ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT03382600

Safety and Efficacy of Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) in Combination With TS-1+Cisplatin or TS-1+Oxaliplatin as First Line Chemotherapy in Gastric Cancer (MK-3475-659/KEYNOTE-659)

NCT03382600, Phase 2, Completed, Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC; results first posted 2023-12-01

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.4.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Safety and Efficacy of Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) in Combination With TS-1+Cisplatin or TS-1+Oxaliplatin as First Line Chemotherapy in Gastric Cancer (MK-3475-659/KEYNOTE-659). Trials, record NCT03382600. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.4.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT03382600

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Safety and Efficacy of Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) in Combination With TS-1+Cisplatin or TS-1+Oxaliplatin as First Line Chemotherapy in Gastric Cancer (MK-3475-659/KEYNOTE-659)
NCT number
NCT03382600
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
100 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Conditions
Gastric Cancer
Interventions
Pembrolizumab, Oxaliplatin, TS-1, Cisplatin
First posted
2017-12-26
Last updated
2024-06-11
Results first posted
2023-12-01

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes13

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryObjective Response Rate (ORR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR)Up to ~36 months
For the primary efficacy analysis, ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who have a best response of complete response (CR, disappearance of all target lesions) or partial response (PR, at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters \[SOD\] of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD) per RECIST 1.1 as assessed by BICR.
SecondaryORR According to Immune-related Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (iRECIST) Assessed by BICRUp to ~36 months
For the secondary efficacy analysis, ORR was defined as the percentage of participants whose best response based on imaging is CR (disappearance of all target lesions) or PR (≥30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD) according to iRECIST as assessed by BICR. iRECIST is a modification to RECIST that takes into account unique patterns of atypical response in immunotherapy and enables treatment beyond initial radiographic progression.
SecondaryDuration of Response (DOR) According to RECIST 1.1 Assessed by BICRUp to ~36 months
For participants who demonstrated complete response (CR, disappearance of all target lesions) or partial response (PR, ≥30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions) according to RECIST 1.1 as assessed by BICR, DOR was defined as the time from the earliest date of qualifying response (CR or PR) until earliest date of progressive disease (PD, ≥20% increase in the SOD of target lesions) or death from any cause, whichever came first. DOR was censored at the last tumor assessment date if a responder did not have PD or death.
SecondaryDOR According to iRECIST Assessed by BICRUp to ~36 months
For participants who demonstrated complete response (CR, disappearance of all target lesions) or partial response (PR, ≥30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions) according to iRECIST as assessed by BICR, DOR was defined as the time from the earliest date of qualifying response (CR or PR) until earliest date of progressive disease (PD, ≥20% increase in the SOD of target lesions) or death from any cause, whichever came first. DOR was censored at the last tumor assessment date if a responder did not have PD or death. iRECIST is a modification to RECIST that takes into account unique patterns of atypical response in immunotherapy and enables treatment beyond initial radiographic progression.
SecondaryDisease Control Rate (DCR) According to RECIST 1.1 Assessed by BICRUp to ~36 months
DCR was defined as the percentage of participants in the analysis population who have complete response (CR, disappearance of all target lesions), partial response (PR (≥30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD), or stable disease (SD, neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease (PD, ≥20% increase in the SOD of target lesions\]). Responses are according to RECIST 1.1 as assessed by BICR.
SecondaryDCR According to iRECIST 1.1 Assessed by BICRUp to ~36 months
DCR was defined as the percentage of participants in the analysis population who have CR (disappearance of all target lesions), PR (≥30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD), or stable disease (SD, neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD \[≥20% increase in the SOD of target lesions\]). Responses are according to iRECIST 1.1 as assessed by BICR. iRECIST is a modification to RECIST that takes into account unique patterns of atypical response in immunotherapy and enables treatment beyond initial radiographic progression.
SecondaryTime to Response (TTR) According to RECIST 1.1 Assessed by BICRUp to ~36 months
TTR was defined as the time from the date of enrollment day to the first date of confirmed CR (disappearance of all target lesions) or PR (≥30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD). Responses are according to RECIST 1.1 as assessed by BICR.
SecondaryTTR According to iRECIST 1.1 Assessed by BICRUp to ~36 months
TTR was defined as the time from the date of enrollment day to the first date of confirmed CR (disappearance of all target lesions) or PR (≥30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD). Responses are according to iRECIST 1.1 as assessed by BICR. iRECIST is a modification to RECIST that takes into account unique patterns of atypical response in immunotherapy and enables treatment beyond initial radiographic progression.
SecondaryProgression-free Survival (PFS) According to RECIST 1.1 Assessed by BICRUp to ~36 months
PFS was defined as the time from the date of enrollment day to the first documented PD (defined as ≥20% increase in the SOD of target lesions) or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Responses are according to RECIST 1.1 as assessed by BICR.
SecondaryPFS According to iRECIST 1.1 Assessed by BICRUp to ~36 months
PFS was defined as the time from the date of enrollment day to the first documented PD (defined as ≥20% increase in the SOD of target lesions) or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Responses are according to iRECIST 1.1 as assessed by BICR. iRECIST is a modification to RECIST that takes into account unique patterns of atypical response in immunotherapy and enables treatment beyond initial radiographic progression.

Outcomes13

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYObjective Response Rate (ORR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR)Up to ~36 monthsAll participants who received ≥1 dose of study treatment are included.Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYORR According to Immune-related Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (iRECIST) Assessed by BICRUp to ~36 monthsAll participants who received ≥1 dose of study drug are included.Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYDuration of Response (DOR) According to RECIST 1.1 Assessed by BICRUp to ~36 monthsAll participants who received ≥1 dose of study drug and had a confirmed response of CR or PR are included.monthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYDOR According to iRECIST Assessed by BICRUp to ~36 monthsAll participants who received ≥1 dose of study drug and had a confirmed response of CR or PR are included.monthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYDisease Control Rate (DCR) According to RECIST 1.1 Assessed by BICRUp to ~36 monthsAll participants who received ≥1 dose of study drug are included.Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYDCR According to iRECIST 1.1 Assessed by BICRUp to ~36 monthsAll participants who received ≥1 dose of study drug are included.Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYTime to Response (TTR) According to RECIST 1.1 Assessed by BICRUp to ~36 monthsAll participants who received ≥1 dose of study drug are included.monthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYTTR According to iRECIST 1.1 Assessed by BICRUp to ~36 monthsAll participants who received ≥1 dose of study drug are included.monthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYProgression-free Survival (PFS) According to RECIST 1.1 Assessed by BICRUp to ~36 monthsAll participants who received ≥1 dose of study drug are included.monthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYPFS According to iRECIST 1.1 Assessed by BICRUp to ~36 monthsAll participants who received ≥1 dose of study drug are included.monthsMEDIAN

Results by group26

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Objective Response Rate (ORR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR)Pembrolizumab + Oxaliplatin +TS-1 (Cohort 1)72.295% Confidence Interval 58.4 to 83.5Percentage of participants
Objective Response Rate (ORR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR)Pembrolizumab + Cisplatin +TS-1 (Cohort 2)80.495% Confidence Interval 66.1 to 90.6Percentage of participants
ORR According to Immune-related Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (iRECIST) Assessed by BICRPembrolizumab + Oxaliplatin +TS-1 (Cohort 1)72.295% Confidence Interval 58.4 to 83.5Percentage of participants
ORR According to Immune-related Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (iRECIST) Assessed by BICRPembrolizumab + Cisplatin +TS-1 (Cohort 2)80.495% Confidence Interval 66.1 to 90.6Percentage of participants
Duration of Response (DOR) According to RECIST 1.1 Assessed by BICRPembrolizumab + Oxaliplatin +TS-1 (Cohort 1)10.695% Confidence Interval 5.6 to NAmonths
Duration of Response (DOR) According to RECIST 1.1 Assessed by BICRPembrolizumab + Cisplatin +TS-1 (Cohort 2)9.595% Confidence Interval 4.7 to 15.3months
DOR According to iRECIST Assessed by BICRPembrolizumab + Oxaliplatin +TS-1 (Cohort 1)10.695% Confidence Interval 5.6 to NAmonths
DOR According to iRECIST Assessed by BICRPembrolizumab + Cisplatin +TS-1 (Cohort 2)9.595% Confidence Interval 4.7 to NAmonths
Disease Control Rate (DCR) According to RECIST 1.1 Assessed by BICRPembrolizumab + Oxaliplatin +TS-1 (Cohort 1)96.395% Confidence Interval 87.3 to 99.5Percentage of participants
Disease Control Rate (DCR) According to RECIST 1.1 Assessed by BICRPembrolizumab + Cisplatin +TS-1 (Cohort 2)97.895% Confidence Interval 88.5 to 99.9Percentage of participants

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDPembrolizumab + Oxaliplatin +TS-1 (Cohort 1)54
Overall StudySTARTEDPembrolizumab + Cisplatin +TS-1 (Cohort 2)46
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPembrolizumab + Oxaliplatin +TS-1 (Cohort 1)0
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPembrolizumab + Cisplatin +TS-1 (Cohort 2)0
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPembrolizumab + Oxaliplatin +TS-1 (Cohort 1)54
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPembrolizumab + Cisplatin +TS-1 (Cohort 2)46

Adverse events252

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPembrolizumab + Oxaliplatin +TS-1 (Cohort 1)1354
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPembrolizumab + Cisplatin +TS-1 (Cohort 2)1846
otherFebrile neutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPembrolizumab + Oxaliplatin +TS-1 (Cohort 1)454
otherFebrile neutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPembrolizumab + Cisplatin +TS-1 (Cohort 2)146
otherNeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPembrolizumab + Oxaliplatin +TS-1 (Cohort 1)354
otherNeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPembrolizumab + Cisplatin +TS-1 (Cohort 2)646
otherVertigoEar and labyrinth disordersPembrolizumab + Oxaliplatin +TS-1 (Cohort 1)354
otherVertigoEar and labyrinth disordersPembrolizumab + Cisplatin +TS-1 (Cohort 2)046
otherAdrenal insufficiencyEndocrine disordersPembrolizumab + Oxaliplatin +TS-1 (Cohort 1)354
otherAdrenal insufficiencyEndocrine disordersPembrolizumab + Cisplatin +TS-1 (Cohort 2)346

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityPembrolizumab + Oxaliplatin +TS-1 (Cohort 1)354
Total, all-cause mortalityPembrolizumab + Cisplatin +TS-1 (Cohort 2)046
Total, other adverse eventsPembrolizumab + Oxaliplatin +TS-1 (Cohort 1)5454
Total, other adverse eventsPembrolizumab + Cisplatin +TS-1 (Cohort 2)4646
Total, serious adverse eventsPembrolizumab + Oxaliplatin +TS-1 (Cohort 1)2754
Total, serious adverse eventsPembrolizumab + Cisplatin +TS-1 (Cohort 2)2246

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
32145474DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons4

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Pembrolizumab + Oxaliplatin +TS-1 (Cohort 1) vs Pembrolizumab + Cisplatin +TS-1 (Cohort 2): Number of Participants With ≥1 Adverse Event (AE)Trial comparisons
Pembrolizumab + Oxaliplatin +TS-1 (Cohort 1) vs Pembrolizumab + Cisplatin +TS-1 (Cohort 2): Number of Participants Discontinuing From Study Treatment Due to AE(s)Trial comparisons
Pembrolizumab + Oxaliplatin +TS-1 (Cohort 1) vs Pembrolizumab + Cisplatin +TS-1 (Cohort 2): deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Pembrolizumab + Oxaliplatin +TS-1 (Cohort 1) vs Pembrolizumab + Cisplatin +TS-1 (Cohort 2): serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Source

Release
trials-2026-11-12-0.4.0
Release manifest SHA-256
0f4a8d8c48aee2a7573ae0fa94ecbeab70c1adbe449bbc95c424bc7d3e97b9d4
Registry capture
2026-11-12
Results copy, AACT
2026-03-23
NIH clinical studies file
2026-11-13

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03382600

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03382600/results?page=2