ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT03354598

Oral Sulopenem-etzadroxil/Probenecid Versus Ciprofloxacin for Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infection in Adult Women

NCT03354598, Phase 3, Completed, Iterum Therapeutics, International Limited; results first posted 2020-12-17

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Oral Sulopenem-etzadroxil/Probenecid Versus Ciprofloxacin for Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infection in Adult Women. Trials, record NCT03354598. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT03354598

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Oral Sulopenem-etzadroxil/Probenecid Versus Ciprofloxacin for Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infection in Adult Women
NCT number
NCT03354598
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
1,671 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Iterum Therapeutics, International Limited
Conditions
Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infections
Interventions
Sulopenem-Etzadroxil/Probenecid, Ciprofloxacin
First posted
2017-11-28
Last updated
2021-01-12
Results first posted
2020-12-17

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes4

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercentage of Microbiologic Modified Intent to Treat Resistant (Micro-MITTR) Participants With Overall SuccessDay 12+/-1 day
Overall Success: Clinical Success (resolution of uncomplicated urinary tract infection (uUTI) symptoms present at study entry and no new symptoms) AND Microbiologic success (eradication of the baseline pathogen)
PrimaryPercentage of Microbiologic Modified Intent to Treat Susceptible (Micro-MITTS) Participants With Overall SuccessDay 12 +/- 1 dayOverall Success is Clinical Success (resolution of uUTI symptoms present at study entry and no new uUTI symptoms) AND Microbiologic success (eradication of the baseline pathogen)
SecondaryPercentage of Microbiologic Modified Intent to Treat Resistant (Micro-MITTR) Patients With Microbiologic SuccessDay 12+/-1 dayMicrobiologic success is defined as eradication of the baseline pathogen (\<1000 Colony Forming Units (CFU)/mL) at the Test of Cure visit
OtherPercentage of Microbiologic Modified Intent to Treat (Micro-MITT) Participants With Overall Success12 +/- 1 dayOverall Success is Clinical Success (resolution of uUTI symptoms present at study entry and no new uUTI symptoms) AND Microbiologic success (eradication of the baseline pathogen)

Outcomes4

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercentage of Microbiologic Modified Intent to Treat Resistant (Micro-MITTR) Participants With Overall SuccessDay 12+/-1 daymicro-MITTR population: patients with baseline uropathogen non-susceptible to the comparator ciprofloxacin.percentage of participantsNUMBER
PRIMARYPercentage of Microbiologic Modified Intent to Treat Susceptible (Micro-MITTS) Participants With Overall SuccessDay 12 +/- 1 daymicro-MITTS population: patients with baseline uropathogen susceptible to the comparator ciprofloxacin.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Microbiologic Modified Intent to Treat Resistant (Micro-MITTR) Patients With Microbiologic SuccessDay 12+/-1 daymicro-MITTR population: patients with baseline uropathogen non-susceptible to the comparator ciprofloxacin.percentage of participantsNUMBER
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIEDPercentage of Microbiologic Modified Intent to Treat (Micro-MITT) Participants With Overall Success12 +/- 1 daymicro-MITT population: micro-MITTR and micro-MITTS (ciprofloxacin nonsusceptible and ciprofloxacin susceptible) populations combined.percentage of participantsNUMBER

Results by group8

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percentage of Microbiologic Modified Intent to Treat Resistant (Micro-MITTR) Participants With Overall SuccessSulopenem-etzadroxil/Probenecid62.6percentage of participants
Percentage of Microbiologic Modified Intent to Treat Resistant (Micro-MITTR) Participants With Overall SuccessCiprofloxacin36.0percentage of participants
Percentage of Microbiologic Modified Intent to Treat Susceptible (Micro-MITTS) Participants With Overall SuccessSulopenem-etzadroxil/Probenecid66.8percentage of participants
Percentage of Microbiologic Modified Intent to Treat Susceptible (Micro-MITTS) Participants With Overall SuccessCiprofloxacin78.6percentage of participants
Percentage of Microbiologic Modified Intent to Treat Resistant (Micro-MITTR) Patients With Microbiologic SuccessSulopenem-etzadroxil/Probenecid74.1percentage of participants
Percentage of Microbiologic Modified Intent to Treat Resistant (Micro-MITTR) Patients With Microbiologic SuccessCiprofloxacin49.6percentage of participants
Percentage of Microbiologic Modified Intent to Treat (Micro-MITT) Participants With Overall SuccessSulopenem-etzadroxil/Probenecid65.6percentage of participants
Percentage of Microbiologic Modified Intent to Treat (Micro-MITT) Participants With Overall SuccessCiprofloxacin67.9percentage of participants

Participant flow18

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDSulopenem-etzadroxil/Probenecid835
Overall StudySTARTEDCiprofloxacin836
Overall StudyMicrobiologic Modified Intent to Treat Resistant (Micro-MITTR) ParticipantsSulopenem-etzadroxil/Probenecid147
Overall StudyMicrobiologic Modified Intent to Treat Resistant (Micro-MITTR) ParticipantsCiprofloxacin139
Overall StudyMicrobiologic Modified Intent to Treat Susceptible (Micro-MITTS) ParticipantsSulopenem-etzadroxil/Probenecid370
Overall StudyMicrobiologic Modified Intent to Treat Susceptible (Micro-MITTS) ParticipantsCiprofloxacin415
Overall StudyMicrobiologic Modified Intent to Treat (Micro-MITT) ParticipantsSulopenem-etzadroxil/Probenecid517
Overall StudyMicrobiologic Modified Intent to Treat (Micro-MITT) ParticipantsCiprofloxacin554
Overall StudyModified Intent to Treat (MITT) ParticipantsSulopenem-etzadroxil/Probenecid785
Overall StudyModified Intent to Treat (MITT) ParticipantsCiprofloxacin794

Adverse events24

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherDiarrheaGastrointestinal disordersSulopenem-etzadroxil/Probenecid103833947
otherDiarrheaGastrointestinal disordersCiprofloxacin2182791
seriousDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersSulopenem-etzadroxil/Probenecid08330
seriousDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersCiprofloxacin18271
seriousAbdominal pain upperGastrointestinal disordersSulopenem-etzadroxil/Probenecid18331
seriousAbdominal pain upperGastrointestinal disordersCiprofloxacin08270
serioussmall intestine obstructionGastrointestinal disordersSulopenem-etzadroxil/Probenecid18331
serioussmall intestine obstructionGastrointestinal disordersCiprofloxacin08270
seriouschest painGeneral disordersSulopenem-etzadroxil/Probenecid18331
seriouschest painGeneral disordersCiprofloxacin08270

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalitySulopenem-etzadroxil/Probenecid1833
Total, all-cause mortalityCiprofloxacin0827
Total, other adverse eventsSulopenem-etzadroxil/Probenecid103833
Total, other adverse eventsCiprofloxacin21827
Total, serious adverse eventsSulopenem-etzadroxil/Probenecid6833
Total, serious adverse eventsCiprofloxacin2827

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
36069202DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Sulopenem-etzadroxil/Probenecid vs Ciprofloxacin: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Sulopenem-etzadroxil/Probenecid vs Ciprofloxacin: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03354598

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03354598/events?page=2