ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT03439345

Lowering Events in Non-proliferative Retinopathy in Scotland

NCT03439345, Phase 4, Completed, University of Oxford; results first posted 2025-05-14

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Lowering Events in Non-proliferative Retinopathy in Scotland. Trials, record NCT03439345. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT03439345

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Lowering Events in Non-proliferative Retinopathy in Scotland
NCT number
NCT03439345
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Enrollment
1,151 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
University of Oxford
Conditions
Diabetic Retinopathy
Interventions
Fenofibrate 145 mg, Placebo Oral Tablet
First posted
2018-02-20
Last updated
2025-05-14
Other registries' IDs
isrctn:ISRCTN15073006
Results first posted
2025-05-14

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes28

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Progression to Referable Diabetic Retinopathy or Maculopathy, or Treatment4.0 years (interquartile range, 3.6 to 4.3) years
Primary outcome was a composite of the development of referable diabetic retinopathy or referable maculopathy, or treatment for diabetic retinopathy or maculopathy (including retinal laser therapy, vitrectomy or intravitreal injection of medication). Referable diabetic retinopathy was defined by the NHS Scotland's grading criteria as any development of R3, R4 or M2 disease. R3 (referable background diabetic retinopathy): any of four or more blot hemorrhages in both inferior and superior hemi-fields, or venous beading, or intraretinal microvascular abnormalities (IRMA); R4 (proliferative diabetic retinopathy): any active new vessels, or vitreous hemorrhage; M2 (referable maculopathy): any blot hemorrhages, or hard exudates within a radius of ≤1 optic disc diameter of the centre of the fovea. Adverse event reports of eye procedures, vitreous haemorrhages and macular oedema were adjudicated by experienced doctors at the Central Co-ordinating Office (CCO), masked to treatment allocation.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With the Individual Component of the Composite Primary Outcome: Development of Referable Diabetic Retinopathy or Maculopathy4.0 years (interquartile range, 3.6 to 4.3) yearsProgression of Diabetic Retinopathy/Maculopathy to a referable grade (R3 or R4 or M2) based on the NHS Scotland grading scheme in at least one eye.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With the Individual Component of Composite Primary Outcome: Treatment for Diabetic Retinopathy or Maculopathy4.0 years (interquartile range, 3.6 to 4.3) yearsTreatment for diabetic retinopathy or maculopathy (including intravitreal injection of medication, retinal laser therapy, or vitrectomy) in either eye.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Any Progression of Diabetic Retinopathy or Maculopathy Across the NHS Scotland Retinopathy Grading Scale4.0 years (interquartile range, 3.6 to 4.3) years
Any progression of diabetic retinopathy or maculopathy across the NHS Scotland retinopathy grading scale. R4 = Proliferative DR, R3 = Referable background DR, R2 = Observable background DR. R1 = Mild background DR, R0 = No DR anywhere (where R4 is the highest severity grade and R0 is the lowest grade); M2 = Referable maculopathy, M1 = Observable maculopathy, M0 = No Maculopathy (where M2 is the highest severity grade and M0 is the lowest grade).
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Referable Maculopathy (Exudates or Blot Haemorrhages Within One Disc Diameter of the Fovea)4.0 years (interquartile range, 3.6 to 4.3) yearsThe presence of hard exudates or blot haemorrhages within 1 disc diameter of the macula/fovea
SecondaryNumber of Participants With The Development of Macular Oedema4.0 years (interquartile range, 3.6 to 4.3) yearsThe accumulation of macular fluid as determined by optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging or on adverse event report
SecondaryVisual Acuity4.0 years (interquartile range, 3.6 to 4.3) years
Based on measurement of visual acuity at retinal screening visits. Baseline visual acuity was taken from routine measurement within NHS Scotland's Diabetic Eye Screening programme (using the latest value within 18 months of randomisation). Visual acuity after randomisation was obtained by averaging available results for a participant. Conversion from Snellen to LogMAR was applied where necessary. This analysis is based on the better eye: if only 1 eye with results, analyse that eye; if 2 eyes, use eye with better acuity; if identical acuity in both eyes, use the right eye. LogMAR typically ranges from -0.3 (20/10 vision on the Snellen chart) to 1 (20/200 vision). Lower scores indicate better vision.
SecondaryVisual Function, Based on the National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire 25 (VFQ-25).4.0 years (interquartile range, 3.6 to 4.3) years
Visual function is based on the Visual Function Questionnaire-25. Visual function was defined by the composite score derived from the VFQ-25. VFQ-25 data were collected at the screening visit, after two years and at the end of the study. Results from two years and end-of-study were averaged to provide a trial-averaged result for a participant. The VFQ-25 composite score ranges from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate better visual function. It is calculated by averaging results from up to 11 vision-related sub-scales.
SecondaryQuality of Life, Based on the EQ-5D Index Score4.0 years (interquartile range, 3.6 to 4.3) years
Quality of life was measured using the EQ-5D instrument, and valued by mapping to the EQ-5D-3L UK value set using the mapping function developed by Hernandez Alava et al. Pharmaco Economics (2022). EQ-5D data were collected at the screening visit, after two years and at the end of the study. Results from two years and end-of-study were averaged to provide a trial-averaged result for a participant. Possible scores range from -0.59 to 1.00, where 1 is the best possible health state and 0 represents a quality of life considered equivalent to death.
SecondaryQuality of Life, Based on the EQ-5D Visual Analogue Scale.4.0 years (interquartile range, 3.6 to 4.3) years
EQ-5D Visual Analogue Scale data were collected at the screening visit, after two years and at the end of the study. Results from two years and end-of-study were averaged to provide a trial-averaged result for a participant. EQ VAS scores range from 0 to 100, where 100 is the best possible health state.

Outcomes28

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYNumber of Participants With Progression to Referable Diabetic Retinopathy or Maculopathy, or Treatment4.0 years (interquartile range, 3.6 to 4.3) yearsIntention-to-treat comparisons among all randomised participants of the effects of allocation to fenofibrate versus placebo during the scheduled treatment period on time to the first occurrence.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With the Individual Component of the Composite Primary Outcome: Development of Referable Diabetic Retinopathy or Maculopathy4.0 years (interquartile range, 3.6 to 4.3) yearsIntention-to-treat comparisons among all randomised participants of the effects of allocation to fenofibrate versus placebo during the scheduled treatment period on time to the first occurrence.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With the Individual Component of Composite Primary Outcome: Treatment for Diabetic Retinopathy or Maculopathy4.0 years (interquartile range, 3.6 to 4.3) yearsIntention-to-treat comparisons among all randomised participants of the effects of allocation to fenofibrate versus placebo during the scheduled treatment period on time to first occurrence.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Any Progression of Diabetic Retinopathy or Maculopathy Across the NHS Scotland Retinopathy Grading Scale4.0 years (interquartile range, 3.6 to 4.3) yearsIntention-to-treat comparisons among all randomised participants of the effects of allocation to fenofibrate versus placebo during the scheduled treatment period on time to the first occurrenceParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Referable Maculopathy (Exudates or Blot Haemorrhages Within One Disc Diameter of the Fovea)4.0 years (interquartile range, 3.6 to 4.3) yearsIntention-to-treat comparisons among all randomised participants of the effects of allocation to fenofibrate versus placebo during the scheduled treatment period on time to the first occurrenceParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With The Development of Macular Oedema4.0 years (interquartile range, 3.6 to 4.3) yearsIntention-to-treat comparisons among all randomised participants of the effects of allocation to fenofibrate versus placebo during the scheduled treatment period on time to the first occurrenceParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYVisual Acuity4.0 years (interquartile range, 3.6 to 4.3) yearsIntention-to-treat comparisons among all randomised participants of the effects of allocation to fenofibrate versus placebo during the scheduled treatment period on trial-averaged visual acuity.LogMARMEAN
SECONDARYVisual Function, Based on the National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire 25 (VFQ-25).4.0 years (interquartile range, 3.6 to 4.3) years
Intention-to-treat comparisons among all randomised participants of the effects of allocation to fenofibrate versus placebo during the scheduled treatment period on trial-averaged VFQ-25 Composite Score. Collected at baseline, at approximately 2 years and at the end of the trial.
score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYQuality of Life, Based on the EQ-5D Index Score4.0 years (interquartile range, 3.6 to 4.3) years
Intention-to-treat comparisons among all randomised participants of the effects of allocation to fenofibrate versus placebo during the scheduled treatment period on trial-averaged EQ-5D Index Score. Collected at baseline, at approximately 2 years and at the end of the trial.
score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYQuality of Life, Based on the EQ-5D Visual Analogue Scale.4.0 years (interquartile range, 3.6 to 4.3) years
Intention-to-treat comparisons among all randomised participants of the effects of allocation to fenofibrate versus placebo during the scheduled treatment period on trial-averaged EQ-5D Visual Analogue Scale. Collected at baseline, at approximately 2 years and at the end of the trial.
score on a scaleMEAN

Results by group56

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Number of Participants With Progression to Referable Diabetic Retinopathy or Maculopathy, or TreatmentFenofibrate 145 mg131Participants
Number of Participants With Progression to Referable Diabetic Retinopathy or Maculopathy, or TreatmentPlacebo Oral Tablet168Participants
Number of Participants With the Individual Component of the Composite Primary Outcome: Development of Referable Diabetic Retinopathy or MaculopathyFenofibrate 145 mg130Participants
Number of Participants With the Individual Component of the Composite Primary Outcome: Development of Referable Diabetic Retinopathy or MaculopathyPlacebo Oral Tablet168Participants
Number of Participants With the Individual Component of Composite Primary Outcome: Treatment for Diabetic Retinopathy or MaculopathyFenofibrate 145 mg17Participants
Number of Participants With the Individual Component of Composite Primary Outcome: Treatment for Diabetic Retinopathy or MaculopathyPlacebo Oral Tablet28Participants
Number of Participants With Any Progression of Diabetic Retinopathy or Maculopathy Across the NHS Scotland Retinopathy Grading ScaleFenofibrate 145 mg185Participants
Number of Participants With Any Progression of Diabetic Retinopathy or Maculopathy Across the NHS Scotland Retinopathy Grading ScalePlacebo Oral Tablet231Participants
Number of Participants With Referable Maculopathy (Exudates or Blot Haemorrhages Within One Disc Diameter of the Fovea)Fenofibrate 145 mg107Participants
Number of Participants With Referable Maculopathy (Exudates or Blot Haemorrhages Within One Disc Diameter of the Fovea)Placebo Oral Tablet149Participants

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDFenofibrate 145 mg576
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo Oral Tablet575
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDFenofibrate 145 mg576
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo Oral Tablet573
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDFenofibrate 145 mg0
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo Oral Tablet2

Adverse events72

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherEye disordersEye disordersFenofibrate 145 mg2576
otherEye disordersEye disordersPlacebo Oral Tablet2575
otherGastrointestinal disordersGastrointestinal disordersFenofibrate 145 mg6576
otherGastrointestinal disordersGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo Oral Tablet5575
otherHepatobiliary disordersHepatobiliary disordersFenofibrate 145 mg0576
otherHepatobiliary disordersHepatobiliary disordersPlacebo Oral Tablet1575
otherInvestigationsInvestigationsFenofibrate 145 mg1576
otherInvestigationsInvestigationsPlacebo Oral Tablet3575
otherMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersFenofibrate 145 mg3576
otherMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersPlacebo Oral Tablet2575

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityFenofibrate 145 mg35576
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo Oral Tablet38575
Total, other adverse eventsFenofibrate 145 mg17576
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo Oral Tablet21575
Total, serious adverse eventsFenofibrate 145 mg208576
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo Oral Tablet204575

Papers2

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
38385587BACKGROUNDPubMed
38905569RESULTPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons23

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Fenofibrate 145 mg vs Placebo Oral Tablet: Number of Participants in Subgroup Age ≥60y With Progression to Referable Diabetic Retinopathy or Maculopathy, or Treatment.Trial comparisons
Fenofibrate 145 mg vs Placebo Oral Tablet: Number of Participants in Subgroup With Progression to Referable Diabetic Retinopathy or Maculopathy, or Treatment, After 1 Year From RandomizationTrial comparisons
Fenofibrate 145 mg vs Placebo Oral Tablet: Number of Participants in Subgroup Sex - Male With Progression to Referable Diabetic Retinopathy or Maculopathy, or TreatmentTrial comparisons
Fenofibrate 145 mg vs Placebo Oral Tablet: Number of Participants With Occurrence of Major Cardiovascular Events (Myocardial Infarction, Stroke, Coronary or Peripheral Revascularisation)Trial comparisons
Fenofibrate 145 mg vs Placebo Oral Tablet: Number of Participants in Subgroup - HbA1c ≥70 mmol/Mol With Progression to Referable Diabetic Retinopathy or Maculopathy, or TreatmentTrial comparisons
Fenofibrate 145 mg vs Placebo Oral Tablet: Number of Participants in Subgroup - eGFR ≥60 mL/Min/1.73m^2 With Progression to Referable Diabetic Retinopathy or Maculopathy, or TreatmentTrial comparisons
Fenofibrate 145 mg vs Placebo Oral Tablet: Number of Participants in Subgroup - Type 1 Diabetes With Progression to Referable Diabetic Retinopathy or Maculopathy, or TreatmentTrial comparisons
Fenofibrate 145 mg vs Placebo Oral Tablet: Number of Participants in Subgroup - HbA1c <70 mmol/Mol With Progression to Referable Diabetic Retinopathy or Maculopathy, or TreatmentTrial comparisons
Fenofibrate 145 mg vs Placebo Oral Tablet: Number of Participants With the Individual Component of Composite Primary Outcome: Treatment for Diabetic Retinopathy or MaculopathyTrial comparisons
Fenofibrate 145 mg vs Placebo Oral Tablet: Number of Participants in Subgroup Sex - Female With Progression to Referable Diabetic Retinopathy or Maculopathy, or TreatmentTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03439345

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03439345/registered?page=2