ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT03188666

A Study to Examine the Safety, Tolerability and Effects on Abnormal Bone Formation of REGN2477 in Patients With Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva

NCT03188666, Phase 2, Completed, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals; results first posted 2022-12-02

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Study to Examine the Safety, Tolerability and Effects on Abnormal Bone Formation of REGN2477 in Patients With Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva. Trials, record NCT03188666. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT03188666

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Study to Examine the Safety, Tolerability and Effects on Abnormal Bone Formation of REGN2477 in Patients With Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva
NCT number
NCT03188666
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
44 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
Conditions
Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva
Interventions
REGN2477, Matching placebo
First posted
2017-06-15
Last updated
2022-12-02
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2016-005035-33
Results first posted
2022-12-02

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes43

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPeriod 1: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEsUp to Week 28
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) are adverse events not present at baseline or represent the exacerbation of a pre-existing condition during the on-treatment period. A serious TEAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that resulted in any of following outcomes not present at baseline or represent the exacerbation of a pre-existing condition during the on-treatment period: death, life-threatening, required initial/prolonged in-participant hospitalization, persistent/significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect/considered as medically important event. Number of participants with TEAEs and Serious TEAEs are reported.
PrimaryPeriod 1: Number of Participants With TEAEs by SeverityUp to Week 28
Severity of TEAEs were graded as follows: Mild: Does not interfere in a significant manner with the participant's normal functioning level. It may be an annoyance. Prescription drugs are not ordinarily needed for relief of symptoms but may be given because of personality of the participants. Moderate: Produces some impairment of functioning but is not hazardous to health. It was uncomfortable or an embarrassment. Treatment for symptom may be needed. Severe: Produces significant impairment of functioning or incapacitation and was a definite hazard to the participant's health. Treatment for symptom may be given and/or participants hospitalized. Number of participants with TEAEs by severity is reported.
Primary
Period 1: Time-Weighted Average (Standardized Area Under the Curve [AUC]) of the Percent Change From Baseline in Total Lesion Activity by Fluorine-18-labeled Sodium Fluoride (18^F-NaF) Positron Emission Tomography (PET) at Week 28 (AHO)
Baseline and Week 28
18\^F-NaF PET is used to assess lesion and disease activity. Time-weighted average (standardized area under the curve \[AUC\]) of the percent change from baseline in total lesion activity by 18\^F-NaF PET up to Week 28 in AHO analysis set is reported.
PrimaryPeriod 1: Percent Change From Baseline in the Total Volume of HO Lesions as Assessed by Computed Tomography (CT) at Week 28 (AHO)Week 28
CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT scan acquired contemporaneously to the PET scan. Percent change from baseline in the total volume of HO lesions as assessed by CT during Period 1 at Week 28 is reported.
PrimaryPeriod 2: Number of New HO Lesions as Assessed by CT at Week 56 Relative to Week 28 Scan (AHO COVID-19 mITT)Week 28, Week 56
CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT scan acquired contemporaneously to the PET scan. HO detectable by CT that developed after baseline are referred to as "new HO lesions." Number of new HO lesions as assessed by CT at Week 56 relative to Week 28 scan is reported.
PrimaryPeriod 1: Time-weighted Average (Standardized AUC) of the Percent Change From Baseline in Total Lesion Activity Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET at Week 28 (AHOC)Week 28
18\^F-NaF PET is used to assess lesion and disease activity. Time-weighted average (Standardized AUC) of the percent change from baseline in total lesion activity as assessed by 18\^F-NaF PET in Active HO Classic ACVR1 Mutation (AHOC) analysis set up to Week 28 is reported.
PrimaryPeriod 1: Percent Change From Baseline in the Total Volume of HO Lesions as Assessed by CT at Week 28 (AHOC)Week 28
CT is a diagnostic imaging test used to create detailed images of internal organs, bones, soft tissue, and blood vessels. CT scan acquired contemporaneously to the PET scan. Percent change from baseline in the total volume of HO lesions was assessed by CT at Week 28 in AHOC analysis set is reported.
Secondary
Period 1: Time-weighted Average (Standardized AUC) of the Change From Baseline in Daily Pain Due to Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva (FOP) Assessed by Daily Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 28 (AHO)
Week 28
The pain NRS is a patient reported outcome (PRO) used by participants to rate their pain associated with FOP. Participants were asked to rate their pain on a scale that ranges from "0" (no pain) to "10" (worst possible pain), where the highest score indicated worst outcome. Time-weighted average (Standardized AUC) of the change from baseline in daily pain due to FOP assessed by daily NRS at Week 28 in AHO analysis set is reported.
SecondaryPeriod 1: Time-weighted Average (Standardized AUC) of the Change From Baseline in Daily Pain Due to FOP, Assessed by Daily NRS at Week 28 (AHOC)Week 28
The pain NRS is a PRO used by participants to rate their pain associated with FOP. Participants were asked to rate their pain on a scale that ranges from "0" (no pain) to "10" (worst possible pain), where the highest score indicated worst outcome. Time-Weighted average (standardized AUC) of the change from baseline in daily pain due to FOP assessed by daily NRS at Week 28 in AHOC analysis set is reported.
SecondaryPeriod 1: Percent Change From Baseline in 18^F-NaF SUVmax of Individual Active HO Site(s) Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET at Week 8 (AHOC)Week 8
Standardized uptake value max (SUVmax) was a measurement of the maximum radiopharmaceutical uptake within the volume of interest. Relative accuracy of a particular radiotracer in a particular tissue is determined by expressing the absolute accuracy (obtained in the primary outcome measure) in terms of percent difference between SUVmax values obtained from PET/CT. Percent Change in 18\^F-NaF SUVmax of Individual Active HO Site(s) assessed by 18\^F-NaF PET in AHOC analysis set is reported.

Outcomes43

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPeriod 1: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEsUp to Week 28The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received any study drug and was analyzed as treated.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
PRIMARYPeriod 1: Number of Participants With TEAEs by SeverityUp to Week 28The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received any study drug and was analyzed as treated.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
PRIMARY
Period 1: Time-Weighted Average (Standardized Area Under the Curve [AUC]) of the Percent Change From Baseline in Total Lesion Activity by Fluorine-18-labeled Sodium Fluoride (18^F-NaF) Positron Emission Tomography (PET) at Week 28 (AHO)
Baseline and Week 28
Baseline-active heterotopic ossification analysis set (AHO) included all randomized participants who had at least one active HO lesion at baseline; and was based on the treatment allocated (as randomized).
Percent ChangeLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
PRIMARYPeriod 1: Percent Change From Baseline in the Total Volume of HO Lesions as Assessed by Computed Tomography (CT) at Week 28 (AHO)Week 28AHO analysis set included all randomized participants who had at least one active HO lesion at baseline was based on the treatment allocated (as randomized).Percent ChangeLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
PRIMARYPeriod 2: Number of New HO Lesions as Assessed by CT at Week 56 Relative to Week 28 Scan (AHO COVID-19 mITT)Week 28, Week 56
COVID-19 mITT: All AHO participants who received a treatment in Period 2 for whom at least 1 post-Week 28 scan was collected and the period between any consecutive doses was less than 9 weeks (63 days) before the 1st post-week 28 scan. Overall number of participants analyzed are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. Separate analyses were conducted from week 56 relative to baseline for participants on treatment during both periods (REGN2477/REGN2477) as planned.
New HO LesionsNUMBER
PRIMARYPeriod 1: Time-weighted Average (Standardized AUC) of the Percent Change From Baseline in Total Lesion Activity Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET at Week 28 (AHOC)Week 28
AHOC analysis set included all randomized participants with the classic ACVR1 \[R206H\] mutation and who had at least one AHO at baseline, as defined by 18\^F-NaF PET positivity; and was based on the treatment allocated (as randomized). Overall number of participants analyzed are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
Percent ChangeLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
PRIMARYPeriod 1: Percent Change From Baseline in the Total Volume of HO Lesions as Assessed by CT at Week 28 (AHOC)Week 28
AHOC analysis set included all randomized participants with the classic ACVR1 \[R206H\] mutation and who had at least one AHO at baseline, as defined by 18\^F-NaF PET positivity; and was based on the treatment allocated (as randomized). Overall number of participants analyzed are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
Percent ChangeLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARY
Period 1: Time-weighted Average (Standardized AUC) of the Change From Baseline in Daily Pain Due to Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva (FOP) Assessed by Daily Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 28 (AHO)
Week 28
AHO analysis set included all randomized participants who had at least one active HO lesion at baseline; based on the treatment allocated (as randomized). Overall number of participants analyzed are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
Score on a ScaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYPeriod 1: Time-weighted Average (Standardized AUC) of the Change From Baseline in Daily Pain Due to FOP, Assessed by Daily NRS at Week 28 (AHOC)Week 28
AHOC analysis set included all randomized participants with the classic ACVR1 \[R206H\] mutation and who had at least one AHO at baseline, as defined by 18\^F-NaF PET positivity; and was based on the treatment allocated (as randomized). Overall number of participants analyzed are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
Score on a ScaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYPeriod 1: Percent Change From Baseline in 18^F-NaF SUVmax of Individual Active HO Site(s) Assessed by 18^F-NaF PET at Week 8 (AHOC)Week 8
AHOC analysis set included all randomized participants with the classic ACVR1 \[R206H\] mutation and who had at least one AHO at baseline, as defined by 18\^F-NaF PET positivity; and was based on the treatment allocated (as randomized). Overall number of participants analyzed are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
Percent ChangeMEAN

Results by group84

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Period 1: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEsPlaceboParticipants with at least one TEAE24Participants
Period 1: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEsREGN2477 10 mg/kg Q4WParticipants with at least one TEAE20Participants
Period 1: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEsPlaceboParticipants with at least one serious TEAE2Participants
Period 1: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEsREGN2477 10 mg/kg Q4WParticipants with at least one serious TEAE4Participants
Period 1: Number of Participants With TEAEs by SeverityPlaceboParticipants with at least one Mild TEAE9Participants
Period 1: Number of Participants With TEAEs by SeverityREGN2477 10 mg/kg Q4WParticipants with at least one Mild TEAE7Participants
Period 1: Number of Participants With TEAEs by SeverityPlaceboParticipants with at least one Moderate TEAE12Participants
Period 1: Number of Participants With TEAEs by SeverityREGN2477 10 mg/kg Q4WParticipants with at least one Moderate TEAE10Participants
Period 1: Number of Participants With TEAEs by SeverityPlaceboParticipants with at least one Severe TEAE3Participants
Period 1: Number of Participants With TEAEs by SeverityREGN2477 10 mg/kg Q4WParticipants with at least one Severe TEAE3Participants

Participant flow36

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Period 1 (28 Weeks Double-blind)STARTEDPlacebo24
Period 1 (28 Weeks Double-blind)STARTEDREGN2477 10 mg/kg Q4W20
Period 1 (28 Weeks Double-blind)STARTEDPlacebo/REGN2477 10 mg/kg Q4W0
Period 1 (28 Weeks Double-blind)STARTEDREGN2477/REGN2477 10 mg/kg Q4W0
Period 1 (28 Weeks Double-blind)COMPLETEDPlacebo24
Period 1 (28 Weeks Double-blind)COMPLETEDREGN2477 10 mg/kg Q4W19
Period 1 (28 Weeks Double-blind)COMPLETEDPlacebo/REGN2477 10 mg/kg Q4W0
Period 1 (28 Weeks Double-blind)COMPLETEDREGN2477/REGN2477 10 mg/kg Q4W0
Period 1 (28 Weeks Double-blind)NOT COMPLETEDPlacebo0
Period 1 (28 Weeks Double-blind)NOT COMPLETEDREGN2477 10 mg/kg Q4W1

Adverse events992

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersPlacebo92413
otherArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersREGN2477 10 mg/kg Q4W7208
otherArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersPlacebo/REGN2477 10 mg/kg Q4W82416
otherArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersREGN2477/REGN2477 10 mg/kg Q4W91924
otherPain in extremityMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersPlacebo92419
otherPain in extremityMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersREGN2477 10 mg/kg Q4W5206
otherPain in extremityMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersPlacebo/REGN2477 10 mg/kg Q4W62418
otherPain in extremityMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersREGN2477/REGN2477 10 mg/kg Q4W81922
otherMyalgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersPlacebo3243
otherMyalgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersREGN2477 10 mg/kg Q4W1201

Adverse event totals12

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo024
Total, all-cause mortalityREGN2477 10 mg/kg Q4W020
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo/REGN2477 10 mg/kg Q4W224
Total, all-cause mortalityREGN2477/REGN2477 10 mg/kg Q4W319
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo2424
Total, other adverse eventsREGN2477 10 mg/kg Q4W2020
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo/REGN2477 10 mg/kg Q4W2424
Total, other adverse eventsREGN2477/REGN2477 10 mg/kg Q4W1819
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo224
Total, serious adverse eventsREGN2477 10 mg/kg Q4W420

Papers6

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
32515349DERIVEDPubMed
32557665DERIVEDPubMed
37770652DERIVEDPubMed
39216107DERIVEDPubMed
39381032DERIVEDPubMed
41806277DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03188666

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03188666/registered?page=2