ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT03124459

Study of ACE-083 in Patients With Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease

NCT03124459, Phase 2, Terminated, Acceleron Pharma, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ USA; results first posted 2021-07-28

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Study of ACE-083 in Patients With Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease. Trials, record NCT03124459. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT03124459

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Study of ACE-083 in Patients With Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease
NCT number
NCT03124459
Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
63 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Acceleron Pharma, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ USA
Conditions
Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease
Interventions
ACE-083, Placebo
First posted
2017-04-21
Last updated
2022-09-26
Results first posted
2021-07-28
Limitations and caveats
The study was terminated because the statistically significant increase in total muscle volume (TMV) failed to translate to statistically significant improvements in functional or disease-related quality of life secondary endpoints in the study.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes11

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPart 1: Frequency of Adverse EventsFrom initiation of treatment (Study Day 1) to end of follow-up period for Part 1 (Study Day 141).
Number of subjects with at least one adverse event related to treatment intervention from Part 1 of this study. Since this outcome measure was only pre-specified for Part 1, only data from the Part 1 participants is reported.
PrimaryPart 2: Percent Change in Muscle Volume to the End of the Double-blind Placebo-controlled Portion of the Study.From initiation of treatment (Study Day 1) to end of follow-up period of the double-blind placebo-controlled portion of the study (Study Day 190).
The percent change from baseline in volume of injected muscle, by MRI compared to the Day 190 Assessment is reported. The pre-specified timepoint for this outcome was only for data collected from participants to the end of the double-blind placebo controlled portion of the study, therefore data for the open-label arm of the study is not reported.
SecondaryPart 2: Absolute Change in Amount of Intramuscular Fat Tissue to the End of the Double-blind Placebo-controlled Portion of the StudyFrom initiation of treatment (Study Day 1) to end of follow-up period of the double-blind placebo-controlled portion of the study (Study Day 190).
The absolute change from baseline in intramuscular fat fraction of the injected muscle, by MRI compared to Day 190 Assessment is reported. The pre-specified timepoint for this outcome was only for data collected from participants to the end of the double-blind placebo controlled portion of the study, therefore data for the open-label arm of the study is not reported.
SecondaryPart 2: Percent Change in Muscle Strength to the End of the Double-blind Placebo-controlled Portion of the StudyFrom initiation of treatment (Study Day 1) to end of follow-up period of the double-blind placebo-controlled portion of the study (Study Day 190).
Percent change from baseline in strength of the injected muscle, by Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) compared to Day 190 Assessment is reported. The pre-specified timepoint for this outcome was only for data collected from participants to the end of the double-blind placebo controlled portion of the study, therefore data for the open-label arm of the study is not reported.
SecondaryPart 2: Percent Change in Muscle Function - Walk/Run Time to the End of the Double-blind Placebo-controlled Portion of the StudyFrom initiation of treatment (Study Day 1) to end of follow-up period of the double-blind placebo-controlled portion of the study (Study Day 190).
The percent change from baseline in functional assessments, as measured by 10-meter walk/run time when compared to Day 190 Assessment is reported. The pre-specified timepoint for this outcome was only for data collected from participants to the end of the double-blind placebo controlled portion of the study, therefore data for the open-label arm of the study is not reported.
SecondaryPart 2: Percent Change in Muscle Function - Walk Distance Assessed at the End of the Double-blind Placebo-controlled Portion of the StudyFrom initiation of treatment (Study Day 1) to end of follow-up period for the double-blind placebo-controlled portion of the study (Study Day 190).
Percent change from baseline in functional assessments, as measured by 6-minute walk distance when compared to Day 190 Assessment, is reported. The pre-specified timepoint for this outcome was only for data collected from participants to the end of the double-blind placebo controlled portion of the study, therefore data for the open-label arm of the study is not reported.
SecondaryPart 2: Change in Balance and Fall Risk at the End of the Double-blind Placebo-controlled Portion of the Study.From initiation of treatment (Study Day 1) to end of follow-up period of the double-blind placebo-controlled portion of the study (Study Day 190).
Change from baseline in static and dynamic balance, as measured by the Berg Balance Scale, a 14-item scoring system to assess balance and fall risk in adults. The Berg balance scale is used to objectively determine a patient's ability (or inability) to safely balance during a series of predetermined tasks. It is a 14 item list with each item consisting of a five-point ordinal scale ranging from 0 to 4, with 0 indicating the lowest level of function and 4 the highest level of function. Total scores are used for reporting, with a range of 0-56, with higher scores mean a better demonstration of function. A score of 56 indicates functional balance. A score of \< 45 indicates individuals may be at greater risk of falling. The pre-specified timepoints for reporting are baseline Berg scale score and Day 190 score, therefore data for the open-label arm of the study is not reported.
SecondaryPart 2: Percent Change in Balance and Fall Risk From Baseline to the End of the Double-blind Placebo-controlled Portion of the StudyFrom initiation of treatment (Study Day 1) to end of follow-up period of the double-blind placebo-controlled portion of the study (Study Day 190).
Percent change was calculated for the difference from baseline and Day 190 Assessment scores on the Berg Balance Scale. The Berg Balance Scale, is a 14-item scoring system to assess balance and fall risk in adults. The Berg balance scale is used to objectively determine a patient's ability (or inability) to safely balance during a series of predetermined tasks. It is a 14 item list with each item consisting of a five-point ordinal scale ranging from 0 to 4, with 0 indicating the lowest level of function and 4 the highest level of function. Total scores are used for reporting, with a range of 0-56, with higher scores mean a better demonstration of function. A score of 56 indicates functional balance. A score of \< 45 indicates individuals may be at greater risk of falling. The pre-specified timepoints for reporting are baseline Berg scale score and Day 190 score, therefore data for the open-label arm of the study is not reported.
SecondaryPart 2: Change in Clinical Examination Score From Baseline to End of the Double-blind Placebo-controlled Portion of the StudyFrom initiation of treatment (Study Day 1) to end of follow-up period of the double-blind placebo-controlled portion of the study (Study Day 190).
Change from baseline in the Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) Examination Score, version 2 (CMTES2), a composite scoring system to assess sensory and motor impairment in subjects with CMT. The total score is a subset of the following items from the CMT neuropathy score instrument: Sensory symptoms, Motor symptoms (legs), Motor symptoms (arms), Pinprick Sensibility, Vibration, Strength (legs), and Strength (arms). Each individual item is assessed using a rating from 0 to 4 inclusive. The range of CMTES2 scores is from 0 to 28 inclusive. A higher score means a greater degree of symptom severity. The Baseline score and score on the Day 190 Assessment are reported. The pre-specified timepoints for reporting are baseline Berg scale score and Day 190 score, therefore data for the open-label arm of the study is not reported.
SecondaryPart 2: Percent Change in Clinical Examination Score in Baseline to End of the Double-blind Placebo-controlled Portion of the StudyFrom initiation of treatment (Study Day 1) to end of follow-up period of the double-blind placebo-controlled portion of the study (Study Day 190).
Percent change was calculated for the difference in the Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) Examination Score (CMTES2) from baseline and Day 190 Assessment scores. The pre-specified timepoints for reporting are baseline Berg scale score and Day 190 score, therefore data for the open-label arm of the study is not reported.

Outcomes11

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPart 1: Frequency of Adverse EventsFrom initiation of treatment (Study Day 1) to end of follow-up period for Part 1 (Study Day 141).The Safety Set consists of all patients enrolled in the study who have received at least 1 dose of study drug.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
PRIMARYPart 2: Percent Change in Muscle Volume to the End of the Double-blind Placebo-controlled Portion of the Study.From initiation of treatment (Study Day 1) to end of follow-up period of the double-blind placebo-controlled portion of the study (Study Day 190).Per Protocol Set: All participants enrolled/randomized in the study who received at least 1 dose of the study drug (includes placebo) with no major protocol violationspercent changeLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYPart 2: Absolute Change in Amount of Intramuscular Fat Tissue to the End of the Double-blind Placebo-controlled Portion of the StudyFrom initiation of treatment (Study Day 1) to end of follow-up period of the double-blind placebo-controlled portion of the study (Study Day 190).Per Protocol Set: All participants enrolled/randomized in the study who received at least 1 dose of the study drug (includes placebo) with no major protocol violationsmm3LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYPart 2: Percent Change in Muscle Strength to the End of the Double-blind Placebo-controlled Portion of the StudyFrom initiation of treatment (Study Day 1) to end of follow-up period of the double-blind placebo-controlled portion of the study (Study Day 190).Per Protocol Set: All participants enrolled/randomized in the study who received at least 1 dose of the study drug (includes placebo) with no major protocol violationspercent changeLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYPart 2: Percent Change in Muscle Function - Walk/Run Time to the End of the Double-blind Placebo-controlled Portion of the StudyFrom initiation of treatment (Study Day 1) to end of follow-up period of the double-blind placebo-controlled portion of the study (Study Day 190).Per Protocol Set: All participants enrolled/randomized in the study who received at least 1 dose of the study drug (includes placebo) with no major protocol violationsPercent changeLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYPart 2: Percent Change in Muscle Function - Walk Distance Assessed at the End of the Double-blind Placebo-controlled Portion of the StudyFrom initiation of treatment (Study Day 1) to end of follow-up period for the double-blind placebo-controlled portion of the study (Study Day 190).Per Protocol Set: All participants enrolled/randomized in the study who received at least 1 dose of the study drug (includes placebo) with no major protocol violationsPercent changeLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYPart 2: Change in Balance and Fall Risk at the End of the Double-blind Placebo-controlled Portion of the Study.From initiation of treatment (Study Day 1) to end of follow-up period of the double-blind placebo-controlled portion of the study (Study Day 190).Per Protocol Set: All participants enrolled/randomized in the study who received at least 1 dose of the study drug (includes placebo) with no major protocol violationsscore on scaleMEAN
SECONDARYPart 2: Percent Change in Balance and Fall Risk From Baseline to the End of the Double-blind Placebo-controlled Portion of the StudyFrom initiation of treatment (Study Day 1) to end of follow-up period of the double-blind placebo-controlled portion of the study (Study Day 190).Per Protocol Set: All participants enrolled/randomized in the study who received at least 1 dose of the study drug (includes placebo) with no major protocol violationspercent change in score on scaleMEAN
SECONDARYPart 2: Change in Clinical Examination Score From Baseline to End of the Double-blind Placebo-controlled Portion of the StudyFrom initiation of treatment (Study Day 1) to end of follow-up period of the double-blind placebo-controlled portion of the study (Study Day 190).Per Protocol Set: All participants enrolled/randomized in the study who received at least 1 dose of the study drug (includes placebo) with no major protocol violationsscore on scaleMEAN
SECONDARYPart 2: Percent Change in Clinical Examination Score in Baseline to End of the Double-blind Placebo-controlled Portion of the StudyFrom initiation of treatment (Study Day 1) to end of follow-up period of the double-blind placebo-controlled portion of the study (Study Day 190).Per Protocol Set: All participants enrolled/randomized in the study who received at least 1 dose of the study drug (includes placebo) with no major protocol violations.percent change in score on scaleMEAN

Results by group27

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Part 1: Frequency of Adverse EventsPart 1 Cohort 1 (150 mg)6Participants
Part 1: Frequency of Adverse EventsPart 1 Cohort 2 (200 mg)5Participants
Part 1: Frequency of Adverse EventsPart 1 Cohort 3 (240 mg)6Participants
Part 2: Percent Change in Muscle Volume to the End of the Double-blind Placebo-controlled Portion of the Study.Part 2 (Double-blind Placebo Controlled) Placebo Arm2.2Standard Error 4.1percent change
Part 2: Percent Change in Muscle Volume to the End of the Double-blind Placebo-controlled Portion of the Study.Part 2 (Double-blind Placebo Controlled) ACE-083 Arm15.8Standard Error 4.3percent change
Part 2: Absolute Change in Amount of Intramuscular Fat Tissue to the End of the Double-blind Placebo-controlled Portion of the StudyPart 2 (Double-blind Placebo Controlled) Placebo Arm1Standard Error 1.8mm3
Part 2: Absolute Change in Amount of Intramuscular Fat Tissue to the End of the Double-blind Placebo-controlled Portion of the StudyPart 2 (Double-blind Placebo Controlled) ACE-083 Arm-2.1Standard Error 1.9mm3
Part 2: Percent Change in Muscle Strength to the End of the Double-blind Placebo-controlled Portion of the StudyPart 2 (Double-blind Placebo Controlled) Placebo Arm-3.4Standard Error 19.8percent change
Part 2: Percent Change in Muscle Strength to the End of the Double-blind Placebo-controlled Portion of the StudyPart 2 (Double-blind Placebo Controlled) ACE-083 Arm32.0Standard Error 19.8percent change
Part 2: Percent Change in Muscle Function - Walk/Run Time to the End of the Double-blind Placebo-controlled Portion of the StudyPart 2 (Double-blind Placebo Controlled) Placebo Arm-10.1Standard Error 4.7Percent change

Participant flow54

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Part 1-Open Label Dose EscalationSTARTEDPart 1 Cohort 1 (150 mg)6
Part 1-Open Label Dose EscalationSTARTEDPart 1 Cohort 2 (200 mg)6
Part 1-Open Label Dose EscalationSTARTEDPart 1 Cohort 3 (240 mg)6
Part 1-Open Label Dose EscalationSTARTEDPart 2 (Double-blind Placebo Controlled) Placebo Arm0
Part 1-Open Label Dose EscalationSTARTEDPart 2 (Double-blind Placebo Controlled) ACE-083 Arm0
Part 1-Open Label Dose EscalationSTARTEDPart 2 (Open-label) ACE-083 Arm0
Part 1-Open Label Dose EscalationCOMPLETEDPart 1 Cohort 1 (150 mg)6
Part 1-Open Label Dose EscalationCOMPLETEDPart 1 Cohort 2 (200 mg)6
Part 1-Open Label Dose EscalationCOMPLETEDPart 1 Cohort 3 (240 mg)6
Part 1-Open Label Dose EscalationCOMPLETEDPart 2 (Double-blind Placebo Controlled) Placebo Arm0

Adverse events966

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherpain in extremityMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersPart 1 Cohort 1(150mg)36
otherpain in extremityMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersPart 1 Cohort 2 (200mg)06
otherpain in extremityMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersPart 1 Cohort 3 (250mg)26
otherpain in extremityMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersPart 2 (Double-blind Placebo Controlled) Placebo Arm421
otherpain in extremityMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersPart 2 (Double-blind Placebo Controlled) ACE-083 Arm623
otherpain in extremityMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersPart 2 (Open Label)840
othermuscle spasmMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersPart 1 Cohort 1(150mg)16
othermuscle spasmMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersPart 1 Cohort 2 (200mg)26
othermuscle spasmMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersPart 1 Cohort 3 (250mg)16
othermuscle spasmMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersPart 2 (Double-blind Placebo Controlled) Placebo Arm121

Adverse event totals18

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityPart 1 Cohort 1(150mg)06
Total, all-cause mortalityPart 1 Cohort 2 (200mg)06
Total, all-cause mortalityPart 1 Cohort 3 (250mg)06
Total, all-cause mortalityPart 2 (Double-blind Placebo Controlled) Placebo Arm021
Total, all-cause mortalityPart 2 (Double-blind Placebo Controlled) ACE-083 Arm023
Total, all-cause mortalityPart 2 (Open Label)040
Total, other adverse eventsPart 1 Cohort 1(150mg)66
Total, other adverse eventsPart 1 Cohort 2 (200mg)66
Total, other adverse eventsPart 1 Cohort 3 (250mg)66
Total, other adverse eventsPart 2 (Double-blind Placebo Controlled) Placebo Arm1921

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
35545446DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03124459

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03124459/results?page=2