ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT03415152

A Prospective Observational Program Using Digital Technology Tools to Enhance Patient Adherence to Omacor Therapy

NCT03415152, Completed, Abbott; results first posted 2020-10-12

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Prospective Observational Program Using Digital Technology Tools to Enhance Patient Adherence to Omacor Therapy. Trials, record NCT03415152. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT03415152

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Prospective Observational Program Using Digital Technology Tools to Enhance Patient Adherence to Omacor Therapy
NCT number
NCT03415152
Status
Completed
Enrollment
3,000 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Abbott
Conditions
History of Myocardial Infarction, Hypertriglyceridemia
Interventions
Omacor (Omega-3-acid ethyl esters)
First posted
2018-01-30
Last updated
2020-10-12
Results first posted
2020-10-12
Limitations and caveats
Score on the G. Health of the SF-36 scale should not be taken into account due to a technical error occurred at the stage of transferring the scale to the electronic case report form and which affected the results, changing the patient's responses

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes14

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryMean Adherence Rate at the End of the Study (Visit 3)6 monthsMean adherence rate is a ratio of the sum of days when the patient took the full prescribed dose of Omacor in the specified period to the number of days in the period.
SecondaryMean Score of National Questionnaire of Treatment Compliance (Edited by Fofanova T.V. et al.) at the End of the Study (Visit 3)6 months
The average score for the National questionnaire on therapy compliance for all study duration Visit 1 - Visit 3. The text of the National questionnaire of treatment compliance consists of five statements with four options for choice. The answer corresponding to very high compliance is estimated at 3 points, the answer corresponding to high compliance is estimated at 2 points, medium compliance - at 1 point and low compliance - 0 points. The patient can get a maximum of 15 points, a minimum of 0 points. Higher scores mean higher compliance
SecondaryThe Percentage of Patients Who Have Chosen Each of the Suggested Reasons for Therapy Termination6 monthsThe percentage of patients (%) who have chosen each of the suggested reason for therapy termination.
SecondaryThe Average Score on Each of 8 Scales of Short Form Survey (SF)-36 Quality of Life Questionnaire at Visit 2 and Visit 3 vs. the Baseline (Visit 1)3 months, 6 months
Mean difference of the average score on each of 8 scales of Short Form Survey (SF)-36 quality of life questionnaire at Visit 2 and Visit 3 versus the baseline. 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) taps eight health concepts. Each of 36 items is scored on a 0 to 100 range so that the lowest and highest possible scores are 0 and 100, respectively, so that a high score defines a more favorable health state.
SecondaryChange of Lipid Profile Parameters at Visit 2 and Visit 3 vs. the Baseline (Visit 1)3 months, 6 monthsMean difference of lipid profile parameters at Visit 2 and Visit 3 vs. the Baseline (Visit 1\)
SecondaryNumber of Hospitalizations Due to Cardio-vascular Reasons During 6 Months of the Program6 monthsPercentage of patients with hospitalizations due to cardiovascular disease
SecondaryNumber of New Cases of Stenocardia During 6 Months of the Program6 monthsPercentage of patients with new cases of stenocardia
SecondaryNumber of Non-fatal Myocardial Infarction Cases During 6 Months of the Program6 monthsPercentage of patients with non-fatal myocardial infarction cases
SecondaryNumber of Cases of Cardio-vascular Death During 6 Months of the Program6 monthsPercentage of patients dead due to cardio-vascular death
SecondaryMean Adherence Rate at Visit 23 monthsMean adherence rate is a ratio of the sum of days when the patient took the full prescribed dose of Omacor in the specified period to the number of days in the period.

Outcomes14

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYMean Adherence Rate at the End of the Study (Visit 3)6 monthsPopulation of patients registered in electronic system and reported Omacor administrationproportion of daysMEAN
SECONDARYMean Score of National Questionnaire of Treatment Compliance (Edited by Fofanova T.V. et al.) at the End of the Study (Visit 3)6 monthsPopulation of patients attended at Visit 3 (month 6)score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYThe Percentage of Patients Who Have Chosen Each of the Suggested Reasons for Therapy Termination6 monthspercentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYThe Average Score on Each of 8 Scales of Short Form Survey (SF)-36 Quality of Life Questionnaire at Visit 2 and Visit 3 vs. the Baseline (Visit 1)3 months, 6 monthsPopulation of patients registered in electronic system and reported Omacor administrationscore on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange of Lipid Profile Parameters at Visit 2 and Visit 3 vs. the Baseline (Visit 1)3 months, 6 monthsPer protocol population: patients who attended at least one follow-up visit.mmol/LMEAN
SECONDARYNumber of Hospitalizations Due to Cardio-vascular Reasons During 6 Months of the Program6 monthspercentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of New Cases of Stenocardia During 6 Months of the Program6 monthspercentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Non-fatal Myocardial Infarction Cases During 6 Months of the Program6 monthspercentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Cases of Cardio-vascular Death During 6 Months of the Program6 monthspercentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYMean Adherence Rate at Visit 23 monthsPopulation of patients registered in electronic system and reported Omacor administrationproportion of daysMEAN

Results by group51

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Mean Adherence Rate at the End of the Study (Visit 3)Omacor (Omega-3-acid Ethyl Esters)0.37Standard Deviation 0.38proportion of days
Mean Score of National Questionnaire of Treatment Compliance (Edited by Fofanova T.V. et al.) at the End of the Study (Visit 3)Omacor (Omega-3-acid Ethyl Esters)12.9Standard Deviation 2.99score on a scale
The Percentage of Patients Who Have Chosen Each of the Suggested Reasons for Therapy TerminationOmacor (Omega-3-acid Ethyl Esters)Adverse drug reactions0percentage of participants
The Percentage of Patients Who Have Chosen Each of the Suggested Reasons for Therapy TerminationOmacor (Omega-3-acid Ethyl Esters)Lack of efficacy0.08percentage of participants
The Percentage of Patients Who Have Chosen Each of the Suggested Reasons for Therapy TerminationOmacor (Omega-3-acid Ethyl Esters)Inconvenience of use0.43percentage of participants
The Percentage of Patients Who Have Chosen Each of the Suggested Reasons for Therapy TerminationOmacor (Omega-3-acid Ethyl Esters)Absence at the pharmacy0.23percentage of participants
The Percentage of Patients Who Have Chosen Each of the Suggested Reasons for Therapy TerminationOmacor (Omega-3-acid Ethyl Esters)Other reason1.94percentage of participants
The Percentage of Patients Who Have Chosen Each of the Suggested Reasons for Therapy TerminationOmacor (Omega-3-acid Ethyl Esters)Total2.68percentage of participants
The Average Score on Each of 8 Scales of Short Form Survey (SF)-36 Quality of Life Questionnaire at Visit 2 and Visit 3 vs. the Baseline (Visit 1)Omacor (Omega-3-acid Ethyl Esters)Physical functioning (V2-V1,3 m)7.63Standard Deviation 13.4score on a scale
The Average Score on Each of 8 Scales of Short Form Survey (SF)-36 Quality of Life Questionnaire at Visit 2 and Visit 3 vs. the Baseline (Visit 1)Omacor (Omega-3-acid Ethyl Esters)Role limitations due to physical health (V2-V1,3m)32.86Standard Deviation 48.42score on a scale

Participant flow3

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDOmacor (Omega-3-acid Ethyl Esters)3,000
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDOmacor (Omega-3-acid Ethyl Esters)1,975
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDOmacor (Omega-3-acid Ethyl Esters)1,025

Adverse events4

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherEructationGastrointestinal disordersOmacor (Omega-3-acid Ethyl Esters)13,0001
otherAbnormal faecesGastrointestinal disordersOmacor (Omega-3-acid Ethyl Esters)13,0001
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersOmacor (Omega-3-acid Ethyl Esters)13,0001
otherAlanine aminotransferase increasedInvestigationsOmacor (Omega-3-acid Ethyl Esters)13,0001

Adverse event totals3

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityOmacor (Omega-3-acid Ethyl Esters)43,000
Total, other adverse eventsOmacor (Omega-3-acid Ethyl Esters)43,000
Total, serious adverse eventsOmacor (Omega-3-acid Ethyl Esters)03,000

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
35877173DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03415152

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03415152/results?page=2