ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT03375489

Early Integrated Telehealth Versus In-Person Palliative Care for Patients With Lung Cancer

NCT03375489, Not applicable, Completed, Massachusetts General Hospital; results first posted 2025-05-16

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Early Integrated Telehealth Versus In-Person Palliative Care for Patients With Lung Cancer. Trials, record NCT03375489. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT03375489

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Early Integrated Telehealth Versus In-Person Palliative Care for Patients With Lung Cancer
NCT number
NCT03375489
Status
Completed
Phases
Not applicable
Enrollment
1,798 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Massachusetts General Hospital
Conditions
Lung Cancer
Interventions
Telehealth Palliative Care, In-person Palliative Care
First posted
2017-12-18
Last updated
2025-05-16
Results first posted
2025-05-16

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes16

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPatient-reported Quality of Life24 Weeks
Compare the difference between study groups in patient-reported quality of life as measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lung Questionnaire, which has a total scale score range from 0-136 with higher scores indicating better overall quality of life.
SecondaryPatient-reported Communication About Their End-of-Life Care Preferences With Their Clinicians48 weeks (or last assessment prior to death if before 48 weeks)
Compare the difference between study groups in the proportion of patients who reported that they discussed their end-of-life care preferences with their clinicians based on a single item from the Prognosis and Treatment Perceptions Questionnaire (PTPQ). The PTPQ includes a self-report item that assesses whether the patient communicated with their clinicians about their wishes for care if they were dying (i.e., scored dichotomously as "yes vs. no").
SecondaryLength of Stay in HospiceFrom hospice enrollment until patient death during study periodCompare the difference between study groups in the length of stay in hospice (as measured in days) among patients who died during study period per medical record review.
SecondaryProportion of Patient's Palliative Care Visits With a Caregiver Present24 weeksCompare the difference between study groups in the proportion of palliative care visits that had a caregiver present as documented by the palliative care clinician using a study visit summary form.
SecondaryPatient-reported Satisfaction With Care24 weeks
Compare the difference between study groups in patient-reported satisfaction with care as measured by the Satisfaction and Care Delivery Questionnaire, which has a total scale score range from 0-52 with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction.
SecondaryCaregiver-reported Satisfaction With Care24 weeks
Compare the difference between study groups in caregiver-reported satisfaction with care as measured by the Satisfaction and Care Delivery Questionnaire (caregiver version), which has a total scale score range from 0-48 with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction.
OtherPatient-reported Coping Strategiesup to 48 weeks
Compare the difference between study groups in patient-reported coping strategies as measured by the Brief Cope (approach-oriented coping score range: 6-24, with higher scores indicating greater use of approach-oriented coping strategies; avoidant coping score range: 4-16, with higher scores indicating greater use of avoidant coping strategies).
OtherPatient-reported Prognostic Understandingup to 48 weeks
Compare the difference between study groups in patient-reported prognostic understanding as measured by the Prognosis and Treatment Perceptions Questionnaire, in which patients rate two items about the goal of their cancer care (i.e., scored dichotomously as either "to cure my cancer" vs any other option) and whether their cancer is curable (i.e., scored dichotomously as "yes or no").
OtherCaregiver-reported Prognostic Understandingup to 48 weeks
Compare the difference between study groups in caregiver-reported prognostic understanding as measured by the Prognosis and Treatment Perceptions Questionnaire, in which caregivers rate two items about the goal of their loved one's cancer care (i.e., scored dichotomously as either "to cure his/her cancer" vs any other option) and whether their loved one's cancer is curable (i.e., scored dichotomously as "yes or no").
OtherCaregiver-reported Quality of Lifeup to 48 weeks
Compare the difference between study groups in caregiver-reported quality of life as measured by the Caregiver Oncology Quality of Life Questionnaire, which has a total scale score range of 0-100 with higher scores indicating better quality of life.

Outcomes16

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPatient-reported Quality of Life24 WeeksThe analysis population represents the numbers of patients in each study group who completed the baseline and 24-week Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lung Questionnaire.units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYPatient-reported Communication About Their End-of-Life Care Preferences With Their Clinicians48 weeks (or last assessment prior to death if before 48 weeks)The analysis population represents the numbers of patients in each study group who completed the Prognosis and Treatment Perceptions Questionnaire at least once post baseline up to 48 weeks.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYLength of Stay in HospiceFrom hospice enrollment until patient death during study periodThe analysis population represents the numbers of patients in each study group who who died during the study period.daysLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYProportion of Patient's Palliative Care Visits With a Caregiver Present24 weeks
The analysis population represents the numbers of patients in each study group who had any palliative care visits, and the overall number of units analyzed represents the numbers of palliative care visits in each study group through week 24.
proportion of visits with a caregiverNUMBER
SECONDARYPatient-reported Satisfaction With Care24 weeksThe analysis population represents the numbers of patients in each study group who completed the 24-week Satisfaction and Care Delivery Questionnaire.units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYCaregiver-reported Satisfaction With Care24 weeksThe analysis population represents the numbers of caregivers in each study group who completed the 24-week Satisfaction and Care Delivery Questionnaire.units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIEDPatient-reported Coping Strategiesup to 48 weeks
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIEDPatient-reported Prognostic Understandingup to 48 weeks
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIEDCaregiver-reported Prognostic Understandingup to 48 weeks
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIEDCaregiver-reported Quality of Lifeup to 48 weeks

Results by group12

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Patient-reported Quality of LifeTelehealth Palliative Care: Patients99.795% Confidence Interval 98.0 to 101.3units on a scale
Patient-reported Quality of LifeIn-person Palliative Care: Patients97.795% Confidence Interval 96.1 to 99.3units on a scale
Patient-reported Communication About Their End-of-Life Care Preferences With Their CliniciansTelehealth Palliative Care: Patients130Participants
Patient-reported Communication About Their End-of-Life Care Preferences With Their CliniciansIn-person Palliative Care: Patients115Participants
Length of Stay in HospiceTelehealth Palliative Care: Patients25.395% Confidence Interval 19.2 to 31.3days
Length of Stay in HospiceIn-person Palliative Care: Patients25.195% Confidence Interval 19.0 to 31.1days
Proportion of Patient's Palliative Care Visits With a Caregiver PresentTelehealth Palliative Care: Patient36.695% Confidence Interval 33.6 to 39.7proportion of visits with a caregiver
Proportion of Patient's Palliative Care Visits With a Caregiver PresentIn-person Palliative Care: Patient49.795% Confidence Interval 46.4 to 53.1proportion of visits with a caregiver
Patient-reported Satisfaction With CareTelehealth Palliative Care: Patient41.395% Confidence Interval 40.4 to 42.3units on a scale
Patient-reported Satisfaction With CareIn-person Palliative Care: Patient41.095% Confidence Interval 40.1 to 41.9units on a scale

Participant flow12

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDTelehealth Palliative Care: Patient633
Overall StudySTARTEDIn-person Palliative Care: Patient617
Overall StudySTARTEDTelehealth Palliative Care: Caregiver272
Overall StudySTARTEDIn-person Palliative Care: Caregiver276
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDTelehealth Palliative Care: Patient633
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDIn-person Palliative Care: Patient617
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDTelehealth Palliative Care: Caregiver272
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDIn-person Palliative Care: Caregiver276
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDTelehealth Palliative Care: Patient0
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDIn-person Palliative Care: Patient0

Adverse events0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

None in this release.

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityTelehealth Palliative Care: Patients365633
Total, all-cause mortalityIn-person Palliative Care: Patients368617
Total, other adverse eventsTelehealth Palliative Care: Patients00
Total, other adverse eventsIn-person Palliative Care: Patients00
Total, serious adverse eventsTelehealth Palliative Care: Patients00
Total, serious adverse eventsIn-person Palliative Care: Patients00

Papers3

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
35588200DERIVEDPubMed
39259563DERIVEDPubMed
42954305DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Telehealth Palliative Care: Patients vs In-person Palliative Care: Patients: Patient-reported Communication About Their End-of-Life Care Preferences With Their CliniciansTrial comparisons
Telehealth Palliative Care: Patients vs In-person Palliative Care: Patients: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03375489

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03375489/registered