ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT03444870

Efficacy and Safety Study of Gantenerumab in Participants With Early Alzheimer's Disease (AD)

NCT03444870, Phase 3, Terminated, Hoffmann-La Roche; results first posted 2024-01-30

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Efficacy and Safety Study of Gantenerumab in Participants With Early Alzheimer's Disease (AD). Trials, record NCT03444870. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT03444870

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Efficacy and Safety Study of Gantenerumab in Participants With Early Alzheimer's Disease (AD)
NCT number
NCT03444870
Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
1,053 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Hoffmann-La Roche
Conditions
Alzheimer Disease
Interventions
Gantenerumab, Placebo
First posted
2018-02-23
Last updated
2024-01-30
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2017-001364-38
Results first posted
2024-01-30

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes38

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryDBT Period: Change From Baseline to Week 116 in Global Outcome, as Measured by CDR-SBBaseline, Week 116
CDR was derived through semi-structured interview with the participant and an appropriate informant, and it rated impairment across six domains: memory, orientation, judgment, and problem solving, community affairs, home and hobbies, and personal care on a 5-point scale for which 0=no impairment, 0.5=questionable impairment, and 1, 2, and 3=mild, moderate, and severe impairment, respectively. The CDR-SB is based on summing each of the domain box scores with total score ranging from 0-18 with higher scores reflecting greater cognitive and functional impairment. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
PrimaryChina Extension: DBT Period: Change From Baseline to Week 116 in Global Outcome, as Measured by CDR-SBBaseline, Week 116
CDR was derived through semi-structured interview with the participant and an appropriate informant, and it rated impairment across six domains: memory, orientation, judgment, and problem solving, community affairs, home and hobbies, and personal care on a 5-point scale for which 0=no impairment, 0.5=questionable impairment, and 1, 2, and 3=mild, moderate, and severe impairment, respectively. The CDR-SB is based on summing each of the domain box scores with total score ranging from 0-18 with higher scores reflecting greater cognitive and functional impairment. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
SecondaryDBT Period: Change From Baseline to Week 116 in Alzheimer Disease Assessment Scale-Cognition Subscale 13 (ADAS-Cog13) ScoreBaseline, Week 116
The ADAS-Cog13 total score includes all of the items in the ADAS-Cog11 in addition to delayed word recall and the number cancellation. For the ADAS-cog 13 the range is 0-85 (score range for Delayed Word Recall \[DWR\] score is 0-10 and for Number Cancellation \[NC\] is 0-5, thus the score is ADAS-cog 11\[0-70\] plus the scores for DWR and NC). A higher score indicates worse performance. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement in cognitive function.
SecondaryDBT Period: Change From Baseline to Week 116 in Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study- Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL) Total ScoreBaseline, Week 116
ADCS-ADL is a 23-item rater-administered, observer-reported outcome (ObsRO) that captures a participant's ability to perform basic activities of daily living (e.g., eating and toileting) and more complex ADL or instrumental activities of daily living (iADL, e.g., using the telephone, managing finances, preparing a meal). Total score ranges from 0-78, with higher scores reflecting better functioning. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement.
SecondaryDBT Period: Change From Baseline to Week 116 in Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ) ScoreBaseline, Week 116
FAQ is a rater-administered ObsRO (informant-based measure) that measures a participant's functional ability to perform complex higher-order activities. The observer provides performance ratings of the target person on ten complex higher-order activities. Total score that ranges from 0-30, with higher scores reflecting greater functional impairment. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
SecondaryDBT Period: Change From Baseline to Week 116 in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) Total ScoreBaseline, Week 116
MMSE is a rater-administered performance-based outcome (PerfO) that includes a set of standardized questions used to evaluate possible cognitive impairment and help stage the severity level of this impairment. The questions target six areas: orientation, registration, attention, short-term recall, language, and constructional praxis/visuospatial abilities. Total score ranges from 0-30, with lower scores indicating greater impairment. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement.
SecondaryDBT Period: Change From Baseline to Week 116 in Alzheimer Disease Assessment Scale-Cognition Subscale 11 (ADAS-Cog11) ScoreBaseline, Week 116
The ADAS-Cog11 was designed to measure cognitive symptom change in participants with Alzheimer's Disease (AD) and consisted of 11 tasks. The standard 11 items (and corresponding score range) were: word recall (0-10), commands (0-5), constructional praxis (0-5), naming objects and fingers (0-5), ideational praxis (0-5), orientation (0-8), word recognition (0-12), spoken language ability (0-5), comprehension of spoken language (0-5), word-finding difficulty (0-5), and remembering test instructions (0-5). The test included 7 performance items and 4 clinician-rated items. The ADAS-Cog11 total score was the sum of all 11 individual items, with a total score ranging from 0 (no impairment) to 70 (severe impairment). Higher scores indicated more severe cognitive impairment. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
SecondaryDBT Period: Change From Baseline to Week 116 in Verbal Fluency Task (VFT) ScoreBaseline, Week 116
VFT is a rater administered PerfO that measures speed and flexibility of verbal thought with a total score that ranges from 0-99 (lower scores indicating lower performance). A positive change from baseline indicates improvement.
SecondaryDBT Period: Change From Baseline to Week 116 in the Coding (Digit Symbol Substitution Test [DSST]) SubtestBaseline, Week 116
Coding, also called DSST is a rater administered PerfO that measures speed of processing and associative memory with a total score that ranges from 0-135 (lower scores indicating lower performance). The DSST was adapted from the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale. The 120-second version of the test was used in this study. Positive change from baseline indicates improvement.
SecondaryDBT Period: Change From Baseline to Week 116 in Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-iADL) Instrumental ScoreBaseline, Week 116
The ADCS-iADL measures activities such as using the telephone, shopping and preparing a meal. The ADCS-iADL consists of 16 questions with a score range of 0 to 56 where a higher score represents better function. Positive change from baseline indicates improvement.

Outcomes38

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYDBT Period: Change From Baseline to Week 116 in Global Outcome, as Measured by CDR-SBBaseline, Week 116ITT analysis set included all participants randomized during the global phase, who received at least one dose of study drug.score on a scaleMEAN
PRIMARYChina Extension: DBT Period: Change From Baseline to Week 116 in Global Outcome, as Measured by CDR-SBBaseline, Week 116The study was terminated early by the sponsor before any participant had reached Week 116 visit in the China extension phase.
SECONDARYDBT Period: Change From Baseline to Week 116 in Alzheimer Disease Assessment Scale-Cognition Subscale 13 (ADAS-Cog13) ScoreBaseline, Week 116
ITT analysis set included all participants randomized during the global phase, who received at least one dose of study drug. Overall number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis.
score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYDBT Period: Change From Baseline to Week 116 in Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study- Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL) Total ScoreBaseline, Week 116
ITT analysis set included all participants randomized during the global phase, who received at least one dose of study drug. Overall number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis.
score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYDBT Period: Change From Baseline to Week 116 in Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ) ScoreBaseline, Week 116
ITT analysis set included all participants randomized during the global phase, who received at least one dose of study drug. Overall number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis.
score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYDBT Period: Change From Baseline to Week 116 in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) Total ScoreBaseline, Week 116ITT analysis set included all participants randomized during the global phase, who received at least one dose of study drug.score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYDBT Period: Change From Baseline to Week 116 in Alzheimer Disease Assessment Scale-Cognition Subscale 11 (ADAS-Cog11) ScoreBaseline, Week 116
ITT analysis set included all participants randomized during the global phase, who received at least one dose of study drug. Overall number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis.
score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYDBT Period: Change From Baseline to Week 116 in Verbal Fluency Task (VFT) ScoreBaseline, Week 116
ITT analysis set included all participants randomized during the global phase, who received at least one dose of study drug. Overall number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis.
score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYDBT Period: Change From Baseline to Week 116 in the Coding (Digit Symbol Substitution Test [DSST]) SubtestBaseline, Week 116
ITT analysis set included all participants randomized during the global phase, who received at least one dose of study drug. Overall number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis.
score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYDBT Period: Change From Baseline to Week 116 in Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-iADL) Instrumental ScoreBaseline, Week 116
ITT analysis set included all participants randomized during the global phase, who received at least one dose of study drug. Overall number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis.
score on a scaleMEAN

Results by group97

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
DBT Period: Change From Baseline to Week 116 in Global Outcome, as Measured by CDR-SBGlobal - DBT Period: Placebo3.65Standard Error 0.16score on a scale
DBT Period: Change From Baseline to Week 116 in Global Outcome, as Measured by CDR-SBGlobal - DBT Period: Gantenerumab3.35Standard Error 0.14score on a scale
DBT Period: Change From Baseline to Week 116 in Alzheimer Disease Assessment Scale-Cognition Subscale 13 (ADAS-Cog13) ScoreGlobal - DBT Period: Placebo9.82Standard Error 0.57score on a scale
DBT Period: Change From Baseline to Week 116 in Alzheimer Disease Assessment Scale-Cognition Subscale 13 (ADAS-Cog13) ScoreGlobal - DBT Period: Gantenerumab8.57Standard Error 0.47score on a scale
DBT Period: Change From Baseline to Week 116 in Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study- Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL) Total ScoreGlobal - DBT Period: Placebo-12.32Standard Error 0.68score on a scale
DBT Period: Change From Baseline to Week 116 in Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study- Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL) Total ScoreGlobal - DBT Period: Gantenerumab-11.21Standard Error 0.60score on a scale
DBT Period: Change From Baseline to Week 116 in Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ) ScoreGlobal - DBT Period: Placebo8.13Standard Error 0.33score on a scale
DBT Period: Change From Baseline to Week 116 in Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ) ScoreGlobal - DBT Period: Gantenerumab7.28Standard Error 0.30score on a scale
DBT Period: Change From Baseline to Week 116 in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) Total ScoreGlobal - DBT Period: Placebo-5.18Standard Error 0.25score on a scale
DBT Period: Change From Baseline to Week 116 in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) Total ScoreGlobal - DBT Period: Gantenerumab-4.86Standard Error 0.23score on a scale

Participant flow72

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Double-Blind Treatment (DBT) PeriodSTARTEDGlobal - DBT Period: Placebo486
Double-Blind Treatment (DBT) PeriodSTARTEDGlobal - DBT Period: Gantenerumab499
Double-Blind Treatment (DBT) PeriodSTARTEDChina Extension - DBT Period: Placebo33
Double-Blind Treatment (DBT) PeriodSTARTEDChina Extension - DBT Period: Gantenerumab35
Double-Blind Treatment (DBT) PeriodSTARTEDGlobal - OLE Period: Placebo (DBT) to Gantenerumab0
Double-Blind Treatment (DBT) PeriodSTARTEDGlobal - OLE Period: Gantenerumab (DBT) to Gantenerumab0
Double-Blind Treatment (DBT) PeriodIntent-to-treat (ITT) Analysis SetGlobal - DBT Period: Placebo485
Double-Blind Treatment (DBT) PeriodIntent-to-treat (ITT) Analysis SetGlobal - DBT Period: Gantenerumab499
Double-Blind Treatment (DBT) PeriodIntent-to-treat (ITT) Analysis SetChina Extension - DBT Period: Placebo0
Double-Blind Treatment (DBT) PeriodIntent-to-treat (ITT) Analysis SetChina Extension - DBT Period: Gantenerumab0

Adverse events1,374

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherArrhythmiaCardiac disordersGlobal - DBT Period: Placebo14811
otherArrhythmiaCardiac disordersGlobal - DBT Period: Gantenerumab05030
otherArrhythmiaCardiac disordersChina Extension - DBT Period: Placebo0330
otherArrhythmiaCardiac disordersChina Extension - DBT Period: Gantenerumab0350
otherArrhythmiaCardiac disordersGlobal - OLE Period: Placebo (DBT) to Gantenerumab090
otherArrhythmiaCardiac disordersGlobal - OLE Period: Gantenerumab (DBT) to Gantenerumab2203
otherCardiac failure chronicCardiac disordersGlobal - DBT Period: Placebo14811
otherCardiac failure chronicCardiac disordersGlobal - DBT Period: Gantenerumab05030
otherCardiac failure chronicCardiac disordersChina Extension - DBT Period: Placebo0330
otherCardiac failure chronicCardiac disordersChina Extension - DBT Period: Gantenerumab0350

Adverse event totals18

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityGlobal - DBT Period: Placebo11481
Total, all-cause mortalityGlobal - DBT Period: Gantenerumab3503
Total, all-cause mortalityChina Extension - DBT Period: Placebo033
Total, all-cause mortalityChina Extension - DBT Period: Gantenerumab035
Total, all-cause mortalityGlobal - OLE Period: Placebo (DBT) to Gantenerumab19
Total, all-cause mortalityGlobal - OLE Period: Gantenerumab (DBT) to Gantenerumab020
Total, other adverse eventsGlobal - DBT Period: Placebo329481
Total, other adverse eventsGlobal - DBT Period: Gantenerumab366503
Total, other adverse eventsChina Extension - DBT Period: Placebo1133
Total, other adverse eventsChina Extension - DBT Period: Gantenerumab2035

Papers6

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
37966285DERIVEDPubMed
39556389DERIVEDPubMed
39887500DERIVEDPubMed
40302041DERIVEDPubMed
40603145DERIVEDPubMed
42598748DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons11

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Global - OLE Period: Gantenerumab (DBT) to Gantenerumab vs Global - OLE Period: Placebo (DBT) to Gantenerumab: OLE Period: Number of Participants With at Least One ARIA-H MRI FindingTrial comparisons
China Extension - DBT Period: Gantenerumab vs China Extension - DBT Period: Placebo: China - DBT Period: Number of Participants With Injection-Site ReactionsTrial comparisons
Global - DBT Period: Gantenerumab vs Global - DBT Period: Placebo: DBT Period: Number of Participants With Injection-Site ReactionsTrial comparisons
Global - OLE Period: Gantenerumab (DBT) to Gantenerumab vs Global - OLE Period: Placebo (DBT) to Gantenerumab: OLE Period: Number of Participants With at Least One AEsTrial comparisons
China Extension - DBT Period: Gantenerumab vs China Extension - DBT Period: Placebo: China - DBT Period: Number of Participants With at Least One AETrial comparisons
Global - DBT Period: Gantenerumab vs Global - DBT Period: Placebo: DBT Period: Number of Participants With at Least One Adverse Event (AE)Trial comparisons
Global - DBT Period: Gantenerumab vs Global - DBT Period: Placebo: DBT Period: Number of Participants With at Least One Amyloid-Related Imaging Abnormalities-Edema (ARIA-E) Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Finding
Trial comparisons
Global - OLE Period: Gantenerumab (DBT) to Gantenerumab vs Global - OLE Period: Placebo (DBT) to Gantenerumab: OLE Period: Number of Participants With at Least One ARIA-E MRI FindingTrial comparisons
China Extension - DBT Period: Gantenerumab vs China Extension - DBT Period: Placebo: China - DBT Period: Number of Participants With at Least One ARIA-H MRI FindingTrial comparisons
Global - DBT Period: Gantenerumab vs Global - DBT Period: Placebo: DBT Period: Number of Participants With at Least One Amyloid-Related Imaging Abnormalities-Haemosiderin Deposition (ARIA-H) MRI Finding
Trial comparisons

Tests3

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

TestNamed asSource
Delayed Recall ModuleSecondary outcomeConductCognition
Symbol CodingSecondary outcomeConductCognition
Verbal FluencySecondary outcomeConductCognition

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03444870

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03444870/registered?page=2