ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT03325881

Efficacy and Safety of SHP465 at 6.25 mg in the Treatment of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) in Children Aged 6-12 Years

NCT03325881, Phase 3, Completed, Shire; results first posted 2019-08-13

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Efficacy and Safety of SHP465 at 6.25 mg in the Treatment of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) in Children Aged 6-12 Years. Trials, record NCT03325881. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT03325881

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Efficacy and Safety of SHP465 at 6.25 mg in the Treatment of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) in Children Aged 6-12 Years
NCT number
NCT03325881
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
89 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Shire
Conditions
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)
Interventions
SHP465, Placebo
First posted
2017-10-30
Last updated
2021-06-02
Results first posted
2019-08-13

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes11

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange From Baseline in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale-5 (ADHD-RS-5) Total Score at Week 4Baseline, Week 4
Clinician administered ADHD-RS-5, child, home version total score were analyzed. ADHD-RS-5 consisted of 18 items designed to reflect current symptomatology of ADHD based on diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, fifth edition (DSM-5) criteria. Each item was scored on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (reflecting no symptoms) to 3 (reflecting severe symptoms) with total scores ranging from 0-54. The 18 items were grouped into 2 subscales: hyperactivity or impulsivity (9 items) and inattentiveness (9 items). Higher total scores indicated higher impairment and lower scores indicated no impairment. Least square (LS) mean was calculated based on restricted maximum likelihood (REML) method of estimation and utilized an unstructured covariance type.
SecondaryClinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 4Week 4
CGI scale was measured to rate the overall improvement of a participants condition on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). LS mean was calculated based on restricted maximum likelihood (REML) method of estimation and utilized an unstructured covariance type.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)From start of study drug administration up to follow-up (Week 5)
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. TEAEs were defined as AEs that start or deteriorate on or after the date of the first dose of investigational product and no later than 3 days following the last dose of investigational product.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Change in Vital Signs Were Reported as Adverse Event (AE)From start of study drug administration up to follow-up (Week 5)
Vital sign assessments included systolic and diastolic blood pressure and pulse. Participants with clinically significant deviations from baseline values which are deemed clinically significant in the opinion of the investigator were considered as AE's. An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Change in Clinical Laboratory Test Results Assessed by the InvestigatorFrom start of study drug administration up to follow-up (Week 5)
Clinical laboratory tests included biochemistry, endocrinology, hematology and urinalysis. The investigator assessed out-of-range clinical laboratory values for clinical significance, if the value(s) were not clinically significant or clinically significant.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Change in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Assessed by the InvestigatorFrom start of study drug administration up to follow-up (Week 5)Participants with clinically significant deviations from baseline values which are deemed clinically significant in the opinion of the investigator were considered in 12-lead ECG and reported.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Quality of Sleep Assessed by Post Sleep Questionnaire (PSQ) at Baseline and Week 4Baseline, Week 4
The PSQ was a 7-item questionnaire typically used to assess sleep quality with pharmacologic treatment. The questionnaire collected data on average time to sleep, sleep latency, frequency of interrupted sleep, duration of interrupted sleep, total sleep time and sleep quality over the last week. Participants analyzed for number of times woke up per night category were only the participants who responded as yes for the woke up during the night category in this outcome measure.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Length of Time Awake Per Night and Length of Time to Fall Asleep Per Night Assessed by PSQ at Week 4Baseline, Week 4
The PSQ was a 7-item questionnaire typically used to assess sleep quality with pharmacologic treatment. The questionnaire collected data on average time to sleep, sleep latency, frequency of interrupted sleep, duration of interrupted sleep, total sleep time and sleep quality over the last week.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Length of Time Sleeping Per Night Assessed by PSQ at Week 4Baseline, Week 4
The PSQ was a 7-item questionnaire typically used to assess sleep quality with pharmacologic treatment. The questionnaire collected data on average time to sleep, sleep latency, frequency of interrupted sleep, duration of interrupted sleep, total sleep time and sleep quality over the last week.
SecondaryTotal Sleep Disturbance Score of Children's Sleep Habits Questionnaire (CSHQ ) at Week 4Week 4
The CSHQ is a validated, retrospective, parent-reported sleep screening tool. The questionnaire consists of 35 items that yield a TSD score, as well as 8 subscale scores, including bedtime resistance, sleep duration, parasomnias, sleep disordered breathing, night wakings, daytime sleepiness, sleep anxiety, and sleep onset delay. Parents were asked to think of a recent "typical" week of their child's sleep and to indicate how often sleep disturbance behaviors occurred. A 3-point scale was used for rating: "usually" if the sleep behavior occurs 5 to 7 times per week, "sometimes" for 2 to 4 times per week, and "rarely" for once or not at all during the week. The TSD score, which is the sum of all responses, included all items of the 8 subscales, but consisted of only 33 items because two on the bedtime resistance and sleep anxiety subscales were identical (range: 0, 99). A negative value indicates less sleep disturbance.

Outcomes11

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale-5 (ADHD-RS-5) Total Score at Week 4Baseline, Week 4
Full analysis set consisted of all participants in the safety set who had baseline ADHD-RS-5 total score and at least 1 postdose ADHD-RS-5 total score. Here, number of participants analyzed refer to the number of participants evaluable for this outcome at specified time point.
Score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYClinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 4Week 4
Full analysis set consisted of all participants in the safety set who had baseline ADHD-RS-5 total score and at least 1 postdose ADHD-RS-5 total score. Here, number of participants analyzed refer to the number of participants evaluable for this outcome at specified time point.
Score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)From start of study drug administration up to follow-up (Week 5)Safety set consisted of all participants in the randomized set who as taken at least 1 dose of investigator product.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Change in Vital Signs Were Reported as Adverse Event (AE)From start of study drug administration up to follow-up (Week 5)Safety set consisted of all participants in the randomized set who taken at least 1 dose of investigational product.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Change in Clinical Laboratory Test Results Assessed by the InvestigatorFrom start of study drug administration up to follow-up (Week 5)Safety set consisted of all participants in the randomized set who taken at least 1 dose of investigational product.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Change in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Assessed by the InvestigatorFrom start of study drug administration up to follow-up (Week 5)Safety set consisted of all participants in the randomized set who taken at least 1 dose of investigational product.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Quality of Sleep Assessed by Post Sleep Questionnaire (PSQ) at Baseline and Week 4Baseline, Week 4
Safety set consisted of all participants in the randomized set who taken at least 1 dose of investigational product. Here, number of participants analyzed refer to the number of participants evaluable for this outcome at specified time point.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Length of Time Awake Per Night and Length of Time to Fall Asleep Per Night Assessed by PSQ at Week 4Baseline, Week 4
Safety set consisted of all participants in the randomized set who taken at least 1 dose of investigational product. Here, number of participants analyzed refer to the number of participants evaluable for this outcome at specified time point.
minutesMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Length of Time Sleeping Per Night Assessed by PSQ at Week 4Baseline, Week 4
Safety set consisted of all participants in the randomized set who taken at least 1 dose of investigational product. Here, number of participants analyzed refer to the number of participants evaluable for this outcome at specified time point.
hoursMEAN
SECONDARYTotal Sleep Disturbance Score of Children's Sleep Habits Questionnaire (CSHQ ) at Week 4Week 4
Safety set consisted of all participants in the randomized set who took at least 1 dose of SHP465. Here, number of participants analyzed refer to the number of participants evaluable for this outcome at specified time point.
Units on scaleMEAN

Results by group104

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change From Baseline in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale-5 (ADHD-RS-5) Total Score at Week 4Placebo-9.795% Confidence Interval -13.2 to -6.2Score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale-5 (ADHD-RS-5) Total Score at Week 4SHP465-11.695% Confidence Interval -15.0 to -8.2Score on a scale
Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 4Placebo3.395% Confidence Interval 3.0 to 3.6Score on a scale
Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 4SHP4653.295% Confidence Interval 2.9 to 3.5Score on a scale
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Placebo7Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)SHP46511Participants
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Change in Vital Signs Were Reported as Adverse Event (AE)PlaceboNumber of participants with secondary hypertension1Participants
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Change in Vital Signs Were Reported as Adverse Event (AE)SHP465Number of participants with secondary hypertension0Participants
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Change in Vital Signs Were Reported as Adverse Event (AE)PlaceboNumber of participants with Tachycardia1Participants
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Change in Vital Signs Were Reported as Adverse Event (AE)SHP465Number of participants with Tachycardia0Participants

Participant flow8

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo44
Overall StudySTARTEDSHP46545
Overall StudyTreatedPlacebo43
Overall StudyTreatedSHP46545
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo41
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDSHP46542
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo3
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDSHP4653

Adverse events2

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersPlacebo3434
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersSHP4652452

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo043
Total, all-cause mortalitySHP465045
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo343
Total, other adverse eventsSHP465245
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo043
Total, serious adverse eventsSHP465045

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
33185468DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons5

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
SHP465 vs Placebo: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Change in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Assessed by the InvestigatorTrial comparisons
SHP465 vs Placebo: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Trial comparisons
SHP465 vs Placebo: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Change in Clinical Laboratory Test Results Assessed by the InvestigatorTrial comparisons
SHP465 vs Placebo: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
SHP465 vs Placebo: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03325881

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03325881/results?page=2