ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT03192137

Study to Evaluate ISV-305 Compared to Vehicle for Treatment of Inflammation and Pain Associated With Cataract Surgery

NCT03192137, Phase 3, Completed, Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Limited; results first posted 2020-06-29

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Study to Evaluate ISV-305 Compared to Vehicle for Treatment of Inflammation and Pain Associated With Cataract Surgery. Trials, record NCT03192137. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT03192137

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Study to Evaluate ISV-305 Compared to Vehicle for Treatment of Inflammation and Pain Associated With Cataract Surgery
NCT number
NCT03192137
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
260 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Limited
Conditions
Inflammation and Pain Associated With Cataract Surgery
Interventions
ISV-305, Vehicle
First posted
2017-06-19
Last updated
2021-11-19
Results first posted
2020-06-29

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes2

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryProportion of Participants With Anterior Chamber Cell (ACC) Grade 0 in Study Eye at Day 15 (Last Observation Carried Forward) in the Modified Intent to Treat (mITT) PopulationDay 15
Biomicroscopic measurement of anterior chamber cells was conducted in the surgery eye (study eye) by the same examiner from visit to visit whenever possible. A slit-lamp biomicroscope was used at x16 magnification with a 1 x 1 mm oblique high-intensity beam. Two cell counts were summed and divided by 2 to determine an average final anterior chamber cell count. This final cell count was converted to a grade: Grades 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 were assigned for cell counts of 0, 1 to 10, 11 to 20, 21 to 50, and \> 50, respectively. If the averaged count fell between two grades, the higher grade was selected (e.g., if the two counts were 10 and 11, the average of 10.5 fell into Grade 2). Missing anterior chamber cell grade at Day 15 was imputed by last non-missing scheduled post-baseline anterior chamber cell grade assessed prior to Day 15 (last observation carried forward).
SecondaryProportion of Participants Who Achieved a Pain Score of 0 on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Each Post-surgical AssessmentDay 1 to Day 29
Eye pain/discomfort in the study eye was evaluated at every visit except Visit 2 (Surgery; Day 0) using a VAS, scoring from 0 to 100 using a mark on a 100 mm line (0 = absent; 100 = maximum). Participants were asked to rate the feeling of the symptom in the study eye from absent to extreme by moving a slide on the side of the scale to align with images of descriptive faces.

Outcomes2

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYProportion of Participants With Anterior Chamber Cell (ACC) Grade 0 in Study Eye at Day 15 (Last Observation Carried Forward) in the Modified Intent to Treat (mITT) PopulationDay 15
mITT Population - included randomized participants who underwent cataract surgery, received at least one dose of ISV-305 or vehicle, and had at least one post-surgery efficacy assessment (ACC or VAS). Participants who received rescue medications were included in the mITT Population, but were treated as failures.
participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYProportion of Participants Who Achieved a Pain Score of 0 on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Each Post-surgical AssessmentDay 1 to Day 29
mITT Population - included randomized participants who underwent cataract surgery, received at least one dose of ISV-305 or vehicle, and had at least one post-surgery efficacy assessment (ACC or VAS). Participants who received rescue medications were included in the mITT Population but were treated as failures.
ParticipantsNUMBER

Results by group22

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Proportion of Participants With Anterior Chamber Cell (ACC) Grade 0 in Study Eye at Day 15 (Last Observation Carried Forward) in the Modified Intent to Treat (mITT) PopulationISV-3050 (did not receive rescue therapy)69participants
Proportion of Participants With Anterior Chamber Cell (ACC) Grade 0 in Study Eye at Day 15 (Last Observation Carried Forward) in the Modified Intent to Treat (mITT) PopulationVehicle0 (did not receive rescue therapy)16participants
Proportion of Participants With Anterior Chamber Cell (ACC) Grade 0 in Study Eye at Day 15 (Last Observation Carried Forward) in the Modified Intent to Treat (mITT) PopulationISV-3050 (received rescue therapy)0participants
Proportion of Participants With Anterior Chamber Cell (ACC) Grade 0 in Study Eye at Day 15 (Last Observation Carried Forward) in the Modified Intent to Treat (mITT) PopulationVehicle0 (received rescue therapy)0participants
Proportion of Participants With Anterior Chamber Cell (ACC) Grade 0 in Study Eye at Day 15 (Last Observation Carried Forward) in the Modified Intent to Treat (mITT) PopulationISV-305164participants
Proportion of Participants With Anterior Chamber Cell (ACC) Grade 0 in Study Eye at Day 15 (Last Observation Carried Forward) in the Modified Intent to Treat (mITT) PopulationVehicle130participants
Proportion of Participants With Anterior Chamber Cell (ACC) Grade 0 in Study Eye at Day 15 (Last Observation Carried Forward) in the Modified Intent to Treat (mITT) PopulationISV-30525participants
Proportion of Participants With Anterior Chamber Cell (ACC) Grade 0 in Study Eye at Day 15 (Last Observation Carried Forward) in the Modified Intent to Treat (mITT) PopulationVehicle210participants
Proportion of Participants With Anterior Chamber Cell (ACC) Grade 0 in Study Eye at Day 15 (Last Observation Carried Forward) in the Modified Intent to Treat (mITT) PopulationISV-30536participants
Proportion of Participants With Anterior Chamber Cell (ACC) Grade 0 in Study Eye at Day 15 (Last Observation Carried Forward) in the Modified Intent to Treat (mITT) PopulationVehicle312participants

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDISV-305173
Overall StudySTARTEDVehicle87
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDISV-305123
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDVehicle29
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDISV-30550
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDVehicle58

Adverse events28

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherIritisEye disordersISV-3056158
otherIritisEye disordersVehicle580
otherVisual acuity reducedEye disordersISV-3057158
otherVisual acuity reducedEye disordersVehicle280
otherEye painEye disordersISV-3053158
otherEye painEye disordersVehicle480
otherCystoid macular oedemaEye disordersISV-3052158
otherCystoid macular oedemaEye disordersVehicle380
otherEye inflammationEye disordersISV-3051158
otherEye inflammationEye disordersVehicle480

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityISV-3050158
Total, all-cause mortalityVehicle080
Total, other adverse eventsISV-30531158
Total, other adverse eventsVehicle2180
Total, serious adverse eventsISV-3053158
Total, serious adverse eventsVehicle080

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
ISV-305 vs Vehicle: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
ISV-305 vs Vehicle: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03192137

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03192137/results?page=2