ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT03297294

Safety and Efficacy of EMA401 in Patients With Painful Diabetic Neuropathy (PDN)

NCT03297294, Phase 2, Terminated, Novartis Pharmaceuticals; results first posted 2020-06-04

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Safety and Efficacy of EMA401 in Patients With Painful Diabetic Neuropathy (PDN). Trials, record NCT03297294. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT03297294

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Safety and Efficacy of EMA401 in Patients With Painful Diabetic Neuropathy (PDN)
NCT number
NCT03297294
Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
142 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Conditions
Painful Diabetic Neuropathy
Interventions
EMA401, Placebo
First posted
2017-09-29
Last updated
2021-10-08
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2016-000281-39
Results first posted
2020-06-04

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes13

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange in Weekly Mean 24-hour Average Pain Score Using the 11 Point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) From Baseline to Week 12Baseline up to Week 12
The NRS is an 11-point scale ranging from zero ("no pain") to ten ("pain as bad as you can imagine") for self-reporting of pain by patients. The following parameters were evaluated using the 11-point NRS: 24-hour Average Pain Score and 24-hour Worst Pain Score Patients evaluated their "average pain" and "worst pain" during the past 24 hours in the evening prior to sleep by touching the appropriate corresponding number between zero and ten on a eDiary device.
SecondaryChange in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) From Baseline to Week 12Baseline up to Week 12
The Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) is a 12 item patient reported outcome measure that contains 10 descriptors representing 5 dimensions of pain (burning pain, deep/pressing pain, paroxysmal pain, evoked pain and paraesthesia/dysesthesia) and 2 temporal items designed to assess pain duration and the number of pain paroxysms. The sum of the responses to the 10 questions (all except temporal questions) was regarded as the total score and was divided by 10 (10 questions). The range of the total score and of the 5 dimensional scores is 0 to 10. Lower values represent better outcomes.
SecondaryChange in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form Interference (BPI-SF) Mean Total Score From Baseline to Week 12Baseline up to Week 12
The BPI-SF is a validated, self-administered (at clinic) questionnaire that assesses pain severity and its mpact on daily functions. Patients were asked to complete the 7-item pain interference scale that assessed the degree to which pain interfered with walking and other physical activity, work, mood, relations with others and sleep using a zero to ten scale with zero being "does not interfere" and ten being "completely interferes". The BPI total score is the sum of the 7 items. Each item ranges from 0 to 10, thus the total score ranges from 0 to 70. Lower values indicate a better outcome.
SecondaryChange in Weekly Mean of the 24-hour Worst Pain Score, Using an 11-point NRS, From Baseline to Week 12Baseline up to Week 12
The NRS is an 11-point scale ranging from zero ("no pain") to ten ("pain as bad as you can imagine") for self-reporting of pain by patients. The following parameters were evaluated using the 11-point NRS: 24-hour Average Pain Score and 24-hour Worst Pain Score Patients evaluated their "average pain" and "worst pain" during the past 24 hours in the evening prior to sleep by touching the appropriate corresponding number between zero and ten on a eDiary device.
SecondaryNumber of Participants Per Patient Global Impression of Change Category at Week 12Baseline up to Week 12
The Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) is a patient-reported instrument that measures change in overall status on a scale ranging from one ("very much improved") to seven ("very much worse"). The PGIC is based on the validated Clinical Global Impression of Change scale. The PGIC was to be completed by patients using the electronic tablet at the site
SecondaryPercentage of Patients Achieving at Least 30% Pain Reduction at Week 12 on NRS 11 Point ScaleBaseline up to Week 12
The NRS is an 11-point scale ranging from zero ("no pain") to ten ("pain as bad as you can imagine") for self-reporting of pain by patients. The number of patients with observed response, i.e. a decrease of 30% units in weekly mean of the 24-hour average pain score NRS. Logistic regression model with region, treatment, sex, use of PHN medications (yes/no) as factors and age and baseline NRS as covariates. An odds ratio \>1 = higher chance of a clinically important improvement.
SecondaryPercentage of Patients Achieving at Least 50% Pain Reduction at Week 12 on NRS 11 Point ScaleBaseline up to Week 12
The NRS is an 11-point scale ranging from zero ("no pain") to ten ("pain as bad as you can imagine") for self-reporting of pain by patients. The number of patients with observed response, i.e. a decrease of 50% units in weekly mean of the 24-hour average pain score NRS. Logistic regression model with region, treatment, sex, use of PHN medications (yes/no) as factors and age and baseline NRS as covariates. An odds ratio \>1 = higher chance of a clinically important improvement.
SecondaryMean Change in Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) From Baseline to Week 12Baseline up to Week 12
Patients were asked to complete the ISI using five-point Likert-style scale as a measure of perceived sleep difficulties. The questionnaire assessed the severity of insomnia, satisfaction with current sleep pattern, sleep interference, "noticeability" of sleeping problem to others and concern about sleeping problems. The scale consists of 7 items. The sum of seven items represents the total score. Each of the 7 items is scored using a range from 0 to 4, thus the total score values ranges from zero to 28. Lower values represent better outcomes.
SecondaryPlasma Pharmacokinetics (PK) Concentrations at Week 8 and 12Week 8 (Prior dose, 1-3 hours, 4-6 hours), Week 12 (Prior dose, 1-3 hours, 4-6 hours)
Due to the premature termination of the study, the number of patients and observations providing PK data was much smaller than planned, and no PK model was developed. As a consequence, no PK parameters (Cmax, Tmax, AUC) were derived for this study. Only, summary statistics of the plasma concentrations were calculated
SecondaryPercentage of Patients Who Required Rescue Medication in Double-blind Treatment PeriodBaseline and weekly up to 12 weeks, once during double-blind period
Patients were allowed to take acetaminophen/paracetamol up to a maximum of 3 g daily (divided into 4 times/day) for unacceptable pain due to any reason during the study. This medication use was to be recorded in eDiary prior to use. Percentages of patients presented are those who required rescue meds within 7 days prior to visit.

Outcomes13

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange in Weekly Mean 24-hour Average Pain Score Using the 11 Point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) From Baseline to Week 12Baseline up to Week 12Full analysis setscores on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) From Baseline to Week 12Baseline up to Week 12scores on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form Interference (BPI-SF) Mean Total Score From Baseline to Week 12Baseline up to Week 12scores on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange in Weekly Mean of the 24-hour Worst Pain Score, Using an 11-point NRS, From Baseline to Week 12Baseline up to Week 12scores on numeric rating scaleMEAN
SECONDARYNumber of Participants Per Patient Global Impression of Change Category at Week 12Baseline up to Week 12ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYPercentage of Patients Achieving at Least 30% Pain Reduction at Week 12 on NRS 11 Point ScaleBaseline up to Week 12Full analysis set% of participants - model adjusted rateNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Patients Achieving at Least 50% Pain Reduction at Week 12 on NRS 11 Point ScaleBaseline up to Week 12Full analysis set% of participants - model adjusted rateNUMBER
SECONDARYMean Change in Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) From Baseline to Week 12Baseline up to Week 12Full analysis setscores on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYPlasma Pharmacokinetics (PK) Concentrations at Week 8 and 12Week 8 (Prior dose, 1-3 hours, 4-6 hours), Week 12 (Prior dose, 1-3 hours, 4-6 hours)PK analysis setng/mLGEOMETRIC_MEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Patients Who Required Rescue Medication in Double-blind Treatment PeriodBaseline and weekly up to 12 weeks, once during double-blind periodFull analysis setPercentage of participantsNUMBER

Results by group79

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change in Weekly Mean 24-hour Average Pain Score Using the 11 Point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) From Baseline to Week 12EMA401 100mg BID DBWeek 4-1.0Standard Error 0.21scores on a scale
Change in Weekly Mean 24-hour Average Pain Score Using the 11 Point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) From Baseline to Week 12Placebo BID DBWeek 4-0.8Standard Error 0.18scores on a scale
Change in Weekly Mean 24-hour Average Pain Score Using the 11 Point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) From Baseline to Week 12EMA401 100mg BID DBWeek 8-1.7Standard Error 0.29scores on a scale
Change in Weekly Mean 24-hour Average Pain Score Using the 11 Point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) From Baseline to Week 12Placebo BID DBWeek 8-1.1Standard Error 0.26scores on a scale
Change in Weekly Mean 24-hour Average Pain Score Using the 11 Point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) From Baseline to Week 12EMA401 100mg BID DBWeek 12-1.9Standard Error 0.31scores on a scale
Change in Weekly Mean 24-hour Average Pain Score Using the 11 Point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) From Baseline to Week 12Placebo BID DBWeek 12-1.3Standard Error 0.27scores on a scale
Change in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) From Baseline to Week 12EMA401 100mg BID DBWeek 4-1.2Standard Error 0.19scores on a scale
Change in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) From Baseline to Week 12Placebo BID DBWeek 4-1.0Standard Error 0.18scores on a scale
Change in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) From Baseline to Week 12EMA401 100mg BID DBWeek 8-1.3Standard Error 0.25scores on a scale
Change in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) From Baseline to Week 12Placebo BID DBWeek 8-0.9Standard Error 0.22scores on a scale

Participant flow30

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Double-Blind Treatment Period (DB)STARTEDEMA401 100mg BID DB70
Double-Blind Treatment Period (DB)STARTEDPlacebo BID DB67
Double-Blind Treatment Period (DB)STARTEDEMA401 100mg BID -> EMA401 100mg BID TW0
Double-Blind Treatment Period (DB)STARTEDEMA401 100mg BID -> Placebo BID TW0
Double-Blind Treatment Period (DB)STARTEDPlacebo BID -> Placebo BID TW0
Double-Blind Treatment Period (DB)COMPLETEDEMA401 100mg BID DB32
Double-Blind Treatment Period (DB)COMPLETEDPlacebo BID DB30
Double-Blind Treatment Period (DB)COMPLETEDEMA401 100mg BID -> EMA401 100mg BID TW0
Double-Blind Treatment Period (DB)COMPLETEDEMA401 100mg BID -> Placebo BID TW0
Double-Blind Treatment Period (DB)COMPLETEDPlacebo BID -> Placebo BID TW0

Adverse events75

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherPalpitationsCardiac disordersEMA401 100mg BID DB069
otherPalpitationsCardiac disordersPlacebo BID DB166
otherPalpitationsCardiac disordersEMA401 100mg BID -> EMA401 100mg BID TW014
otherPalpitationsCardiac disordersEMA401 100mg BID -> Placebo BID TW112
otherPalpitationsCardiac disordersPlacebo BID -> Placebo BID TW026
otherAbdominal pain upperGastrointestinal disordersEMA401 100mg BID DB569
otherAbdominal pain upperGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo BID DB066
otherAbdominal pain upperGastrointestinal disordersEMA401 100mg BID -> EMA401 100mg BID TW014
otherAbdominal pain upperGastrointestinal disordersEMA401 100mg BID -> Placebo BID TW012
otherAbdominal pain upperGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo BID -> Placebo BID TW026

Adverse event totals15

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityEMA401 100mg BID DB069
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo BID DB066
Total, all-cause mortalityEMA401 100mg BID -> EMA401 100mg BID TW014
Total, all-cause mortalityEMA401 100mg BID -> Placebo BID TW012
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo BID -> Placebo BID TW026
Total, other adverse eventsEMA401 100mg BID DB2369
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo BID DB1066
Total, other adverse eventsEMA401 100mg BID -> EMA401 100mg BID TW114
Total, other adverse eventsEMA401 100mg BID -> Placebo BID TW212
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo BID -> Placebo BID TW026

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
33675631DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03297294

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03297294/results?page=2