression, regardless of whether subjects discontinued treatment or received a subsequent therapy prior to progression, up to 2 years.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYOverall Survival (OS) - Part 1Time from the date of randomization until death due to any cause, up to 2 yearsMonthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYOverall Survival (OS) - Safety Lead-InTime from the date of randomization until death due to any cause, up to 2 yearsParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYDuration of Response (DoR) - Part 1Time from the date of first documented response until the date of documented PD or death in the absence of disease progression, up to 2 years
Kaplan Meier median is presented for DoR. At the time of reporting, there were 3 censored observations in the V+C arm, none in the P+C arm. The observed number of responders in the trial was much lower than anticipated; 9 responders in total, 6 for varlitinib and 3 for placebo. Based on results of the primary endpoints, the follow-up analysis to provide more long-term efficacy data planned for when 70% of patients had experienced an OS event was not undertaken based on pre-specified criteria.
DaysMEDIAN
SECONDARYDisease Control Rate DCR - Part 1Number (%) of subjects with ≥ 1 visit response of CR or PR, or with SD for a minimum of 12 weeks (± 5 days) from randomization.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYTumor Size - Part 1Week 12Percentage change from BaselineMEAN
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Tests- Safety Lead-inSubject screening visit to 28 days post last study drug administrationNo subjects reported with any CS values across majority of the hematologic, clinical chemistry, urinalysis parameters during the Safety Lead-In of the studyParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Tests - Part 1Subject screening visit to 28 days post last study drug administrationNo subjects reported with any CS values across majority of the hematologic, clinical chemistry and urinalysis parameters at the end of treatment.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS

Results by group103

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Objective Response Rate (ORR) - Part 1Varlitinib and CapecitabineResponders - CR0Participants
Objective Response Rate (ORR) - Part 1Placebo and CapecitabineResponders - CR0Participants
Objective Response Rate (ORR) - Part 1Varlitinib and CapecitabineResponders - PR6Participants
Objective Response Rate (ORR) - Part 1Placebo and CapecitabineResponders - PR3Participants
Objective Response Rate (ORR) - Part 1Varlitinib and CapecitabineNon-Responders - SD29Participants
Objective Response Rate (ORR) - Part 1Placebo and CapecitabineNon-Responders - SD34Participants
Objective Response Rate (ORR) - Part 1Varlitinib and CapecitabineNon-Responders - PD24Participants
Objective Response Rate (ORR) - Part 1Placebo and CapecitabineNon-Responders - PD24Participants
Objective Response Rate (ORR) - Part 1Varlitinib and CapecitabineNon-Responders - NE5Participants
Objective Response Rate (ORR) - Part 1Placebo and CapecitabineNon-Responders - NE2Participants

Participant flow9

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDVarlitinib and Capecitabine - Safety Lead-In24
Overall StudySTARTEDVarlitinib and Capecitabine - Part 164
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo and Capecitabine - Part 163
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDVarlitinib and Capecitabine - Safety Lead-In0
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDVarlitinib and Capecitabine - Part 123
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo and Capecitabine - Part 122
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDVarlitinib and Capecitabine - Safety Lead-In24
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDVarlitinib and Capecitabine - Part 141
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo and Capecitabine - Part 141

Adverse events420

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersVarlitinib and Capecitabine - Safety Lead-In152429
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersVarlitinib and Capecitabine - Part 1336458
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo and Capecitabine - Part 1146319
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersVarlitinib and Capecitabine - Safety Lead-In132431
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersVarlitinib and Capecitabine - Part 1266443
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo and Capecitabine - Part 1166319
otherVomitingGastrointestinal disordersVarlitinib and Capecitabine - Safety Lead-In112427
otherVomitingGastrointestinal disordersVarlitinib and Capecitabine - Part 1226430
otherVomitingGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo and Capecitabine - Part 1116318
otherAbdominal PainGastrointestinal disordersVarlitinib and Capecitabine - Safety Lead-In92412

Adverse event totals9

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityVarlitinib and Capecitabine - Safety Lead-In224
Total, all-cause mortalityVarlitinib and Capecitabine - Part 13564
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo and Capecitabine - Part 13563
Total, other adverse eventsVarlitinib and Capecitabine - Safety Lead-In2424
Total, other adverse eventsVarlitinib and Capecitabine - Part 16464
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo and Capecitabine - Part 15963
Total, serious adverse eventsVarlitinib and Capecitabine - Safety Lead-In1324
Total, serious adverse eventsVarlitinib and Capecitabine - Part 12564
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo and Capecitabine - Part 12763

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Varlitinib and Capecitabine vs Placebo and Capecitabine: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Tests - Part 1Trial comparisons
Varlitinib and Capecitabine vs Placebo and Capecitabine: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Change in Vital Signs and Physical Examinations - Part 1Trial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03093870

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03093870/results?page=2