ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT03214081

Special Drug Use Surveillance of Vonoprazan for "Maintenance Therapy of Reflux Esophagitis: Long-term Use"

NCT03214081, Completed, Takeda; results first posted 2019-10-23

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Special Drug Use Surveillance of Vonoprazan for "Maintenance Therapy of Reflux Esophagitis: Long-term Use". Trials, record NCT03214081. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT03214081

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Special Drug Use Surveillance of Vonoprazan for "Maintenance Therapy of Reflux Esophagitis: Long-term Use"
NCT number
NCT03214081
Status
Completed
Enrollment
1,237 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Takeda
Conditions
Reflux Esophagitis
Interventions
Vonoprazan
First posted
2017-07-11
Last updated
2025-06-10
Results first posted
2019-10-23

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes12

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercentage of Participants Who Had One or More Adverse Drug ReactionsUp to 12 months
An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. Adverse drug reaction refers to AE related to administered drug.
SecondaryEndoscopic Relapse RateFrom the initiation of the maintenance therapy to Month 12 (or discontinuation of the therapy), up to 12 months
Endoscopic relapse rate was defined as a percentage of participants who met the criteria of Grade A to D in the modified Los Angeles (LA) classification. The modified LA classification graded endoscopic findings as follows- Grade N: normal mucosa; Grade M: minimal changes to the mucosa, such as erythema and/or whitish turbidity; Grade A: non-confluent mucosal breaks \<5 mm in length; Grade B: nonconfluent mucosal breaks ≥ 5 mm in length; Grade C: confluent mucosal breaks \<75% circumferential; Grade D: confluent mucosal breaks \>=75% circumferential.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Recorded Severity of Subjective Symptoms of HeartburnBaseline, Month 6 and at Month 12
Presence or absence and severity of subjective symptoms were collected from participants during medical interviews of each visit as none (asymptomatic), mild (occasionally or slightly symptomatic), moderate (considerably symptomatic), severe (unendurably symptomatic), and unknown. Number of participants who had mild, moderate, or severe heartburn at each time points were reported.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Recorded Severity of Subjective Symptoms of Acid RefluxBaseline, Month 6 and at Month 12
Presence or absence and severity of subjective symptoms were collected from participants during medical interviews of each visit as none (asymptomatic), mild (occasionally or slightly symptomatic), moderate (considerably symptomatic), severe (unendurably symptomatic), and unknown. Number of participants who had mild, moderate, or severe acid reflux at each time points were reported.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Recorded Severity of Subjective Symptoms of Postprandial FullnessBaseline, Month 6 and at Month 12
Presence or absence and severity of subjective symptoms were collected from participants during medical interviews of each visit as none (asymptomatic), mild (occasionally or slightly symptomatic), moderate (considerably symptomatic), severe (unendurably symptomatic), and unknown. Number of participants who had mild, moderate, or severe postprandial fullness at each time points were reported.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Recorded Severity of Subjective Symptoms of Early SatiationBaseline, Month 6 and at Month 12
Presence or absence and severity of subjective symptoms were collected from participants during medical interviews of each visit as none (asymptomatic), mild (occasionally or slightly symptomatic), moderate (considerably symptomatic), severe (unendurably symptomatic), and unknown. Number of participants who had mild, moderate, or severe early satiation at each time points were reported.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Recorded Severity of Subjective Symptoms of Epigastric PainBaseline, Month 6 and at Month 12
Presence or absence and severity of subjective symptoms were collected from participants during medical interviews of each visit as none (asymptomatic), mild (occasionally or slightly symptomatic), moderate (considerably symptomatic), severe (unendurably symptomatic), and unknown. Number of participants who had mild, moderate, or severe epigastric pain at each time points were reported.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Recorded Severity of Subjective Symptoms of Epigastric BurningBaseline, Month 6 and at Month 12
Presence or absence and severity of subjective symptoms were collected from participants during medical interviews of each visit as none (asymptomatic), mild (occasionally or slightly symptomatic), moderate (considerably symptomatic), severe (unendurably symptomatic), and unknown. Number of participants who had mild, moderate, or severe epigastric burning at each time points were reported.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Recorded Severity of Subjective Symptoms of Abdominal BloatingBaseline, Month 6 and at Month 12
Presence or absence and severity of subjective symptoms were collected from participants during medical interviews of each visit as none (asymptomatic), mild (occasionally or slightly symptomatic), moderate (considerably symptomatic), severe (unendurably symptomatic), and unknown. Number of participants who had mild, moderate, or severe abdominal bloating at each time points were reported.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Recorded Severity of Subjective Symptoms of Nausea/VomitingBaseline, Month 6 and at Month 12
Presence or absence and severity of subjective symptoms were collected from participants during medical interviews of each visit as none (asymptomatic), mild (occasionally or slightly symptomatic), moderate (considerably symptomatic), severe (unendurably symptomatic), and unknown. Number of participants who had mild, moderate, or severe nausea/vomiting at each time points were reported.

Outcomes12

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercentage of Participants Who Had One or More Adverse Drug ReactionsUp to 12 monthsSafety Analysis Set, The safety analysis set was defined as all participants who completed the survey.Percentage of ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYEndoscopic Relapse RateFrom the initiation of the maintenance therapy to Month 12 (or discontinuation of the therapy), up to 12 monthsEfficacy assessment population, The efficacy assessment population was defined as participants who completed the survey and had efficacy data at baseline and post-baseline time points available.Percentage of ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Recorded Severity of Subjective Symptoms of HeartburnBaseline, Month 6 and at Month 12
Efficacy assessment population, The efficacy assessment population was defined as participants who completed the survey and had efficacy data at baseline and post-baseline time points available. Number analyzed is the number of participants who were evaluable at each time point.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Recorded Severity of Subjective Symptoms of Acid RefluxBaseline, Month 6 and at Month 12
Efficacy assessment population, The efficacy assessment population was defined as participants who completed the survey and had efficacy data at baseline and post-baseline time points available. Number analyzed is the number of participants who were evaluable at each time point.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Recorded Severity of Subjective Symptoms of Postprandial FullnessBaseline, Month 6 and at Month 12
Efficacy assessment population, The efficacy assessment population was defined as participants who completed the survey and had efficacy data at baseline and post-baseline time points available. Number analyzed is the number of participants who were evaluable at each time point.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Recorded Severity of Subjective Symptoms of Early SatiationBaseline, Month 6 and at Month 12
Efficacy assessment population, The efficacy assessment population was defined as participants who completed the survey and had efficacy data at baseline and post-baseline time points available. Number analyzed is the number of participants who were evaluable at each time point.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Recorded Severity of Subjective Symptoms of Epigastric PainBaseline, Month 6 and at Month 12
Efficacy assessment population, The efficacy assessment population was defined as participants who completed the survey and had efficacy data at baseline and post-baseline time points available. Number analyzed is the number of participants who were evaluable at each time point.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Recorded Severity of Subjective Symptoms of Epigastric BurningBaseline, Month 6 and at Month 12
Efficacy assessment population, The efficacy assessment population was defined as participants who completed the survey and had efficacy data at baseline and post-baseline time points available. Number analyzed is the number of participants who were evaluable at each time point.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Recorded Severity of Subjective Symptoms of Abdominal BloatingBaseline, Month 6 and at Month 12
Efficacy assessment population, The efficacy assessment population was defined as participants who completed the survey and had efficacy data at baseline and post-baseline time points available. Number analyzed is the number of participants who were evaluable at each time point.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Recorded Severity of Subjective Symptoms of Nausea/VomitingBaseline, Month 6 and at Month 12
Efficacy assessment population, The efficacy assessment population was defined as participants who completed the survey and had efficacy data at baseline and post-baseline time points available. Number analyzed is the number of participants who were evaluable at each time point.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS

Results by group92

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percentage of Participants Who Had One or More Adverse Drug ReactionsVonoprazan 10 mg or 20 mg2.30Percentage of Participants
Endoscopic Relapse RateVonoprazan 10 mg or 20 mg4.0095% Confidence Interval 2.35 to 6.33Percentage of Participants
Number of Participants With Recorded Severity of Subjective Symptoms of HeartburnVonoprazan 10 mg or 20 mgBaseline / Mild368Participants
Number of Participants With Recorded Severity of Subjective Symptoms of HeartburnVonoprazan 10 mg or 20 mgBaseline / Moderate270Participants
Number of Participants With Recorded Severity of Subjective Symptoms of HeartburnVonoprazan 10 mg or 20 mgBaseline / Severe26Participants
Number of Participants With Recorded Severity of Subjective Symptoms of HeartburnVonoprazan 10 mg or 20 mgMonth 6 / Mild136Participants
Number of Participants With Recorded Severity of Subjective Symptoms of HeartburnVonoprazan 10 mg or 20 mgMonth 6 / Moderate17Participants
Number of Participants With Recorded Severity of Subjective Symptoms of HeartburnVonoprazan 10 mg or 20 mgMonth 6 / Severe2Participants
Number of Participants With Recorded Severity of Subjective Symptoms of HeartburnVonoprazan 10 mg or 20 mgMonth 12 / Mild84Participants
Number of Participants With Recorded Severity of Subjective Symptoms of HeartburnVonoprazan 10 mg or 20 mgMonth 12 / Moderate7Participants

Participant flow3

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDVonoprazan 10 mg or 20 mg1,237
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDVonoprazan 10 mg or 20 mg1,174
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDVonoprazan 10 mg or 20 mg63

Adverse events18

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersVonoprazan 10 mg or 20 mg111,174
seriousPneumoniaInfections and infestationsVonoprazan 10 mg or 20 mg21,174
seriousPeritonitis bacterialInfections and infestationsVonoprazan 10 mg or 20 mg11,174
seriousAcute LeukaemiaNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)Vonoprazan 10 mg or 20 mg11,174
seriousLymphomaNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)Vonoprazan 10 mg or 20 mg11,174
seriousMyelodysplastic syndromeNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)Vonoprazan 10 mg or 20 mg11,174
seriousHepatic cancerNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)Vonoprazan 10 mg or 20 mg11,174
seriousMyelopathyNervous system disordersVonoprazan 10 mg or 20 mg11,174
seriousSubarachnoid haemorrhageNervous system disordersVonoprazan 10 mg or 20 mg11,174
seriousAngina unstableCardiac disordersVonoprazan 10 mg or 20 mg11,174

Adverse event totals3

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityVonoprazan 10 mg or 20 mg71,174
Total, other adverse eventsVonoprazan 10 mg or 20 mg111,174
Total, serious adverse eventsVonoprazan 10 mg or 20 mg151,174

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
41982134DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03214081

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03214081/results?page=2