ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT03232281

Study to Compare the Oestradiol Suppression, Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Two Formulations of Triptorelin (Triptorelin Pamoate PR 3-month and Triptorelin Acetate PR 1-month) in Chinese Subjects With Endometriosis

NCT03232281, Phase 3, Completed, Ipsen; results first posted 2021-10-14

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Study to Compare the Oestradiol Suppression, Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Two Formulations of Triptorelin (Triptorelin Pamoate PR 3-month and Triptorelin Acetate PR 1-month) in Chinese Subjects With Endometriosis. Trials, record NCT03232281. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT03232281

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Study to Compare the Oestradiol Suppression, Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Two Formulations of Triptorelin (Triptorelin Pamoate PR 3-month and Triptorelin Acetate PR 1-month) in Chinese Subjects With Endometriosis
NCT number
NCT03232281
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
300 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Ipsen
Conditions
Endometriosis
Interventions
Triptorelin Pamoate PR 3-month, Triptorelin Acetate PR 1-month
First posted
2017-07-27
Last updated
2021-10-14
Results first posted
2021-10-14

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes8

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercentage of Subjects Castrated (E2 ≤184 Pmol/L or 50 pg/mL) at Week 12Week 12
Castration was defined as serum oestradiol (E2) ≤184 picomoles/litre (pmol/L) or 50 picograms/millilitre (pg/mL). The primary endpoint was evaluated based on centralised blinded bioanalysis of serum samples for E2. The percentage of subjects castrated and the 95% asymptotic confidence intervals (CIs), calculated from binomial distribution, are presented.
SecondaryPercentage of Subjects Castrated (E2 ≤184 Pmol/L or 50 pg/mL) at Weeks 4 and 8Weeks 4 and 8
The percentages of subjects who were castrated at Weeks 4 and 8 where castration was defined as serum E2 ≤184 pmol/L or 50 pg/mL are presented. The 95% asymptotic CIs were calculated from the binomial distribution.
SecondaryPercentage of Subjects Castrated (E2 ≤110 Pmol/L or 30 pg/mL) at Weeks 4, 8 and 12Weeks 4, 8 and 12
The percentages of subjects who were castrated at Weeks 4, 8 and 12 where castration was defined as serum E2 ≤110 pmol/L or 30 pg/mL are presented. The 95% asymptotic CIs were calculated from the binomial distribution.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Endometriosis-associated Pelvic Pain at Weeks 4, 8 and 12Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Endometriosis-associated pelvic pain was assessed using a 100 millimetres (mm) visual analogue scale (VAS) where subjects indicated the subjective level of their most severe endometriosis pain over the last 4 weeks by making a single vertical mark on the line ranging from 'absence of pain' (0 mm) to 'unbearable pain' (100 mm). Lower scores indicated a better outcome. Baseline was defined as the last available assessment prior to the first dose of study medication. The least squares (LS) mean change from baseline at each timepoint as measured by the VAS is presented.
SecondaryMean E2 Concentration at Weeks Baseline and 4, 8 and 12Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 4, 8 and 12The mean serum E2 concentrations at baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12 are presented.
SecondaryMean Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Concentration at Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 4, 8 and 12The mean FSH concentrations at baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12 are presented.
SecondaryMean Luteinising Hormone (LH) Concentration at Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12The mean LH concentrations at baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12 are presented.
SecondaryMedian Time to Menses RecoveryBaseline (Day 1) up to Week 40 (end of study visit)
Time to menses recovery was defined as the time (in days) between the date of the last dose of study medication and the date of the first day the subject observed menstrual bleeding of the next menstrual period. Menses recovery status was assessed at all study visits from Day 1 to the end of study visit. The median time to menses recovery was analysed using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Outcomes8

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercentage of Subjects Castrated (E2 ≤184 Pmol/L or 50 pg/mL) at Week 12Week 12
The per protocol set included all randomised subjects who received at least one dose of study medication with at least one baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment of the primary efficacy parameter, and without major protocol violations/deviations affecting the primary efficacy endpoint.
percentage of subjectsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Subjects Castrated (E2 ≤184 Pmol/L or 50 pg/mL) at Weeks 4 and 8Weeks 4 and 8
The full analysis set included all randomised subjects who received at least one dose of study medication with at least one baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment of the primary efficacy parameter.
percentage of subjectsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Subjects Castrated (E2 ≤110 Pmol/L or 30 pg/mL) at Weeks 4, 8 and 12Weeks 4, 8 and 12
The full analysis set included all randomised subjects who received at least one dose of study medication with at least one baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment of the primary efficacy parameter.
percentage of subjectsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Endometriosis-associated Pelvic Pain at Weeks 4, 8 and 12Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 4, 8 and 12
The full analysis set included all randomised subjects who received at least one dose of study medication with at least one baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment of the primary efficacy parameter.
mmLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYMean E2 Concentration at Weeks Baseline and 4, 8 and 12Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 4, 8 and 12
The full analysis set included all randomised subjects who received at least one dose of study medication with at least one baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment of the primary efficacy parameter.
pmol/LMEAN
SECONDARYMean Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Concentration at Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 4, 8 and 12
The full analysis set included all randomised subjects who received at least one dose of study medication with at least one baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment of the primary efficacy parameter.
International Units/L (IU/L)MEAN
SECONDARYMean Luteinising Hormone (LH) Concentration at Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12
The full analysis set included all randomised subjects who received at least one dose of study medication with at least one baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment of the primary efficacy parameter.
IU/LMEAN
SECONDARYMedian Time to Menses RecoveryBaseline (Day 1) up to Week 40 (end of study visit)
The full analysis set included all randomised subjects who received at least one dose of study medication with at least one baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment of the primary efficacy parameter.
daysMEDIAN

Results by group44

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percentage of Subjects Castrated (E2 ≤184 Pmol/L or 50 pg/mL) at Week 12Triptorelin Pamoate PR 3-month98.695% Confidence Interval 96.65 to 100.00percentage of subjects
Percentage of Subjects Castrated (E2 ≤184 Pmol/L or 50 pg/mL) at Week 12Triptorelin Acetate PR 1-month99.395% Confidence Interval 97.98 to 100.00percentage of subjects
Percentage of Subjects Castrated (E2 ≤184 Pmol/L or 50 pg/mL) at Weeks 4 and 8Triptorelin Pamoate PR 3-monthWeek 498.095% Confidence Interval 95.67 to 100.00percentage of subjects
Percentage of Subjects Castrated (E2 ≤184 Pmol/L or 50 pg/mL) at Weeks 4 and 8Triptorelin Acetate PR 1-monthWeek 499.395% Confidence Interval 98.03 to 100.00percentage of subjects
Percentage of Subjects Castrated (E2 ≤184 Pmol/L or 50 pg/mL) at Weeks 4 and 8Triptorelin Pamoate PR 3-monthWeek 897.395% Confidence Interval 94.65 to 99.91percentage of subjects
Percentage of Subjects Castrated (E2 ≤184 Pmol/L or 50 pg/mL) at Weeks 4 and 8Triptorelin Acetate PR 1-monthWeek 8100.095% Confidence Interval 100.00 to 100.00percentage of subjects
Percentage of Subjects Castrated (E2 ≤110 Pmol/L or 30 pg/mL) at Weeks 4, 8 and 12Triptorelin Pamoate PR 3-monthWeek 498.095% Confidence Interval 95.67 to 100.00percentage of subjects
Percentage of Subjects Castrated (E2 ≤110 Pmol/L or 30 pg/mL) at Weeks 4, 8 and 12Triptorelin Acetate PR 1-monthWeek 499.395% Confidence Interval 98.03 to 100.00percentage of subjects
Percentage of Subjects Castrated (E2 ≤110 Pmol/L or 30 pg/mL) at Weeks 4, 8 and 12Triptorelin Pamoate PR 3-monthWeek 895.295% Confidence Interval 91.80 to 98.68percentage of subjects
Percentage of Subjects Castrated (E2 ≤110 Pmol/L or 30 pg/mL) at Weeks 4, 8 and 12Triptorelin Acetate PR 1-monthWeek 899.395% Confidence Interval 98.03 to 100.00percentage of subjects

Participant flow12

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDTriptorelin Pamoate PR 3-month150
Overall StudySTARTEDTriptorelin Acetate PR 1-month150
Overall StudyReceived TreatmentTriptorelin Pamoate PR 3-month149
Overall StudyReceived TreatmentTriptorelin Acetate PR 1-month150
Overall StudyCompleted Week 12Triptorelin Pamoate PR 3-month143
Overall StudyCompleted Week 12Triptorelin Acetate PR 1-month148
Overall StudyCompleted Week 24Triptorelin Pamoate PR 3-month143
Overall StudyCompleted Week 24Triptorelin Acetate PR 1-month144
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDTriptorelin Pamoate PR 3-month143
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDTriptorelin Acetate PR 1-month144

Adverse events50

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAbdominal pain lowerGastrointestinal disordersTriptorelin Pamoate PR 3-month41494
otherAbdominal pain lowerGastrointestinal disordersTriptorelin Acetate PR 1-month1315019
otherAbdominal pain upperGastrointestinal disordersTriptorelin Pamoate PR 3-month61497
otherAbdominal pain upperGastrointestinal disordersTriptorelin Acetate PR 1-month815010
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersTriptorelin Pamoate PR 3-month81498
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersTriptorelin Acetate PR 1-month41504
otherPyrexiaGeneral disordersTriptorelin Pamoate PR 3-month61496
otherPyrexiaGeneral disordersTriptorelin Acetate PR 1-month81509
otherNasopharyngitisInfections and infestationsTriptorelin Pamoate PR 3-month1614919
otherNasopharyngitisInfections and infestationsTriptorelin Acetate PR 1-month2415030

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityTriptorelin Pamoate PR 3-month0149
Total, all-cause mortalityTriptorelin Acetate PR 1-month0150
Total, other adverse eventsTriptorelin Pamoate PR 3-month132149
Total, other adverse eventsTriptorelin Acetate PR 1-month135150
Total, serious adverse eventsTriptorelin Pamoate PR 3-month2149
Total, serious adverse eventsTriptorelin Acetate PR 1-month1150

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
35947347DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Triptorelin Pamoate PR 3-month vs Triptorelin Acetate PR 1-month: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Triptorelin Pamoate PR 3-month vs Triptorelin Acetate PR 1-month: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03232281

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03232281/results?page=2