ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT03099304

Outcomes49

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARY
Percentage of Participants Treated With Ruxolitinib Cream Who Achieved a ≥ 50% Improvement From Baseline in Facial Assessment of the Vitiligo Area and Severity Index Score (F-VASI50) Compared With Participants Treated With Vehicle at Week 24
Baseline; Week 24
Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population: all randomized participants. Treatment groups were to be defined according to the treatment assignment at the time of randomization regardless of the actual ruxolitinib cream or vehicle cream participants might have applied during their participation in the study. Missing post-Baseline values were considered as not having achieved responses for visits up to Week 52.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a Facial Assessment of the Physician's Global Vitiligo Assessment (F-PhGVA) of Clear or Almost ClearWeek 24ITT Population. Missing post-Baseline values were considered as not having achieved F-PhGVA response for visits up to Week 24.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a ≥ 50% Improvement From Baseline in Full Body Assessment of Vitiligo Area and Severity Index (T-VASI) at Week 52Baseline; Week 52ITT Population. Missing post-Baseline values were considered as not having achieved responses for visits up to Week 52. Only participants with available data were analyzed.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYDose Response on Percentage Change From Baseline in F-VASIup to 156 weeksBased on the data for percentage change from Baseline in F-VASI and T-VASI scores during the treatment periods, the Emax model was not appropriate; therefore, the dose responses were not assessed.
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) and Any Grade 3 or Higher TEAE up to Week 24up to 24 weeks
Safety Population: all participants who applied at least 1 dose of study drug. Treatment groups for this population were to be determined according to the actual treatment the participant received on Day 1.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Any TEAE and Any Grade 3 or Higher TEAE up to Week 52up to 52 weeks
Safety Population. Treatment groups for this population were to be determined according to the actual treatment the participant received on Day 1. Analysis from Day 1 to Week 52 was conducted in participants randomized to receive ruxolitinib cream 0.5% QD, ruxolitinib cream 1.5% QD, or ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID during the vehicle-controlled period (Day 1 to Week 24).
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Any TEAE and Any Grade 3 or Higher TEAE From Week 24 to Week 52Week 24 to Week 52
Safety Population. Treatment groups for this population were to be determined according to the actual treatment the participant received on Day 1. Analysis was conducted in participants who were randomized to ruxolitinib cream 0.15% QD and vehicle groups in the vehicle-controlled period (Day 1 to Week 24) and then had a dose in the continued double-blind period (Week 24 to Week 52).
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants Who Applied Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID Throughout Study Participation With Any TEAE and Any Grade 3 or Higher TEAEup to Week 156
Safety Population. Treatment groups for this population were to be determined according to the actual treatment the participant received on Day 1. Analysis was only conducted in participants who received ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID on Day 1.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Any TEAE and Any Grade 3 or Higher TEAE From Week 52 to Week 156Week 52 to Week 156Open-label Evaluable Population: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the Open-label PeriodParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYMean Change From Baseline in F-VASI Score at Week 24Baseline; Week 24
ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed. Mixed-model for Repeated Measures (MMRM) model for post-Baseline measures: (response variable = treatment + stratification factor \[age ≤30 versus \>30\] + visit + treatment\*visit). All post-Baseline visits up to Week 24 were included in the model.
scores on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYMean Change From Baseline in F-VASI Score at Weeks 52, 104, and 156Baseline; Weeks 52, 104, and 156ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed.scores on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage Change From Baseline in F-VASI Score at Week 24Baseline; Week 24
ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed. MMRM model for post-Baseline measures: (response variable = treatment + stratification factor \[age ≤30 versus \>30\] + visit + treatment\*visit). All post-Baseline visits up to Week 24 were included in the model.
percent changeLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYPercentage Change From Baseline in F-VASI Score at Weeks 52, 104, and 156Baseline; Weeks 52, 104, and 156ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed.percent changeMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Who Achieved an F-VASI50 at Weeks 52, 104, and 156Baseline; Weeks 52, 104, and 156ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage Change From Baseline in F-BSA Repigmentation at Week 24Baseline; Week 24ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed.percent changeMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage Change From Baseline in F-BSA Repigmentation at Weeks 52, 104, and 156Baseline; Weeks 52, 104, and 156ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed.percent changeMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage Change From Baseline in T-BSA Repigmentation at Week 24Baseline; Week 24ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed.percent changeMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage Change From Baseline in T-BSA Repigmentation at Weeks 52, 104, and 156Baseline; Weeks 52, 104, and 156ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed.percent changeMEAN
SECONDARYMean Change From Baseline in T-VASI Score at Week 24Baseline; Week 24
ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed. MMRM model for post-Baseline measures: (response variable = treatment + stratification factor \[age ≤30 versus \>30\] + visit + treatment\*visit). All post-Baseline visits up to Week 24 were included in the model.
scores on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYMean Change From Baseline in T-VASI Score at Weeks 52, 104, and 156Baseline; Weeks 52, 104, and 156ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed.scores on a scaleMEAN

Source ClinicalTrials.govtrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this list from software.

Twenty rows a page, as JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03099304/outcomes