ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT03446612

Anemia Study in Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) : Erythropoiesis Via a Novel Prolyl Hydroxylase Inhibitor (PHI) Daprodustat -Forearm Blood Flow (ASCEND-FBF)

NCT03446612, Phase 2, Terminated, GlaxoSmithKline; results first posted 2021-07-21

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Anemia Study in Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) : Erythropoiesis Via a Novel Prolyl Hydroxylase Inhibitor (PHI) Daprodustat -Forearm Blood Flow (ASCEND-FBF). Trials, record NCT03446612. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT03446612

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Anemia Study in Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) : Erythropoiesis Via a Novel Prolyl Hydroxylase Inhibitor (PHI) Daprodustat -Forearm Blood Flow (ASCEND-FBF)
NCT number
NCT03446612
Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
6 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
GlaxoSmithKline
Conditions
Anaemia
Interventions
Daprodustat, Darbepoetin alfa, Acetylcholine, Sodium nitroprusside, L-N-monomethyl arginine acetate (L-NMMA)
First posted
2018-02-27
Last updated
2024-03-27
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2017-002268-42
Results first posted
2021-07-21

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes53

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange in FBF Ratio in Response to Acetylcholine (Day 1 to Day 42)Day 1 to Day 42
Venous occlusion plethysmography was used for FBF assessment. Acetylcholine (ACH) was infused intra-arterially at 7.5, 15 and 30 micrograms/minute (ug/min) each for 6 minutes per infusion. FBF ratio was defined as the ratio of a participant's treatment (infused) arm value divided by the non-treatment (non-infused) arm value. The overall ratio was determined by taking the participant's Day 42 FBF ratio and dividing by the Day 1 FBF ratio.
SecondaryChange in the Absolute FBF From Day 1 to Day 42 in Response to AcetylcholineDay 1 to Day 42
Venous occlusion plethysmography was used for FBF assessment. Acetylcholine was infused intra-arterially at 7.5, 15 and 30 ug/min each for 6 minutes per infusion. Measures were made in both arms concurrently. Change in the absolute FBF from Day 1 to Day 42 in response to acetylcholine is the difference between absolute value of FBF in infused arm on Day 1 and Day 42 in response to acetylcholine.
SecondaryChange in FBF Ratio in Response to Sodium Nitroprusside (Day 1 to Day 42)Day 1 to Day 42
Venous occlusion plethysmography was used for FBF assessment. Sodium nitroprusside was infused at 3 and 10 ug/min each for 6 minutes per infusion into the brachial artery of the test arm. FBF ratio was defined as the ratio of a participant's treatment (infused) arm value divided by the non-treatment (non-infused) arm value. The overall ratio was determined by taking the participant's Day 42 FBF ratio and dividing by the Day 1 FBF ratio.
SecondaryChange in the Absolute FBF From Day 1 to Day 42 in Response to Sodium NitroprussideDay 1 to Day 42
Venous occlusion plethysmography was used for FBF assessment. Sodium nitroprusside was infused at 3 and 10 ug/min each for 6 minutes per infusion into the brachial artery of the test arm. Measures were made in both arms concurrently. Change in the absolute FBF from Day 1 to Day 42 in response to sodium nitroprusside is the difference between absolute value of FBF in infused arm on Day 1 and Day 42 in response to sodium nitroprusside.
SecondaryChange in FBF Ratio in Response to NG-monomethyl Arginine Acetate (L-NMMA) (Day 1 to Day 42)Day 1 to Day 42
Venous occlusion plethysmography was used for FBF assessment. Effects on basal nitric oxide synthesis was assessed using L-NMMA at doses of 2 and 8 micromoles per minute (umol/min) each infused for 6 minutes into the brachial artery of the test arm. FBF ratio was defined as the ratio of a participant's treatment (infused) arm value divided by the non-treatment (non-infused) arm value. The overall ratio was determined by taking the participant's Day 42 FBF ratio and dividing by the Day 1 FBF ratio.
SecondaryChange in the Absolute FBF From Day 1 to Day 42 in Response to L-NMMADay 1 to Day 42
Venous occlusion plethysmography was used for FBF assessment. Effects on basal nitric oxide synthesis was assessed using L-NMMA at doses of 2 and 8 umol/min each infused for 6 minutes into the brachial artery of the test arm. Measures were made in both arms concurrently. Change in the absolute FBF from Day 1 to Day 42 in response to L-NMMA is the difference between absolute value of FBF in infused arm on Day 1 and Day 42 in response to L-NMMA.
SecondaryChange in FBF Ratio in Response to Acetylcholine at Day 42 Versus (vs) Day 1 in Participants Treated With DaprodustatDay 1 and Day 42
Venous occlusion plethysmography was used for FBF assessment. Acetylcholine was infused intra-arterially at 7.5, 15 and 30 ug/min each for 6 minutes per infusion. The Day 42 ratio was calculated by taking the participants Day 42 treatment (infused) arm and dividing by the Day 42 non-treatment (control) arm value. The Day 1 ratio was calculated by taking the participants Day 1 treatment (infused) arm and dividing by the Day 1 non-treatment (control) arm value. Change in FBF ratio from Day 1 to Day 42 was determined by taking the participants Day 42 ratio and dividing by the Day 1 ratio.
SecondaryChange in FBF Ratio in Response to Sodium Nitroprusside at Day 42 vs Day 1 in Participants Treated With DaprodustatDay 1 and Day 42
Venous occlusion plethysmography was used for FBF assessment. Sodium nitroprusside was infused at 3 and 10 ug/min each for 6 minutes per infusion into the brachial artery of the test arm. The Day 42 ratio was calculated by taking the participants Day 42 treatment (infused) arm and dividing by the Day 42 non-treatment (control) arm value. The Day 1 ratio was calculated by taking the participants Day 1 treatment (infused) arm and dividing by the Day 1 non-treatment (control) arm value. Change in FBF ratio from Day 1 to Day 42 was determined by taking the participants Day 42 ratio and dividing by the Day 1 ratio.
SecondaryChange in FBF Ratio in Response to L-NMMA at Day 42 vs Day 1 in Participants Treated With DaprodustatDay 1 and Day 42
Venous occlusion plethysmography was used for FBF assessment. Effects on basal nitric oxide synthesis was assessed using L-NMMA at doses of 2 and 8 umol/min each infused for 6 minutes into the brachial artery of the test arm. The Day 42 ratio was calculated by taking the participants Day 42 treatment (infused) arm and dividing by the Day 42 non-treatment (control) arm value. The Day 1 ratio was calculated by taking the participants Day 1 treatment (infused) arm and dividing by the Day 1 non-treatment (control) arm value. Change in FBF ratio from Day 1 to Day 42 was determined by taking the participants Day 42 ratio and dividing by the Day 1 ratio.
SecondaryChange in FBF Ratio in Response to Acetylcholine at Day 42 vs Day 1 in Participants Treated With Darbepoetin AlfaDay 1 and Day 42
Venous occlusion plethysmography was used for FBF assessment. Acetylcholine was infused intra-arterially at 7.5, 15 and 30 ug/min each for 6 minutes per infusion. The Day 42 ratio was calculated by taking the participants Day 42 treatment (infused) arm and dividing by the Day 42 non-treatment (control) arm value. The Day 1 ratio was calculated by taking the participants Day 1 treatment (infused) arm and dividing by the Day 1 non-treatment (control) arm value. Change in FBF ratio from Day 1 to Day 42 was determined by taking the participants Day 42 ratio and dividing by the Day 1 ratio.

Outcomes53

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange in FBF Ratio in Response to Acetylcholine (Day 1 to Day 42)Day 1 to Day 42
Pharmacodynamic Per-Protocol (PDPP) population included all randomized participants who provided pharmacodynamic (PD) data at Day 1 and Day 42. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n=X in the category titles).
RatioMEAN
SECONDARYChange in the Absolute FBF From Day 1 to Day 42 in Response to AcetylcholineDay 1 to Day 42PDPP Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n=X in the category titles).ug/minMEAN
SECONDARYChange in FBF Ratio in Response to Sodium Nitroprusside (Day 1 to Day 42)Day 1 to Day 42PDPP Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.RatioMEAN
SECONDARYChange in the Absolute FBF From Day 1 to Day 42 in Response to Sodium NitroprussideDay 1 to Day 42PDPP Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.ug/minMEAN
SECONDARYChange in FBF Ratio in Response to NG-monomethyl Arginine Acetate (L-NMMA) (Day 1 to Day 42)Day 1 to Day 42PDPP Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.RatioMEAN
SECONDARYChange in the Absolute FBF From Day 1 to Day 42 in Response to L-NMMADay 1 to Day 42PDPP Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.umol/minMEAN
SECONDARYChange in FBF Ratio in Response to Acetylcholine at Day 42 Versus (vs) Day 1 in Participants Treated With DaprodustatDay 1 and Day 42PDPP Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n=X in the category titles).RatioMEAN
SECONDARYChange in FBF Ratio in Response to Sodium Nitroprusside at Day 42 vs Day 1 in Participants Treated With DaprodustatDay 1 and Day 42PDPP Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.RatioMEAN
SECONDARYChange in FBF Ratio in Response to L-NMMA at Day 42 vs Day 1 in Participants Treated With DaprodustatDay 1 and Day 42PDPP Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.RatioMEAN
SECONDARYChange in FBF Ratio in Response to Acetylcholine at Day 42 vs Day 1 in Participants Treated With Darbepoetin AlfaDay 1 and Day 42PDPP PopulationRatioMEAN

Results by group500

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change in FBF Ratio in Response to Acetylcholine (Day 1 to Day 42)DaprodustatACH 7.5 ug/min, n=2, 21.1304Standard Deviation 0.30030Ratio
Change in FBF Ratio in Response to Acetylcholine (Day 1 to Day 42)Darbepoetin AlfaACH 7.5 ug/min, n=2, 20.4351Standard Deviation 0.17032Ratio
Change in FBF Ratio in Response to Acetylcholine (Day 1 to Day 42)DaprodustatACH 15 ug/min, n=1, 20.7866Standard Deviation NARatio
Change in FBF Ratio in Response to Acetylcholine (Day 1 to Day 42)Darbepoetin AlfaACH 15 ug/min, n=1, 20.6183Standard Deviation 0.00435Ratio
Change in FBF Ratio in Response to Acetylcholine (Day 1 to Day 42)DaprodustatACH 30 ug/min, n=1, 21.1328Standard Deviation NARatio
Change in FBF Ratio in Response to Acetylcholine (Day 1 to Day 42)Darbepoetin AlfaACH 30 ug/min, n=1, 20.8090Standard Deviation 0.28395Ratio
Change in the Absolute FBF From Day 1 to Day 42 in Response to AcetylcholineDaprodustat7.5 ug/min, n=2, 28.3180Standard Deviation 4.50592ug/min
Change in the Absolute FBF From Day 1 to Day 42 in Response to AcetylcholineDarbepoetin Alfa7.5 ug/min, n=2, 2-6.0360Standard Deviation 3.09976ug/min
Change in the Absolute FBF From Day 1 to Day 42 in Response to AcetylcholineDaprodustat15 ug/min, n=1, 2-4.6374Standard Deviation NAug/min
Change in the Absolute FBF From Day 1 to Day 42 in Response to AcetylcholineDarbepoetin Alfa15 ug/min, n=1, 2-8.8299Standard Deviation 9.98143ug/min

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDDaprodustat2
Overall StudySTARTEDDarbepoetin Alfa3
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDDaprodustat2
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDDarbepoetin Alfa2
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDDaprodustat0
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDDarbepoetin Alfa1

Adverse events14

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherFaeces softGastrointestinal disordersDaprodustat020
otherFaeces softGastrointestinal disordersDarbepoetin Alfa131
otherAbdominal pain upperGastrointestinal disordersDaprodustat020
otherAbdominal pain upperGastrointestinal disordersDarbepoetin Alfa131
otherGoutMetabolism and nutrition disordersDaprodustat020
otherGoutMetabolism and nutrition disordersDarbepoetin Alfa131
otherBilateral foot discomfort secondary to GoutMetabolism and nutrition disordersDaprodustat020
otherBilateral foot discomfort secondary to GoutMetabolism and nutrition disordersDarbepoetin Alfa131
otherSwollen right foot secondary to GoutMetabolism and nutrition disordersDaprodustat020
otherSwollen right foot secondary to GoutMetabolism and nutrition disordersDarbepoetin Alfa131

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityDaprodustat02
Total, all-cause mortalityDarbepoetin Alfa03
Total, other adverse eventsDaprodustat02
Total, other adverse eventsDarbepoetin Alfa13
Total, serious adverse eventsDaprodustat02
Total, serious adverse eventsDarbepoetin Alfa03

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
36005278DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons4

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Daprodustat vs Darbepoetin Alfa: Number of Participants Discontinuing the Randomized Study TreatmentTrial comparisons
Daprodustat vs Darbepoetin Alfa: Number of Participants With Any AE of Special Interest (AESI)Trial comparisons
Daprodustat vs Darbepoetin Alfa: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Daprodustat vs Darbepoetin Alfa: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03446612

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03446612/registered?page=2