Trial · NCT03161093
Registered outcomes49
Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
1 to 20 of 49
Download this page as JSON| List | Outcome | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Change in the WOMAC Pain Subscale Scores From Baseline to Week 16 in Participants Treated With Fasinumab 1mg SC Q4W Compared With That of Participants Treated With Placebo | Baseline to Week 16 | The WOMAC index is comprised of 24 parameters grouped in 3 subscales (pain-5 questions, physical function -17 questions and stiffness - 2 questions), with 0-10 grading of each question. The scores for each subscale are summed up, divided by number of questions, and each subscale is reported using Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. In addition to subscales, a total score is provided as the sum of normalized subscale scores divided by three, and reported using a Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. Higher scores indicate worse pain, stiffness and functional limitations. |
| Primary | Change in the WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Scores From Baseline to Week 16 in Participants Treated With Fasinumab 1mg Q4W Compared With That of Participants Treated With Placebo | Baseline to Week 16 | The WOMAC index is comprised of 24 parameters grouped in 3 subscales (pain-5 questions, physical function -17 questions and stiffness - 2 questions), with 0-10 grading of each question. The scores for each subscale are summed up, divided by number of questions, and each subscale is reported using Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. In addition to subscales, a total score is provided as the sum of normalized subscale scores divided by three, and reported using a Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. Higher scores indicate worse pain, stiffness and functional limitations. |
| Primary | Change in the WOMAC Pain Subscale Scores From Baseline to Week 16 in Participants Treated With Fasinumab 1mg SC Q8W Compared With That of Participants Treated With Placebo | Baseline to Week 16 | The WOMAC index is comprised of 24 parameters grouped in 3 subscales (pain-5 questions, physical function -17 questions and stiffness - 2 questions), with 0-10 grading of each question. The scores for each subscale are summed up, divided by number of questions, and each subscale is reported using Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. In addition to subscales, a total score is provided as the sum of normalized subscale scores divided by three, and reported using a Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. Higher scores indicate worse pain, stiffness and functional limitations. |
| Primary | Change in the WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Scores From Baseline to Week 16 in Participants Treated With Fasinumab 1mg Q8W Compared With That of Participants Treated With Placebo | Baseline to Week 16 | The WOMAC index is comprised of 24 parameters grouped in 3 subscales (pain-5 questions, physical function -17 questions and stiffness - 2 questions), with 0-10 grading of each question. The scores for each subscale are summed up, divided by number of questions, and each subscale is reported using Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. In addition to subscales, a total score is provided as the sum of normalized subscale scores divided by three, and reported using a Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. Higher scores indicate worse pain, stiffness and functional limitations. |
| Secondary | Change in the Patient Global Assessment (PGA) Scores From Baseline to Week 16 in Participants Treated With Fasinumab 1mg Q4W Compared With That of Participants Treated With Placebo | Baseline to Week 16 | The Patient Global Assessment of OA (PGA) is a patient-rated assessment of current disease state on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = very good; 2 = good; 3 = fair; 4 = poor; and 5 = very poor). |
| Secondary | Change in the PGA Scores From Baseline to Week 16 in Participants Treated With Fasinumab 1mg Q4W Compared With That of Participants Treated With Naproxen | Baseline to Week 16 | The Patient Global Assessment of OA (PGA) is a patient-rated assessment of current disease state on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = very good; 2 = good; 3 = fair; 4 = poor; and 5 = very poor). |
| Secondary | Change In The PGA Scores From Baseline To Week 44 In Participants Treated With Fasinumab 1mg Q4W Compared With That Of Participants Treated With Placebo | Baseline to Week 44 | The Patient Global Assessment of OA (PGA) is a patient-rated assessment of current disease state on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = very good; 2 = good; 3 = fair; 4 = poor; and 5 = very poor). |
| Secondary | Percentage Of Participants Treated With Fasinumab 1mg Q4W, Compared With That of Participants Treated With Placebo, Who Had A Response At Week 16, With Response Defined As An Improvement By ≥30% In The WOMAC Pain Subscale Scores | Baseline to Week 16 | The WOMAC index is comprised of 24 parameters grouped in 3 subscales (pain-5 questions, physical function -17 questions and stiffness - 2 questions), with 0-10 grading of each question. The scores for each subscale are summed up, divided by number of questions, and each subscale is reported using Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. In addition to subscales, a total score is provided as the sum of normalized subscale scores divided by three, and reported using a Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. Higher scores indicate worse pain, stiffness and functional limitations. |
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Treated With Fasinumab 1mg Q4W, Compared With That of Participants Treated With Naproxen, Who Had A Response At Week 16, With Response Defined As An Improvement By ≥30% In The WOMAC Pain Subscale Scores | Week 16 | The WOMAC index is comprised of 24 parameters grouped in 3 subscales (pain-5 questions, physical function -17 questions and stiffness - 2 questions), with 0-10 grading of each question. The scores for each subscale are summed up, divided by number of questions, and each subscale is reported using Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. In addition to subscales, a total score is provided as the sum of normalized subscale scores divided by three, and reported using a Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. Higher scores indicate worse pain, stiffness and functional limitations. |
| Secondary | Change in WOMAC Pain Subscale Scores From Baseline to Week 16 In Participants Treated With Fasinumab 1mg Q4W, Compared With That of Participants Treated With Naproxen | Baseline to Week 16 | The WOMAC index is comprised of 24 parameters grouped in 3 subscales (pain-5 questions, physical function -17 questions and stiffness - 2 questions), with 0-10 grading of each question. The scores for each subscale are summed up, divided by number of questions, and each subscale is reported using Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. In addition to subscales, a total score is provided as the sum of normalized subscale scores divided by three, and reported using a Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. Higher scores indicate worse pain, stiffness and functional limitations. |
| Secondary | Change in WOMAC Pain Subscale Scores From Baseline to Week 44 in Participants Treated With Fasinumab 1mg Q4W, Compared With That of Participants Treated With Placebo | Baseline to Week 44 | The WOMAC index is comprised of 24 parameters grouped in 3 subscales (pain-5 questions, physical function -17 questions and stiffness - 2 questions), with 0-10 grading of each question. The scores for each subscale are summed up, divided by number of questions, and each subscale is reported using Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. In addition to subscales, a total score is provided as the sum of normalized subscale scores divided by three, and reported using a Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. Higher scores indicate worse pain, stiffness and functional limitations. |
| Secondary | Change in WOMAC Pain Subscale Scores From Baseline to Week 44 in Participants Treated With Fasinumab 1 mg Q4W, Compared With That of Participants Treated With Naproxen | Baseline to Week 44 | The WOMAC index is comprised of 24 parameters grouped in 3 subscales (pain-5 questions, physical function -17 questions and stiffness - 2 questions), with 0-10 grading of each question. The scores for each subscale are summed up, divided by number of questions, and each subscale is reported using Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. In addition to subscales, a total score is provided as the sum of normalized subscale scores divided by three, and reported using a Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. Higher scores indicate worse pain, stiffness and functional limitations. |
| Secondary | Change in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Scores From Baseline to the Average Score Across Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16, in Participants Treated With Fasinumab 1 mg Q4W Compared With That of Participants Treated With Placebo | Baseline to average score across weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16 | The WOMAC index is comprised of 24 parameters grouped in 3 subscales (pain-5 questions, physical function -17 questions and stiffness - 2 questions), with 0-10 grading of each question. The scores for each subscale are summed up, divided by number of questions, and each subscale is reported using Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. In addition to subscales, a total score is provided as the sum of normalized subscale scores divided by three, and reported using a Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. Higher scores indicate worse pain, stiffness and functional limitations. |
| Secondary | Change in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Scores From Baseline to the Average Score Across Weeks 36, 40 and 44 in Participants Treated With Fasinumab 1mg Q4W Compared With That of Participants Treated With Placebo | Baseline to average score across weeks 36, 40 and 44 | The WOMAC index is comprised of 24 parameters grouped in 3 subscales (pain-5 questions, physical function -17 questions and stiffness - 2 questions), with 0-10 grading of each question. The scores for each subscale are summed up, divided by number of questions, and each subscale is reported using Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. In addition to subscales, a total score is provided as the sum of normalized subscale scores divided by three, and reported using a Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. Higher scores indicate worse pain, stiffness and functional limitations. |
| Secondary | Change in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Scores From Baseline to Week 16 in Participants Treated With Fasinumab 1mg Q4W, Compared With That of Participants Treated With Naproxen | Baseline to Week 16 | The WOMAC index is comprised of 24 parameters grouped in 3 subscales (pain-5 questions, physical function -17 questions and stiffness - 2 questions), with 0-10 grading of each question. The scores for each subscale are summed up, divided by number of questions, and each subscale is reported using Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. In addition to subscales, a total score is provided as the sum of normalized subscale scores divided by three, and reported using a Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. Higher scores indicate worse pain, stiffness and functional limitations. |
| Secondary | Change in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Scores From Baseline to Week 44 in Participants Treated With Fasinumab 1mg Q4W, Compared With That of Participants Treated With Placebo | Baseline to Week 44 | The WOMAC index is comprised of 24 parameters grouped in 3 subscales (pain-5 questions, physical function -17 questions and stiffness - 2 questions), with 0-10 grading of each question. The scores for each subscale are summed up, divided by number of questions, and each subscale is reported using Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. In addition to subscales, a total score is provided as the sum of normalized subscale scores divided by three, and reported using a Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. Higher scores indicate worse pain, stiffness and functional limitations. |
| Secondary | Change in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Scores From Baseline to Week 44 in Participants Treated With Fasinumab 1mg Q4W, Compared With That of Participants Treated With Naproxen | Baseline to Week 44 | The WOMAC index is comprised of 24 parameters grouped in 3 subscales (pain-5 questions, physical function -17 questions and stiffness - 2 questions), with 0-10 grading of each question. The scores for each subscale are summed up, divided by number of questions, and each subscale is reported using Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. In addition to subscales, a total score is provided as the sum of normalized subscale scores divided by three, and reported using a Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. Higher scores indicate worse pain, stiffness and functional limitations. |
| Secondary | Change In WOMAC Pain Subscale Scores From Baseline To The Average Score Across Weeks 4, 8, 12 And 16, in Participants Treated With Fasinumab 1mg Q4W Compared With That of Participants Treated With Placebo | Baseline to average score across weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16 | The WOMAC index is comprised of 24 parameters grouped in 3 subscales (pain-5 questions, physical function -17 questions and stiffness - 2 questions), with 0-10 grading of each question. The scores for each subscale are summed up, divided by number of questions, and each subscale is reported using Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. In addition to subscales, a total score is provided as the sum of normalized subscale scores divided by three, and reported using a Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. Higher scores indicate worse pain, stiffness and functional limitations. |
| Secondary | Change in WOMAC Pain Subscale Scores From Baseline To The Average Score Across Weeks 36, 40 And 44 In Participants Treated With Fasinumab 1mg Q4W Compared With That of Participants Treated With Placebo | Baseline to average score across weeks 36, 40 and 44 | The WOMAC index is comprised of 24 parameters grouped in 3 subscales (pain-5 questions, physical function -17 questions and stiffness - 2 questions), with 0-10 grading of each question. The scores for each subscale are summed up, divided by number of questions, and each subscale is reported using Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. In addition to subscales, a total score is provided as the sum of normalized subscale scores divided by three, and reported using a Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. Higher scores indicate worse pain, stiffness and functional limitations. |
| Secondary | Change in the Patient Global Assessment (PGA) Scores From Baseline to Week 16 in Participants Treated With Fasinumab 1mg Q8W Compared With That of Participants Treated With Placebo | Baseline to Week 16 | The Patient Global Assessment of OA (PGA) is a patient-rated assessment of current disease state on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = very good; 2 = good; 3 = fair; 4 = poor; and 5 = very poor). |
Source ClinicalTrials.govtrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0
Sources 3
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
- ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
- ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)
ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.
For software
Read this list from software.
Twenty rows a page, as JSON. No key.
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03161093/registered