ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT03371017

Registered outcomes34

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryOverall Survival (OS) in PD-L1-positive PopulationTime from randomization to death (Up to 68 months)
OS was defined as time from randomization to death from any cause. Participants without a reported death event at the time of the analysis were censored on the date they were last known to be alive. If no post-baseline data were available, OS was censored at the date of randomization +1 day.
PrimaryOS in Modified Intent-to-treat (mITT) PopulationTime from randomization to death (Up to 68 months)
OS was defined as time from randomization to death from any cause. Participants without a reported death event at the time of the analysis were censored on the date they were last known to be alive. If no post-baseline data were available, OS was censored at the date of randomization +1 day.
Secondary12-month Survival Rate in PD-L1-positive Population12 months
12-month survival rate was defined as the percentage of participants alive 12 months after randomization. The 12-month survival rates were estimated by Kaplan-Meier methodology. Percentages have been rounded off to the nearest whole number.
Secondary12-month Survival Rate in mITT Population12 months
12-month survival rate was defined as the percentage of participants alive 12 months after randomization. The 12-month survival rates were estimated by Kaplan-Meier methodology. Percentages have been rounded off to nearest whole number.
Secondary18-month Survival Rate in PD-L1-positive Population18 months
18-month survival rate was defined as the percentage of participants alive 18 months after randomization. The 18-month survival rates were estimated by Kaplan-Meier methodology. Percentages have been rounded off to nearest whole number.
Secondary18-month Survival Rate in mITT Population18 months
18-month survival rate was defined as the percentage of participants alive 18 months after randomization. The 18-month survival rates were estimated by Kaplan-Meier methodology. Percentages have been rounded off to nearest whole number.
SecondaryProgression-free Survival (PFS) in PD-L1-positive PopulationTime from randomization to the first occurrence of PD or death (Up to 68 months)
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence of PD, as determined by the investigator according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1), or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of diameters at prior timepoints (including baseline). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥5 millimeters (mm). Data for participants not experiencing PD or death were censored at the last tumour assessment date. If no tumor assessment was performed after randomisation, data were censored at the date of randomisation +1 day.
SecondaryPFS in mITT PopulationTime from randomization to the first occurrence of PD or death (Up to 68 months)
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence of PD, as determined by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1, or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of diameters at prior timepoints (including baseline). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. Data for participants not experiencing PD or death were censored at the last tumour assessment date. If no tumor assessment was performed after randomisation, data were censored at the date of randomisation +1 day.
SecondaryObjective Response Rate (ORR) in Response-evaluable Population, Subset of PD-L1-positive PopulationBaseline up to end of study (Up to 68 months)
ORR was defined as percentage of participants with measurable disease at baseline who achieved a documented unconfirmed objective response (OR). OR was defined as either a complete response (CR) or a partial response (PR), as determined by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes must have a reduction in short axis to \<10 millimeters (mm). PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters (SOD) of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD, in the absence of CR. Percentages have been rounded off to nearest whole number.
SecondaryORR in Response-evaluable Population, Subset of mITT PopulationBaseline up to end of study (Up to 68 months)
ORR was defined as percentage of participants with measurable disease at baseline who achieved a documented unconfirmed OR. OR was defined as either a CR or PR, as determined by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes must have a reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD, in the absence of CR. Percentages have been rounded off to nearest whole number.
SecondaryDuration of Objective Response (DoR) in DoR-evaluable Population Subset of PD-L1-positive PopulationTime from the first occurrence of a documented OR until the date of PD/death (Up to 68 months)
DoR was defined as the time from the first occurrence of a documented unconfirmed response (CR or PR) until the date of PD as determined by the investigator from tumor assessments using RECIST v1.1 or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes must have a reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD, in the absence of CR. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study, including baseline, in addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered progression.
SecondaryDoR in DoR-evaluable Population Subset of mITT PopulationTime from the first occurrence of a documented OR until the date of PD/death (Up to 68 months)
DoR was defined as the time from the first occurrence of a documented unconfirmed response (CR or PR) until the date of PD as determined by the investigator from tumor assessments using RECIST v1.1 or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes must have a reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD, in the absence of CR. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study, including baseline, in addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered progression.
SecondaryClinical Benefit Rate (CBR) in Response-evaluable Population Subset of PD-L1-positive PopulationUp to 68 months
CBR was defined as the percentage of participants with either an unconfirmed CR or PR or stable disease (SD) that lasts at least 6 months as determined by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes must have a reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD, in the absence of CR. SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for CR or PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest SOD at prior timepoints (including baseline). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. Percentages have been rounded off to nearest whole number.
SecondaryCBR in Response-evaluable Population Subset of mITT PopulationUp to 68 months
CBR was defined as the percentage of participants with either an unconfirmed CR or PR or SD that lasts at least 6 months as determined by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes must have a reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD, in the absence of CR. SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for CR or PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest SOD at prior timepoints (including baseline). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. Percentages have been rounded off to nearest whole number.
SecondaryConfirmed Objective Response Rate (C-ORR) in Response-evaluable Population Subset of PD-L1-positive PopulationUp to 68 months
C-ORR was defined as percentage of participants with measurable disease at baseline who achieved a documented confirmed OR. OR was defined as either a CR or PR, as determined by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes must have a reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD, in the absence of CR. Percentages have been rounded off to nearest whole number.
SecondaryC-ORR in Response-evaluable Population Subset of mITT PopulationUp to 68 months
C-ORR was defined as percentage of participants with measurable disease at baseline who achieved a documented confirmed OR. OR was defined as either a CR or PR, as determined by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes must have a reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD, in the absence of CR. Percentages have been rounded off to nearest whole number.
SecondaryDoR for Confirmed Responders (C-DoR) in C-DoR-evaluable Population Subset of PD-L1-positive PopulationTime from the first occurrence of a documented OR until the date of PD/death (Up to 68 months)
C-DoR was defined as the time from the first occurrence of a documented confirmed response (CR or PR) until the date of PD as determined by the investigator from tumor assessments using RECIST v1.1 or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes must have a reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD, in the absence of CR. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study, including baseline, in addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered progression.
SecondaryC-DoR in C-DoR-evaluable Population Subset of mITT PopulationTime from the first occurrence of a documented OR until the date of PD/death (Up to 68 months)
C-DoR was defined as the time from the first occurrence of a documented confirmed response (CR or PR) until the date of PD as determined by the investigator from tumor assessments using RECIST v1.1 or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes must have a reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD, in the absence of CR. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study, including baseline, in addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered progression.
Secondary
Time to Confirmed Deterioration (TTD) in Global Health Status/Quality of Life (GHS/QoL) According to the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire - Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) in PD-L1-positive Population
Up to 68 months
TTD in GHS/QoL, defined by a minimally important decrease of ≥10 points at 2 consecutive assessment time-points on the GHS/QoL scale (Items 29, 30) of EORTC QLQ-C30, which consists of 30 questions that assess 5 aspects of participant functioning (physical, emotional, role, cognitive, and social), three symptom scales (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, and pain), GHS and QoL, \& six single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties) with a recall period of the previous week. Participant responses to questions regarding GHS (Question 29: GHS; "How would you rate your overall health during the past week?") \& QoL (Question 30: QoL; "How would you rate your overall quality of life during the past week?") were assessed \& were scored on a 7-point scale (1= Very poor; 7=Excellent). Scores are linearly transformed on a scale of 0 to 100, with a high score indicating better QoL.
SecondaryTTD in GHS/QoL According to EORTC QLQ-C30 in mITT PopulationUp to 68 months
TTD in GHS/QoL, defined by a minimally important decrease of ≥10 points at 2 consecutive assessment time-points on the GHS/QoL scale (Items 29, 30) of EORTC QLQ-C30, which consists of 30 questions that assess 5 aspects of participant functioning (physical, emotional, role, cognitive, and social), three symptom scales (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, and pain), GHS and QoL, \& six single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties) with a recall period of the previous week. Participant responses to questions regarding GHS (Question 29: GHS; "How would you rate your overall health during the past week?") \& QoL (Question 30: QoL; "How would you rate your overall quality of life during the past week?") were assessed \& were scored on a 7-point scale (1= Very poor; 7=Excellent). Scores are linearly transformed on a scale of 0 to 100, with a high score indicating better QoL.

Source ClinicalTrials.govtrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this list from software.

Twenty rows a page, as JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03371017/registered