ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT03110029

Evaluating the Efficacy and Compatibility of Efinaconazole 10% Solution (Jublia) for the Treatment of Toenail Onychomycosis in Patients Wearing Toenail Polish Compared to Those Without Polish

NCT03110029, Phase 4, Completed, University of Alabama at Birmingham; results first posted 2019-03-20

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Evaluating the Efficacy and Compatibility of Efinaconazole 10% Solution (Jublia) for the Treatment of Toenail Onychomycosis in Patients Wearing Toenail Polish Compared to Those Without Polish. Trials, record NCT03110029. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT03110029

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Evaluating the Efficacy and Compatibility of Efinaconazole 10% Solution (Jublia) for the Treatment of Toenail Onychomycosis in Patients Wearing Toenail Polish Compared to Those Without Polish
NCT number
NCT03110029
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Enrollment
13 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Conditions
Onychomycosis of Toenail
Interventions
Efinaconazole 10% Topical Application Solution [JUBLIA], Application of Nail Polish
First posted
2017-04-12
Last updated
2019-06-27
Results first posted
2019-03-20

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes2

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercentage of Nail Polish Disruption Using the Likert Scale52 weeks
Patients will answer the following question: Which will be answered using a Likert scale where 0 represents no alteration in polish and 10 represents complete destruction of the polish: Is the quality of your polish diminished with use of Jublia?
SecondaryPercentage of Disease Improvement Using Onychomycosis Severity Index (OSI)52 week
Using 3rd party blinding, DLSO was assessed at baseline and at every subsequent visit using the onychomycosis severity index (OSI), measuring percent of the target nail involved, and grading the infection from mild to moderate to severe. The range for OSI is 0-20 with 20 indicating severe nails disease. Nail growth was measured at each visit. Fungal testing was done at screening, 3 months, 7 months, end of treatment (48 weeks), and end of study (52 weeks). Clinical and mycologic cure was evaluated at week 52.

Outcomes2

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercentage of Nail Polish Disruption Using the Likert Scale52 weeksOnly participants who completed the trial were included in results. Two participants withdrew due to personal scheduling conflicts.percentage of nail polish disruptionMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Disease Improvement Using Onychomycosis Severity Index (OSI)52 week
We did not include results from the two participants who withdrew from the study due to personal scheduling conflicts. Results for only 11 subjects who completed the study are represented in the number of participants analyzed.
percentage change target nailMEAN

Results by group4

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percentage of Nail Polish Disruption Using the Likert ScaleWearing Toenail Polish0.6Full Range 0 to 100percentage of nail polish disruption
Percentage of Nail Polish Disruption Using the Likert ScaleAbstain From Wearing Toenail Polish0Full Range 0 to 100percentage of nail polish disruption
Percentage of Disease Improvement Using Onychomycosis Severity Index (OSI)Wearing Toenail Polish0.56Full Range 0 to 100percentage change target nail
Percentage of Disease Improvement Using Onychomycosis Severity Index (OSI)Abstain From Wearing Toenail Polish0.54Full Range 0 to 100percentage change target nail

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDStudy Group (Frequently Wears Toenail Polish)7
Overall StudySTARTEDControl Group (no Toenail Polish)6
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDStudy Group (Frequently Wears Toenail Polish)6
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDControl Group (no Toenail Polish)5
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDStudy Group (Frequently Wears Toenail Polish)1
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDControl Group (no Toenail Polish)1

Adverse events0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

None in this release.

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityEfinaconazole 10% and Nail Polish07
Total, all-cause mortalityEfinaconazole 10% Without Nail Polish06
Total, other adverse eventsEfinaconazole 10% and Nail Polish07
Total, other adverse eventsEfinaconazole 10% Without Nail Polish06
Total, serious adverse eventsEfinaconazole 10% and Nail Polish07
Total, serious adverse eventsEfinaconazole 10% Without Nail Polish06

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Efinaconazole 10% and Nail Polish vs Efinaconazole 10% Without Nail Polish: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Efinaconazole 10% and Nail Polish vs Efinaconazole 10% Without Nail Polish: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03110029

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03110029/registered