ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT03340064

Outcomes13

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercent Change in Partial Seizure Frequency Per Week From Baseline to Visit 6From Baseline (Week 0) to Visit 6 (up to Week 6)
The Full Analysis Set Adjunctive therapy (FAS\_A) consisted of all participants in the SS\_A who had at least 1 post-Baseline efficacy assessment. Here, number of participants analyzed signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
percent changeMEDIAN
SECONDARYPercent Change in Partial Seizure Frequency Per Week From Baseline to Visit 4From Baseline (Week 0) to Visit 4 (up to Week 2)The FAS\_A consisted of all participants in the SS\_A who had at least 1 post-Baseline efficacy assessment.percent changeMEDIAN
SECONDARYPercent Change in Partial Seizure Frequency Per Week From Baseline to Visit 5From Baseline (Week 0) to Visit 5 (up to Week 4)The FAS\_A consisted of all participants in the SS\_A who had at least 1 post-Baseline efficacy assessment.percent changeMEDIAN
SECONDARYPercent Change From Baseline for Each Analysis Visit in Partial Seizure Frequency Per Week on Adjunctive Therapy
From Baseline (Week 0), Week 8, 10, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120, 132, 144, 156, 168, 180, 192, 204, 216, 228, 240, 252, 264, 276, 288, 300, EOS/EDV (up to Week 295), and Safety follow-up (up to Week 295)
The FAS\_A consisted of all participants in the SS\_A who had at least 1 post-Baseline efficacy assessment. Here, number of participants analyzed signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. Here, number analyzed signifies participants who were evaluable at specified time points.
percent changeMEDIAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With a Percent Change in Partial Seizure Frequency Per Week of <0%, 0% to <25%, 25% to <50%, ≥50%, ≥75%, or 100% on Adjunctive Therapy
From Baseline (Week 0), Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120, 132, 144, 156, 168, 180, 192, 204, 216, 228, 240, 252, 264, 276, 288, 300, EOS/EDV Week 2, EOS/EDV Week 4, and Safety follow-up (up to Week 295)
FAS\_A consisted of all participants in SS\_A who had at least 1 post-Baseline efficacy assessment. Here, number analyzed signifies participants who were at risk at each previous analysis visit (X-1). As per planned analysis, outcome categories ≥50%, ≥75% and 100% are overlapping, so that percentages of categories of this outcome measure can add up to more than 100%. Data for one participant assessed within study duration was mapped to Analysis Visit 35/Week 300 based on statistical plan.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercent Change From Baseline for Each Analysis Visit in Partial Seizure Frequency Per Week on Monotherapy
From Baseline (Week 0), Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120, 132, 144, 156, 168, 180, 192, 204, 216, 228, 240, 252, 264, 276, and Safety follow-up (up to Week 295)
The FAS\_M consisted of all participants in the SS\_M who had at least 1 post-Baseline efficacy assessment. Here, number analyzed signifies participants who were evaluable at specified time points.percent changeMEDIAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With a Percent Change in Partial Seizure Frequency Per Week of <0%, 0% to <25%, 25% to <50%, ≥50%, ≥75%, or 100% on Monotherapy
From Baseline (Week 0), Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120, 132, 144, 156, 168, 180, 192, 204, 216, 228, 240, 252, 264, 276, and Safety follow-up (up to Week 295)
The FAS\_M consisted of all participants in the SS\_M who had at least 1 post-Baseline efficacy assessment. Here, number analyzed signifies participants who were at risk at each previous analysis visit (X-1). As per planned analysis, outcome categories ≥50%, ≥75% and 100% are overlapping, so that percentages of categories of this outcome measure can add up to more than 100%.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the First PeriodFrom Baseline (Week 0) to Visit 6 (up to Week 6)
The SS\_A consisted of all enrolled participants on adjunctive therapy who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the evaluation period. The SS\_M consisted of all enrolled participants on monotherapy who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the evaluation period.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the First PeriodFrom Baseline (Week 0) to Visit 6 (up to Week 6)
The SS\_A consisted of all enrolled participants on adjunctive therapy who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the evaluation period. The SS\_M consisted of all enrolled participants on monotherapy who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the evaluation period.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With TEAEs Leading to Discontinuation From Study Medication During the First PeriodFrom Baseline (Week 0) to Visit 6 (up to Week 6)
The SS\_A consisted of all enrolled participants on adjunctive therapy who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the evaluation period. The SS\_M consisted of all enrolled participants on monotherapy who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the evaluation period.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With TEAEs During the Combined First and Second PeriodFrom Baseline (Week 0) to the End of Safety Follow-up (up to Week 295)
The SS\_A consisted of all enrolled participants on adjunctive therapy who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the evaluation period. The SS\_M consisted of all enrolled participants on monotherapy who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the evaluation period.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent SAEs During the Combined First and Second PeriodFrom Baseline (Week 0) to the End of Safety Follow-up (up to Week 295)
The SS\_A consisted of all enrolled participants on adjunctive therapy who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the evaluation period. The SS\_M consisted of all enrolled participants on monotherapy who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the evaluation period.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With TEAEs Leading to Discontinuation From Study Medication During the Combined First and Second PeriodFrom Baseline (Week 0) to the End of Safety Follow-up (up to Week 295)
The SS\_A consisted of all enrolled participants on adjunctive therapy who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the evaluation period. The SS\_M consisted of all enrolled participants on monotherapy who received at least 1 dose of study medication in the evaluation period.
percentage of participantsNUMBER

Source ClinicalTrials.govtrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this list from software.

Twenty rows a page, as JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03340064/outcomes