ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT03446456

Vasopressin and Pain Perception in the Brain

NCT03446456, Phase 1, Phase 2, Recruiting, University of Maryland, Baltimore; results first posted 2021-12-16

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Vasopressin and Pain Perception in the Brain. Trials, record NCT03446456. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT03446456

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Vasopressin and Pain Perception in the Brain
NCT number
NCT03446456
Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 1, Phase 2
Enrollment
56 participants, estimated
Lead sponsor
University of Maryland, Baltimore
Conditions
Acute Pain
Interventions
Arginine vasopressin, Saline, Observational learning, fMRI data aquisition
First posted
2018-02-26
Last updated
2026-10-28
Results first posted
2021-12-16

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes4

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange in BOLD Singal in Supplementary Motor Area Compared to Whole Brain Average During the Painful StimulationDay 2, the average of 24 trials of painful stimulations with each stimulation lasting 20 seconds
Blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) responses will allow the identification of relative activation/deactivation in the brain as a result of events (e.g. painful stimulations) that will be given during the experiment. Changes in the Percentage of BOLD signal are calculated as the BOLD signal in the right supplementary motor area during the 20-second heat pain divided by the whole-brain average BOLD signal during that 20-second heat pain.
SecondaryHeating TemperatureDay 1 (calibration)
On Day 1, the heating temperature was calibrated to the individual level. The heating temperature corresponding to 50 out of 100 visual analog scale pain ratings was selected as the testing temperature for day 2 (test).
SecondaryPain RatingsDay 2 (test)Participants will provide their pain on a Visual Analogue Scale raging from 0=no pain to 100= maximum unbearable pain. Normal value will be absence of pain.
OtherImplicit Association Test (IAT) Response Latency DifferenceDay 1
The IAT is a behavioral test that examines racial biases via measuring the strength of associations between concepts (e.g., African-American, Asian, White) and evaluations (good, bad). Participants were asked to press a response key when they saw images (people) or words (good/bad) on the screen. Response latencies (RL) were measured in milliseconds using E-prime as the reaction time to press the response key. An RL difference (D) score was calculated as 1) Compute the standard deviation (SD) of RL from overall trials; 2) M1 is the mean of RL in the condition where "White" and "good" share the same response key. M2 is the mean of RL in the condition where "African-American/Asian people" and "good" share the same response key; 3) D = (M2-M1)/SD. The D score ranges from -2 to +2. Positive values indicate a racial preference for White people. Negative values indicate a racial preference for African-American/Black or Asian people. A value close to 0 indicates no racial preference.

Outcomes4

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange in BOLD Singal in Supplementary Motor Area Compared to Whole Brain Average During the Painful StimulationDay 2, the average of 24 trials of painful stimulations with each stimulation lasting 20 secondspercentage of BOLD signal changeMEAN
SECONDARYHeating TemperatureDay 1 (calibration)celsius degreeMEAN
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIEDImplicit Association Test (IAT) Response Latency DifferenceDay 1difference scoreMEAN
SECONDARYPain RatingsDay 2 (test)units on a scaleMEAN

Results by group8

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change in BOLD Singal in Supplementary Motor Area Compared to Whole Brain Average During the Painful StimulationSaline0.485Standard Deviation 0.271percentage of BOLD signal change
Change in BOLD Singal in Supplementary Motor Area Compared to Whole Brain Average During the Painful StimulationArginine Vasopressin0.482Standard Deviation 0.387percentage of BOLD signal change
Heating TemperatureSaline44.16Standard Deviation 0.77celsius degree
Heating TemperatureArginine Vasopressin44.44Standard Deviation 0.83celsius degree
Implicit Association Test (IAT) Response Latency DifferenceSaline0.03Standard Deviation 0.37difference score
Implicit Association Test (IAT) Response Latency DifferenceArginine Vasopressin0.07Standard Deviation 0.32difference score
Pain RatingsSaline44.84Standard Deviation 24.49units on a scale
Pain RatingsArginine Vasopressin47.19Standard Deviation 26.27units on a scale

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDSaline20
Overall StudySTARTEDArginine Vasopressin20
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDSaline16
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDArginine Vasopressin16
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDSaline4
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDArginine Vasopressin4

Adverse events0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

None in this release.

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalitySaline016
Total, all-cause mortalityArginine Vasopressin016
Total, other adverse eventsSaline016
Total, other adverse eventsArginine Vasopressin016
Total, serious adverse eventsSaline016
Total, serious adverse eventsArginine Vasopressin016

Papers5

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
11992114BACKGROUNDPubMed
19278785BACKGROUNDPubMed
24076046BACKGROUNDPubMed
26272535BACKGROUNDPubMed
26321018BACKGROUNDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Saline vs Arginine Vasopressin: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Saline vs Arginine Vasopressin: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests1

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

TestNamed as
Implicit Association Test (IAT)Other outcome

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03446456

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03446456/registered