ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT03407625

Foley Bulb With Oral Misoprostol for Induction of Labor

NCT03407625, Not applicable, Completed, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center; results first posted 2020-11-04

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Foley Bulb With Oral Misoprostol for Induction of Labor. Trials, record NCT03407625. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT03407625

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Foley Bulb With Oral Misoprostol for Induction of Labor
NCT number
NCT03407625
Status
Completed
Phases
Not applicable
Enrollment
2,227 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Conditions
Pregnancy, Labor, Induced
Interventions
Foley bulb plus Oral Misoprostol, Oral Misoprostol
First posted
2018-01-23
Last updated
2020-11-04
Results first posted
2020-11-04
Limitations and caveats
Pre-specified outcomes (dose of Oxytocin give at the delivery, terbutaline use, and the number of participants with intravenous analgesia during labor) were not collected as they were found to be not meaningful.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes24

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Vaginal Deliveryat deliveryvaginal delivery at first induction
SecondaryTime to Deliveryfrom start of induction agent to time of deliveryTime (in hours) from start of induction agent to delivery at first induction
SecondaryIndication for Cesarean Deliveryat deliveryAmong women delivered by cesarean, the indication for cesarean
SecondaryDose of Oxytocin Given (mcg or mg)at deliveryTotal dose of oxytocin given for induction as calculated by volume infused, concentration of solution and rate of infusion
SecondaryTime With Foley Bulb in PlaceFrom time of documented insertion until the time of documented expulsion or removal, whichever came first, assessed up to 24 hours.time (in hours) from insertion to removal or expulsion of foley bulb
SecondaryPresence of Chorioamnionitisat deliveryIntrapartum fever (temp equal or greater than 38C) with no other identified cause
SecondaryUse of Intravenous Analgesia During Laborat deliveryIntravenous analgesia used between the start of induction and delivery
SecondaryNumber of Participants Used Neuraxial Analgesia During Laborfrom start of induction to deliveryRegional or neuraxial analgesia (labor epidural or spinal) used between the start of induction and delivery
SecondaryNumber of Participants Used General Anesthesia for Deliveryat deliveryGeneral anesthesia administered for delivery
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Meconium-stained Amniotic FluidAt the time of rupture of membranes and at deliveryIdentification of any meconium (green tinge) in the amniotic fluid before or during delivery by a healthcare provider's assessment of gross fluid color.

Outcomes24

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYNumber of Participants With Vaginal Deliveryat deliveryParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYTime to Deliveryfrom start of induction agent to time of deliveryThis number represents women delivered at first inductionhoursMEAN
SECONDARYIndication for Cesarean Deliveryat deliveryParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYDose of Oxytocin Given (mcg or mg)at deliveryTotal dose of oxytocin was not found to be meaningful, thus data were not collected.
SECONDARYTime With Foley Bulb in PlaceFrom time of documented insertion until the time of documented expulsion or removal, whichever came first, assessed up to 24 hours.Number of women with successful Foley bulb placementhoursMEDIAN
SECONDARYPresence of Chorioamnionitisat deliveryParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYUse of Intravenous Analgesia During Laborat deliveryIntravenous analgesia was not clinically meaningful and was not collected
SECONDARYNumber of Participants Used Neuraxial Analgesia During Laborfrom start of induction to deliveryParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants Used General Anesthesia for Deliveryat deliveryParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Meconium-stained Amniotic FluidAt the time of rupture of membranes and at deliveryParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS

Results by group47

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Number of Participants With Vaginal DeliveryFoley Bulb Plus Oral Misoprostol869Participants
Number of Participants With Vaginal DeliveryOral Misoprostol860Participants
Time to DeliveryFoley Bulb Plus Oral Misoprostol17.3Standard Deviation 9.2hours
Time to DeliveryOral Misoprostol18.2Standard Deviation 9.2hours
Indication for Cesarean DeliveryFoley Bulb Plus Oral MisoprostolLabor dystocia122Participants
Indication for Cesarean DeliveryOral MisoprostolLabor dystocia110Participants
Indication for Cesarean DeliveryFoley Bulb Plus Oral MisoprostolAbnormal fetal heart rate tracing110Participants
Indication for Cesarean DeliveryOral MisoprostolAbnormal fetal heart rate tracing115Participants
Indication for Cesarean DeliveryFoley Bulb Plus Oral MisoprostolMalpresentation3Participants
Indication for Cesarean DeliveryOral MisoprostolMalpresentation3Participants

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDFoley Bulb Plus Oral Misoprostol1,117
Overall StudySTARTEDOral Misoprostol1,110
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDFoley Bulb Plus Oral Misoprostol1,117
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDOral Misoprostol1,110
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDFoley Bulb Plus Oral Misoprostol0
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDOral Misoprostol0

Adverse events0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

None in this release.

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityFoley Bulb Plus Oral Misoprostol01,117
Total, all-cause mortalityOral Misoprostol01,110
Total, other adverse eventsFoley Bulb Plus Oral Misoprostol01,117
Total, other adverse eventsOral Misoprostol01,110
Total, serious adverse eventsFoley Bulb Plus Oral Misoprostol01,117
Total, serious adverse eventsOral Misoprostol01,110

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
33030881DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons19

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Foley Bulb Plus Oral Misoprostol vs Oral Misoprostol: Number of Participants With an 5-minute Apgar Score Less Than 4Trial comparisons
Foley Bulb Plus Oral Misoprostol vs Oral Misoprostol: Number of Participants With TachysystoleTrial comparisons
Foley Bulb Plus Oral Misoprostol vs Oral Misoprostol: Presence of ChorioamnionitisTrial comparisons
Foley Bulb Plus Oral Misoprostol vs Oral Misoprostol: Number of Participants Used Neuraxial Analgesia During LaborTrial comparisons
Foley Bulb Plus Oral Misoprostol vs Oral Misoprostol: Number of Participants With Uterine Hyperstimulation SyndromeTrial comparisons
Foley Bulb Plus Oral Misoprostol vs Oral Misoprostol: Number of Participants With Meconium-stained Amniotic FluidTrial comparisons
Foley Bulb Plus Oral Misoprostol vs Oral Misoprostol: Number of Participants With Unplanned HysterectomyTrial comparisons
Foley Bulb Plus Oral Misoprostol vs Oral Misoprostol: Number of Participants With Neonatal SepsisTrial comparisons
Foley Bulb Plus Oral Misoprostol vs Oral Misoprostol: Number of Participants With NICU Admission OrderTrial comparisons
Foley Bulb Plus Oral Misoprostol vs Oral Misoprostol: Number of Participants With Uterine RuptureTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03407625

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03407625/registered?page=2