ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT03440385

Induction Study #2 of Oral Ozanimod as Induction Therapy for Moderately to Severely Active Crohn's Disease

NCT03440385, Phase 3, Completed, Celgene; results first posted 2024-12-05

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Induction Study #2 of Oral Ozanimod as Induction Therapy for Moderately to Severely Active Crohn's Disease. Trials, record NCT03440385. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT03440385

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Induction Study #2 of Oral Ozanimod as Induction Therapy for Moderately to Severely Active Crohn's Disease
NCT number
NCT03440385
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
606 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Celgene
Conditions
Crohn Disease
Interventions
Ozanimod, Placebo
First posted
2018-02-22
Last updated
2024-12-05
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2017-004293-33
Results first posted
2024-12-05

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes13

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercentage of Participants With Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score < 150Week 12
The CDAI is a composite score that is used to measure the clinical activity of Crohn's disease (CD). The CDAI uses a questionnaire with 8 disease activity variables: number of soft/liquid stools, severity of abdominal pain, general well-being, presence of complications, need for antidiarrheal drugs, presence of an abdominal mass, hematocrit, and deviation in body weight. The sub scores of number of soft/liquid stool, severity of abdominal pain (0 \[none\] to 3 \[Severe\]), general well-being (0 \[well\] to 4 \[terrible\] were summed over the 7 days prior to each visit. Additionally, the remaining predictors were also noted and weighted to create the total CDAI score which ranged from 0-600 with a higher score indicating a worse outcome.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Abdominal Pain and Stool Frequency Clinical RemissionWeek 12
Abdominal pain and stool frequency clinical remission was defined as average daily abdominal pain score ≤ 1 point, and average daily stool frequency ≤ 3 with abdominal pain and stool frequency no worse than baseline at Week 12. Participants entered the responses in diaries daily. The 7 days entries prior to Week 12 visit were considered for calculating average abdominal pain score and stool frequency. The abdominal pain was graded on severity of 0 (none) to 3 (severe) scale and stool frequency was defined number of liquid or soft stools per day. Baseline was defined as the last assessment prior to the start time of the first drug administration if time of measurement is available else the last assessment prior to or on the date of the first drug administration.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With a Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease (SES-CD) Score Decrease From Baseline of ≥ 50%Week 12
The SES-CD assessed the degree of inflammation. The SES-CD assesses the following 4 components: size of ulcers, ulcerated surface, affected surface, and presence of narrowing. Each of these components was scored on a scale of 0 (none/unaffected) to 3 (worst). In the SES-CD, each of these 4 components are assessed in the five segments: ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, and rectum. The SES-CD was the sum of the individual scores of each of the components across the five segments. The range of SES-CD scores was 0 - 12 for each segment, and 0 - 60 for the overall SES-CD score, with larger scores indicating greater degree of inflammation. Baseline was defined as the last assessment prior to the start time of the first drug administration if time of measurement is available else the last assessment prior to or on the date of the first drug administration.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Reduction From Baseline in the Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score of >= 100 Points or a Total CDAI Score < 150Week 12
The CDAI is a composite score that is used to measure the clinical activity of Crohn's disease (CD). The CDAI uses a questionnaire with 8 disease activity variables: number of soft/liquid stools, severity of abdominal pain, general well-being, presence of complications, need for antidiarrheal drugs, presence of an abdominal mass, hematocrit, and deviation in body weight. The sub scores of number of soft/liquid stool, severity of abdominal pain (0 \[none\] to 3 \[Severe\]), general well-being (0 \[well\] to 4 \[terrible\] were summed over the 7 days prior to each visit. Additionally, the remaining predictors were also noted and weighted to create the total CDAI score which ranged from 0-600 with a higher score indicating a worse outcome. Baseline was defined as the last assessment prior to the start time of the first drug administration if time of measurement is available else the last assessment prior to or on the date of the first drug administration.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score Reduction From Baseline of ≥ 100 Points or CDAI Score < 150 and SES-CD Decrease From Baseline of ≥ 50%Week 12
CDAI include 8 components number of soft/liquid stools, severity of abdominal pain, wellbeing, complications, need antidiarrheal drugs, abdominal mass, hematocrit, deviation in body wt. Subscores of numbers of soft/liquid stool, severity of abdominal pain (0 \[none\] to 3 \[Severe\]), general well-being (0 \[well\] to 4 \[terrible\] were summed over the 7 days prior to visit. The others weighted to create the total CDAI score ranging 0-600 with higher score indicating worse outcome. The SES-CD has 4 components size of ulcers, ulcerated surface, affected surface, presence of narrowing. Each component was scored on scale of 0 (none) to 3 (worst). In SES-CD, each of 4 components are assessed in the five segments: ileum, right, transverse, left colon, and rectum. The SES-CD was the sum of the individual scores of each of the components across the five segments. The range of SES-CD scores was 0 - 12 for each segment, and 0 - 60 for overall, with larger scores show greater degree of inflammation.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score < 150 and Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease (SES-CD) Score Decrease From Baseline of ≥ 50%Week 12
CDAI include 8 components number of soft/liquid stools, severity of abdominal pain, wellbeing, complications, need antidiarrheal drugs, abdominal mass, hematocrit, deviation in body wt. Subscores of numbers of soft/liquid stool, severity of abdominal pain (0 \[none\] to 3 \[Severe\]), general well-being (0 \[well\] to 4 \[terrible\] were summed over the 7 days prior to visit. The others weighted to create the total CDAI score ranging 0-600 with higher score indicating worse outcome. The SES-CD has 4 components size of ulcers, ulcerated surface, affected surface, presence of narrowing. Each component was scored on scale of 0 (none) to 3 (worst). In SES-CD, each of 4 components are assessed in the five segments: ileum, right, transverse, left colon, and rectum. The SES-CD was the sum of the individual scores of each of the components across the five segments. The range of SES-CD scores was 0 - 12 for each segment, and 0 - 60 for overall, with larger scores show greater degree of inflammation.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Abdominal Pain and Stool Frequency Clinical Remission and a Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease (SES-CD) Score <= 4 Points and Decrease >= 2 PointsWeek 12
Abdominal pain (AP) and stool frequency (SF) clinical remission was defined as average daily abdominal pain score ≤ 1 point, and average daily stool frequency ≤ 3 times with AP and SF no worse than baseline at Week 12. Participants entered responses in diaries daily. The 7 days entries prior to visit were considered for calculating average AP score and SF. The AP was graded on severity of 0 (none) to 3 (severe) scale and SF was defined number of liquid or soft stools per day. The SES-CD has 4 components size of ulcers, ulcerated surface, affected surface, presence of narrowing. Each component was scored on scale of 0 (none) to 3 (worst). In SES-CD, each of 4 components are assessed in the five segments: ileum, right, transverse, left colon, and rectum. The SES-CD was the sum of the individual scores of each of the components across the five segments. The range of SES-CD scores was 0 - 12 for each segment, and 0 - 60 for overall, with larger scores show greater degree of inflammation.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Global Histologic Activity Score (GHAS) RemissionWeek 12
GHAS assesses the inflammation and mucosal damage. GHAS has 8 components Epithelial damage, Architectural changes, Infiltration of mononuclear cells in the lamina propria, Infiltration of polymorphonuclear cells in the lamina propria, Polymorphonuclear cells in epithelium, Presence of erosion and/or ulcers, Presence of granuloma and number of biopsy specimens affected. Each of these components was scored on a scale of 0 (none/unaffected) to 2 (worst). Each of these 8 components are assessed in the five segments: ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, and rectum. Within each segment, the GHAS score has a range of 0 - 16, and the total GHAS score has a range of 0 - 80. Higher numbers correspond to more inflammation and more mucosal damage. Baseline was defined as the last assessment prior to the start time of the first drug administration if time of measurement is available else the last assessment prior to or on the date of the first drug administration.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With CDAI Reduction From Baseline of >=70 PointsWeek 12
The CDAI is a composite score that is used to measure the clinical activity of Crohn's disease (CD). The CDAI uses a questionnaire with 8 disease activity variables: number of soft/liquid stools, severity of abdominal pain, general well-being, presence of complications, need for antidiarrheal drugs, presence of an abdominal mass, hematocrit, and deviation in body weight. The sub scores of number of soft/liquid stool, severity of abdominal pain (0 \[none\] to 3 \[Severe\]), general well-being (0 \[well\] to 4 \[terrible\] were summed over the 7 days prior to each visit. Additionally, the remaining predictors were also noted and weighted to create the total CDAI score which ranged from 0-600 with a higher score indicating a worse outcome. Baseline was defined as the last assessment prior to the start time of the first drug administration if time of measurement is available else the last assessment prior to or on the date of the first drug administration.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Absence of Ulcers ≥ 0.5 cm With no Segment With Any Ulcerated Surface ≥10%Week 12The ulcerated surface were assessed via endoscopy.

Outcomes13

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercentage of Participants With Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score < 150Week 12Intent to Treat population included all the randomized participants.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Abdominal Pain and Stool Frequency Clinical RemissionWeek 12Intent to Treat Population included all the randomized participants.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With a Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease (SES-CD) Score Decrease From Baseline of ≥ 50%Week 12Intent to Treat population included all the randomized participants.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Reduction From Baseline in the Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score of >= 100 Points or a Total CDAI Score < 150Week 12Intent to treat population included all the randomized participants.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score Reduction From Baseline of ≥ 100 Points or CDAI Score < 150 and SES-CD Decrease From Baseline of ≥ 50%Week 12
Intent to Treat population included all the randomized participants. Baseline was defined as the last assessment prior to the start time of the first drug administration if time of measurement is available else the last assessment prior to or on the date of the first drug administration
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score < 150 and Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease (SES-CD) Score Decrease From Baseline of ≥ 50%Week 12
Intent to Treat population included all the randomized participants. Baseline was defined as the last assessment prior to the start time of the first drug administration if time of measurement is available else the last assessment prior to or on the date of the first drug administration.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Abdominal Pain and Stool Frequency Clinical Remission and a Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease (SES-CD) Score <= 4 Points and Decrease >= 2 PointsWeek 12
Intent to Treat population included all the randomized subjects. Baseline was defined as the last assessment prior to the start time of the first drug administration if time of measurement is available else the last assessment prior to or on the date of the first drug administration.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Global Histologic Activity Score (GHAS) RemissionWeek 12Intent to treat population included all the randomized participants.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With CDAI Reduction From Baseline of >=70 PointsWeek 12Intent to treat population included all the randomized participants.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Absence of Ulcers ≥ 0.5 cm With no Segment With Any Ulcerated Surface ≥10%Week 12Intent to treat participants included all the randomized participants.percentage of partiicpantsNUMBER

Results by group26

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percentage of Participants With Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score < 150Ozanimod29.8percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score < 150Placebo30.5percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Abdominal Pain and Stool Frequency Clinical RemissionOzanimod29.0percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Abdominal Pain and Stool Frequency Clinical RemissionPlacebo26.6percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With a Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease (SES-CD) Score Decrease From Baseline of ≥ 50%Ozanimod25.6percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With a Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease (SES-CD) Score Decrease From Baseline of ≥ 50%Placebo21.2percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Reduction From Baseline in the Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score of >= 100 Points or a Total CDAI Score < 150Ozanimod46.2percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Reduction From Baseline in the Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score of >= 100 Points or a Total CDAI Score < 150Placebo47.3percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score Reduction From Baseline of ≥ 100 Points or CDAI Score < 150 and SES-CD Decrease From Baseline of ≥ 50%Ozanimod16.9percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score Reduction From Baseline of ≥ 100 Points or CDAI Score < 150 and SES-CD Decrease From Baseline of ≥ 50%Placebo14.3percentage of participants

Participant flow8

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDOzanimod403
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo203
Overall StudySafety PopulationOzanimod404
Overall StudySafety PopulationPlacebo202
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDOzanimod360
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo183
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDOzanimod43
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo20

Adverse events52

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherCrohn's diseaseGastrointestinal disordersOzanimod15404
otherCrohn's diseaseGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo11202
seriousAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersOzanimod1404
seriousAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPlacebo0202
seriousPericarditisCardiac disordersOzanimod0404
seriousPericarditisCardiac disordersPlacebo1202
seriousRetinal vein occlusionEye disordersOzanimod1404
seriousRetinal vein occlusionEye disordersPlacebo0202
seriousAbdominal painGastrointestinal disordersOzanimod2404
seriousAbdominal painGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo0202

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityOzanimod0404
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo0202
Total, other adverse eventsOzanimod15404
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo11202
Total, serious adverse eventsOzanimod24404
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo11202

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
36208720DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Ozanimod vs Placebo: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Ozanimod vs Placebo: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03440385

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03440385/results?page=2