ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT03103919

Study to Evaluate the Impact of Using Wearable Devices in Addition to Standard Clinical Practice on Parkinson´s Subject Symptoms Management

NCT03103919, Phase 4, Completed, UCB Biopharma S.P.R.L.; results first posted 2019-02-19

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Study to Evaluate the Impact of Using Wearable Devices in Addition to Standard Clinical Practice on Parkinson´s Subject Symptoms Management. Trials, record NCT03103919. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT03103919

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Study to Evaluate the Impact of Using Wearable Devices in Addition to Standard Clinical Practice on Parkinson´s Subject Symptoms Management
NCT number
NCT03103919
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Enrollment
40 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
UCB Biopharma S.P.R.L.
Conditions
Parkinson´s Disease
Interventions
Kinesia-ONE™, Kinesia-360™, Rotigotine
First posted
2017-04-06
Last updated
2019-02-19
Results first posted
2019-02-19

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes15

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange From Baseline to Visit 2 in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III Motor ScoreBaseline (Visit 1/Week 1) to Visit 2 (Week 12/ 3 months after start of treatment with Neupro)
UPDRS Part III has 27 items assessing motor skills including facial expression and speech, tremors, rigidity, posture, gait, and bradykinesia. Each of the 27 items in the UPDRS part III is measured on a scale of 0 to 4, where 0 is normal and 4 represents severe abnormalities. The motor score ranges from 0 to 108, where the maximum score indicates the worse condition. A negative value in change in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale indicates improvement, whereas a positive value indicates worsening of disease.
PrimaryChange From Baseline to Visit 2 in Kinesia-ONE™ Variable: Finger Tapping Speed ScoreBaseline (Visit 1/Week 1) to Visit 2 (Week 12)
Kinesia-ONE™ measures were averaged from triplicate repeated assessments at a measurement point. Kinesia-ONE scores ranged from 0 to 4 (where 0 is normal and 4 represents severe abnormalities), with negative change from Baseline scores indicating improvement in disease symptoms.
PrimaryChange From Baseline to Visit 2 in Kinesia-ONE™ Variable: Rest Tremor ScoreBaseline (Visit 1/Week 1) to Visit 2 (Week 12)
Kinesia-ONE™ measures were averaged from triplicate repeated assessments at a measurement point. Kinesia-ONE scores ranged from 0 to 4 (where 0 is normal and 4 represents severe abnormalities), with negative change from Baseline scores indicating improvement in disease symptoms.
PrimaryChange From Baseline to Visit 2 in Kinesia-ONE™ Variable: Averaged Finger Tapping Speed and Resting Tremor ScoresBaseline (Visit 1/Week 1) to Visit 2 (Week 12)
Kinesia-ONE™ measures were averaged from triplicate repeated assessments at a measurement point. The finger tapping speed scores and resting tremor scores were averaged and provided as one score ranging from 0 to 4 (where 0 is normal and 4 represents severe abnormalities), with negative change from Baseline scores indicating improvement in disease symptoms.
PrimaryChange From Baseline to Visit 2 in Kinesia-ONE™ Variable: Postural Tremor ScoreBaseline (Visit 1/Week 1) to Visit 2 (Week 12)
Kinesia-ONE™ measures were averaged from triplicate repeated assessments at a measurement point. Kinesia-ONE scores ranged from 0 to 4 (where 0 is normal and 4 represents severe abnormalities), with negative change from Baseline scores indicating improvement in disease symptoms.
PrimaryChange From Baseline to Visit 2 in Kinesia-ONE™ Variable: Finger Tapping Amplitude ScoreBaseline (Visit 1/Week 1) to Visit 2 (Week 12)
Kinesia-ONE™ measures were averaged from triplicate repeated assessments at a measurement point. Kinesia-ONE scores ranged from 0 to 4 (where 0 is normal and 4 represents severe abnormalities), with negative change from Baseline scores indicating improvement in disease symptoms.
PrimaryChange From Baseline to Visit 2 in Kinesia-ONE™ Variable: Hand Grasp Speed ScoreBaseline (Visit 1/Week 1) to Visit 2 (Week 12)
Kinesia-ONE™ measures were averaged from triplicate repeated assessments at a measurement point. Kinesia-ONE scores ranged from 0 to 4 (where 0 is normal and 4 represents severe abnormalities), with negative change from Baseline scores indicating improvement in disease symptoms.
PrimaryChange From Baseline to Visit 2 in Kinesia-ONE™ Variable: Hand Grasp Amplitude ScoreBaseline (Visit 1/Week 1) to Visit 2 (Week 12)
Kinesia-ONE™ measures were averaged from triplicate repeated assessments at a measurement point. Kinesia-ONE scores ranged from 0 to 4 (where 0 is normal and 4 represents severe abnormalities), with negative change from Baseline scores indicating improvement in disease symptoms.
PrimaryChange From Baseline to Visit 2 in Kinesia-ONE™ Variable: Rapid Alternating Movement Speed ScoreBaseline (Visit 1/Week 1) to Visit 2 (Week 12)
Kinesia-ONE™ measures were averaged from triplicate repeated assessments at a measurement point. Kinesia-ONE scores ranged from 0 to 4 (where 0 is normal and 4 represents severe abnormalities), with negative change from Baseline scores indicating improvement in disease symptoms.
PrimaryChange From Baseline to Visit 2 in Kinesia-ONE™ Variable: Rapid Alternating Amplitude ScoreBaseline (Visit 1/Week 1) to Visit 2 (Week 12)
Kinesia-ONE™ measures were averaged from triplicate repeated assessments at a measurement point. Kinesia-ONE scores ranged from 0 to 4 (where 0 is normal and 4 represents severe abnormalities), with negative change from Baseline scores indicating improvement in disease symptoms.

Outcomes15

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange From Baseline to Visit 2 in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III Motor ScoreBaseline (Visit 1/Week 1) to Visit 2 (Week 12/ 3 months after start of treatment with Neupro)The Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all subjects who had at least 1 valid Baseline and at least 1 valid post-Baseline efficacy measurement.Scores on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
PRIMARYChange From Baseline to Visit 2 in Kinesia-ONE™ Variable: Finger Tapping Speed ScoreBaseline (Visit 1/Week 1) to Visit 2 (Week 12)The Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all subjects who had at least 1 valid Baseline and at least 1 valid post-Baseline efficacy measurement.Scores on scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
PRIMARYChange From Baseline to Visit 2 in Kinesia-ONE™ Variable: Rest Tremor ScoreBaseline (Visit 1/Week 1) to Visit 2 (Week 12)The Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all subjects who had at least 1 valid Baseline and at least 1 valid post-Baseline efficacy measurement.Scores on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
PRIMARYChange From Baseline to Visit 2 in Kinesia-ONE™ Variable: Averaged Finger Tapping Speed and Resting Tremor ScoresBaseline (Visit 1/Week 1) to Visit 2 (Week 12)The Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all subjects who had at least 1 valid Baseline and at least 1 valid post-Baseline efficacy measurement.Scores on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
PRIMARYChange From Baseline to Visit 2 in Kinesia-ONE™ Variable: Postural Tremor ScoreBaseline (Visit 1/Week 1) to Visit 2 (Week 12)The Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all subjects who had at least 1 valid Baseline and at least 1 valid post-Baseline efficacy measurement.Scores on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
PRIMARYChange From Baseline to Visit 2 in Kinesia-ONE™ Variable: Finger Tapping Amplitude ScoreBaseline (Visit 1/Week 1) to Visit 2 (Week 12)The Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all subjects who had at least 1 valid Baseline and at least 1 valid post-Baseline efficacy measurement.Scores on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
PRIMARYChange From Baseline to Visit 2 in Kinesia-ONE™ Variable: Hand Grasp Speed ScoreBaseline (Visit 1/Week 1) to Visit 2 (Week 12)The Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all subjects who had at least 1 valid Baseline and at least 1 valid post-Baseline efficacy measurement.Scores on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
PRIMARYChange From Baseline to Visit 2 in Kinesia-ONE™ Variable: Hand Grasp Amplitude ScoreBaseline (Visit 1/Week 1) to Visit 2 (Week 12)The Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all subjects who had at least 1 valid Baseline and at least 1 valid post-Baseline efficacy measurement.Scores on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
PRIMARYChange From Baseline to Visit 2 in Kinesia-ONE™ Variable: Rapid Alternating Movement Speed ScoreBaseline (Visit 1/Week 1) to Visit 2 (Week 12)The Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all subjects who had at least 1 valid Baseline and at least 1 valid post-Baseline efficacy measurement.Scores on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
PRIMARYChange From Baseline to Visit 2 in Kinesia-ONE™ Variable: Rapid Alternating Amplitude ScoreBaseline (Visit 1/Week 1) to Visit 2 (Week 12)The Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all subjects who had at least 1 valid Baseline and at least 1 valid post-Baseline efficacy measurement.Scores on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN

Results by group30

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change From Baseline to Visit 2 in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III Motor ScoreRotigotine + Standard Care FAS-1.0Standard Error 2.1Scores on a scale
Change From Baseline to Visit 2 in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III Motor ScoreRotigotine + Standard Care + Kinesia-360™ Wearable Device FAS-5.3Standard Error 2.0Scores on a scale
Change From Baseline to Visit 2 in Kinesia-ONE™ Variable: Finger Tapping Speed ScoreRotigotine + Standard Care FAS-0.394Standard Error 0.160Scores on scale
Change From Baseline to Visit 2 in Kinesia-ONE™ Variable: Finger Tapping Speed ScoreRotigotine + Standard Care + Kinesia-360™ Wearable Device FAS-0.389Standard Error 0.167Scores on scale
Change From Baseline to Visit 2 in Kinesia-ONE™ Variable: Rest Tremor ScoreRotigotine + Standard Care FAS-0.495Standard Error 0.231Scores on a scale
Change From Baseline to Visit 2 in Kinesia-ONE™ Variable: Rest Tremor ScoreRotigotine + Standard Care + Kinesia-360™ Wearable Device FAS-0.674Standard Error 0.238Scores on a scale
Change From Baseline to Visit 2 in Kinesia-ONE™ Variable: Averaged Finger Tapping Speed and Resting Tremor ScoresRotigotine + Standard Care FAS-0.450Standard Error 0.156Scores on a scale
Change From Baseline to Visit 2 in Kinesia-ONE™ Variable: Averaged Finger Tapping Speed and Resting Tremor ScoresRotigotine + Standard Care + Kinesia-360™ Wearable Device FAS-0.525Standard Error 0.156Scores on a scale
Change From Baseline to Visit 2 in Kinesia-ONE™ Variable: Postural Tremor ScoreRotigotine + Standard Care FAS-0.489Standard Error 0.141Scores on a scale
Change From Baseline to Visit 2 in Kinesia-ONE™ Variable: Postural Tremor ScoreRotigotine + Standard Care + Kinesia-360™ Wearable Device FAS-0.342Standard Error 0.143Scores on a scale

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDRotigotine + Standard Care20
Overall StudySTARTEDRotigotine + Standard Care + Kinesia-360™ Wearable Device19
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDRotigotine + Standard Care18
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDRotigotine + Standard Care + Kinesia-360™ Wearable Device17
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDRotigotine + Standard Care2
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDRotigotine + Standard Care + Kinesia-360™ Wearable Device2

Adverse events52

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherVision blurredEye disordersRotigotine + Standard Care0200
otherVision blurredEye disordersRotigotine + Standard Care + Kinesia-360™ Wearable Device1191
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersRotigotine + Standard Care0200
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersRotigotine + Standard Care + Kinesia-360™ Wearable Device1191
otherAbdominal distensionGastrointestinal disordersRotigotine + Standard Care1201
otherAbdominal distensionGastrointestinal disordersRotigotine + Standard Care + Kinesia-360™ Wearable Device0190
otherConstipationGastrointestinal disordersRotigotine + Standard Care1201
otherConstipationGastrointestinal disordersRotigotine + Standard Care + Kinesia-360™ Wearable Device0190
otherAbdominal discomfortGastrointestinal disordersRotigotine + Standard Care1201
otherAbdominal discomfortGastrointestinal disordersRotigotine + Standard Care + Kinesia-360™ Wearable Device0190

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityRotigotine + Standard Care020
Total, all-cause mortalityRotigotine + Standard Care + Kinesia-360™ Wearable Device019
Total, other adverse eventsRotigotine + Standard Care920
Total, other adverse eventsRotigotine + Standard Care + Kinesia-360™ Wearable Device1019
Total, serious adverse eventsRotigotine + Standard Care120
Total, serious adverse eventsRotigotine + Standard Care + Kinesia-360™ Wearable Device119

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons4

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Rotigotine + Standard Care SS vs Rotigotine + Standard Care + Kinesia-360™ Wearable Device SS: Number of Subjects With Any Adverse Events During the Course of the StudyTrial comparisons
Rotigotine + Standard Care SS vs Rotigotine + Standard Care + Kinesia-360™ Wearable Device SS: Number of Subjects Who Discontinued the Treatment With Neupro During the Course of the StudyTrial comparisons
Rotigotine + Standard Care vs Rotigotine + Standard Care + Kinesia-360™ Wearable Device: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Rotigotine + Standard Care vs Rotigotine + Standard Care + Kinesia-360™ Wearable Device: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03103919

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03103919/results?page=2