ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT03098797

A Trial to Evaluate Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of Elamipretide in Subjects With Barth Syndrome

NCT03098797, Phase 2, Phase 3, Completed, Stealth BioTherapeutics Inc.; results first posted 2024-04-16

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Trial to Evaluate Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of Elamipretide in Subjects With Barth Syndrome. Trials, record NCT03098797. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT03098797

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Trial to Evaluate Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of Elamipretide in Subjects With Barth Syndrome
NCT number
NCT03098797
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2, Phase 3
Enrollment
12 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Stealth BioTherapeutics Inc.
Conditions
Barth Syndrome
Interventions
Elamipretide, Placebo
First posted
2017-04-04
Last updated
2024-04-16
Results first posted
2024-04-16

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes14

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPart 1: Distance Walked During the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) by VisitPre-dose to Week 12 (end of treatment)
Average distance walked in meters during the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) at end of treatment, where end of treatment means end of Visit 5 (Week 12) for Period 1 and end of Visit 10 (Week 12) for Period 2. Results were pooled for each 12 week period.
PrimaryPart 1: Total Fatigue Score Based on the BTHS-SA by Visit.Pre-dose, Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12 (end of treatment)
Total Fatigue Score (Q1, Q2, and Q4) Based on the BarTH Syndrome Symptom Assessment (BTHS-SA) by visit at predose, Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12 (end of treatment). The BTHS-SA is 3-question fatigue assessment using a 0 to 4-point scale for each question where no fatigue =0 and very severe fatigue =4, with scores from all 3 questions combined and averaged for all subjects; a lower score means better outcome, higher score means a worse outcome. Combined Min score=0, max score =12. Weekly values are based on the weekly average of the last 7 days before the site or visiting nurse visit for both periods. Results from each 12-week period were combined, where end of treatment for Period 1 =Visit 5 (week 12), and End of Period 2 = Visit 10 (week 12)
SecondaryPart 2: Distance Walked During the 6MWTBaseline to Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, 168, 192Change from baseline for distance walked in meters during the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) by visit where Baseline= Part 1 Period 1 Pre-dose
SecondaryPart 2: Change From Baseline: Total Fatigue Score (Q1, Q2, and Q4) Based on the BTHS-SA by VisitBaseline to Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 192
Change from Baseline (mean) in Total Fatigue Score (Q1, Q2, and Q4) Based on the BarTH Syndrome Symptom Assessment (BTHS-SA) by visit. The BTHS-SA is 3-question fatigue assessment using a 0-4 point scale for each question where no fatigue =0 and very severe fatigue =4, with scores from all 3 questions combined and averaged for all subjects by visit; a lower score means better outcome, higher score means a worse outcome. Change from baseline: an increase in scores would mean worse outcome, a decrease in scores means better outcome. Combined Min score=-12, max score =12. Weekly values are based on the weekly average of the last 7 days before the site or visiting nurse visit for both periods. Baseline= Period 1 Predose.
SecondaryPart 1: Muscle Strength as Measured by HHD by VisitPre-dose to Week 12 (end of treatment)
Muscle strength as measured by handheld dynamometry (HHD) in Newtons, where end of treatment means end of Visit 5 (Week 12) for Period 1 and end of Visit 10 (Week 12) for Period 2. Results were pooled for each 12 week period. Handheld dynamometry assesses the average strength of the knee extensors of both legs.
SecondaryPart 2: Change From Baseline: Muscle Strength by HHD (Newtons) by VisitBaseline to Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96,168, 192
Muscle strength as measured by handheld dynamometry (HHD) in Newtons. Handheld dynamometry assesses the average strength of the knee extensors of both legs. Change from baseline where Baseline= Part 1 Period 1 Pre-dose: the greater positive change, the better the outcome, the smaller positive change (or negative change) the number the worse the outcome.
SecondaryPart 1: 5XSST by VisitPre-dose to Week 12 (end of treatment)
Time (in seconds) to complete the Five Times Sit-To-Stand, where end of treatment means end of Visit 5 (Week 12) for Period 1 and end of Visit 10 (Week 12) for Period 2. Results were pooled for each 12 week period.
SecondaryPart 2: Change From Baseline: 5X Sit to Stand by VisitBaseline to Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, 168, 192Change in baseline in time (in seconds), where Baseline= Part 1 Period 1 Pre-dose to complete the Five Times Sit-To-Stand by visit. More time means worse outcome, less time means better outcome.
SecondaryPart 1: SWAY Application Balance Assessments by VisitPre-dose to Week 12 (end of treatment)
SWAY application balance assessment consists of five stances each performed for 10 seconds and scores postural stability on a scale from 0-100 with higher scores indicating better postural stability from Pre-dose to Week 12 (end of treatment), where end of treatment means end of Visit 5 (Week 12) for Period 1 and end of Visit 10 (Week 12) for Period 2. Results were pooled for each 12 week period.
SecondaryPart 2: Change From Baseline: SWAY Application Balance AssessmentBaseline to Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96,168, 192
Change from Baseline: SWAY Application Balance Assessment,where Baseline= Part 1 Period 1 Pre-doseSWAY application balance assessment consists of five stances each performed for 10 seconds and scores postural stability on a scale from 0-100 with higher scores indicating better postural stability. An increase from baseline is a better outcome and a decrease in score is a worse outcome.

Outcomes14

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPart 1: Distance Walked During the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) by VisitPre-dose to Week 12 (end of treatment)All participants for whom 6MWT was measured.metersMEAN
PRIMARYPart 1: Total Fatigue Score Based on the BTHS-SA by Visit.Pre-dose, Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12 (end of treatment)All participants for whom Total Fatigue Score was measuredscore on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYPart 2: Distance Walked During the 6MWTBaseline to Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, 168, 192All participants for whom distance walked in 6MWT was measured.metersMEAN
SECONDARYPart 2: Change From Baseline: Total Fatigue Score (Q1, Q2, and Q4) Based on the BTHS-SA by VisitBaseline to Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 192All participants for whom Total Fatigue Score was measured.score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYPart 1: Muscle Strength as Measured by HHD by VisitPre-dose to Week 12 (end of treatment)All participants for whom muscle strength as measured by handheld dynamometry was measured.NewtonsMEAN
SECONDARYPart 2: Change From Baseline: Muscle Strength by HHD (Newtons) by VisitBaseline to Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96,168, 192All participants for whom Muscle Strength by HHD (Newtons) was measured.NewtonsMEAN
SECONDARYPart 1: 5XSST by VisitPre-dose to Week 12 (end of treatment)All participants for whom 5XSST was measured.secondsMEAN
SECONDARYPart 2: Change From Baseline: 5X Sit to Stand by VisitBaseline to Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, 168, 192All participants for whom 5X Sit to Stand was measured.secondsMEAN
SECONDARYPart 1: SWAY Application Balance Assessments by VisitPre-dose to Week 12 (end of treatment)All participants for who SWAY application balance was measured.Score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYPart 2: Change From Baseline: SWAY Application Balance AssessmentBaseline to Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96,168, 192All participants for whom SWAY Application Balance Assessment was measured.score on a scaleMEAN

Results by group166

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Part 1: Distance Walked During the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) by VisitExperimental: ElamipretidePre-dose400.1Standard Deviation 55.07meters
Part 1: Distance Walked During the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) by VisitPlaceboPre-dose412.6Standard Deviation 60.16meters
Part 1: Distance Walked During the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) by VisitExperimental: ElamipretideWeek 12 (End of Treatment443.1Standard Deviation 65.43meters
Part 1: Distance Walked During the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) by VisitPlaceboWeek 12 (End of Treatment443.9Standard Deviation 77.10meters
Part 1: Total Fatigue Score Based on the BTHS-SA by Visit.Experimental: ElamipretidePre-dose7.672Standard Deviation 1.9360score on a scale
Part 1: Total Fatigue Score Based on the BTHS-SA by Visit.PlaceboPre-dose7.433Standard Deviation 1.3848score on a scale
Part 1: Total Fatigue Score Based on the BTHS-SA by Visit.Experimental: ElamipretideWeek 16.837Standard Deviation 2.1114score on a scale
Part 1: Total Fatigue Score Based on the BTHS-SA by Visit.PlaceboWeek 16.994Standard Deviation 1.7093score on a scale
Part 1: Total Fatigue Score Based on the BTHS-SA by Visit.Experimental: ElamipretideWeek 46.220Standard Deviation 2.3325score on a scale
Part 1: Total Fatigue Score Based on the BTHS-SA by Visit.PlaceboWeek 46.485Standard Deviation 1.4447score on a scale

Participant flow30

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
First Intervention (12 Weeks)STARTEDExperimental: Elamipretide, Then Placebo6
First Intervention (12 Weeks)STARTEDPlacebo, Then Elamipretide6
First Intervention (12 Weeks)COMPLETEDExperimental: Elamipretide, Then Placebo6
First Intervention (12 Weeks)COMPLETEDPlacebo, Then Elamipretide6
First Intervention (12 Weeks)NOT COMPLETEDExperimental: Elamipretide, Then Placebo0
First Intervention (12 Weeks)NOT COMPLETEDPlacebo, Then Elamipretide0
Washout (4 Weeks)STARTEDExperimental: Elamipretide, Then Placebo6
Washout (4 Weeks)STARTEDPlacebo, Then Elamipretide6
Washout (4 Weeks)COMPLETEDExperimental: Elamipretide, Then Placebo6
Washout (4 Weeks)COMPLETEDPlacebo, Then Elamipretide6

Adverse events508

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherInjection site bruisingGeneral disordersPart 2 (OLE): Elamipretide (Sequence AB)05
otherInjection site bruisingGeneral disordersPart 2 (OLE): Elamipretide (Sequence BA)15
otherInjection site bruisingGeneral disordersPart 1: Elamipretide312
otherInjection site bruisingGeneral disordersPart 1: Placebo012
otherMedical site device erythemaGeneral disordersPart 2 (OLE): Elamipretide (Sequence AB)05
otherMedical site device erythemaGeneral disordersPart 2 (OLE): Elamipretide (Sequence BA)05
otherMedical site device erythemaGeneral disordersPart 1: Elamipretide112
otherMedical site device erythemaGeneral disordersPart 1: Placebo112
otherMedical device site irritationGeneral disordersPart 2 (OLE): Elamipretide (Sequence AB)05
otherMedical device site irritationGeneral disordersPart 2 (OLE): Elamipretide (Sequence BA)15

Adverse event totals12

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityPart 2 (OLE): Elamipretide (Sequence AB)05
Total, all-cause mortalityPart 2 (OLE): Elamipretide (Sequence BA)05
Total, all-cause mortalityPart 1: Elamipretide06
Total, all-cause mortalityPart 1: Placebo06
Total, other adverse eventsPart 2 (OLE): Elamipretide (Sequence AB)55
Total, other adverse eventsPart 2 (OLE): Elamipretide (Sequence BA)55
Total, other adverse eventsPart 1: Elamipretide1212
Total, other adverse eventsPart 1: Placebo1212
Total, serious adverse eventsPart 2 (OLE): Elamipretide (Sequence AB)15
Total, serious adverse eventsPart 2 (OLE): Elamipretide (Sequence BA)45

Papers3

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
37180415DERIVEDPubMed
38602181DERIVEDPubMed
40281531DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03098797

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03098797/results?page=2