ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT03396588

Non-Opiate Treatment After Prenatal Opiate Exposure to Prevent Postnatal Injury to the Young Brain

NCT03396588, Phase 3, Completed, Henrietta Bada; results first posted 2025-05-23

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Non-Opiate Treatment After Prenatal Opiate Exposure to Prevent Postnatal Injury to the Young Brain. Trials, record NCT03396588. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT03396588

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Non-Opiate Treatment After Prenatal Opiate Exposure to Prevent Postnatal Injury to the Young Brain
NCT number
NCT03396588
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
120 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Henrietta Bada
Conditions
Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome
Interventions
Clonidine, Morphine
First posted
2018-01-11
Last updated
2025-05-23
Results first posted
2025-05-23

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes9

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange in Neurobehavioral Performance Summary Scores From the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Network Neurobehavioral Scale (NNNS)Baseline (5-10 days post natal age) and one-month post-natal age (between 4-6 weeks of age), or at discharge, whichever comes first.
The summary scores from the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Network Neurobehavioral Scale (NNNS) give a measure of infant neurobehavior in the following areas (score range): habituation (1-9), regulation (2.20-7.50), attention (1.29-8.4), Handling (0-1), quality of movement (1.20-6.20), Non-optimal reflexes (0-12), Asymmetric reflexes (0-7), arousal (2.43-6.67), hypertonicity (0-8), hypotonicity (0-5.0), excitability (0-11), lethargy (0-11.0), and stress/abstinence (0-0.57). A higher score for each item means a higher level of the construct. For example, a higher score for hypertonicity means the infant is more hypertonic and higher score on hypotonicity means the infant is more hypotonic. No cut-off score published for normal or abnormal behavioral performance.
PrimaryBayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development Third Edition6 months of life
Scores obtained Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development Third Edition in the developmental domains of motor, cognitive, and language. This tool for measures of motor, cognitive, and language development is a series of standardized measurements and for each domain, the standardized scores have a mean of 100 and standard deviation of 15 with a range of 55-155 for cognitive and a range of 45-155 for language and motor (lower scores indicating greater impairment). Scores below 1 standard deviation (=or less than 84) is considered below normal. Scores above 1 standard deviation (over 115) represent higher than normal functioning in each domain. The score for each domain (motor, cognitive, and language functioning) represents the composite score.
PrimaryBayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development Third Edition1 year of life
Scores obtained Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development Third Edition in the developmental domains of motor, cognitive, and language. This tool for measures of motor, cognitive, and language development is a series of standardized measurements and for each domain, the standardized scores have a mean of 100 and standard deviation of 15 with a range of 55-155 for cognitive and a range of 45-155 for language and motor (lower scores indicating greater impairment). Scores below 1 standard deviation (=or less than 84) is considered below normal. Scores above 1 standard deviation (over 115) represent higher than normal functioning in each domain. The score for each domain (motor, cognitive, and language functioning) represents the composite score.
PrimaryBayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development Third Edition2 years of life
Scores obtained Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development Third Edition in the developmental domains of motor, cognitive, and language. This tool for measures of motor, cognitive, and language development is a series of standardized measurements and for each domain, the standardized scores have a mean of 100 and standard deviation of 15 with a range of 55-155 for cognitive and a range of 45-155 for language and motor (lower scores indicating greater impairment). Scores below 1 standard deviation (=or less than 84) is considered below normal. Scores above 1 standard deviation (over 115) represent higher than normal functioning in each domain. The score for each domain (motor, cognitive, and language functioning) represents the composite score.
PrimaryAges and Stages Questionnaire Third Edition (ASQ-3)12 months of age
The ASQ-3 is a developmental screening tool to assess developmental progress in children. Children are scored in the areas of communication, gross motor skills, fine motor skills, problem solving, and personal/social skills. The child's parent/guardian answers whether their child already does an activity (yes=10), sometimes does it (sometimes=5), or does not yet do it (not yet=0). The answers are then used to score each category. Each category is then broken down into whether the child falls above the cutoff (child development is on schedule), close to the cutoff (child development is slightly delayed and requires monitoring/intervention), or below the cutoff (delayed development and further assessment required).
PrimaryAges and Stages Questionnaire Third Edition (ASQ-3)24 months
The ASQ-3 is a developmental screening tool to assess developmental progress in children. Children are scored in the areas of communication, gross motor skills, fine motor skills, problem solving, and personal/social skills. The child's parent/guardian answers whether their child already does an activity (yes=10), sometimes does it (sometimes=5), or does not yet do it (not yet=0). The answers are then used to score each category. Each category is then broken down into whether the child falls above the cutoff (child development is on schedule), close to the cutoff (child development is slightly delayed and requires monitoring/intervention), or below the cutoff (delayed development and further assessment required).
PrimaryChildhood Behavior Checklist (CBCL) T-ScoresOnce post discharge (between 18 months up to 24 months of age)
The CBCL/1.5-5 is validated for children ages 1.5 to 5 years old. It obtains caregivers' ratings of 113 behavior items. Scores are broken down into internalizing problems (scores range 29-100, normal is below 60), externalizing problems (scores range from 28-100, normal is below 60), and total problems (range is 28-100, normal is below 60). Items are scored on the following syndrome scales: Emotionally Reactive, Anxious/Depressed, Somatic Complaints, Withdrawn, Attention Problems, Aggressive Behavior, and Sleep Problems. Items are also scored on the following DSM-oriented scales: Affective Problems, Anxiety Problems, Pervasive Developmental Problems, Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Problems, Stress Problems, Autism Spectrum Problems, and Oppositional Defiant Problems. The CBCL consists of 113 items, scored on a three-point Likert scale (0=absent, 1= occurs sometimes, 2=occurs often)
SecondaryDuration of Treatment60 daysTotal number days of treatment
SecondaryChildhood Behavior Checklist 1.5-5 T-ScoresOnce post discharge (between 18 months up to 24 months of age)
On the CBCL 1.5-5, T-scores, with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10, are used to interpret results, with scores of 65 or higher indicating a clinical range, and scores between 60 and 64 suggesting a borderline clinical range.

Outcomes9

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange in Neurobehavioral Performance Summary Scores From the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Network Neurobehavioral Scale (NNNS)Baseline (5-10 days post natal age) and one-month post-natal age (between 4-6 weeks of age), or at discharge, whichever comes first.Some babies were unable to be assessed in certain domains and therefore were not included in the total analyzed for that domain.score on a scaleMEAN
PRIMARYBayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development Third Edition6 months of lifeParticipants may not have had the 6 month Bayley due to the participant being lost to follow up, or because of COVID-19 research restrictions.score on a scaleMEAN
PRIMARYBayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development Third Edition1 year of lifeParticipants may not have had the 12 month Bayley due to the participant being lost to follow up, or because of COVID-19 research restrictions.score on a scaleMEAN
PRIMARYBayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development Third Edition2 years of lifeParticipants may not have had the 24 month Bayley due to the participant being lost to follow up, or because of COVID-19 research restrictions.score on a scaleMEAN
PRIMARYAges and Stages Questionnaire Third Edition (ASQ-3)12 months of ageASQ-3 assessments were used for babies who were unable to have Bayley assessment performed due to COVID-19 research restrictions. The babies who had the Bayley did not have the ASQ.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
PRIMARYAges and Stages Questionnaire Third Edition (ASQ-3)24 monthsThe ASQ-3 at 24 months was used for babies who were unable to have the Bayley assessment due to COVID-19 research restrictions.~The babies who had the Bayley did not have the ASQ performed.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
PRIMARYChildhood Behavior Checklist (CBCL) T-ScoresOnce post discharge (between 18 months up to 24 months of age)Only children in the treated cohorts had the CBCL.~Participants who were considered lost to follow up did not have the CBCL.score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYDuration of Treatment60 daysdaysMEAN
SECONDARYChildhood Behavior Checklist 1.5-5 T-ScoresOnce post discharge (between 18 months up to 24 months of age)Participants who were lost to follow up did not have the CBCL.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS

Results by group124

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change in Neurobehavioral Performance Summary Scores From the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Network Neurobehavioral Scale (NNNS)ClonidineHabituation0.595% Confidence Interval -1.0 to 1.0score on a scale
Change in Neurobehavioral Performance Summary Scores From the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Network Neurobehavioral Scale (NNNS)MorphineHabituation0.395% Confidence Interval -1.0 to 1.0score on a scale
Change in Neurobehavioral Performance Summary Scores From the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Network Neurobehavioral Scale (NNNS)ClonidineAttention1.095% Confidence Interval -0.1 to 2.0score on a scale
Change in Neurobehavioral Performance Summary Scores From the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Network Neurobehavioral Scale (NNNS)MorphineAttention0.695% Confidence Interval 0.2 to 1.6score on a scale
Change in Neurobehavioral Performance Summary Scores From the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Network Neurobehavioral Scale (NNNS)ClonidineHandling-0.195% Confidence Interval -0.4 to 0.1score on a scale
Change in Neurobehavioral Performance Summary Scores From the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Network Neurobehavioral Scale (NNNS)MorphineHandling0.195% Confidence Interval 0.0 to 0.4score on a scale
Change in Neurobehavioral Performance Summary Scores From the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Network Neurobehavioral Scale (NNNS)ClonidineQuality of movement0.195% Confidence Interval -0.3 to 0.8score on a scale
Change in Neurobehavioral Performance Summary Scores From the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Network Neurobehavioral Scale (NNNS)MorphineQuality of movement0.095% Confidence Interval -0.5 to 0.5score on a scale
Change in Neurobehavioral Performance Summary Scores From the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Network Neurobehavioral Scale (NNNS)ClonidineRegulation0.595% Confidence Interval -0.5 to 1.3score on a scale
Change in Neurobehavioral Performance Summary Scores From the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Network Neurobehavioral Scale (NNNS)MorphineRegulation-0.295% Confidence Interval -0.8 to 0.2score on a scale

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDClonidine60
Overall StudySTARTEDMorphine60
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDClonidine58
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDMorphine57
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDClonidine2
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDMorphine3

Adverse events38

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherFinnegan scores consecutively >8Nervous system disordersClonidine2460
otherFinnegan scores consecutively >8Nervous system disordersMorphine1760
otherAdjunct medication addedInvestigationsClonidine1360
otherAdjunct medication addedInvestigationsMorphine260
otherPhenobarbitol addedInvestigationsClonidine1560
otherPhenobarbitol addedInvestigationsMorphine560
seriousSustained tachycardiaCardiac disordersClonidine360
seriousSustained tachycardiaCardiac disordersMorphine460
seriousSkin lesionsSkin and subcutaneous tissue disordersClonidine260
seriousSkin lesionsSkin and subcutaneous tissue disordersMorphine160

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityClonidine160
Total, all-cause mortalityMorphine060
Total, other adverse eventsClonidine5260
Total, other adverse eventsMorphine2460
Total, serious adverse eventsClonidine960
Total, serious adverse eventsMorphine1560

Papers3

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
14993525BACKGROUNDPubMed
25624389BACKGROUNDPubMed
39575611DERIVEDPubMed

Grants1

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

ProjectTitlePrincipal investigatorsOrganizationFunderFiscal years
R01DA043519Non-opiate treatment after prenatal opiate exposure to Prevent Postnatal Injury to the Young Brain (No-POPPY)BADA, HENRIETTA S.; LEGGAS, MARKOSUNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKYNATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE2017 to 2021

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Clonidine vs Morphine: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Clonidine vs Morphine: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03396588

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03396588/results?page=2