ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT03214588

Efficacy, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of Multiple Doses of Oral TAK-831 in Adults With Friedreich Ataxia

NCT03214588, Phase 2, Completed, Neurocrine Biosciences; results first posted 2019-12-19

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Efficacy, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of Multiple Doses of Oral TAK-831 in Adults With Friedreich Ataxia. Trials, record NCT03214588. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT03214588

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Efficacy, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of Multiple Doses of Oral TAK-831 in Adults With Friedreich Ataxia
NCT number
NCT03214588
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
67 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Neurocrine Biosciences
Conditions
Friedreich Ataxia
Interventions
TAK-831, TAK-831 Placebo
First posted
2017-07-11
Last updated
2021-06-14
Results first posted
2019-12-19

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes20

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange From Baseline in the Inverse Time to Complete the 9-Hole Peg Test (9-HPT-1)Baseline and Week 12
The 9-HPT-1 is a measure of timed upper extremity (arm and hand) function and manual dexterity. The participant picks up pegs 1 at a time (9 in total), using 1 hand only, and places them into holes on the board as quickly as possible, in any order until all holes are filled. Then, without pausing, the participant removes the pegs 1 at a time and returns them as quickly as possible. Each participant performs this task twice with each hand separately. Results on both tests are then averaged for an overall task completion time and the inverse transform is performed. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. Change from Baseline in 9-HPT-1 was analyzed using mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with Baseline 9-HPT-1 as a covariate; pooled site, visit, treatment, and ambulation status (randomization factor) as fixed factors; and treatment-by-visit and Baseline 9-HPT-1-by-visit interactions.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Component Score of the Friedreich Ataxia Rating Scale (FARS)Baseline and Weeks 2, 7 and 12
The ADL component of the FARS includes 9 subscales: speech, swallowing, cutting food and handling utensils, dressing, personal hygiene, falling, walking, quality of sitting position, and bladder function. Each of these subscales is rated on a 5-point scale where 0=normal to 4=severe disability/inability to carry out activity independently for a total possible score of 0 to 36, with higher scores representing greater disability/dependency. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Change from Baseline in FARS ADL upper limb function items were analyzed using MMRM ANCOVA with Baseline FARS ADL as a covariate; pooled site, visit, treatment, and ambulation status (randomization factor) as fixed factors; and treatment-by-visit and Baseline FARS ADL-by-visit interactions.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the Inverse Time to Complete the 9-HPT-1Baseline and Weeks 2 and 7
The 9-HPT-1 is a measure of timed upper extremity (arm and hand) function and manual dexterity. The participant picks up pegs 1 at a time (9 in total), using 1 hand only, and places them into holes on the board as quickly as possible, in any order until all holes are filled. Then, without pausing, the participant removes the pegs 1 at a time and returns them as quickly as possible. Each participant performs this task twice with each hand separately. Results on both tests are then averaged for an overall task completion time, and the inverse transform is performed. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. Change from Baseline in 9-HPT-1 was analyzed using MMRM ANCOVA with Baseline 9-HPT-1 as a covariate; pooled site, visit, treatment, and ambulation status (randomization factor) as fixed factors; and treatment-by-visit and Baseline 9-HPT-1-by-visit interactions.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the ADL Component Individual Item ScoresBaseline and Weeks 2, 7 and 12
The ADL component of the FARS includes 9 subscales: speech, swallowing, cutting food and handling utensils, dressing, personal hygiene, falling, walking, quality of sitting position, and bladder function. Each of these subscales is rated on a 5-point scale where 0=normal to 4=severe disability/inability to carry out activity independently. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Statistical analyses were available for the following subscales: cutting food-handling utensils, dressing and personal hygiene.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the Modified Friedreich Ataxia Rating Scale Neurological Examination (mFARS-neuro) Total ScoreBaseline and Weeks 2, 7 and 12
The mFARS-neuro neurological examination is a clinician-rated measure based on neural substrates affected in Friedreich ataxia including: bulbar on a scale of 0-11, upper limb coordination on a scale of 0-36, lower limb coordination on a scale of 0-16, and upright stability/gait functions on a scale of 0-36 for a total possible score of 0 to 99 with higher scores representing greater disability. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Change from Baseline in mFARS-neuro was analyzed using MMRM ANCOVA with Baseline mFARS-neuro as a covariate; pooled site, visit, treatment, and ambulation status (randomization factor) as fixed factors; and treatment-by-visit and Baseline mFARS-neuro-by-visit interactions.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the mFARS-neuro Subscales ScoresBaseline and Weeks 2, 7, and 12
The mFARS-neuro neurological examination is a clinician-rated measure based on neural substrates affected in Friedreich ataxia including: bulbar on a scale of 0-11, upper limb coordination on a scale of 0-36, lower limb coordination on a scale of 0-16, and upright stability/gait functions on a scale of 0-36, with the higher scores representing greater disability. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Change from Baseline in mFARS-neuro was analyzed using MMRM ANCOVA with Baseline mFARS-neuro as a covariate; pooled site, visit, treatment, and ambulation status (randomization factor) as fixed factors; and treatment-by-visit and Baseline mFARS-neuro-by visit interactions.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the mFARS-neuro Individual Item ScoresBaseline and Weeks 2, 7, and 12
mFARS-neuro examination is a clinician-rated measure based on neural substrates affected in Friedreich ataxia individual items:Cough,Speech,Right(R)Finger to Finger Test,Left(L)Finger to Finger Test,R-Nose to Finger Test,L-Nose to Finger Test,R-Dysmetria Test,L-Dysmetria Test,Rapid Alternating Movement(RAM)of R-Hands,RAM of L-Hands,R-Finger Taps(FT),L-FT,R-Heel Along Shin Slide,L-Heel Along Shin Slide,R-Heel Along Shin Tap,L-Heel Along Shin Tap,Siting Posture,Stance Feet Apart(SFA)-3 Trial Average(TTA),SFA(Eyes Closed)-TTA,Stance Feet Together(SFT)-TTA,SFT(Eyes Closed)-TTA,Tandem Stance-TTA,Stance on Dominant Foot-TTA,Tandem Walk and Gait.Items were scored on scale of 0 to 2,3,4 or 5,with higher scores indicating greater disability.Negative change from Baseline(BL)indicates improvement.Change from BL in mFARS-neuro was analyzed using MMRM ANCOVA with BL as covariate;pooled site,visit,treatment,ambulation status as fixed factors;treatment-by-visit,BL mFARS-neuro-by visit interactions.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the Timed 25-Foot Walk (T25FW)Baseline and Weeks 2, 7 and 12
The participant was instructed to walk 25 feet as quickly as possible, but safely. The time was calculated from the initiation of the instruction to start and ends when the participant has reached the 25-foot mark. The task was immediately administered again by having the participant walk back the same distance. The two trials were averaged. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Change from Baseline in T25FW was analyzed using MMRM ANCOVA with Baseline T25FW as a covariate; pooled site, visit, treatment, and ambulation status (randomization factor) as fixed factors; and treatment-by-visit and Baseline T25FW-by-visit interactions.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the 9-HPT and T25FW Composite ScoreBaseline and Weeks 2, 7, and 12
9-HPT and T25FW were evaluated together as a performance-based composite measure. The inverse transform of each score was computed. The inverse scores from each test were tabulated and converted to test-specific Z scores by subtracting the cohort mean from the raw score, and then dividing by the cohort standard deviation (SD) to create a Z score for the test. The composite Z scores were created by subtracting Z-score for T25FW from the Z-score for 9-HPT-1. A larger Z-score represents a better outcome. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. Change from Baseline in composite score was analyzed using MMRM ANCOVA with Baseline composite score as a covariate; pooled site, visit, treatment, and ambulation status (randomization factor) as fixed factors; and treatment-by-visit and Baseline composite score-by-visit interactions.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Low-Contrast Letter Acuity (LCLA) Test ScoreBaseline and Weeks 2, 7, and, 12
The LCLA test assessed visual function in both eyes using the Low-Contrast Sloan Letter Charts at different contrast levels. The score ranged from 0 to 70, where 0=worst visual functioning and 70=best visual functioning. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. The change from Baseline in LCLA was analyzed using MMRM ANCOVA with Baseline LCLA as a covariate; pooled site, visit, treatment, and ambulation status (randomization factor) as fixed factors; and treatment-by-visit and Baseline LCLA-by-visit interactions.

Outcomes20

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in the Inverse Time to Complete the 9-Hole Peg Test (9-HPT-1)Baseline and Week 12
Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participant who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis at the given time-point.
1/secondsLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in the Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Component Score of the Friedreich Ataxia Rating Scale (FARS)Baseline and Weeks 2, 7 and 12
FAS included all randomized participant who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis at the given time-point.
score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in the Inverse Time to Complete the 9-HPT-1Baseline and Weeks 2 and 7
FAS included all randomized participant who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis at the given time-point.
1/secondsLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in the ADL Component Individual Item ScoresBaseline and Weeks 2, 7 and 12
FAS included all randomized participant who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis at the given time-point.
score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in the Modified Friedreich Ataxia Rating Scale Neurological Examination (mFARS-neuro) Total ScoreBaseline and Weeks 2, 7 and 12
FAS included all randomized participant who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis at the given time-point.
score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in the mFARS-neuro Subscales ScoresBaseline and Weeks 2, 7, and 12
FAS included all randomized participant who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis at the given time-point.
unit on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in the mFARS-neuro Individual Item ScoresBaseline and Weeks 2, 7, and 12
FAS included all randomized participant who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis at the given time-point.
score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in the Timed 25-Foot Walk (T25FW)Baseline and Weeks 2, 7 and 12
FAS included all randomized participant who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis at the given time-point.
secondsLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in the 9-HPT and T25FW Composite ScoreBaseline and Weeks 2, 7, and 12
FAS included all randomized participant who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis at the given time-point.
z-scoreLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Low-Contrast Letter Acuity (LCLA) Test ScoreBaseline and Weeks 2, 7, and, 12
FAS included all randomized participant who received at least 1 dose of the study drug for the treatment period. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis at the given time-point.
score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN

Results by group1,122

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change From Baseline in the Inverse Time to Complete the 9-Hole Peg Test (9-HPT-1)Placebo0.00038Standard Error 0.0004481/seconds
Change From Baseline in the Inverse Time to Complete the 9-Hole Peg Test (9-HPT-1)TAK-831 75 mg-0.00017Standard Error 0.0006221/seconds
Change From Baseline in the Inverse Time to Complete the 9-Hole Peg Test (9-HPT-1)TAK-831 300 mg-0.00032Standard Error 0.0004451/seconds
Change From Baseline in the Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Component Score of the Friedreich Ataxia Rating Scale (FARS)PlaceboChange from Baseline at Week 2-0.25Standard Error 0.468score on a scale
Change From Baseline in the Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Component Score of the Friedreich Ataxia Rating Scale (FARS)TAK-831 75 mgChange from Baseline at Week 2-1.12Standard Error 0.665score on a scale
Change From Baseline in the Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Component Score of the Friedreich Ataxia Rating Scale (FARS)TAK-831 300 mgChange from Baseline at Week 20.34Standard Error 0.463score on a scale
Change From Baseline in the Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Component Score of the Friedreich Ataxia Rating Scale (FARS)PlaceboChange from Baseline at Week 7-0.33Standard Error 0.465score on a scale
Change From Baseline in the Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Component Score of the Friedreich Ataxia Rating Scale (FARS)TAK-831 75 mgChange from Baseline at Week 7-0.15Standard Error 0.655score on a scale
Change From Baseline in the Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Component Score of the Friedreich Ataxia Rating Scale (FARS)TAK-831 300 mgChange from Baseline at Week 70.03Standard Error 0.467score on a scale
Change From Baseline in the Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Component Score of the Friedreich Ataxia Rating Scale (FARS)PlaceboChange from Baseline at Week 12-0.61Standard Error 0.493score on a scale

Participant flow9

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo27
Overall StudySTARTEDTAK-831 75 mg14
Overall StudySTARTEDTAK-831 300 mg26
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo26
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDTAK-831 75 mg13
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDTAK-831 300 mg24
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo1
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDTAK-831 75 mg1
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDTAK-831 300 mg2

Adverse events144

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAngina pectorisCardiac disordersPlacebo027
otherAngina pectorisCardiac disordersTAK-831 75 mg114
otherAngina pectorisCardiac disordersTAK-831 300 mg026
otherVertigoEar and labyrinth disordersPlacebo127
otherVertigoEar and labyrinth disordersTAK-831 75 mg114
otherVertigoEar and labyrinth disordersTAK-831 300 mg026
otherAltered visual depth perceptionEye disordersPlacebo027
otherAltered visual depth perceptionEye disordersTAK-831 75 mg114
otherAltered visual depth perceptionEye disordersTAK-831 300 mg026
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo427

Adverse event totals9

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo027
Total, all-cause mortalityTAK-831 75 mg014
Total, all-cause mortalityTAK-831 300 mg026
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo2127
Total, other adverse eventsTAK-831 75 mg1014
Total, other adverse eventsTAK-831 300 mg2426
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo027
Total, serious adverse eventsTAK-831 75 mg014
Total, serious adverse eventsTAK-831 300 mg026

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03214588

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03214588/results?page=2