ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT03152552

A Dose Finding Study to Assess the Effect of LIK066 Compared to Placebo or Empagliflozin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Heart Failure

NCT03152552, Phase 2, Terminated, Novartis Pharmaceuticals; results first posted 2019-08-28

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Dose Finding Study to Assess the Effect of LIK066 Compared to Placebo or Empagliflozin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Heart Failure. Trials, record NCT03152552. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT03152552

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Dose Finding Study to Assess the Effect of LIK066 Compared to Placebo or Empagliflozin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Heart Failure
NCT number
NCT03152552
Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
125 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Conditions
Diabetes Mellitus and Heart Failure
Interventions
LIK066, Placebo, Empagliflozin
First posted
2017-05-15
Last updated
2019-08-28
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2016-003084-19
Results first posted
2019-08-28
Limitations and caveats
Due to early discontinuation of the study, the analysis of efficacy was done on the available data (mostly for Epoch 3 (double-blind period 1) only). Because of the small sample sizes the interpretation of the results remained limited.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes26

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange From Baseline in N-terminal Pro B-type Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) at Week 12Baseline, Week 12
Evaluation of NT-proBNP was performed by a central laboratory. For Change from baseline, Geometric mean is the geometric mean of the endpoint to baseline ratio. Pre-planned statistical analysis was not performed for this primary endpoint due to early study termination. Only descriptive statistics are presented.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Weeks 12 and 36Baseline, Week 12, Week 36
HbA1c was measured from a blood sample and analyzed using a National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program (NGSP) certified method at a central laboratory. Pre-planned statistical analysis was not performed for this secondary endpoint due to early study termination. Only descriptive statistics are presented.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Weeks 12 and 36Baseline, Week 12, Week 36
FPG was measured from a blood sample after an overnight fast; patients were not allowed to eat or drink anything (except water) for at least 8 h before each study visit. Samples were analyzed at a central laboratory. Pre-planned statistical analysis was not performed for this secondary endpoint due to early study termination. Only descriptive statistics are presented.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Body Weight at Weeks 12 and 36Baseline, Week 12, Week 36
Body weight was measured to the nearest 0.1 kg on a calibrated scale (weight and bio-impedance measurements), provided by the sponsor. Exceptionally (e.g. if the body weight exceeded the limits of the provided scale) sites were allowed to use another scale for weight measurement as available, but during the study the same scale was to be used for the same patient. The measurement was performed with the study patient in underwear and without shoes. Indoor clothing was also acceptable, but measurements were to be done consistently (either with underwear or with indoor clothing) throughout the study. Voiding before weight measurement was required. Pre-planned statistical analysis was not performed for this secondary endpoint due to early study termination. Only descriptive statistics are presented.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Body Composition Assessed by Bio-impedance (Total Body Fat Mass) at Weeks 12 and 36Baseline, Week 12, Week 36
Body composition was measured in all patients using bio-impedance, except in patients where it was contra-indicated, e.g. those using an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. Body composition parameters were assessed as available for the different models of calibrated bio-impedance scales. Pre-planned statistical analysis was not performed for this secondary endpoint due to early study termination. Only descriptive statistics are presented
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Body Composition Assessed by Bio-impedance (Visceral Fat Level) at Weeks 12 and 36Baseline, Week 12, Week 36
Body composition was measured in all patients using bio-impedance, except in patients where it was contra-indicated, e.g. those using an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. Body composition parameters were assessed as available for the different models of calibrated bio-impedance scales. Pre-planned statistical analysis was not performed for this secondary endpoint due to early study termination. Only descriptive statistics are presented. Visceral fat levels were measured by Omron device. Levels ranged from 1 - 30 and are relative (not absolute) values. The Omron scale values are: 0 - 9 (normal), 10 - 14 (high) and 15 - 30 (very high). Visceral fat area ( 0 - approx. 300cm\^2, 1 inch = 2.54 cm) distribution with 30 levels.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Body Composition Assessed by Bio-impedance (Lean Body Mass) at Weeks 12 and 36Baseline, Week 12, Week 36
Body composition was measured in all patients using bio-impedance, except in patients where it was contra-indicated, e.g. those using an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. Body composition parameters were assessed as available for the different models of calibrated bio-impedance scales. Pre-planned statistical analysis was not performed for this secondary endpoint due to early study termination. Only descriptive statistics are presented
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Body Composition Assessed by DXA (Total Body Fat Mass) at Weeks 12 and 36Baseline, Week 12, Week 36
A whole body DXA scan was performed to assess Total Body Fat Mass (Whole Body Minus Head Hologic, Whole Body Minus Head Lunar). DXA data were transferred to a central reading vendor for independent review and analysis. Only descriptive statistics done.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Body Composition Assessed by DXA (Visceral Fat Mass) at Weeks 12 and 36Baseline, Week 12, Week 36
A whole body DXA scan was performed to assess Visceral Fat Mass (Whole Body Minus Head Hologic, Whole Body Minus Head Lunar). DXA data were transferred to a central reading vendor for independent review and analysis. Only descriptive statistics done.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Body Composition Assessed by DXA (Lean Body Mass) at Weeks 12 and 36Baseline, Week 12, Week 36
A whole body DXA scan was performed to assess Lean Body Mass (Whole Body Minus Head Hologic, Whole Body Minus Head Lunar). DXA data were transferred to a central reading vendor for independent review and analysis. Only descriptive statistics done.

Outcomes26

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in N-terminal Pro B-type Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) at Week 12Baseline, Week 12The Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all randomized patients who were not mis-randomized. LIK066 doses and placebo arms are considered per study primary objective.ratioGEOMETRIC_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Weeks 12 and 36Baseline, Week 12, Week 36The Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all randomized patients who were not mis-randomized.Percentage (%)MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Weeks 12 and 36Baseline, Week 12, Week 36The Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all randomized patients who were not mis-randomized.millimoles per litre (mmol/L)MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Body Weight at Weeks 12 and 36Baseline, Week 12, Week 36The Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all randomized patients who were not mis-randomized.kilogram (kg)MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Body Composition Assessed by Bio-impedance (Total Body Fat Mass) at Weeks 12 and 36Baseline, Week 12, Week 36The Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all randomized patients who were not mis-randomized.Percentage of body fat massMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Body Composition Assessed by Bio-impedance (Visceral Fat Level) at Weeks 12 and 36Baseline, Week 12, Week 36The Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all randomized patients who were not mis-randomized.LevelMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Body Composition Assessed by Bio-impedance (Lean Body Mass) at Weeks 12 and 36Baseline, Week 12, Week 36The Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all randomized patients who were not mis-randomized.Percentage of body fat massMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Body Composition Assessed by DXA (Total Body Fat Mass) at Weeks 12 and 36Baseline, Week 12, Week 36
The Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all randomized patients who were not mis-randomized. The analysis included patients who participated in the DXA sub-study. Due to early termination of the study, only the data shown was available.
kilogram (kg)MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Body Composition Assessed by DXA (Visceral Fat Mass) at Weeks 12 and 36Baseline, Week 12, Week 36
The Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all randomized patients who were not mis-randomized. The analysis included patients who participated in the DXA sub-study. Due to early termination of the study, no data was collected.
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Body Composition Assessed by DXA (Lean Body Mass) at Weeks 12 and 36Baseline, Week 12, Week 36
The Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all randomized patients who were not mis-randomized. The analysis included patients who participated in the DXA sub-study. Due to early termination of the study, only the data shown was available.
kilogram (kg)MEAN

Results by group232

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change From Baseline in N-terminal Pro B-type Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) at Week 12LIK066 2.5mg0.895% Confidence Interval 0.5 to 1.2ratio
Change From Baseline in N-terminal Pro B-type Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) at Week 12LIK066 10mg0.695% Confidence Interval 0.2 to 1.7ratio
Change From Baseline in N-terminal Pro B-type Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) at Week 12LIK066 50mg0.895% Confidence Interval 0.7 to 1.1ratio
Change From Baseline in N-terminal Pro B-type Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) at Week 12Placebo1.195% Confidence Interval 0.8 to 1.6ratio
Change From Baseline in Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Weeks 12 and 36LIK066 2.5mgChange from BL at Week 12-0.29Standard Deviation 0.836Percentage (%)
Change From Baseline in Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Weeks 12 and 36LIK066 10mgChange from BL at Week 12-0.01Standard Deviation 0.508Percentage (%)
Change From Baseline in Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Weeks 12 and 36LIK066 50mgChange from BL at Week 12-0.58Standard Deviation 0.335Percentage (%)
Change From Baseline in Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Weeks 12 and 36EMPA 25mgChange from BL at Week 12-0.44Standard Deviation 1.176Percentage (%)
Change From Baseline in Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Weeks 12 and 36PlaceboChange from BL at Week 12-0.04Standard Deviation 0.913Percentage (%)
Change From Baseline in Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Weeks 12 and 36LIK066 2.5mgChange from BL at Week 360.13Standard Deviation 0.961Percentage (%)

Participant flow35

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Treatment Period 1 (12 Weeks)STARTEDLIK066 2.5mg15
Treatment Period 1 (12 Weeks)STARTEDLIK066 10mg16
Treatment Period 1 (12 Weeks)STARTEDLIK066 50mg31
Treatment Period 1 (12 Weeks)STARTEDEMPA 25mg30
Treatment Period 1 (12 Weeks)STARTEDPlacebo33
Treatment Period 1 (12 Weeks)Full Analysis Set (FAS)LIK066 2.5mg15
Treatment Period 1 (12 Weeks)Full Analysis Set (FAS)LIK066 10mg16
Treatment Period 1 (12 Weeks)Full Analysis Set (FAS)LIK066 50mg30
Treatment Period 1 (12 Weeks)Full Analysis Set (FAS)EMPA 25mg30
Treatment Period 1 (12 Weeks)Full Analysis Set (FAS)Placebo33

Adverse events230

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAtrial fibrillationCardiac disordersLIK066 2.5mg015
otherAtrial fibrillationCardiac disordersLIK066 10mg016
otherAtrial fibrillationCardiac disordersLIK066 50mg030
otherAtrial fibrillationCardiac disordersEMPA 25mg230
otherAtrial fibrillationCardiac disordersPlacebo133
otherConstipationGastrointestinal disordersLIK066 2.5mg015
otherConstipationGastrointestinal disordersLIK066 10mg116
otherConstipationGastrointestinal disordersLIK066 50mg030
otherConstipationGastrointestinal disordersEMPA 25mg130
otherConstipationGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo133

Adverse event totals15

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityLIK066 2.5mg015
Total, all-cause mortalityLIK066 10mg116
Total, all-cause mortalityLIK066 50mg030
Total, all-cause mortalityEMPA 25mg030
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo133
Total, other adverse eventsLIK066 2.5mg715
Total, other adverse eventsLIK066 10mg616
Total, other adverse eventsLIK066 50mg830
Total, other adverse eventsEMPA 25mg1230
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo933

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03152552

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03152552/registered?page=2