ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT03305809

A Study of LY3154207 in Participants With Dementia Due to Lewy Body Dementia (LBD) Associated With Idiopathic Parkinson's Disease (PD) or Dementia With Lewy Bodies (DLB)

NCT03305809, Phase 2, Completed, Eli Lilly and Company; results first posted 2021-07-23

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.4.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Study of LY3154207 in Participants With Dementia Due to Lewy Body Dementia (LBD) Associated With Idiopathic Parkinson's Disease (PD) or Dementia With Lewy Bodies (DLB). Trials, record NCT03305809. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.4.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT03305809

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Study of LY3154207 in Participants With Dementia Due to Lewy Body Dementia (LBD) Associated With Idiopathic Parkinson's Disease (PD) or Dementia With Lewy Bodies (DLB)
NCT number
NCT03305809
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
344 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Eli Lilly and Company
Conditions
Lewy Body Dementia
Interventions
LY3154207, Placebo
First posted
2017-10-10
Last updated
2021-07-23
Results first posted
2021-07-23

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes20

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange From Baseline in the Continuity of Attention (CoA) Composite Score of the Cognitive Drug Research Computerized Cognition Battery (CDR-CCB)Baseline, Week 12
The CDR-CCB tests is designed to evaluate the effects of novel compounds on the quality of cognitive functioning which includes tests of attention (simple and choice reaction time, digit vigilance), working memory (spatial and numeric) and episodic memory (word recognition, picture recognition). Continuity of attention measures speed and accuracy and is calculated from 3 attentional tasks on the CDR computerized battery tests. For continuity of attention, the score range is -999 to 35. A high score reflects someone able to keep his/her mind on a single task for a prolonged period. A negative change from baseline reflects impairment compared to baseline. Data presented are model-based bayesian posterior mean response rates with 95% credible interval.
SecondaryChange From Baseline on the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Clinician Global Impression of Change (ADCS-CGIC) ScoreBaseline, Week 12
The ADCS-CGIC is a validated categorical measure of change in a participant's clinical condition between baseline and follow-up visits; it is used to assess global clinical status. The ADCS CGIC score is based on direct examination of the participant and an interview of the caregiver. The rater should refer to the baseline ADCS-CGIC worksheets in making a rating. A skilled and experienced clinician who is blinded to treatment assignment rates the participant on a 7-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 (marked improvement) to 7 (marked worsening). 1= Very much better 2= Much better 3= A little better 4= Same 5= A little worse 6= Much worse 7= Very much worse. Least squares (LS) means were calculated using mixed model repeated measures adjusting for treatment + visit + treatment\*visit + age\*acheifl + age + concomitant use of acetylcholinesterase inhibitor (AChEI).
SecondaryChange From Baseline on the CDR-CCB Power of Attention (PoA) Composite ScoreBaseline, Week 12
The PoA is a composite score derived from the CDR-CCB that measures the intensity of concentration (ability to focus attention): the faster the responses, the more processes are being brought to bear upon the task. Power of attention is calculated from the sum of three cognitive function speed tests: simple reaction time, choice reaction time and the speed of detections in digit vigilance task. Score ranges from 450 milliseconds - 61500 milliseconds. A low score reflects a fast reaction time and a high intensity of concentration. A positive change from baseline reflects impairment compared to the baseline assessment Values are calculated by a computer and higher scores mean better outcome. LS means were calculated using mixed model repeated measures adjusting for baseline total Score + treatment + visit + treatment\*Visit + visit\*baseline total Score + age + concomitant use of AChEI.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the 13-item Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog13)Baseline, Week 12
The ADAS is a rater administered instrument that was designed to assess the severity of the dysfunction in the cognitive and noncognitive behaviors characteristic of persons with AD. The cognitive subscale of the ADAS that was used as the primary efficacy measure consists of 13 items assessing areas of cognitive function most typically impaired in AD: orientation, verbal memory, language, praxis, delayed free recall, digit cancellation. The ADAS--Cog13 scale ranges from 0 to 85. Higher scores indicate greater disease severity. LS means were calculated using mixed model repeated measures adjusting for baseline total Score + treatment + visit + treatment\*Visit + visit\*baseline total Score + age + concomitant use of AChEI.
SecondaryChange From Screening in the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) ScoreScreening (Baseline), Week 12
The Montreal Cognitive Assessment is a screening tool for global cognitive function with a total score ranging from 0 to 30 units on a scale. The MoCA is divided into 7 subscores (maximum possible subscore): visuospatial/executive (5 points), naming (3 points), memory (5 points for delayed recall), attention (6 points), language (3 points), abstraction (2 points) and orientation to time and place (6 points). A score of 26-30 is normal. A score less than 26 is considered as mild cognitive impairment. Higher values represent a better outcome. LS means were calculated using mixed model repeated measures adjusting for baseline total Score + treatment + visit + treatment\*Visit + visit\*baseline total Score + age + concomitant use of AChEI.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) Total Score and Individual Item ScoresBaseline, Week 12
The NPI is a condition-specific measure designed to assess neuropsychiatric disturbances in people with Alzheimer Disease (AD),as well as other related dementing disorders.It assesses 12 behavioral disturbances,namely delusions,hallucinations,depression/dysphoria,anxiety,agitation/aggression,elation/euphoria,disinhibition,irritability/lability,apathy, aberrant motor activity, night-time behavior disturbances,and appetite/eating abnormalities.The frequency scored from 0 (never) to 4 (very frequently).The Severity scored from 0 (none) to 3 (marked).The domain score is obtained by multiplying frequency and severity scores.The total NPI score is sum total of all of individual domain scores (0-144).Higher score indiciates more abnormal behaviors.LS means were calculated using mixed model repeated measures adjusting for baseline total score + treatment + visit + treatment\*visit + visit\*baseline total score + age + concomitant use of AChEI.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) ScoreBaseline, Week 12
The ESS is a self-administered questionnaire with 8 questions. Each activity is scored on a scale ranging from 0-3, with 0 = would never fall asleep, and 3 = high chance of falling asleep. The total score ranges from 0-24, with a higher number representing an increased propensity for sleepiness. LS means were calculated using mixed model repeated measures adjusting for baseline total score + treatment + visit + treatment\*visit + visit\*baseline total score + age + concomitant use of AChEI.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the Movement Disorder Society's Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Total Score (Sum of Parts I-III)Baseline, Week 12
Movement Disorder Society-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) retains the four-scale structure with a reorganization of the various subscale; (Part I; 13 items) non-motor experiences of daily living, (Part II; 13) motor experiences of daily living, (Part III; 34) motor examination, and (Part IV; 6) motor complications. The scale range for MDS-UPDRS MDS-UPDRS Part I (non-motor experiences of daily living) and Part II (motor experiences of daily living) scores, total score was 0-52, with higher scores reflecting greater severity. For MDS-UPDRS Part III (motor examination) scores, the scale range for Part III Total Score was 0-132, with higher scores reflecting greater severity. LS means were calculated using mixed model repeated measures adjusting for baseline total score + treatment + visit + treatment\*visit + visit\*baseline total score + age + concomitant use of AChEI + levodopa equivalency dose (LED).
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the Penn Parkinson's Daily Activities Questionnaire-15 (PDAQ-15) Total ScoreBaseline, Week 12
The PDAQ-15 is a 15-item measure of instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) that are impacted by cognitive impairment in participants with parkinson's disease dementia (PDD). The PDAQ-15 is derived from the original 50-item scale, which has demonstrated test-retest reliability, construct validity, sensitivity, and specificity to Parkinson's disease (PD) cognitive impairment and the questionnaire is completed by the caregiver. The score range is 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating better function. LS means were calculated using mixed model repeated measures adjusting for baseline total score + treatment + visit + treatment\*visit + visit\*baseline total score + age + concomitant use of AChEI.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS) Verbal Fluency Test ScoreBaseline, Week 12
The DKEFS verbal fluency category switching test measures letter fluency, category fluency, and category switching. The score is the total number of correct words generated during each of the 60-second trials within the three conditions of the test. Scales scores vary from 0 min to N/A max (no concrete maximum). Higher score = higher ability in language processing. LS means were calculated using mixed model repeated measures adjusting for baseline total score + treatment + visit + treatment\*visit + visit\*baseline total score + age + concomitant use of AChEI.

Outcomes20

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in the Continuity of Attention (CoA) Composite Score of the Cognitive Drug Research Computerized Cognition Battery (CDR-CCB)Baseline, Week 12All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug, who had the baseline efficacy assessment and had at least 1 postdose efficacy assessment.Units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline on the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Clinician Global Impression of Change (ADCS-CGIC) ScoreBaseline, Week 12All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug with baseline and post-baseline CGIC data.Score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline on the CDR-CCB Power of Attention (PoA) Composite ScoreBaseline, Week 12All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug with baseline and post-baseline CDR-CCB PoA data.Units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in the 13-item Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog13)Baseline, Week 12All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug with baseline and post-baseline ADAS-Cog13 data.Units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Screening in the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) ScoreScreening (Baseline), Week 12All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug with baseline and post-baseline MoCA data.Units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) Total Score and Individual Item ScoresBaseline, Week 12All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug with baseline and post-baseline NPI score data.Units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) ScoreBaseline, Week 12All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug with baseline and post-baseline ESS data.Units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in the Movement Disorder Society's Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Total Score (Sum of Parts I-III)Baseline, Week 12All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug with baseline and post-baseline MDS-UPDRS data.Units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in the Penn Parkinson's Daily Activities Questionnaire-15 (PDAQ-15) Total ScoreBaseline, Week 12All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug with baseline and post-baseline PDAQ-15 data.Units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS) Verbal Fluency Test ScoreBaseline, Week 12All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug with baseline and post-baseline D-KEFS data.Units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN

Results by group159

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change From Baseline in the Continuity of Attention (CoA) Composite Score of the Cognitive Drug Research Computerized Cognition Battery (CDR-CCB)Placebo1.0495% Confidence Interval -0.339 to 2.373Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in the Continuity of Attention (CoA) Composite Score of the Cognitive Drug Research Computerized Cognition Battery (CDR-CCB)10 mg LY31542070.1595% Confidence Interval -1.206 to 1.496Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in the Continuity of Attention (CoA) Composite Score of the Cognitive Drug Research Computerized Cognition Battery (CDR-CCB)30 mg LY31542070.9695% Confidence Interval -0.448 to 2.362Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in the Continuity of Attention (CoA) Composite Score of the Cognitive Drug Research Computerized Cognition Battery (CDR-CCB)75 mg LY31542070.2695% Confidence Interval -1.310 to 1.801Units on a scale
Change From Baseline on the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Clinician Global Impression of Change (ADCS-CGIC) ScorePlacebo4.0Standard Error 0.13Score on a scale
Change From Baseline on the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Clinician Global Impression of Change (ADCS-CGIC) Score10 mg LY31542073.8Standard Error 0.12Score on a scale
Change From Baseline on the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Clinician Global Impression of Change (ADCS-CGIC) Score30 mg LY31542073.3Standard Error 0.13Score on a scale
Change From Baseline on the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Clinician Global Impression of Change (ADCS-CGIC) Score75 mg LY31542073.1Standard Error 0.15Score on a scale
Change From Baseline on the CDR-CCB Power of Attention (PoA) Composite ScorePlacebo64.14Standard Error 48.681Units on a scale
Change From Baseline on the CDR-CCB Power of Attention (PoA) Composite Score10 mg LY3154207-6.57Standard Error 48.396Units on a scale

Participant flow16

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo86
Overall StudySTARTED10 Milligram (mg) LY315420786
Overall StudySTARTED30 mg LY315420785
Overall StudySTARTED75 mg LY315420787
Overall StudyReceived at Least One Dose of Study DrugPlacebo86
Overall StudyReceived at Least One Dose of Study Drug10 Milligram (mg) LY315420786
Overall StudyReceived at Least One Dose of Study Drug30 mg LY315420785
Overall StudyReceived at Least One Dose of Study Drug75 mg LY315420787
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo79
Overall StudyCOMPLETED10 Milligram (mg) LY315420778

Adverse events160

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo1861
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders10 mg LY31542072862
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders30 mg LY31542075857
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders75 mg LY31542072874
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo3865
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disorders10 mg LY31542072862
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disorders30 mg LY31542077858
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disorders75 mg LY31542078879
otherVomitingGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo3863
otherVomitingGastrointestinal disorders10 mg LY31542070860

Adverse event totals12

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo086
Total, all-cause mortality10 mg LY3154207086
Total, all-cause mortality30 mg LY3154207185
Total, all-cause mortality75 mg LY3154207187
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo2086
Total, other adverse events10 mg LY31542072686
Total, other adverse events30 mg LY31542073085
Total, other adverse events75 mg LY31542074387
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo386
Total, serious adverse events10 mg LY3154207586

Papers2

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
33029934DERIVEDPubMed
36905719DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests6

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

TestNamed asSource
Choice Reaction TimePrimary outcomeConductCognition
Cancellation TestSecondary outcomeConductCognition
Category FluencySecondary outcomeConductCognition
Delayed Recall ModuleSecondary outcomeConductCognition
Simple Reaction TimeSecondary outcomeConductCognition
Verbal FluencySecondary outcomeConductCognition

Source

Release
trials-2026-11-12-0.4.0
Release manifest SHA-256
0f4a8d8c48aee2a7573ae0fa94ecbeab70c1adbe449bbc95c424bc7d3e97b9d4
Registry capture
2026-11-12
Results copy, AACT
2026-03-23
NIH clinical studies file
2026-11-13

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03305809

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03305809/results?page=2