ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT03197922

Treatment of Encopresis in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorders

NCT03197922, Phase 3, Completed, Emory University; results first posted 2024-01-31

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Treatment of Encopresis in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorders. Trials, record NCT03197922. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT03197922

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Treatment of Encopresis in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorders
NCT number
NCT03197922
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
117 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Emory University
Conditions
Encopresis, Autism Spectrum Disorder
Interventions
MIE Treatment, Glycerin Suppository, Treatment as Usual (TAU)
First posted
2017-06-23
Last updated
2024-01-31
Results first posted
2024-01-31

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes6

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercentage of Continent Bowel MovementsBaseline, Week 8The percentage to continent bowel movements, based on parent report during the prior 7 day period, are reported for Baseline and the end of treatment at Week 8.
SecondaryNumber of Children Responding to Treatment as Rated by the Clinical Global Impression Scale - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreWeek 8
The Clinical Global Impression Scale - Improvement (CGI-I) is a single item asking clinicians to indicate the degree of improvement following treatment on a 7-point scale. Responses are 1 = very much improved, 2 = much improved, 3 = minimally improved, 4 = no change, 5 = minimally worse, 6 = much worse, and 7 = very much worse. This study is interested in the proportion of children who are rated by the Independent Evaluator as "Much Improved" or "Very Much Improved" on the CGI-I at Week 8. Responding to treatment is defined as a score of 1 or 2, while scores of 3 to 7 are considered as not responding to treatment. Response to treatment is analyzed through imputation, consistent with an intent to treat approach, where participants who withdrew from the study or were lost to follow-up prior to the Week 8 assessment are considered to be non-responders.
SecondaryParenting Stress Index Short Form Total ScoreBaseline, Week 8
The Parenting Stress Index Short Form (PSI-SF) is a 36-item questionnaire assessing parental stress. It has three subscales of Parental Distress, Parent-Child Dysfunctional Interaction, and Difficult Child. Each subscale has 12 items where responses are given on a 5-point scale where 1 = strongly disagree and 5 = strongly agree. Scores for subscales range from 12 to 60 and the total score ranges from 36 to 180. Higher scores indicate greater parental stress.
SecondaryCaregiver Strain Questionnaire - Short Form 7 (CGSQ-SF7) Objective Strain Subscale ScoreBaseline, Week 8
The Caregiver Strain Questionnaire - Short Form (CGSQ-SF7) assesses parental stress and strain in the prior month in caregivers who are caring for a child with behavioral disorders. The CGSQ-SF includes 7 items where responses are given on a 5-point scale where "not at all" is scored as 0 and "very much" is scored as 4. The CGSQ-SF7 has two subscales: Objective Strain with four items, and Subjective Internalized Strain with three items. The total score for the Objective Strain subscale ranges from 0 to 16 and higher scores indicate greater parental strain.
SecondaryCaregiver Strain Questionnaire - Short Form 7 (CGSQ-SF7) Subjective Internalized Strain Subscale ScoreBaseline, Week 8
The Caregiver Strain Questionnaire - Short Form (CGSQ-SF7) assesses parental stress and strain in the prior month in caregivers who are caring for a child with behavioral disorders. The CGSQ-SF includes 7 items where responses are given on a 5-point scale where "not at all" is scored as 0 and "very much" is scored as 4. The CGSQ-SF7 has two subscales: Objective Strain with four items, and Subjective Internalized Strain with three items. The total score for the Subjective Internalized Strain subscale ranges from 0 to 12 and higher scores indicate greater parental strain.
SecondaryCaregiver Strain Questionnaire - Short Form (CGSQ-SF7) Total ScoreBaseline, Week 8
The Caregiver Strain Questionnaire - Short Form (CGSQ-SF7) assesses parental stress and strain in the prior month in caregivers who are caring for a child with behavioral disorders. The CGSQ-SF includes 7 items where responses are given on a 5-point scale where "not at all" is scored as 0 and "very much" is scored as 4. The CGSQ-SF7 has two subscales: Objective Strain with four items, and Subjective Internalized Strain with three items. A total score is obtained by adding the scores for each subscale. Total scores range from 0 to 28 where higher scores indicate greater caregiver strain.

Outcomes6

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercentage of Continent Bowel MovementsBaseline, Week 8This analysis includes participants with complete data from parent reports of bowel movements during the prior week.percentage of bowel movementsMEAN
SECONDARYNumber of Children Responding to Treatment as Rated by the Clinical Global Impression Scale - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreWeek 8ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYParenting Stress Index Short Form Total ScoreBaseline, Week 8
This analysis includes parents of children who were participating in the study at the indicated study visit. Twenty-seven participants withdrew or were lost to follow-up prior to the Week 8 assessment.
score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYCaregiver Strain Questionnaire - Short Form 7 (CGSQ-SF7) Objective Strain Subscale ScoreBaseline, Week 8
This analysis includes parents of children who were participating in the study at the indicated study visit. Twenty-seven participants withdrew or were lost to follow-up prior to the Week 8 assessment.
score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYCaregiver Strain Questionnaire - Short Form 7 (CGSQ-SF7) Subjective Internalized Strain Subscale ScoreBaseline, Week 8
This analysis includes parents of children who were participating in the study at the indicated study visit. Twenty-seven participants withdrew or were lost to follow-up prior to the Week 8 assessment.
score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYCaregiver Strain Questionnaire - Short Form (CGSQ-SF7) Total ScoreBaseline, Week 8
This analysis includes parents of children who were participating in the study at the indicated study visit. Twenty-seven participants withdrew or were lost to follow-up prior to the Week 8 assessment.
score on a scaleMEAN

Results by group36

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percentage of Continent Bowel MovementsMultidisciplinary Intervention for Encopresis (MIE) Treatment for One WeekBaseline27.33Standard Deviation 29.72percentage of bowel movements
Percentage of Continent Bowel MovementsMultidisciplinary Intervention for Encopresis (MIE) Treatment for Two WeeksBaseline16.99Standard Deviation 28.48percentage of bowel movements
Percentage of Continent Bowel MovementsTreatment as Usual (TAU)Baseline20.70Standard Deviation 25.80percentage of bowel movements
Percentage of Continent Bowel MovementsMultidisciplinary Intervention for Encopresis (MIE) Treatment for One WeekWeek 855.50Standard Deviation 33.18percentage of bowel movements
Percentage of Continent Bowel MovementsMultidisciplinary Intervention for Encopresis (MIE) Treatment for Two WeeksWeek 879.69Standard Deviation 29.51percentage of bowel movements
Percentage of Continent Bowel MovementsTreatment as Usual (TAU)Week 837.74Standard Deviation 35.92percentage of bowel movements
Number of Children Responding to Treatment as Rated by the Clinical Global Impression Scale - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreMultidisciplinary Intervention for Encopresis (MIE) Treatment for One WeekNo response (CGI-I score of 3 to 7)16Participants
Number of Children Responding to Treatment as Rated by the Clinical Global Impression Scale - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreMultidisciplinary Intervention for Encopresis (MIE) Treatment for Two WeeksNo response (CGI-I score of 3 to 7)26Participants
Number of Children Responding to Treatment as Rated by the Clinical Global Impression Scale - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreTreatment as Usual (TAU)No response (CGI-I score of 3 to 7)37Participants
Number of Children Responding to Treatment as Rated by the Clinical Global Impression Scale - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreMultidisciplinary Intervention for Encopresis (MIE) Treatment for One WeekResponse (CGI-I score of 1 or 2)10Participants

Participant flow9

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDMultidisciplinary Intervention for Encopresis (MIE) Treatment for One Week26
Overall StudySTARTEDMultidisciplinary Intervention for Encopresis (MIE) Treatment for Two Weeks47
Overall StudySTARTEDTreatment as Usual (TAU)44
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDMultidisciplinary Intervention for Encopresis (MIE) Treatment for One Week18
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDMultidisciplinary Intervention for Encopresis (MIE) Treatment for Two Weeks32
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDTreatment as Usual (TAU)40
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDMultidisciplinary Intervention for Encopresis (MIE) Treatment for One Week8
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDMultidisciplinary Intervention for Encopresis (MIE) Treatment for Two Weeks15
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDTreatment as Usual (TAU)4

Adverse events105

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherSeizuresNervous system disordersMultidisciplinary Intervention for Encopresis (MIE) Treatment for One Week026
otherSeizuresNervous system disordersMultidisciplinary Intervention for Encopresis (MIE) Treatment for Two Weeks147
otherSeizuresNervous system disordersTreatment as Usual (TAU)044
otherEar infectionEar and labyrinth disordersMultidisciplinary Intervention for Encopresis (MIE) Treatment for One Week026
otherEar infectionEar and labyrinth disordersMultidisciplinary Intervention for Encopresis (MIE) Treatment for Two Weeks047
otherEar infectionEar and labyrinth disordersTreatment as Usual (TAU)144
otherRhinitisInfections and infestationsMultidisciplinary Intervention for Encopresis (MIE) Treatment for One Week526
otherRhinitisInfections and infestationsMultidisciplinary Intervention for Encopresis (MIE) Treatment for Two Weeks447
otherRhinitisInfections and infestationsTreatment as Usual (TAU)444
otherSore throatGeneral disordersMultidisciplinary Intervention for Encopresis (MIE) Treatment for One Week126

Adverse event totals9

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityMultidisciplinary Intervention for Encopresis (MIE) Treatment for One Week026
Total, all-cause mortalityMultidisciplinary Intervention for Encopresis (MIE) Treatment for Two Weeks047
Total, all-cause mortalityTreatment as Usual (TAU)044
Total, other adverse eventsMultidisciplinary Intervention for Encopresis (MIE) Treatment for One Week2426
Total, other adverse eventsMultidisciplinary Intervention for Encopresis (MIE) Treatment for Two Weeks3547
Total, other adverse eventsTreatment as Usual (TAU)4144
Total, serious adverse eventsMultidisciplinary Intervention for Encopresis (MIE) Treatment for One Week026
Total, serious adverse eventsMultidisciplinary Intervention for Encopresis (MIE) Treatment for Two Weeks047
Total, serious adverse eventsTreatment as Usual (TAU)044

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03197922

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03197922/results?page=2