ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT03285308

A Safety and Efficacy Study of Relamorelin in Diabetic Gastroparesis 01

NCT03285308, Phase 3, Terminated, Allergan; results first posted 2021-07-29

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Safety and Efficacy Study of Relamorelin in Diabetic Gastroparesis 01. Trials, record NCT03285308. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT03285308

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Safety and Efficacy Study of Relamorelin in Diabetic Gastroparesis 01
NCT number
NCT03285308
Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
336 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Allergan
Conditions
Gastroparesis, Diabetes Mellitus
Interventions
Placebo, Relamorelin
First posted
2017-09-18
Last updated
2021-07-29
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2017-002136-16
Results first posted
2021-07-29

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes12

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange From Baseline to Week 12 in the Weekly Diabetic Gastroparesis Symptom Severity Score (DGSSS)Baseline (Day-14 to Day-1) to Week 12
Participants assessed the severity of diabetic gastroparesis symptoms daily using the Diabetic Gastroparesis Symptom Severity Diary (DGSSD), recorded in an electronic diary (e-diary). The DGSSS was derived as the sum of the weekly averages of the 4 DGSSD items: nausea, abdominal pain, postprandial fullness and bloating. Each symptom was scored using an 11-point ordinal scale where: 0=no or not at all uncomfortable to 10=worst possible or most uncomfortable for a total possible DGSSS of 0 (best) to 40 (worst). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Baseline was defined as the average of the 2 weekly DGSSS from the Run-in Period.
PrimaryPercentage of Participants Meeting the Vomiting Responder Criterion During Each of the Last 6 Weeks of the 12-week Treatment PeriodWeek 6 to Week 12
The number of vomiting episodes in the previous 24 hours were assessed daily by the participant using the DGSSD and were recorded in the e-diary. A Vomiting Responder was defined as a participant with zero weekly vomiting episodes during each of the last 6 weeks of the 12-week Treatment Period.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Meeting the Nausea Responder Criterion During Each of the Last 6 Weeks of the 12-week Treatment PeriodBaseline (Day-14 to Day-1) to (Week 6 to Week 12)
A Nausea Responder was defined as a participant with improvement (decrease) of at least 2-points in the weekly symptom scores for nausea at each of the last 6 weeks of the 12-week Treatment Period. Nausea was one of the items of the DGSSD assessed daily and recorded in the e-diary by the participant using an 11-point ordinal scale where: 0=no nausea to 10=worst possible nausea.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Meeting the Abdominal Pain Responder Criterion During Each of the Last 6 Weeks of the 12-week Treatment PeriodBaseline (Day-14 to Day-1) to (Week 6 to Week 12)
An Abdominal Pain Responder was defined as a participant with an improvement (decrease) of at least 2-points in the weekly symptom scores for abdominal pain at each of the last 6 weeks of the 12-week Treatment Period. Abdominal pain was one of the items of the DGSSD assessed daily and recorded in the e-diary by the participant using an 11-point ordinal scale where: 0=no abdominal pain to 10=the worst possible abdominal pain and was recorded in an e-diary.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Meeting the Bloating Responder Criterion During Each of the Last 6 Weeks of the 12-week Treatment PeriodBaseline (Day-14 to Day-1) to (Week 6 to Week 12)
A Bloating Responder was defined as a participant with an improvement (decrease) of at least 2-points in the weekly symptom scores for bloating at each of the last 6 weeks of the 12-week Treatment Period. Bloating was one of the items of the DGSSD assessed daily and recorded by the participant in the e-diary using an 11-point ordinal scale where: 0=no bloating and 10=the worst possible bloating and was recorded in the e-diary.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Meeting the Postprandial Fullness Responder Criterion During Each of the Last 6 Weeks of the 12-week Treatment PeriodBaseline (Day-14 to Day-1) to (Week 6 to Week 12)
A Postprandial Fullness Responder was defined as a participant with an improvement (decrease) of at least 2-points in the weekly symptom scores for Postprandial Fullness at each of the last 6 weeks of the 12-week Treatment Period. Postprandial Fullness was one of the items of the DGSSD assessed daily and recorded by the participant in the e-diary using an 11-point ordinal scale where: 0=no feeling of fullness until finishing a meal (best) to 10=feeling full after only a few bites (worst).
SecondaryNumber of Participants Who Experienced One or More Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)Up to approximately 16 weeks
An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of study treatment. A TEAE is an AE that begins or worsens after receiving study drug.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Potential Clinically Significant (PCS) Clinical Laboratory ResultsUp to 12 weeks
Clinical Laboratory tests included Hematology, Chemistry and Urinalysis tests. The investigator determined if the results were clinically significant. Only those categories where at least 1 person had a non-PCS value at Baseline and met the PCS criterion at least once during postbaseline are reported.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Trends for Vital SignsUp to 12 weeksVital Signs included assessments of heart rate, respiratory rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and body temperature. The investigator determined if the results were clinically significant.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) ResultsUp to 12 weeksA standard 12-lead ECG was performed. The investigator determined if the abnormal results were clinically significant.

Outcomes12

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange From Baseline to Week 12 in the Weekly Diabetic Gastroparesis Symptom Severity Score (DGSSS)Baseline (Day-14 to Day-1) to Week 12
Modified Intent-to-treat (mITT) Population included all randomized participants with ≥1 postbaseline assessment of DGSSD. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available at the given time-point.
score on a scaleMEAN
PRIMARYPercentage of Participants Meeting the Vomiting Responder Criterion During Each of the Last 6 Weeks of the 12-week Treatment PeriodWeek 6 to Week 12mITT Population included all randomized participants with ≥1 postbaseline assessment of DGSSD.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Meeting the Nausea Responder Criterion During Each of the Last 6 Weeks of the 12-week Treatment PeriodBaseline (Day-14 to Day-1) to (Week 6 to Week 12)mITT Population included all randomized participants with ≥1 postbaseline assessment of DGSSD.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Meeting the Abdominal Pain Responder Criterion During Each of the Last 6 Weeks of the 12-week Treatment PeriodBaseline (Day-14 to Day-1) to (Week 6 to Week 12)mITT Population included all randomized participants with ≥1 postbaseline assessment of DGSSD.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Meeting the Bloating Responder Criterion During Each of the Last 6 Weeks of the 12-week Treatment PeriodBaseline (Day-14 to Day-1) to (Week 6 to Week 12)mITT Population included all randomized participants with ≥1 postbaseline assessment of DGSSD.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Meeting the Postprandial Fullness Responder Criterion During Each of the Last 6 Weeks of the 12-week Treatment PeriodBaseline (Day-14 to Day-1) to (Week 6 to Week 12)mITT Population included all randomized participants with ≥1 postbaseline assessment of DGSSD.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Participants Who Experienced One or More Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)Up to approximately 16 weeksSafety Population included all participants who received ≥1 administration of double-blind study treatment.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Potential Clinically Significant (PCS) Clinical Laboratory ResultsUp to 12 weeks
Safety Population included all participants who received ≥1 administration of double-blind study treatment. Number analyzed is the number of participants with non-PCS baseline values and at least one post-baseline assessment.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Trends for Vital SignsUp to 12 weeksSafety Population included all participants who received ≥1 administration of double-blind study treatment.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) ResultsUp to 12 weeksSafety Population included all participants who received ≥1 administration of double-blind study treatment.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS

Results by group102

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Weekly Diabetic Gastroparesis Symptom Severity Score (DGSSS)PlaceboBaseline25.1Standard Deviation 5.53score on a scale
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Weekly Diabetic Gastroparesis Symptom Severity Score (DGSSS)Relamorelin 10 μgBaseline24.5Standard Deviation 5.99score on a scale
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Weekly Diabetic Gastroparesis Symptom Severity Score (DGSSS)PlaceboChange from Baseline to Week 12-10.0Standard Deviation 8.89score on a scale
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Weekly Diabetic Gastroparesis Symptom Severity Score (DGSSS)Relamorelin 10 μgChange from Baseline to Week 12-9.3Standard Deviation 8.17score on a scale
Percentage of Participants Meeting the Vomiting Responder Criterion During Each of the Last 6 Weeks of the 12-week Treatment PeriodPlacebo19.5percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Meeting the Vomiting Responder Criterion During Each of the Last 6 Weeks of the 12-week Treatment PeriodRelamorelin 10 μg21.8percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Meeting the Nausea Responder Criterion During Each of the Last 6 Weeks of the 12-week Treatment PeriodPlacebo34.1percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Meeting the Nausea Responder Criterion During Each of the Last 6 Weeks of the 12-week Treatment PeriodRelamorelin 10 μg29.7percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Meeting the Abdominal Pain Responder Criterion During Each of the Last 6 Weeks of the 12-week Treatment PeriodPlacebo28.0percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Meeting the Abdominal Pain Responder Criterion During Each of the Last 6 Weeks of the 12-week Treatment PeriodRelamorelin 10 μg27.9percentage of participants

Participant flow8

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo167
Overall StudySTARTEDRelamorelin 10 μg169
Overall StudySafety PopulationPlacebo163
Overall StudySafety PopulationRelamorelin 10 μg163
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo147
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDRelamorelin 10 μg146
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo20
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDRelamorelin 10 μg23

Adverse events98

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherHyperglycaemiaMetabolism and nutrition disordersPlacebo9163
otherHyperglycaemiaMetabolism and nutrition disordersRelamorelin 10 μg9163
seriousAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPlacebo0163
seriousAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersRelamorelin 10 μg1163
seriousLeukopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPlacebo1163
seriousLeukopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersRelamorelin 10 μg0163
seriousThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPlacebo1163
seriousThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersRelamorelin 10 μg0163
seriousAngina pectorisCardiac disordersPlacebo1163
seriousAngina pectorisCardiac disordersRelamorelin 10 μg1163

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo0167
Total, all-cause mortalityRelamorelin 10 μg0169
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo9163
Total, other adverse eventsRelamorelin 10 μg9163
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo15163
Total, serious adverse eventsRelamorelin 10 μg16163

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
40148033DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons5

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Relamorelin 10 μg vs Placebo: Number of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Trends for Vital SignsTrial comparisons
Relamorelin 10 μg vs Placebo: Number of Participants Who Experienced One or More Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)Trial comparisons
Relamorelin 10 μg vs Placebo: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) ResultsTrial comparisons
Relamorelin 10 μg vs Placebo: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Relamorelin 10 μg vs Placebo: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03285308

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03285308/results?page=2