ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT03412890

LIBERTY EXTENSION: Efficacy and Safety Extension Study of Relugolix in Women With Heavy Menstrual Bleeding Associated With Uterine Fibroids

NCT03412890, Phase 3, Completed, Myovant Sciences GmbH; results first posted 2024-05-09

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. LIBERTY EXTENSION: Efficacy and Safety Extension Study of Relugolix in Women With Heavy Menstrual Bleeding Associated With Uterine Fibroids. Trials, record NCT03412890. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT03412890

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
LIBERTY EXTENSION: Efficacy and Safety Extension Study of Relugolix in Women With Heavy Menstrual Bleeding Associated With Uterine Fibroids
NCT number
NCT03412890
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
477 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Myovant Sciences GmbH
Conditions
Heavy Menstrual Bleeding, Uterine Fibroid
Interventions
Relugolix, Estradiol/norethindrone acetate
First posted
2018-01-29
Last updated
2024-05-09
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2017-003310-74
Results first posted
2024-05-09

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes15

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercentage Of Participants Who Achieved Or Maintained An MBL Volume Of <80 Milliliters (mL) And At Least A 50% Reduction From Baseline MBL Volume At Week 52/End Of TreatmentWeek 52/End of Treatment
A responder was a participant who had MBL volume of \< 80 mL and at least a 50% reduction from baseline MBL volume over the last 35 days of treatment (up to Week 52). All returned feminine products collected at each clinical visit were analyzed by the alkaline hematin method to obtain the MBL volume. MBL volume was measured over the Week 52/early termination feminine product collection interval (up to 35 days prior to the last dose of treatment). The percentage of participants who were responders are presented.
SecondaryChange From Pivotal Study Baseline In MBL Volume At Week 52Week 52
MBL volume was measured using the alkaline hematin method, which involves chemically measuring the blood content of used feminine products. The volume of MBL is measured in mL and a blood loss of 80 mL or more per cycle is considered diagnostic of heavy menstrual bleeding. The least squares (LS) mean was derived for each treatment group using a mixed-effects model with repeated measure with visit, region, and Baseline MBL as fixed effects.
SecondaryPercentage Of Participants Who Achieved Or Maintained Amenorrhea Over The Last 35 Days Of TreatmentWeek 24 up to last 35 days of treatment (up to Week 52)
Amenorrhea was defined as meeting 1 of the following criteria for 2 consecutive visits: * No feminine product returned due to reported amenorrhea; * No feminine product returned due to reports of spotting/negligible bleeding coupled with other data (participant's paper diary) indicating infrequent non-cyclic bleeding/spotting; and * Feminine product collection with a negligible observed MBL volume coupled with data (participant's paper diary) indicating infrequent non-cyclic bleeding/spotting.
SecondaryPercentage Of Participants With A Hemoglobin Level ≤10.5 Gram/Deciliter (g/dL) At Pivotal Study Baseline Who Achieved An Increase Of >2 g/dL From Pivotal Study Baseline At Week 52Week 52
Blood samples were collected from participants for hemoglobin measurements. Percentages are based on number of participants with hemoglobin ≤10.5 g/dL at pivotal study Baseline and reported at Week 52.
SecondaryNumber Of Participants With Hemoglobin Increase Of ≥1 g/dL From Pivotal Study Baseline At Week 52 Among Those With A Hemoglobin Concentration Below Lower Limit Of Normal At Pivotal BaselineWeek 52
Blood samples were collected from participants for hemoglobin measurements. Percentages are based on number of participants with hemoglobin concentration below the lower limit of normal (11.6 g/dL) at pivotal study Baseline and reported at Week 52.
SecondaryChange From Pivotal Study Baseline In Hemoglobin Concentration At Week 52Week 52Blood samples were collected from participants for hemoglobin measurements. The LS mean was derived for each treatment group using a mixed-effects model with repeated measure.
SecondaryChange From Pivotal Study Baseline In The UFS-QoL Symptom Severity Scale At Week 52Week 52
Transformed score ranges from 0 to 100 based on Likert scale (none of time, a little of time, some of the time, most of the time, and all of the time). Lower score indicates less distress and higher score indicates greater distress. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. The LS mean was derived for each treatment group using a mixed-effects model with repeated measure.
SecondaryChange From Pivotal Study Baseline In The UFS-QoL Score Health-Related Quality of Life Subscales Score At Week 52Week 52
Assessed using the UFS-QoL questionnaire. The UFS-QoL subscale scores include items related to uterine fibroid-associated limitations/impairment in activities, revised activities, concern, energy/mood, control, self-consciousness, and sexual function. The scores were transformed to normalized scores. Transformed score ranges from 0 to 100. Higher scores are indicative of better health-related quality of life (high = good). The LS mean was derived for each treatment group using a mixed-effects model with repeated measure.
SecondaryChange From Pivotal Study Baseline In The UFS-QoL Score By Health-Related Quality of Life Total Score At Week 52Week 52
Assessed using the UFS-QoL Questionnaire. The UFS-QoL total score was the sum of the subscales (concern, activities, revised activities, energy/mood, control, self-conscious, and sexual function). The raw scores were transformed to normalized scores. Transformed score ranges from 0 to 100. Higher scores are indicative of better health-related quality of life (high = good). The LS mean was derived for each treatment group using a mixed-effects model with repeated measure.
SecondaryChange From Pivotal Study Baseline In The Uterine Fibroid Symptom Health-Related Quality of Life (UFS-QoL) Bleeding And Pelvic Discomfort (BPD) Scale At Week 52Week 52
The BPD scale has been derived from the UFS-QoL symptom severity scale. The scale consists of the following 3 symptoms proximal to uterine fibroids that are experienced by most participants: heavy bleeding during the menstrual period (Question 1), passing blood clots during the menstrual period (Question 2), and feeling tightness or pressure in the pelvic area (Question 5). Raw scores were transformed to a normalized score, with a range of possible scores from 0 to 100 (none of time, a little of time, some of the time, most of the time, and all of the time), where higher scores values are indicative of greater distress and lower scores are indicative of minimal distress. The LS mean was derived for each treatment group using a mixed-effects model with repeated measure.

Outcomes15

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercentage Of Participants Who Achieved Or Maintained An MBL Volume Of <80 Milliliters (mL) And At Least A 50% Reduction From Baseline MBL Volume At Week 52/End Of TreatmentWeek 52/End of TreatmentExtension Study Population: all participants who enrolled and received any amount of open-label study drug in the open-label extension study.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Pivotal Study Baseline In MBL Volume At Week 52Week 52Extension Study Population: all participants who enrolled and received any amount of open-label study drug in the open-label extension study.mLLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYPercentage Of Participants Who Achieved Or Maintained Amenorrhea Over The Last 35 Days Of TreatmentWeek 24 up to last 35 days of treatment (up to Week 52)Extension Study Population: all participants who enrolled and received any amount of open-label study drug in the open-label extension study.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage Of Participants With A Hemoglobin Level ≤10.5 Gram/Deciliter (g/dL) At Pivotal Study Baseline Who Achieved An Increase Of >2 g/dL From Pivotal Study Baseline At Week 52Week 52
Extension Study Population with a hemoglobin level ≤10.5 g/dL at pivotal study baseline: all participants who enrolled and received any amount of open-label study drug in the open-label extension study and who had a hemoglobin level ≤10.5 g/dL at pivotal study baseline.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber Of Participants With Hemoglobin Increase Of ≥1 g/dL From Pivotal Study Baseline At Week 52 Among Those With A Hemoglobin Concentration Below Lower Limit Of Normal At Pivotal BaselineWeek 52
Extension Study Population with a hemoglobin level below lower limit of normal at pivotal study baseline: all participants who enrolled and received any amount of open-label study drug in the open-label extension study and who had a hemoglobin level below lower limit of normal at pivotal study baseline.
participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Pivotal Study Baseline In Hemoglobin Concentration At Week 52Week 52
Extension Study Population with a hemoglobin level ≤10.5 g/dL at pivotal study baseline: all participants who enrolled and received any amount of open-label study drug in the open-label extension study and who had a hemoglobin level ≤10.5 g/dL at pivotal study baseline.
g/dLLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Pivotal Study Baseline In The UFS-QoL Symptom Severity Scale At Week 52Week 52Extension Study Population: all participants who enrolled and received any amount of open-label study drug in the open-label extension study.score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Pivotal Study Baseline In The UFS-QoL Score Health-Related Quality of Life Subscales Score At Week 52Week 52Extension Study Population: all participants who enrolled and received any amount of open-label study drug in the open-label extension study.score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Pivotal Study Baseline In The UFS-QoL Score By Health-Related Quality of Life Total Score At Week 52Week 52Extension Study Population: all participants who enrolled and received any amount of open-label study drug in the open-label extension study.score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Pivotal Study Baseline In The Uterine Fibroid Symptom Health-Related Quality of Life (UFS-QoL) Bleeding And Pelvic Discomfort (BPD) Scale At Week 52Week 52Extension Study Population: all participants who enrolled and received any amount of open-label study drug in the open-label extension study.score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN

Results by group201

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percentage Of Participants Who Achieved Or Maintained An MBL Volume Of <80 Milliliters (mL) And At Least A 50% Reduction From Baseline MBL Volume At Week 52/End Of TreatmentRelugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)86.5095% Confidence Interval 80.28 to 91.34percentage of participants
Percentage Of Participants Who Achieved Or Maintained An MBL Volume Of <80 Milliliters (mL) And At Least A 50% Reduction From Baseline MBL Volume At Week 52/End Of TreatmentRelugolix Plus Delayed E2/NETA (Group B)79.8795% Confidence Interval 72.52 to 85.98percentage of participants
Percentage Of Participants Who Achieved Or Maintained An MBL Volume Of <80 Milliliters (mL) And At Least A 50% Reduction From Baseline MBL Volume At Week 52/End Of TreatmentPlacebo (Group C)75.0095% Confidence Interval 67.65 to 81.42percentage of participants
Change From Pivotal Study Baseline In MBL Volume At Week 52Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)-251.6Standard Error 16.38mL
Change From Pivotal Study Baseline In MBL Volume At Week 52Relugolix Plus Delayed E2/NETA (Group B)-219.1Standard Error 13.91mL
Change From Pivotal Study Baseline In MBL Volume At Week 52Placebo (Group C)-204.7Standard Error 13.31mL
Percentage Of Participants Who Achieved Or Maintained Amenorrhea Over The Last 35 Days Of TreatmentRelugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)70.5595% Confidence Interval 62.92 to 77.42percentage of participants
Percentage Of Participants Who Achieved Or Maintained Amenorrhea Over The Last 35 Days Of TreatmentRelugolix Plus Delayed E2/NETA (Group B)68.4695% Confidence Interval 60.35 to 75.82percentage of participants
Percentage Of Participants Who Achieved Or Maintained Amenorrhea Over The Last 35 Days Of TreatmentPlacebo (Group C)57.9395% Confidence Interval 49.98 to 65.58percentage of participants
Percentage Of Participants With A Hemoglobin Level ≤10.5 Gram/Deciliter (g/dL) At Pivotal Study Baseline Who Achieved An Increase Of >2 g/dL From Pivotal Study Baseline At Week 52Relugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)58.9795% Confidence Interval 42.10 to 74.43percentage of participants

Participant flow12

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDRelugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)163
Overall StudySTARTEDRelugolix Plus Delayed E2/NETA (Group B)150
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo (Group C)164
Overall StudyReceived at Least 1 Dose of Study DrugRelugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)163
Overall StudyReceived at Least 1 Dose of Study DrugRelugolix Plus Delayed E2/NETA (Group B)149
Overall StudyReceived at Least 1 Dose of Study DrugPlacebo (Group C)164
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDRelugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)133
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDRelugolix Plus Delayed E2/NETA (Group B)108
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo (Group C)122
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDRelugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)30

Adverse events66

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersRelugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)6163
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersRelugolix Plus Delayed E2/NETA (Group B)7149
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersPlacebo (Group C)11164
otherHot flushVascular disordersRelugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)4163
otherHot flushVascular disordersRelugolix Plus Delayed E2/NETA (Group B)0149
otherHot flushVascular disordersPlacebo (Group C)13164
otherNasopharyngitisInfections and infestationsRelugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)10163
otherNasopharyngitisInfections and infestationsRelugolix Plus Delayed E2/NETA (Group B)3149
otherNasopharyngitisInfections and infestationsPlacebo (Group C)8164
otherHypertensionVascular disordersRelugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)2163

Adverse event totals9

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityRelugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)0163
Total, all-cause mortalityRelugolix Plus Delayed E2/NETA (Group B)0149
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo (Group C)0164
Total, other adverse eventsRelugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)22163
Total, other adverse eventsRelugolix Plus Delayed E2/NETA (Group B)12149
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo (Group C)38164
Total, serious adverse eventsRelugolix Plus E2/NETA (Group A)1163
Total, serious adverse eventsRelugolix Plus Delayed E2/NETA (Group B)5149
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo (Group C)11164

Papers3

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
36357960DERIVEDPubMed
37477173DERIVEDPubMed
37863160DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03412890

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03412890/results?page=2