ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT03269318

Registered outcomes11

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryAre children with asthma and their parents willing to be recruited and randomised to a trial of genotyping and personalised management for asthma? Qualitative interviewBaseline to 3 monthsRecruitment rates will be measured as rate of invited participants who are eligible and consenting and will be reported in a Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) participant flowchart.
PrimaryAre there retention issues? If yes, at what stages did these occur? What were the reasons? Qualitative interviewBaseline to 3 months
Acceptability of allocation procedures will be assessed by examining reasons for dropout in discontinuing participants and comparing attrition rates between the two study groups and between participants who did and did not receive their preferred allocation. Attrition rates will be established as discontinuation of intervention and loss to follow-up measurement for both groups
PrimaryAre follow-up data complete?Baseline to 3 monthsSuitability of outcome measures will be evaluated based on completion rates and rates of missing data
PrimaryAcceptability of personalised approachBaseline to 3 months
All participants and their parents/guardians will be invited to have a semi-structured interview with a member of the research team in order to discuss their experiences of living with and managing their asthma. To enhance communication and ensure the child's perspective is captured, children will be invited to make a drawing of what it is like to have asthma and what it feels like when they take their asthma medication. The research team interviewing will then discuss the drawings (as a visual cue) in simple language with each child to understand what the child means.
SecondaryChildhood Asthma Control TestBaseline to 3 months
The Childhood Asthma Control Test (C-ACT) \[10\], a 7-item validated questionnaire capturing the frequency of asthma symptoms and their effect on daily function in children 4 to 11 years of age. It uses a 4-point Likert scale with higher scores indicating better control. The C-ACTuses a single cut point of a score of ≤19 to identify children whose asthma is not well controlled.
SecondaryLung FunctionBaseline to 3 monthsLung function will be measured by a nurse trained in collecting spirometry data in the Royal Alexandra Children's Hospital. Measure of PEF (litres/second), FEV1 (litres) and FVC (litres)
SecondaryDays unable to complete usual activitiesBaseline to 3 monthsParticipants and parents will be asked to report how many days in the last month they have been unable to complete usual activities as a result of their asthma.
SecondaryUse of medicationBaseline to 3 monthsNumber of courses of oral corticosteroids for asthma and any other medication use will be recorded.
SecondaryUse of health servicesBaseline to 3 months
Participants and parents will be asked to report how many times they have had to see their GP or asthma nurse (outside of routine asthma review), been to A\&E or been admitted to hospital as a result of their asthma.
SecondaryBeliefs about medicine questionnaireBaseline to 3 months
The Beliefs About Medicine Questionnaire (BMQ) \[11\] is an 18-item validated questionnaire which will capture parental beliefs about asthma, asthma medication and how these may have affected their child's life. Respondents indicate their degree of agreement with each individual statement about medicines on a 5-point Likert scale, (1=strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree). Scores obtained are summed to give a scale score with higher scores indicating stronger beliefs.
SecondaryExperience of service3 month visit
At the final follow up, participants and parents will be asked to comment on their experience of the service received in the personalised medicine clinic. The validated Commission for Health Improvement Experience of Service Questionnaire will be used as the outcome measure \[12\]. The ESQ consists of 12 items rated on a 3-point Likert scale (3=Certainly True to 1=Not true) and three free-text sections looking at what the respondent liked about the clinic, what they felt needed improving, and any other comments. Higher scores indicate more positive experiences.

Source ClinicalTrials.govtrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this list from software.

Twenty rows a page, as JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03269318/registered