ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT03390504

A Study of Erdafitinib Compared With Vinflunine or Docetaxel or Pembrolizumab in Participants With Advanced Urothelial Cancer and Selected Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor (FGFR) Gene Aberrations

NCT03390504, Phase 3, Active not recruiting, Janssen Research & Development, LLC; results first posted 2025-05-14

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Study of Erdafitinib Compared With Vinflunine or Docetaxel or Pembrolizumab in Participants With Advanced Urothelial Cancer and Selected Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor (FGFR) Gene Aberrations. Trials, record NCT03390504. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT03390504

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Study of Erdafitinib Compared With Vinflunine or Docetaxel or Pembrolizumab in Participants With Advanced Urothelial Cancer and Selected Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor (FGFR) Gene Aberrations
NCT number
NCT03390504
Status
Active not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
629 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Janssen Research & Development, LLC
Conditions
Urothelial Cancer
Interventions
Erdafitinib, Vinflunine, Docetaxel, Pembrolizumab, Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor inhibitor Clinical Trial Assay (FGFRi CTA)
First posted
2018-01-04
Last updated
2026-11-03
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2017-002932-18
Results first posted
2025-05-14

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes21

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryOverall Survival (OS)From randomization (3 days prior to Cycle 1 Day 1) until death due to any cause (maximum up to 51.7 months)Overall survival was measured from the date of randomization to the date of the participant's death.
SecondaryProgression Free Survival (PFS) as Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version (v) 1.1From randomization (3 days prior to Cycle 1 Day 1) until disease progression or relapse from CR or death (maximum up to 51.7 months)
PFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of disease progression or relapse from complete response (CR) based on investigator assessment using RECIST v 1.1, or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. As per RECIST v 1.1, CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must had reduction in the short axis to less than (\<) 10 millimeters (mm). Progressive disease (PD) was defined as at least 20 percent (%) increase in the sum of diameters of measured lesions taking as references the smallest sum of diameters recorded on study (including baseline) and an absolute increase of greater than or equal to (\>=) 5 mm or appearance of at least 1 new lesion.
SecondaryObjective Response Rate (ORR) Per RECIST Version 1.1From start of the treatment (Day 1 Cycle 1) up to maximum of 51.7 months
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved CR or partial response (PR) as determined by investigator per RECIST v1.1. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must had reduction in the short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Physical Functioning Scales of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Bladder Cancer (FACT-Bl)Baseline up to Cycle 11 (each cycle was of 21 days)
The FACT-Bl consisted of 39 items, with 5-point Likert scales, covering 5 primary domains: physical well-being, social/family well-being, emotional well-being, functional well-being and additional concerns for participants with bladder cancer. The response options ranged from 0 to 4 where, 0='Not at all" and 4= "very much." FACT-Bl total score ranged from 0 (worst) to 156 (best). The higher the score, the better the quality of life (QOL). The baseline value was defined as the value collected at the time closest to but prior to the randomization.
SecondaryTime Until Symptom DeteriorationRandomization (3 days prior to Cycle 1 Day 1) up to maximum of 51.7 months
Time until symptom deterioration was defined as the first time to increase in urinary bladder cancer symptoms score from the day of randomization beyond a meaningful change threshold compared to baseline. The urinary bladder cancer symptom score was subset of FACT-Bl which included 3 items related to urinary symptoms, 5-point Likert scale. Response options ranged from 0 to 4, 0 = Not at all, 1= A little bit, 2= Somewhat, 3=Quite a bit, 4 = Very much. A response of 0 indicated no symptoms and 4 indicated severe symptoms. Total sum scores ranged from 0 to 12, higher scores indicate relatively poor quality of life.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Patient-Global Impression of Severity (PGIS)Baseline, 51.7 months
The PGI-S was a single item patient-reported measure assessing participants' impression of severity in bladder cancer symptoms. It uses a 4-point Likert scale as follows: symptoms are: 0-"absent (no symptoms)", 1-"mild", 2-"moderate", 3="severe" and 4= "very severe". Percentage of participants with shift from baseline in PGIS score were reported. A negative shift from baseline in PGIS score indicated Improvement and positive shift from baseline in PGIS score indicated Worsening. The baseline value was defined as the value collected at the time closest to but prior to the randomization.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Utility Scale of the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-5 Levels Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L)Baseline up to Cycle 11 (each cycle was of 21 days)
The EQ-5D-5L was a generic measure of health status. The EQ-5D-5L was a 5-item questionnaire that assessed 5 domains included mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Health utility values generated from the EQ-5D generally range from 0 (a state as bad as being dead) to 1 (full health), with higher scores indicating better QoL. The EQ visual analog scale (VAS) recorded the patient's self-rated health on a VAS, ranged from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state), with higher scores indicating better QoL. The baseline value was defined as the value collected at the time closest to but prior to the randomization.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) of the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-5 Levels Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L)Baseline up to Cycle 11 (each cycle was of 21 days)
The EQ-5D-5L was a generic measure of health status. The EQ-5D-5L was a 5-item questionnaire that assessed 5 domains included mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Health utility values generated from the EQ-5D generally range from 0 (a state as bad as being dead) to 1 (full health), with higher scores indicating better QoL. The EQ VAS recorded the patient's self-rated health on a VAS, ranged from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state), with higher scores indicating better QoL. The baseline value was defined as the value collected at the time closest to but prior to the randomization.
SecondaryDuration of Response (DOR) as Per RECIST Version 1.1From date of first documented response to date of first documented PD or death whichever occurred first (maximum up to 51.7 months)
DOR was defined as time from the date of initial documentation of an overall response (CR or PR) to the date of first documented evidence of progressive disease (PD) (or relapse for participants who experience CR) or death. As per RECIST Version 1.1: CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must had reduction in the short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. PD was defined as at least 20% increase in the sum of diameters of measured lesions taking as references the smallest sum of diameters recorded on study (including baseline) and an absolute increase of \>=5 mm or appearance of at least 1 new lesion.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)From start of the treatment (Day 1 Cycle 1) up to 30 days after last dose of study drug or start of subsequent anticancer therapy (maximum up to 51.7 months)
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a medicinal (investigational or non-investigational) product. An AE does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the intervention. TEAEs were the events between first dose of study drug and up to 30 days after last dose or before start of new anticancer therapy, whichever occurred first. All TEAEs including serious and non-serious events were reported in this outcome measure.

Outcomes21

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYOverall Survival (OS)From randomization (3 days prior to Cycle 1 Day 1) until death due to any cause (maximum up to 51.7 months)Intent-to-Treat (ITT) analysis set included all randomized participants. Participants in this population were analyzed according to the treatment to which they were randomized.MonthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYProgression Free Survival (PFS) as Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version (v) 1.1From randomization (3 days prior to Cycle 1 Day 1) until disease progression or relapse from CR or death (maximum up to 51.7 months)
ITT analysis set included all randomized participants. Participants in this population were analyzed according to the treatment to which they were randomized. Here 'N' (overall number of participants analyzed) refers to the number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
MonthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYObjective Response Rate (ORR) Per RECIST Version 1.1From start of the treatment (Day 1 Cycle 1) up to maximum of 51.7 monthsITT analysis set included all randomized participants. Participants in this population were analyzed according to the treatment to which they were randomized.Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Physical Functioning Scales of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Bladder Cancer (FACT-Bl)Baseline up to Cycle 11 (each cycle was of 21 days)Analysis population set included in ITT (all randomized) participants with available data for this outcome measure.Score on scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYTime Until Symptom DeteriorationRandomization (3 days prior to Cycle 1 Day 1) up to maximum of 51.7 monthsAnalysis population set included in ITT (all randomized) participants with available data for this outcome measure.MonthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Patient-Global Impression of Severity (PGIS)Baseline, 51.7 monthsAnalysis population set included in ITT (all randomized) participants with available data for this outcome measure.Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Utility Scale of the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-5 Levels Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L)Baseline up to Cycle 11 (each cycle was of 21 days)Analysis population set included in ITT (all randomized) participants with available data for this outcome measure.Score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) of the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-5 Levels Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L)Baseline up to Cycle 11 (each cycle was of 21 days)Analysis population set included in ITT (all randomized) participants with available data for this outcome measure.Score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYDuration of Response (DOR) as Per RECIST Version 1.1From date of first documented response to date of first documented PD or death whichever occurred first (maximum up to 51.7 months)
ITT analysis set included all randomized participants. Participants in this population were analyzed according to the treatment to which they were randomized. Here 'N' (overall number of participants analyzed) refers to the number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
MonthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)From start of the treatment (Day 1 Cycle 1) up to 30 days after last dose of study drug or start of subsequent anticancer therapy (maximum up to 51.7 months)Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS

Results by group348

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Overall Survival (OS)Cohort 1: Arm 1A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/9 mg12.0695% Confidence Interval 10.25 to 16.36Months
Overall Survival (OS)Cohort 1: Arm 1B: Chemotherapy (Vinflunine 320 mg/m^2 or Docetaxel 75 mg/m^2)8.7495% Confidence Interval 6.67 to 10.71Months
Overall Survival (OS)Cohort 2: Arm 2A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/ 9 mg10.9195% Confidence Interval 9.23 to 12.58Months
Overall Survival (OS)Cohort 2: Arm 2B: Pembrolizumab 200 mg11.0795% Confidence Interval 9.72 to 13.63Months
Progression Free Survival (PFS) as Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version (v) 1.1Cohort 1: Arm 1A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/9 mg5.3995% Confidence Interval 4.37 to 5.62Months
Progression Free Survival (PFS) as Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version (v) 1.1Cohort 1: Arm 1B: Chemotherapy (Vinflunine 320 mg/m^2 or Docetaxel 75 mg/m^2)2.7395% Confidence Interval 2.10 to 4.17Months
Progression Free Survival (PFS) as Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version (v) 1.1Cohort 2: Arm 2A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/ 9 mg4.4495% Confidence Interval 4.07 to 5.49Months
Progression Free Survival (PFS) as Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version (v) 1.1Cohort 2: Arm 2B: Pembrolizumab 200 mg2.6995% Confidence Interval 1.64 to 3.02Months
Objective Response Rate (ORR) Per RECIST Version 1.1Cohort 1: Arm 1A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/9 mg46.9Percentage of participants
Objective Response Rate (ORR) Per RECIST Version 1.1Cohort 1: Arm 1B: Chemotherapy (Vinflunine 320 mg/m^2 or Docetaxel 75 mg/m^2)12.6Percentage of participants

Participant flow16

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDCohort 1: Arm 1A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/9 mg143
Overall StudySTARTEDCohort 1: Arm 1B: Chemotherapy (Vinflunine 320 mg/m^2 or Docetaxel 75 mg/m^2)135
Overall StudySTARTEDCohort 2: Arm 2A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/ 9 mg175
Overall StudySTARTEDCohort 2: Arm 2B: Pembrolizumab 200 mg176
Overall StudyTreatedCohort 1: Arm 1A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/9 mg142
Overall StudyTreatedCohort 1: Arm 1B: Chemotherapy (Vinflunine 320 mg/m^2 or Docetaxel 75 mg/m^2)117
Overall StudyTreatedCohort 2: Arm 2A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/ 9 mg173
Overall StudyTreatedCohort 2: Arm 2B: Pembrolizumab 200 mg173
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDCohort 1: Arm 1A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/9 mg137
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDCohort 1: Arm 1B: Chemotherapy (Vinflunine 320 mg/m^2 or Docetaxel 75 mg/m^2)114

Adverse events1,096

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersCohort 1: Arm 1A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/9 mg40142
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersCohort 1: Arm 1B: Chemotherapy (Vinflunine 320 mg/m^2 or Docetaxel 75 mg/m^2)39117
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersCohort 2: Arm 2A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/ 9 mg51173
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersCohort 2: Arm 2B: Pembrolizumab 200 mg44173
otherLeukopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersCohort 1: Arm 1A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/9 mg1142
otherLeukopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersCohort 1: Arm 1B: Chemotherapy (Vinflunine 320 mg/m^2 or Docetaxel 75 mg/m^2)15117
otherLeukopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersCohort 2: Arm 2A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/ 9 mg5173
otherLeukopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersCohort 2: Arm 2B: Pembrolizumab 200 mg0173
otherNeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersCohort 1: Arm 1A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/9 mg0142
otherNeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersCohort 1: Arm 1B: Chemotherapy (Vinflunine 320 mg/m^2 or Docetaxel 75 mg/m^2)24117

Adverse event totals12

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityCohort 1: Arm 1A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/9 mg91143
Total, all-cause mortalityCohort 1: Arm 1B: Chemotherapy (Vinflunine 320 mg/m^2 or Docetaxel 75 mg/m^2)90135
Total, all-cause mortalityCohort 2: Arm 2A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/ 9 mg141175
Total, all-cause mortalityCohort 2: Arm 2B: Pembrolizumab 200 mg131176
Total, other adverse eventsCohort 1: Arm 1A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/9 mg141142
Total, other adverse eventsCohort 1: Arm 1B: Chemotherapy (Vinflunine 320 mg/m^2 or Docetaxel 75 mg/m^2)104117
Total, other adverse eventsCohort 2: Arm 2A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/ 9 mg173173
Total, other adverse eventsCohort 2: Arm 2B: Pembrolizumab 200 mg157173
Total, serious adverse eventsCohort 1: Arm 1A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/9 mg63142
Total, serious adverse eventsCohort 1: Arm 1B: Chemotherapy (Vinflunine 320 mg/m^2 or Docetaxel 75 mg/m^2)50117

Papers3

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
37870920DERIVEDPubMed
43001410DERIVEDPubMed
43004726DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03390504

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03390504/registered?page=2